Variability of cortisol assays can confound the diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency in the critically ill population

Cortisol: Analytical and clinical determinants

Cortisol, the main human glucocorticoid, is synthesized from cholesterol in the adrenal cortex and predominantly metabolized by the liver. Interpretation of quantitative results from the analysis of serum, urine and saliva is complicated by variation in circadian rhythm, response to stress as well as the presence of protein-bound and free forms. Interestingly, cortisol is the only hormone routinely measured in serum, urine, and saliva. Preanalytical and analytical challenges arise in each matrix and are further compounded by the use of various stimulation and suppression tests commonly employed in clinical practice. Although not yet included in clinical guidelines, measurement of cortisol in hair may be of interest in specific situations. Immunoassays are the most widely used methods in clinical laboratories to measure cortisol, but they are susceptible to interference from synthetic and endogenous steroids, generally producing a variable overestimation of true cortisol results, especially in urine. Analysis by mass spectrometry provides higher specificity and allows simultaneous measurement of multiple steroids including synthetic steroids, thus reducing diagnostic uncertainty. An integrated review of cortisol in various disease states is also addressed.

Clinical and Technical Aspects in Free Cortisol Measurement

Accurate measurement of cortisol is critical in adrenal insufficiency as it reduces the risk associated with misdiagnosis and supports the optimization of stress dose. Comprehensive assays have been developed to determine the levels of bioactive free cortisol and their clinical and analytical efficacies have been extensively discussed because the level of total cortisol is affected by changes in the structure or circulating levels of corticoid-binding globulin and albumin, which are the main reservoirs of cortisol in the human body. Antibody-based immunoassays are routinely used in clinical laboratories; however, the lack of molecular specificity in cortisol assessment limits their applicability to characterize adrenocortical function. Improved specificity and sensitivity can be achieved by mass spectrometry coupled with chromatographic separation methods, which is a cutting-edge technology to measure individual as well as a panel of steroids in a single analytical run. The purpose of this review is to introduce recent advances in free cortisol measurement from the perspectives of clinical specimens and issues associated with prospective analytical technologies.

Adjunctive treatments for the management of septic shock - a narrative review of the current evidence

Septic shock is a leading cause of death and morbidity worldwide. The cornerstones of management include prompt identification of sepsis, early initiation of antibiotic therapy, adequate fluid resuscitation and organ support. Over the past two decades, there have been considerable improvements in our understanding of the pathophysiology of sepsis and the host response, including regulation of inflammation, endothelial disruption and impaired immunity. This has offered opportunities for innovative adjunctive treatments such as vitamin C, corticosteroids and beta-blockers. Some of these approaches have shown promising results in early phase trials in humans, while others, such as corticosteroids, have been tested in large, international, multicentre randomised controlled trials. Contemporary guidelines make a weak recommendation for the use of corticosteroids to reduce mortality in sepsis and septic shock. Vitamin C, despite showing initial promise in observational studies, has so far not been shown to be clinically effective in randomised trials. Beta-blocker therapy may have beneficial cardiac and non-cardiac effects in septic shock, but there is currently insufficient evidence to recommend their use for this condition. The results of ongoing randomised trials are awaited. Crucial to reducing heterogeneity in the trials of new sepsis treatments will be the concept of enrichment, which refers to the purposive selection of patients with clinical and biological characteristics that are likely to be responsive to the intervention being tested.

The Impact of SARS-Cov-2 Virus Infection on the Endocrine System

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus has spread across the globe rapidly causing an unprecedented pandemic. Because of the novelty of the disease, the possible impact on the endocrine system is not clear. To compile a mini-review describing possible endocrine consequences of SARS-CoV-2 infection, we performed a literature survey using the key words Covid-19, Coronavirus, SARS CoV-1, SARS Cov-2, Endocrine, and related terms in medical databases including PubMed, Google Scholar, and MedARXiv from the year 2000. Additional references were identified through manual screening of bibliographies and via citations in the selected articles. The literature review is current until April 28, 2020. In light of the literature, we discuss SARS-CoV-2 and explore the endocrine consequences based on the experience with structurally-similar SARS-CoV-1. Studies from the SARS -CoV-1 epidemic have reported variable changes in the endocrine organs. SARS-CoV-2 attaches to the ACE2 system in the pancreas causing perturbation of insulin production resulting in hyperglycemic emergencies. In patients with preexisting endocrine disorders who develop COVID-19, several factors warrant management decisions. Hydrocortisone dose adjustments are required in patients with adrenal insufficiency. Identification and management of critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency is crucial. Patients with Cushing syndrome may have poorer outcomes because of the associated immunodeficiency and coagulopathy. Vitamin D deficiency appears to be associated with increased susceptibility or severity to SARS-CoV-2 infection, and replacement may improve outcomes. Robust strategies required for the optimal management of endocrinopathies in COVID-19 are discussed extensively in this mini-review.

Prevention of Adrenal Crisis: Cortisol Responses to Major Stress Compared to Stress Dose Hydrocortisone Delivery

CONTEXT

Patients with adrenal insufficiency require increased hydrocortisone cover during major stress to avoid a life-threatening adrenal crisis. However, current treatment recommendations are not evidence-based.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the most appropriate mode of hydrocortisone delivery in patients with adrenal insufficiency who are exposed to major stress.

DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS

Cross-sectional study: 122 unstressed healthy subjects and 288 subjects exposed to different stressors (major trauma [N = 83], sepsis [N = 100], and combat stress [N = 105]). Longitudinal study: 22 patients with preserved adrenal function undergoing elective surgery. Pharmacokinetic study: 10 patients with primary adrenal insufficiency undergoing administration of 200 mg hydrocortisone over 24 hours in 4 different delivery modes (continuous intravenous infusion; 6-hourly oral, intramuscular or intravenous bolus administration).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

We measured total serum cortisol and cortisone, free serum cortisol, and urinary glucocorticoid metabolite excretion by mass spectrometry. Linear pharmacokinetic modeling was used to determine the most appropriate mode and dose of hydrocortisone administration in patients with adrenal insufficiency exposed to major stress.

RESULTS

Serum cortisol was increased in all stress conditions, with the highest values observed in surgery and sepsis. Continuous intravenous hydrocortisone was the only administration mode persistently achieving median cortisol concentrations in the range observed during major stress. Linear pharmacokinetic modeling identified continuous intravenous infusion of 200 mg hydrocortisone over 24 hours, preceded by an initial bolus of 50-100 mg hydrocortisone, as best suited for maintaining cortisol concentrations in the required range.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous intravenous hydrocortisone infusion should be favored over intermittent bolus administration in the prevention and treatment of adrenal crisis during major stress.

