Direct sodium measurement prevents underestimation of hyponatremia in critically ill patients

Tolvaptan versus fluid restriction in acutely hospitalised patients with moderate-profound hyponatraemia (TVFR-HypoNa): design and implementation of an open-label randomised trial

Background

Current hyponatraemia guidelines are divided on the use of tolvaptan in hospitalised patients with moderate to severe hyponatraemia, due to an uncertain risk-benefit ratio. We will conduct a randomised trial to test the hypothesis that early use of tolvaptan improves the rate of serum sodium correction and clinical outcomes compared with current standard first-line therapy, restriction of fluid intake, without increasing the risk of serum sodium overcorrection.

Methods

We will enrol hospitalised patients with euvolaemic or hypervolaemic hyponatraemia and serum sodium of 115–130 mmol/L at Austin Health, a tertiary care centre in Melbourne, Australia. Participants will be randomised 1:1 to receive either tolvaptan (initial dose 7.5 mg) or fluid restriction (initial limit 1000 ml per 24 h), with titration of therapy based on serum sodium response according to a pre-determined protocol over a 72-h intervention period.

The primary endpoint will be the between-group change in serum sodium over time, from study day 1 to day 4. Secondary endpoints include serum sodium increment in the first 24 and 48 h, proportion of participants with normalised serum sodium, length of hospital stay, requirement for serum sodium re-lowering with intravenous dextrose or desmopressin, cognitive and functional measures (Confusion Assessment Method Short form, Timed Up and Go test, hyponatraemia symptom questionnaire), 30-day readmission rate, treatment satisfaction score and serum sodium 30 days after discharge. The trial will be overseen by an independent Data Safety Monitoring Board. Serum sodium will be monitored every 6–12 h throughout the study period, with pre-specified thresholds for commencing intravenous 5% dextrose if serum sodium rise targets are exceeded.

Discussion

We seek to inform future international guidelines with high-quality data regarding the utility and safety of tolvaptan compared to standard therapy fluid restriction in patients with moderate-severe hyponatraemia in hospital. If tolvaptan use in this patient group is endorsed by our findings, we will have established an evidence-based framework for tolvaptan initiation and monitoring to guide its use.

Trial registration

Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12619001683123. Registered on December 2 2019

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06237-5.

Interference in Ion-Selective Electrodes Due to Proteins and Lipids

BACKGROUND

Ion-selective electrodes (ISE) have become the mainstay of electrolyte measurements in the clinical laboratory. In most automated analyzers used in large diagnostic laboratories, indirect ISE (iISE) -based electrolyte estimation is done; whereas direct ISE (dISE) -based equipment are mostly used in blood gas analyzers and in the point-of-care (PoC) setting.

CONTENT

Both the techniques, iISE as well as dISE, are scientifically robust; however, the results are often not interchangeable. Discrepancy happens between the two commonly due to interferences that affect the two measuring principles differently. Over the last decade, several studies have reported discrepancies between dISE and iISE arising due to abnormal protein and lipid contents in the sample.

SUMMARY

The present review endeavors to consolidate the knowledge accumulated in relation to interferences due to abnormal protein and lipid contents in sample with the principal focus resting on probable solutions thereof.

Therapeutic hypernatremia management during continuous renal replacement therapy with elevated intracranial pressures and respiratory failure