A critical review of the factors leading to cardiopulmonary resuscitation as the default position of hospitalized patients in the USA regardless of severity of illness

BACKGROUND

Physicians are occasionally faced with patients requesting full resuscitation against medical advice. More commonly, neither patients nor their family members make such a request, but physicians simply presume that providing cardiopulmonary resuscitation comports with the patient's wishes. In the USA, in contrast to other countries, a unilateral Do-Not-Resuscitate order by the physician is either forbidden by State Statute or not enforced by hospital policy. Unless otherwise specified, performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation on all hospitalized patients, regardless of the severity of the underlying illness, is the default position. Unlike other medical interventions, no deference is given to the medical judgment of the physician even when a patient is in the last days of a terminal illness. We examine the factors that have led to cardiopulmonary resuscitation having this unique status.

MAIN BODY

A review of the historical factors leading to cardiopulmonary resuscitation as the default position was undertaken. Articles published in the medical literature, lay-press articles, legislative enactments of law, and judicial opinions involving the issue of Do-Not-Resuscitate and cardiopulmonary resuscitation were reviewed regarding their impact on physician and hospital practice in the USA.

CONCLUSION

A critical review of the historical factors reveals that the rapid dissemination of cardiopulmonary training for the public, inaccuracies in the media regarding successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation, well-meaning legislative efforts with inadvertent consequences, and judicial interpretation outside the generally accepted concept of malpractice law have contributed to the situation faced by today's physicians and hospitals in the USA.

The cortisol stress response induced by surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Surgery is a stressor that can be categorized by duration and severity and induces a systemic stress response that includes increased adrenal cortisol production. However, the precise impact of surgical stress on the cortisol response remains to be defined.

DESIGN

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the cortisol stress response induced by surgery and to stratify this response according to different parameters.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search in several databases from 1990 to 2016. Pairs of reviewers independently selected studies, extracted data and evaluated the risk of bias. Cortisol concentrations were standardized, pooled in meta-analysis and plotted over time.

RESULTS

We included 71 studies reporting peri-operative serum cortisol measurements in 2953 patients. The cortisol response differed substantially between moderately/highly invasive and minimally invasive surgical procedures. Minimally invasive procedures did not show a peri-operative cortisol peak, whereas more invasive surgeries caused a cortisol surge that was more pronounced in older subjects, women and patients undergoing open surgery and general anaesthesia. The duration of the procedure and the use of etomidate for induction of anaesthesia did not affect the cortisol response.

CONCLUSIONS

The peri-operative cortisol stress response is dynamic and influenced by patient-specific, surgical and anaesthetic features. However, the available evidence is derived from highly heterogeneous studies, with only two of 71 studies measuring cortisol by mass spectrometry, which currently prevents a precise and reproducible definition of this response.

Measuring cortisol in serum, urine and saliva - are our assays good enough?

Cortisol is a steroid hormone produced in response to stress. It is essential for maintaining health and wellbeing and leads to significant morbidity when deficient or present in excess. It is lipophilic and is transported bound to cortisol-binding globulin (CBG) and albumin; a small fraction (∼10%) of total serum cortisol is unbound and biologically active. Serum cortisol assays measure total cortisol and their results can be misleading in patients with altered serum protein concentrations. Automated immunoassays are used to measure cortisol but lack specificity and show significant inter-assay differences. Liquid chromatography - tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) offers improved specificity and sensitivity; however, cortisol cut-offs used in the short Synacthen and Dexamethasone suppression tests are yet to be validated for these assays. Urine free cortisol is used to screen for Cushing's syndrome. Unbound cortisol is excreted unchanged in the urine and 24-h urine free cortisol correlates well with mean serum-free cortisol in conditions of cortisol excess. Urine free cortisol is measured predominantly by immunoassay or LC-MS/MS. Salivary cortisol also reflects changes in unbound serum cortisol and offers a reliable alternative to measuring free cortisol in serum. LC-MS/MS is the method of choice for measuring salivary cortisol; however, its use is limited by the lack of a single, validated reference range and poorly standardized assays. This review examines the methods available for measuring cortisol in serum, urine and saliva, explores cortisol in disease and considers the difficulties of measuring cortisol in acutely unwell patients and in neonates.

MECHANISMS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY: New concepts to further unravel adrenal insufficiency during critical illness

The concept of 'relative' adrenal insufficiency during critical illness remains a highly debated disease entity. Several studies have addressed how to diagnose or treat this condition but have often yielded conflicting results, which further fuelled the controversy. The main reason for the controversy is the fact that the pathophysiology is not completely understood. Recently, new insights in the pathophysiology of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis response to critical illness were generated. It was revealed that high circulating levels of cortisol during critical illness are explained more by reduced cortisol breakdown than by elevated cortisol production. Cortisol production rate during critical illness is less than doubled during the day but lower than in healthy subjects during the night. High plasma cortisol concentrations due to reduced breakdown in turn reduce plasma ACTH concentrations via feedback inhibition, which with time may lead to an understimulation and hereby a dysfunction of the adrenal cortex. This could explain the high incidence of adrenal insufficiency in the prolonged phase of critical illness. These novel insights have created a new framework for the diagnosis and treatment of adrenal failure during critical illness that has redirected future research.

The utility of the corticotropin test to diagnose adrenal insufficiency in critical illness: an update

OBJECTIVE

One of the most common dynamic testing procedures for assessment of adrenocortical function is the standard corticotropin or the cosyntropin test. The aim of this review was to examine the evidence base underlying the corticotropin test in the management of the critically ill patient.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The principle behind the corticotropin test is the demonstration of an inappropriately low cortisol production in response to exogenous ACTH, a situation analogous to physiological stress. The corticotropin test was originally described in nonstressed subjects, and its applicability and interpretation in the setting of critical illness continues to generate controversy. Attempting to determine the prevalence of an abnormal corticotropin test in critical illness is complicated by the use of different end-points and different populations. Moreover, the test result is also influenced by the assay used for measurement of plasma cortisol. Trials assessing the relationship between corticotropin response and severity of stress and organ dysfunction have produced divergent results, which may reflect differences in the methodology and the association being measured. Moreover, controversy exists with respect to the methodology and the interpretation with respect to the following variables: dose of corticotropin, end-points for assessment of total or free cortisol, effect of plasma cortisol variability, adrenal blood flow and its equivalence with other tests of adrenocortical function.

CONCLUSIONS

The corticotropin test is used widely in the evaluation of adrenocortical function in the endocrine clinics. Its role in the critically ill patient is less well established. Several confounding variables exist and to have a 'one-size-fits-all' approach with a single end-point in the face of several methodological and pathophysiological confounders may be flawed and may result in the institution of inappropriate therapy. The current evidence does not support the use of the corticotrophin test in critical illness to assess adrenocortical function and guiding steroid therapy in critical illness.

Three calculations of free cortisol versus measured values in the critically ill

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the agreement between the calculated free cortisol levels according to widely applied Coolens and adjusted Södergård equations with measured levels in the critically ill.

DESIGN AND METHODS

A prospective study in a mixed intensive care unit. We consecutively included 103 patients with treatment-insensitive hypotension in whom an adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) test (250μg) was performed. Serum total and free cortisol (equilibrium dialysis), corticosteroid-binding globulin and albumin were assessed. Free cortisol was estimated by the Coolens method (C) and two adjusted Södergård (S1 and S2) equations. Bland Altman plots were made.

RESULTS

The bias for absolute (t=0, 30 and 60min after ACTH injection) cortisol levels was 38, -24, 41nmol/L when the C, S1 and S2 equations were used, with 95% limits of agreement between -65-142, -182-135, and -57-139nmol/L and percentage errors of 66, 85, and 64%, respectively. Bias for delta (peak-baseline) cortisol was 14, -31 and 16nmol/L, with 95% limits of agreement between -80-108, -157-95, and -74-105nmol/L, and percentage errors of 107, 114, and 100% for C, S1 and S2 equations, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Calculated free cortisol levels have too high bias and imprecision to allow for acceptable use in the critically ill.

The Frequency of Adrenal Insufficiency in Adolescents and Young Adults with Thalassemia Major versus Thalassemia Intermedia in Iran

BACKGROUND

Endocrine dysfunction is not uncommon complication in patients with transfusion-dependent thalassemia and is thought to occur as a consequence of excessive iron overload. The primary objective of this study is to determine the frequency of adrenal insufficiency in patients with thalassemia major and thalassemia intermediate.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was done at the Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Southern Iran, in 2013. One hundred and ninety patients were divided into two groups; thalassemia major(TM) and thalassemia intermediate (TI) groups. We measured 8 AM serum cortisol, ACTH and ferritin concentrations in all patients.

RESULTS

The mean age of the TM and TI group were 22.5±5.7 and 23.8±6 years, respectively. 90 patients (47.4%) were splenectomized, 34 (36.2%) with TM and 56 (58.2%) with TI (p :<0.001). The median and interquartile range of serum ferritin levels were 2184±3700 ng/ml and 437±443ng/ml in TM and TI respectively (p< 0.001). Three patients with TM (1.6%) had low basal cortisol and ACTH levels. However, their cortisol response to ACTH stimulation was normal.

CONCLUSIONS

Low basal concentrations of cortisol and ACTH occurred in 1.6% of our adolescents young adult patients with TM suggesting a central defect in cortisol secretion at the basal state. However, cortisol response to standard - dose ACTH was normal in all patients with TM and TI.

Free and total cortisol levels are useful prognostic markers in critically ill patients: a prospective observational study

OBJECTIVE

The role of cortisol in the prediction of mortality risk in critical illness is controversial in the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of cortisol concentrations in a mixed population of critically ill patients in medical emergencies.

DESIGN

In this prospective, observational study, measurement of total (TC) and free cortisol (FC) levels was made in the serum samples of 69 critically ill patients (39 males and 30 females, median age of 74 years) at admission (0 h) and 6, 24, 48, and 96 h after admission.

METHODS

Cortisol levels were determined using HPLC coupled high-resolution ESI-TOF mass spectrometry. The severity of disease was calculated by prognostic scores. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS 22.0 software.

RESULTS

The range of TC varied between 49.9 and 8797.8 nmol/l, FC between 0.4 and 759.9 nmol/l. The levels of FC at 0, 6, 24, and 48 h and TC at 0, 6 h were significantly elevated in non-survivors and correlated with the predicted mortality. The prognostic value of these cortisol levels was comparable with the routinely used mortality scores. In predictive models, FC at 6, 24, and 48 h proved to be an independent determinant of mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The predictive values of FC in the first 2 days after admission and TC within 6 h are comparable with the complex, routinely used mortality scores in evaluating the prognosis of critically ill patients. The cortisol response probably reflects the severity of disease.

Cortisol metabolism in critical illness: implications for clinical care

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Critical illness is uniformly characterized by elevated plasma cortisol concentrations, traditionally attributed exclusively to increased cortisol production driven by an activated hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis. However, as plasma adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) concentrations are often not elevated or even low during critical illness, alternative mechanisms must contribute.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent investigations revealed that plasma clearance of cortisol is markedly reduced during critical illness, explained by suppressed expression and activity of the main cortisol metabolizing enzymes in liver and kidney. Furthermore, unlike previously inferred, cortisol production rate in critically ill patients was only moderately increased to less than double that of matched healthy subjects. In the face of low-plasma ACTH concentrations, these data suggest that other factors drive hypercortisolism during critical illness, which may suppress ACTH by feedback inhibition. These new insights add to the limitations of the current diagnostic tools to identify patients at risk of failing adrenal function during critical illness. They also urge to investigate the impact of lower hydrocortisone doses than those hitherto used.

SUMMARY

Recent novel insights reshape the current understanding of the hormonal stress response to critical illness and further underline the need for more studies to unravel the pathophysiology of adrenal (dys)functioning during critical illness.

Endocrine responses to critical illness: novel insights and therapeutic implications

CONTEXT

Critical illness, an extreme form of severe physical stress, is characterized by important endocrine and metabolic changes. Due to critical care medicine, survival from previously lethal conditions has become possible, but many patients now enter a chronic phase of critical illness. The role of the endocrine and metabolic responses to acute and prolonged critical illness in mediating or hampering recovery remains highly debated.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

The recent literature on changes within the hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and on hyperglycemia in relation to recovery from critical illness was critically appraised and interpreted against previous insights. Possible therapeutic implications of the novel insights were analyzed. Specific remaining questions were formulated.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

In recent years, important novel insights in the pathophysiology and the consequences of some of these endocrine responses to acute and chronic critical illness were generated. Acute endocrine adaptations are directed toward providing energy and substrates for the vital fight-or-flight response in a context of exogenous substrate deprivation. Distinct endocrine and metabolic alterations characterize the chronic phase of critical illness, which seems to be no longer solely beneficial and could hamper recovery and rehabilitation.

CONCLUSIONS

Important novel insights reshape the current view on endocrine and metabolic responses to critical illness and further clarify underlying pathways. Although many issues remain unresolved, some therapeutic implications were already identified. More work is required to find better treatments, and the optimal timing for such treatments, to further prevent protracted critical illness, to enhance recovery thereof, and to optimize rehabilitation.

Etomidate, adrenal function, and mortality in critically ill patients

BACKGROUND

In critically ill patients, induction with etomidate is hypothesized to be associated with an increased risk of mortality. Previous randomized studies suggest a modest trend toward an increased risk of death among etomidate recipients; however, this relationship has not been measured with great statistical precision. We aimed to test whether etomidate is associated with risk of hospital mortality and other clinical outcomes in critically ill patients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study from January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2005, of 824 subjects requiring mechanical ventilation, who underwent adrenal function testing in the ICUs of 2 academic medical centers. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, comparing subjects given etomidate (n = 452) to those given an alternative induction agent (n = 372). The secondary outcome was diagnosis of critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency following etomidate exposure.

RESULTS

Overall mortality was 34.3%. After adjustment for age, sex, and baseline illness severity, the relative risk of death among the etomidate recipients was higher than that of subjects given an alternative agent (relative risk 1.20, 95% CI 0.99-1.45). Among subjects whose adrenal function was assessed within the 48 hours following intubation, the adjusted risk of meeting the criteria for critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency was 1.37 (95% CI 1.12-1.66), comparing etomidate recipients to subjects given another induction agent.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study of critically ill patients requiring endotracheal intubation, etomidate administration was associated with a trend toward a relative increase in mortality, similar to the collective results of smaller randomized trials conducted to date. If a small relative increased risk is truly present, though previous trials have been underpowered to detect it, in absolute terms the number of deaths associated with etomidate in this high-risk population would be considerable. Large, prospective controlled trials are needed to finalize the role of etomidate in critically ill patients.

Comparison of salivary cortisol as measured by different immunoassays and tandem mass spectrometry

Assessing the amount of bioavailable cortisol in saliva with immunoassays and thus sampling an endocrine marker of hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis activity is of major interest in both research and clinical practice. However, absolute cortisol concentrations obtained with different immunoassays (IAs) are barely comparable precluding direct comparison between studies or individuals whenever cortisol analyses were not based on the same IA. The present technical report aims to solve this problem by evaluating the validity of, as well as agreement between the most commonly used immunoassays in psychoneuroendocrinological research (i.e., IBL, DRG, Salimetrics, DSL, and DELFIA) and a reference method (LC-MS/MS) in a sample of 195 saliva specimen covering the whole range of cortisol concentrations in adults. A structural equation modelling framework is applied to decompose systematic assay variance and estimate cortisol reference values, which are adjusted for measurement error and interference of salivary cortisone. Our findings reveal nonlinear relations between IAs and LC-MS/MS, which are discussed in terms of IA cross-reactivity with saliva matrix components. Finally guidelines for converting cortisol concentrations being obtained by these immunoassays into comparable reference values are proposed by providing conversion functions, a conversion table, and an online conversion tool.

Pro/con debate: Is etomidate safe in hemodynamically unstable critically ill patients?

Etomidate is an induction agent known for its smooth intubating conditions and cardiovascular stability. Studies, however, have shown that a single dose of etomidate can result in a prolonged adrenal insufficiency. The impact of this in patients with sepsis has been a matter for debate. This review presents a pro/con case for using etomidate in hemodynamically unstable critically ill patients and provides guidance for alternative induction techniques and when the use of etomidate might be justified despite these concerns.

Serial changes in plasma total cortisol, plasma free cortisol, and tissue cortisol activity in patients with septic shock: an observational study

Published data on adrenocortical function in septic shock have enrolled patients at various stages of critical illness and predominantly used plasma total cortisol, with minimal information on serial changes. Moreover, plasma free cortisol and tissue corticosteroid activity may not be strongly associated; however, few published data exist. The aim of this prospective observational study was to investigate serial changes in plasma total and free cortisol and tissue cortisol activity in septic shock. Twenty-nine adult patients admitted with septic shock to a tertiary-level intensive care unit were enrolled. A low-dose corticotropin test was performed on day 1. Plasma total and free cortisol, cortisone, transcortin, and urinary free cortisol and cortisone were analyzed on days 1 to 5, 7, and 10. Urinary and plasma cortisol-cortisone ratios (F:E ratio) were calculated as indices of 11-β hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 2 and global 11-β hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase activity, respectively. Baseline total and free plasma cortisol values from 10 healthy control subjects were obtained for comparative analysis. Baseline plasma total and free cortisol levels were significantly higher than controls (457.8 ± 193 vs. 252 ± 66 nmol/L, P = 0.0002; and 50.83 ± 43.19 vs. 6.4 ± 3.2, P < 0.0001, respectively). Plasma free cortisol rose proportionately higher than total cortisol (124% ± 217.3% vs. 40% ± 33.2%, P = 0.007) following corticotropin. Baseline plasma and urinary F:E ratios were elevated over the reference ranges (13.13 ± 1.5, 1.69 ± 2.8) and were not correlated with plasma free cortisol values (r = 0.2, 0.3 respectively). Over the study period, total cortisol levels and plasma F:E ratios remained elevated, whereas plasma free cortisol levels and urinary F:E ratio declined. At baseline, plasma free cortisol levels were higher in patients who subsequently survived (23.7 ± 10.5 vs. 57.9 ± 45.8 nmol/L, P = 0.04). In septic shock, there is a differential response of plasma total and free cortisol over time and in response to corticotropin. Changes in plasma and urinary F:E ratios suggest tissue modulation of 11-β hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase activity. Total plasma cortisol measurements may not reflect the global adrenal response in septic shock.

Challenges for the endocrine laboratory in critical illness

The endocrine laboratory must provide accurate and timely results for the critically ill patient. A number of pathophysiological factors affect assay systems for adrenal, thyroid and gonadal function tests. The effects are primarily on estimates of 'free hormone' concentration through abnormal binding protein concentrations and the effects of drugs and metabolites on hormone-protein binding. The limitations of the principal analytical techniques (immunoassay and chromatography-mass spectrometry) include drug effects, endogenous antibody interference and ion suppression. These effects are not always easily identified. Analytical specificity and standardisation result in differences in bias between assays and thus a requirement for assay specific decision limits and reference ranges. Good communication between clinician and laboratory is needed to minimise these effects. Developments in mass spectrometry should lead to greater sensitivity and wider applicability of the technique. International efforts to develop higher order reference materials and reference method procedures should lead to greater comparability of results.

Adrenocortical (dys)function in septic shock - a sick euadrenal state

A central feature of the endocrine pathophysiology of septic shock is thought to be the existence of adrenal dysfunction. Based on changes in glucocorticoid secretion and responsiveness, protein binding, and activity. These changes have been described by the terms "Relative Adrenal Insufficiency" (RAI), or "Critical Illness Related Corticosteroid Insufficiency" (CIRCI), and form part of the rationale for trials of glucocorticoid treatment in septic shock. Diagnostic criteria for these conditions have been based on plasma cortisol profiles and have proven notoriously difficult to establish. The uncertainty in this area arises from the inability of current tests to clearly identify who is truly glucocorticoid "deficient" at a cellular level, and hence who requires supplemental glucocorticoid administration. Emerging data suggest that there may be abnormalities in the tissue activity of glucocorticoids in patients with severe sepsis and plasma profiles may not be reliable indicators of tissue glucocorticoid activity, We put forward an alternative point of view, that is the spectrum of adrenocortical dysfunction in sepsis - plasma and tissue, can be grouped under the umbrella of a "sick euadrenal syndrome" rather than an adrenocortical insufficiency.

Interstitium: the next diagnostic and therapeutic platform in critical illness

BACKGROUND

For decades we have been testing blood either ex vivo or else placing monitors directly in the bloodstream to "see" what might be going on in tissues. In the last 20 yrs, conceptual and practical advances in interstitial monitoring have begun to challenge traditional approaches. In this review we explore how interstitial monitoring might be used as a platform for future diagnostics and therapy in critical illness.

RESULTS

From a diagnostic perspective, interstitial analysis has been instructive about the pathophysiology of critical illness. Valuable insights have been gained into the pathophysiology of critical illness. To this end, examples from the areas of interstitial oxygenation and acid base, endocrine pathophysiology, and head injury monitoring have been used. From a therapeutic perspective, the main focus has been on antibiotic therapy and an improved understanding of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in critical illness.

CONCLUSIONS

Monitoring of the interstitium is feasible and can be achieved through minimally invasive techniques. It has improved the understanding of the pathophysiology of critical illness, holds potential in the diagnosis and management of sepsis, may allow early prediction of organ deterioration, and finally offers the possibility of reduction of blood testing and minimizing blood loss. While all of these hold promise, randomized trials will need to be conducted based on interstitial end points rather than plasma end points. This will pave the way for a more rational approach to the therapy of critically ill patients.

Plasma cortisol response to ACTH challenge in hypoxic newborn piglets resuscitated with 21% and 100% oxygen

Although the use of supplemental oxygen to resuscitate asphyxiated neonates remains controversial, the effects of hypoxia and reoxygenation (room air versus pure oxygen) on the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis are unknown. We aimed to evaluate the effect of hypoxia and reoxygenation with either 21% or 100% oxygen on plasma cortisol before and after an adrenocorticotrophin (ACTH) challenge in newborn piglets. Thirty-five piglets (aged 1-3 days, weighing 1.5-2.4 kg) were instrumented to measure heart rate, MAP, and cardiac output. After 2 h of normocapnic hypoxia (PaO2, 20-30 mmHg; pH, <6.95), piglets were resuscitated with 21% or 100% oxygen for 1 h and then 21% oxygen for 3 h. Sham-operated piglets had no hypoxia-reoxygenation (H-R). Serial plasma cortisol levels were determined after a blinded randomized administration of ACTH (4 microg/kg, i.v.) or saline at 2 h reoxygenation. The expression of steroidogenic factor 1 in the adrenals was studied. Cardiac output decreased with hypoxia and recovered with resuscitation. Piglets developed hypotension similarly in 21% and 100% H-R groups during reoxygenation (versus sham-operated group, P < 0.05). Both H-R groups had increased plasma cortisol levels (versus sham-operated group, P < 0.05) at 2 h of reoxygenation after hypoxia, with a further increase in levels in 21% H-R piglets at 4 h reoxygenation (versus 100% H-R piglets, P < 0.05). The response to ACTH was delayed in H-R groups, with the maximum increase at 120 min post-ACTH administration (versus 30-60 min post-ACTH for sham-operated piglets). Plasma cortisol levels increased significantly post-ACTH administration in 21% H-R and sham-operated piglets (115% +/-50% and 126% +/- 25% at 120 min, respectively, P < 0.05 vs. pre-ACTH baselines) but not in 100% H-R piglets (51% +/-14%), which had a lower expression of steroidogenic factor 1 than the other groups. Although the clinical significance of high cortisol levels and cortisol response to ACTH in H-R newborn piglets is uncertain, a preserved cortisol response may support using room air in neonatal resuscitation.

Relative adrenal insufficiency in the intensive care population; background and critical appraisal of the evidence

Dysfunction of the hypothalamo-pituitary adrenal axis has become a central feature in descriptions of the pathophysiology of sepsis. However; despite hundreds of published articles including literature reviews and consensus statements, controversy still exists regarding the fundamental nature of the disorder and its relevance to clinical management. Often referred to as 'relative adrenal insufficiency', a recent consensus conference has proposed the alternate term 'critical illness related corticosteroid insufficiency' and suggested diagnostic criteria of a delta serum cortisol of less than 9 microg/l after adrenocorticotrophic hormone administration or a random total cortisol of under 10 microg/l. This review attempts to establish a critical reappraisal of the evidence for the existence of relative adrenal insufficiency/critical illness related corticosteroid insufficiency in patients with sepsis and examines the background, controversies and possibilities for future research into the condition.

Establishment of outcome-related analytic performance goals

BACKGROUND

Accrediting organizations require laboratories to establish analytic performance criteria that ensure their tests provide results of the high quality required for patient care. However, the procedures for instituting performance criteria that are directly linked to the needs of medical practice are not well established, and therefore alternative strategies often are used to create and implement surrogate performance standards.

CONTENT

We reviewed 6 approaches for establishing outcome-related analytic performance goals: (a) limits defined by regulations and external assessment programs, (b) limits based on biologic variation, (c) limits based on surveys of clinicians about their needs, (d) limits based on effects on guideline driven medical decisions, (e) limits based on analysis of patterns for ordering follow-up clinical tests, and (f) limits based on formal medical decision models. Performance criteria were tabulated for 12 common chemistry analytes and 4 routine hematology tests.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no consensus currently about the preferred methods for establishing medically necessary analytic performance limits. The various methods reviewed give considerably different performance limits. The analytic performance limits claimed by a laboratory should correspond to those limits that can be reliably maintained based on validated QC monitoring systems. These limits generally are larger than the observed CVs and bias parameters collected for assay validation. There is a major need for increased communication among laboratorians and clinicians on this topic, especially when the analytic performance limits that can be consistently maintained by a laboratory are inconsistent with the expectations of health care providers.

Measurement of salivary cortisol with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in patients undergoing dynamic endocrine testing

OBJECTIVE

Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) eliminates cross-reactivity, which is a major limitation of immunoassays used for the measurement of salivary cortisol (SalC). We aimed to evaluate the potential of SalC measured by LC-MS/MS in patients undergoing assessment of the HPA axis.

DESIGN AND PATIENTS

Cross-sectional study of 78 patients admitted for routine testing in a specialized endocrine unit.

MEASUREMENTS

Matched serum and saliva samples were collected from 68 patients who had a short synacthen test (SST, 250 mcg im) and 10 patients who had an insulin tolerance test (ITT, insulin 0.15 U/kg iv). Serum cortisol (SerC) was measured with an automated immunoassay and SalC with LC-MS/MS. Adequate SerC responses were >500 nmol/l.

RESULTS

In all patients with adequate responses, the relative increase in SalC was significantly higher than that in SerC [6.4(0.3-26.1) vs. 1.0(0.3-4.9), P < 0.0001)]. The SerC-SalC relationship was better explained by an exponential rather than a linear model (R(2)=0.83 vs. R(2)=0.65, both P < 0.0001). Based on 59 patients with adequate SerC responses to an SST, an adequate SalC response was defined as 8.3 nmol/l. Seven patients following an SST and three patients following an ITT showed inadequate responses in both SerC and SalC, but two patients with CBG deficiency showed a low SerC with normal SalC.

CONCLUSIONS

We have shown an excellent diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of LC-MS/MS SalC in the assessment of the HPA axis and superiority over SerC when CBG levels are altered. The exponential relationship between SerC and SalC supports the concept of CBG binding capacity saturation.

Measurement of tissue cortisol levels in patients with severe burns: a preliminary investigation

Introduction

The assessment of adrenal function in critically ill patients is problematic, and there is evidence to suggest that measurement of tissue glucocorticoid activity may be more useful than estimation of plasma cortisol concentrations. Interstitial cortisol concentrations of cortisol represent the available pool of glucocorticoids able to enter the cell and bind to the glucocorticoid receptor. However the concentrations of plasma cortisol may not accurately reflect interstitial concentrations. We elected to perform a preliminary study into the feasibility of measuring interstitial cortisol by microdialysis, and to investigate the relationship between total plasma cortisol, free plasma cortisol and interstitial cortisol in patients with severe burns.

Methods

A prospective observational study carried out in a tertiary intensive care unit. Ten adult patients with a mean total burn surface area of 48% were studied. Interstitial cortisol was measured by microdialysis from patient-matched burnt and non-burnt tissue and compared with that of 3 healthy volunteers. Plasma sampling for estimations of total and free cortisol concentrations was performed concurrently.

Results

In the burn patients, mean total plasma and free plasma cortisol concentrations were 8.8 +/- 3.9, and 1.7 +/- 1.1 mcg/dL, (p < 0.001), respectively. Mean subcutaneous microdialysis cortisol concentrations in the burn and non-burn tissue were 0.80 +/- 0.31 vs 0.74 +/- 0.41 mcg/dL (p = 0.8), respectively, and were significantly elevated over the mean subcutaneous microdialysis cortisol concentrations in the healthy volunteers. There was no significant correlation between total plasma or free plasma and microdialysis cortisol concentrations. Plasma free cortisol was better correlated with total burn surface area than total cortisol.

Conclusions

In this preliminary study, interstitial cortisol concentrations measured by microdialysis in burnt and non-burnt skin from patients with severe thermal injury are significantly elevated over those from healthy volunteers. Plasma estimations of cortisol do not correlate with the microdialysis levels, raising the possibility that plasma cortisol may be an unreliable guide to tissue cortisol activity.

The diagnosis and investigation of adrenal insufficiency in adults

There is considerable variation in the methods used to diagnose and investigate adrenal insufficiency in clinical practice. These include a range of adrenocorticotropin (ACTH) stimulation and other dynamic testing protocols, serum cortisol cut-off values for diagnosis and tests used for differential diagnosis. With the introduction of modern cortisol and ACTH assays, the interpretation of tests used for diagnosis and differential diagnosis has become more complex and requires local validation. This review examines the basis of normal hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function and adrenal insufficiency states based upon an evidence base accumulated over the past four decades. The role of the laboratory in the differential diagnosis and interpretation based upon assay methodology is discussed. The accurate identification of patients who may benefit from corticosteroid replacement in special settings such as critical illness is challenging and will be explored.

Critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency

The diagnosis of adrenal failure and the indications for corticosteroid therapy in critically ill patients are controversial. This controversy is fueled by the complexity of the issues and the paucity of data from high quality clinical trials. Nevertheless, while the use of high-dose corticosteroids in patients with severe sepsis and ARDS failed to improve outcome and was associated with increased complications, an extended course of stress-dose corticosteroids has been reported to increase the occurrence of ventilator-free days and survival in select groups of ICU patients. These patients typically have an exaggerated proinflammatory response. Until recently the exaggerated proinflammatory response that characterizes critically ill patients with systemic inflammation has focused on suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and adrenal failure. However, experimental and clinical data suggest that glucocorticoid tissue resistance may also play an important role. This complex syndrome is referred to as critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency (CIRCI) and is defined as inadequate corticosteroid activity for the severity of the illness of a patient. The paper reviews cortisol physiology, CIRCI, and the role of corticosteroid therapy in critically ill patients.

Neuroendocrine dysfunction in pediatric critical illness

BACKGROUND

The extent of neuroendocrine dysfunction (NED) has not been well defined in critically ill children and likely varies significantly from that in adults. We sought to define the prevalence of neuroendocrine dysfunction in a group of children in a multidisciplinary pediatric intensive care unit and determine the relationship of neuroendocrine dysfunction with severity of illness and presence of sepsis.

METHODS

Prospective observational study in a pediatric intensive care unit at a referral childrens hospital. Blood samples were evaluated within 12 hrs of admission for serum cortisol, thyroid stimulating hormone, total triiodothyronine (T3), reverse triiodothyroine (rT3), free thyroxine, and arginine vasopressin. Pediatric risk of mortality, pediatric logistic organ dysfunction scores, and length of stay were calculated.

RESULTS

Seventy-three children were enrolled over a 13-month period. Median patient age was 72 months (range, 3-228 months). Overall prevalence of absolute adrenal insufficiency ranged from 7% to 58% based on cortisol cutoff chosen. Presence of absolute adrenal insufficiency, low T3 syndrome (LT3S), or vasopressin insufficiency did not differ between septic or nonseptic patients. NED did not correlate with pediatric logistic organ dysfunction, Pediatric Risk of Mortality Score III, length of stay, or mortality. Prevalence of multiple NED was 62% (28 of 45 children), where 62% had 2 neurohormonal deficiencies and 24% had 3 neurohormonal deficiencies.

CONCLUSION

NED is common in both septic and nonseptic critically ill children in a single pediatric intensive care unit. Larger scale studies are necessary to determine whether presence of NED, or specific combinations of neurohormonal dysfunction, is important in predicting outcomes or benefit of early hormonal replacement therapies in critically ill children.

The altered adrenal axis and treatment with glucocorticoids during critical illness

Critical illness is generally hallmarked by activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. The development of very high levels of cortisol has been associated with severe illness and a raised risk of death. Likewise, a response that is inadequate relative to the degree of stress, termed relative adrenal insufficiency (also known as critical-illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency) has been associated with increased mortality. Much controversy exists with regard to the definition and biochemical testing of an adequate adrenal response to critical illness, which hampers diagnosis. High doses of glucocorticoids have been shown to have no effect in this setting and might be harmful. Moderate doses have been advocated, however, for critically ill patients with inflammatory conditions, such as acute respiratory distress syndrome and septic shock syndrome. Initial results from proof-of-concept studies were promising but thus far have not been reproduced in large, multicenter trials, although the latter were underpowered to yield definite conclusions. The role of glucocorticoid therapy in intensive care, therefore, remains uncertain. Until the debate has been settled, we recommend that use of glucocorticoid therapy in critically ill patients should continue to be based on the clinician's judgment and that routine adjuvant use should be avoided.

Pituitary-adrenal function in patients with acute subarachnoid haemorrhage: a prospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) may damage the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal gland (HPA) axis and disturb cortisol metabolism. There are no available data that relates to the response of the HPA axis in the acute phase of SAH. We aimed to characterise the behavior of serum adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), total cortisol, stimulated total cortisol and free cortisol concentrations in acute aneurysmal SAH.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was conducted of patients with acute aneurysmal SAH (n = 30) admitted to a tertiary university hospital. Patients admitted for elective aneurysmal surgery (n = 16) served as the control group. An ACTH stimulation test was performed twice during the first week and at three months. The main outcome measure was description of the ACTH-cortisol response by calculating serum free cortisol and measuring total cortisol and ACTH concentrations. A mixed models method was used for testing between the groups, allowing heterogeneity between the groups.

RESULTS

Patients with SAH had higher initial serum total cortisol (mean +/- SD; 793 +/- 312 nmol/L) and free cortisol concentrations (83 +/- 55 nmol/L) than control patients (535 +/- 193 nmol/L, p = 0.001 and 33 +/- 18 nmol/L, p < 0.001, respectively). Thereafter, there were no differences in this respect. Serum free and total cortisol concentrations correlated but were unaffected by the severity of SAH. ACTH concentrations were comparable between SAH and control groups. Patients with Hunt-Hess grades IV to V had higher ACTH concentrations at day one (10.7 +/- 7.1 pmol/l/L) and day five (8.2 +/- 7.7 pmol/L) than patients with grade I-III (day one: 3.8 +/- 2.0 pmol/L, p = 0.002; day five: 4.7 +/- 1.8 pmol/L, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Calculation of serum free cortisol concentration was not helpful in identifying patients with potential hypocortisolism. SAH severity did not affect cortisol concentrations, possibly indicating relative pituitary-adrenal insufficiency in patients with more severe bleeding.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00614887.

Recommendations for the diagnosis and management of corticosteroid insufficiency in critically ill adult patients: consensus statements from an international task force by the American College of Critical Care Medicine

OBJECTIVE

To develop consensus statements for the diagnosis and management of corticosteroid insufficiency in critically ill adult patients.

PARTICIPANTS

A multidisciplinary, multispecialty task force of experts in critical care medicine was convened from the membership of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. In addition, international experts in endocrinology were invited to participate.

DESIGN/METHODS

The task force members reviewed published literature and provided expert opinion from which the consensus was derived. The consensus statements were developed using a modified Delphi methodology. The strength of each recommendation was quantified using the Modified GRADE system, which classifies recommendations as strong (grade 1) or weak (grade 2) and the quality of evidence as high (grade A), moderate (grade B), or low (grade C) based on factors that include the study design, the consistency of the results, and the directness of the evidence.

RESULTS

The task force coined the term critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency to describe the dysfunction of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis that occurs during critical illness. Critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency is caused by adrenal insufficiency together with tissue corticosteroid resistance and is characterized by an exaggerated and protracted proinflammatory response. Critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency should be suspected in hypotensive patients who have responded poorly to fluids and vasopressor agents, particularly in the setting of sepsis. At this time, the diagnosis of tissue corticosteroid resistance remains problematic. Adrenal insufficiency in critically ill patients is best made by a delta total serum cortisol of < 9 microg/dL after adrenocorticotrophic hormone (250 microg) administration or a random total cortisol of < 10 microg/dL. The benefit of treatment with glucocorticoids at this time seems to be limited to patients with vasopressor-dependent septic shock and patients with early severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (PaO2/FiO2 of < 200 and within 14 days of onset). The adrenocorticotrophic hormone stimulation test should not be used to identify those patients with septic shock or acute respiratory distress syndrome who should receive glucocorticoids. Hydrocortisone in a dose of 200 mg/day in four divided doses or as a continuous infusion in a dose of 240 mg/day (10 mg/hr) for > or = 7 days is recommended for septic shock. Methylprednisolone in a dose of 1 mg x kg(-1) x day(-1) for > or = 14 days is recommended in patients with severe early acute respiratory distress syndrome. Glucocorticoids should be weaned and not stopped abruptly. Reinstitution of treatment should be considered with recurrence of signs of sepsis, hypotension, or worsening oxygenation. Dexamethasone is not recommended to treat critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency. The role of glucocorticoids in the management of patients with community-acquired pneumonia, liver failure, pancreatitis, those undergoing cardiac surgery, and other groups of critically ill patients requires further investigation.

CONCLUSION

Evidence-linked consensus statements with regard to the diagnosis and management of corticosteroid deficiency in critically ill patients have been developed by a multidisciplinary, multispecialty task force.

Cerebral perfusion in sepsis-associated delirium

Introduction

The pathophysiology of sepsis-associated delirium is not completely understood and the data on cerebral perfusion in sepsis are conflicting. We tested the hypothesis that cerebral perfusion and selected serum markers of inflammation and delirium differ in septic patients with and without sepsis-associated delirium.

Methods

We investigated 23 adult patients with sepsis, severe sepsis, or septic shock with an extracranial focus of infection and no history of intracranial pathology. Patients were investigated after stabilisation within 48 hours after admission to the intensive care unit. Sepsis-associated delirium was diagnosed using the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), blood flow velocity (FV) in the middle cerebral artery using transcranial Doppler, and cerebral tissue oxygenation using near-infrared spectroscopy were monitored for 1 hour. An index of cerebrovascular autoregulation was calculated from MAP and FV data. C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), S-100β, and cortisol were measured during each data acquisition.

Results

Data from 16 patients, of whom 12 had sepsis-associated delirium, were analysed. There were no significant correlations or associations between MAP, cerebral blood FV, or tissue oxygenation and sepsis-associated delirium. However, we found a significant association between sepsis-associated delirium and disturbed autoregulation (P = 0.015). IL-6 did not differ between patients with and without sepsis-associated delirium, but we found a significant association between elevated CRP (P = 0.008), S-100β (P = 0.029), and cortisol (P = 0.011) and sepsis-associated delirium. Elevated CRP was significantly correlated with disturbed autoregulation (Spearman rho = 0.62, P = 0.010).

Conclusion

In this small group of patients, cerebral perfusion assessed with transcranial Doppler and near-infrared spectroscopy did not differ between patients with and without sepsis-associated delirium. However, the state of autoregulation differed between the two groups. This may be due to inflammation impeding cerebrovascular endothelial function. Further investigations defining the role of S-100β and cortisol in the diagnosis of sepsis-associated delirium are warranted.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00410111.

Low-dose steroid therapy does not affect hemodynamic response in septic shock patients

PURPOSE

Several studies showed that low-dose steroid therapy (LDST) in patients with septic shock leads to a significantly shorter duration of shock and a decreased mortality. However, these results have been criticized. Our purpose was to evaluate the effects of LDST on time to shock reversal and mortality in septic shock.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively studied 203 patients with septic shock admitted to the intensive care unit of our tertiary hospital. A short corticotropin test was performed in all patients within 72 hours of septic shock onset. We performed a propensity score analysis through a logistic regression model with baseline relevant characteristics, and evaluated the influence of LDST on time to shock reversal and inhospital mortality.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-four patients were treated with LDST (steroid group) and 79 without LDST (control group). Patients treated with steroids presented higher Simplified Acute Physiology Score II and maximum Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment scores. Both groups presented similar baseline and stimulated cortisol values. The hazard ratio of remaining on shock adjusted by severity of illness, inadequate antibiotic, and propensity score was 1.15 (95% confidence interval 0.71-1.86) for patients treated with steroids. Inhospital mortality was 62% in the steroid group and 52% in the control group (P = .84). Logistic regression analysis with propensity score neither showed differences between steroid and control group in the inhospital mortality. Predictors of inhospital mortality were age, maximum Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment score, and inadequate antibiotics.

CONCLUSION

In our study, treatment with low-dose steroid therapy was not associated to a reduction in time to shock reversal or mortality.

Hydrocortisone therapy for patients with septic shock

BACKGROUND

Hydrocortisone is widely used in patients with septic shock even though a survival benefit has been reported only in patients who remained hypotensive after fluid and vasopressor resuscitation and whose plasma cortisol levels did not rise appropriately after the administration of corticotropin.

METHODS

In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we assigned 251 patients to receive 50 mg of intravenous hydrocortisone and 248 patients to receive placebo every 6 hours for 5 days; the dose was then tapered during a 6-day period. At 28 days, the primary outcome was death among patients who did not have a response to a corticotropin test.

RESULTS

Of the 499 patients in the study, 233 (46.7%) did not have a response to corticotropin (125 in the hydrocortisone group and 108 in the placebo group). At 28 days, there was no significant difference in mortality between patients in the two study groups who did not have a response to corticotropin (39.2% in the hydrocortisone group and 36.1% in the placebo group, P=0.69) or between those who had a response to corticotropin (28.8% in the hydrocortisone group and 28.7% in the placebo group, P=1.00). At 28 days, 86 of 251 patients in the hydrocortisone group (34.3%) and 78 of 248 patients in the placebo group (31.5%) had died (P=0.51). In the hydrocortisone group, shock was reversed more quickly than in the placebo group. However, there were more episodes of superinfection, including new sepsis and septic shock.

CONCLUSIONS

Hydrocortisone did not improve survival or reversal of shock in patients with septic shock, either overall or in patients who did not have a response to corticotropin, although hydrocortisone hastened reversal of shock in patients in whom shock was reversed. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00147004.)

An update on the diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency and the use of corticotherapy in critical illness

OBJECTIVE

To examine recent literature regarding corticotherapy in critically ill patients suffering from sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and severe community-acquired pneumonia (SCAP).

DATA SOURCES

Literature was identified through MEDLINE (1966-April 2007) using combinations of the key words hydrocortisone, adrenal insufficiency, acute respiratory distress syndrome, pneumonia, sepsis, and cortisol. Bibliographies of relevant articles were reviewed for additional citations. Presentations at recent critical care meetings were also incorporated.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Articles were chosen based upon their relevance to the topics covered.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Earlier studies using high-dose corticotherapy in the intensive care unit have shown treatment to be ineffective. Recent studies using extended courses of low-to-moderate doses of steroids have found favorable results; however, these results must be interpreted with caution due to limitations in the data. One trial of steroids in septic shock found a survival benefit in patients who failed to increase their baseline cortisol by greater than 9 microg/dL in response to adrenocorticotropic hormone, but these results were not reproduced in a subsequent Phase 3 trial. Recently, inaccuracies in measuring cortisol have been identified, making interpretation of cortisol concentrations difficult. A large-scale study failed to confirm a previously reported mortality benefit of corticotherapy in late ARDS, but preliminary data suggest a role for steroid treatment in early ARDS. Finally, a pilot study has found that hydrocortisone lowers morbidity and mortality in SCAP.

CONCLUSIONS

Corticotherapy may be beneficial to some patients with sepsis. The decision to administer steroids in sepsis cannot be based on biochemical markers of adrenal function; rather, treatment should be considered in septic patients with vasopressor refractory hypotension. Although preliminary evidence suggests a role for steroids in early ARDS and SCAP, there are not enough data to suggest routine administration of steroids in these conditions. Additional studies are needed to assess corticotherapy in the critically ill.