Cerebral edema and elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) are common complications of acute brain injury. Hypertonic solutions are routinely used in acute brain injury as effective osmotic agents to lower ICP by increasing the extracellular fluid tonicity. Acute kidney injury in a patient with traumatic brain injury and elevated ICP requiring renal replacement therapy represents a significant therapeutic challenge due to an increased risk of cerebral edema associated with intermittent conventional hemodialysis. Therefore, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) has emerged as the preferred modality of therapy in this patient population. We present our current treatment approach, with demonstrative case vignette illustrations, utilizing hypertonic saline protocols (3% sodium-chloride or, with coexisting severe combined metabolic and respiratory acidosis, with 4.2% sodium-bicarbonate) in conjunction with the CRRT platform, to induce controlled hypernatremia of approximately 155 mEq/L in hemodynamically unstable patients with acute kidney injury and elevated ICP due to acute brain injury. Rationale, mechanism of activation, benefits and potential pitfalls of the therapy are reviewed. The impact of hypertonic citrate solution during regional citrate anticoagulation is specifically discussed. Maintaining plasma hypertonicity in the setting of increased ICP and acute kidney injury could prevent the worsening of ICP during renal replacement therapy by minimizing the osmotic gradient across the blood-brain barrier and maximizing cardiovascular stability.

Management of electrolyte disorders: also the method matters!

Introduction: For the last few decades, electrolyte determinations in plasma or serum are carried out by reliable potentiometric methods. In recent years, a marked technical evolution has taken place, where the clinical analysis of common analytes (e.g. electrolytes) is partly moving from centralised clinical core laboratories to near-patient point-of-care testing. Methods: As the measuring principle used by point-of-care testing markedly differs from the one used in core laboratories, sodium results are not always interchangeable in critically ill patients due to the different sensitivity of the analytical methods for the electrolyte exclusion effect. Results: This effect mainly occurs in patients with decreased plasma protein values. The observed differences in generated test results might significantly affect the judgment and the treatment of electrolyte disturbances. As technical solutions are not likely to occur in the near future, clinicians and laboratorians should be well aware of this growing problem. Mathematical correction of the sodium results for plasma protein concentration may resolve the problem to a certain extent. Discussion: Although electrolyte determinations are generally very reliable, analytical interferences can occur for sodium rarely, mainly due to contamination by surfactants, benzalkonium in particular. For potassium, the major problem is hemolysis. To a lesser extent, leukocyte lysis and thrombocytopenia may also interfere. For chloride determination, the selectivity of the electrodes used is not ideal. Occasionally, false positive signals can be observed in presence of interfering ions (e.g. bromide).

Traditional approach versus Stewart approach for acid-base disorders: Inconsistent evidence

Purpose

The traditional approach and the Stewart approach have been developed for evaluating acid-base phenomena. While some experts have suggested that the two approaches are essentially identical, clinical researches have still been conducted on the superiority of one approach over the other one. In this review, we summarize the concepts of each approach and investigate the reasons of the discrepancy, based on current evidence from the literature search.

Methods

In the literature search, we completed a database search and reviewed articles comparing the Stewart approach with the traditional, bicarbonate-centered approach to November 2016.

Results

Our literature review included 17 relevant articles, 5 of which compared their diagnostic abilities, 9 articles compared their prognostic performances, and 3 articles compared both diagnostic abilities and prognostic performances. These articles show a discrepancy over the abilities to detect acid-base disturbances and to predict patients' outcomes. There are many limitations that could yield this discrepancy, including differences in calculation of the variables, technological differences or errors in measuring variables, incongruences of reference value, normal range of the variables, differences in studied populations, and confounders of prognostic strength such as lactate.

Conclusion

In conclusion, despite the proposed equivalence between the traditional approach and the Stewart approach, our literature search shows inconsistent results on the comparison between the two approaches for diagnostic and prognostic performance. We found crucial limitations in those studies, which could lead to the reasons of the discrepancy.

Prevalence of pseudonatremia in a clinical laboratory - role of the water content

BACKGROUND

Sodium concentration is a frequently used marker to discriminate between differential diagnoses or for clinical follow-up. Pseudonatremia, as a result of indirect ion-selective electrode (ISE) measurements in automated chemistry analyzers, can lead to incorrect diagnosis and treatment. We investigated whether the estimated water content, based on total protein and lipid concentrations, can be used to reduce diagnoses of pseudonatremia.

METHODS

Indirect and direct ISE measurements of sodium were compared in blood samples from intensive care unit (ICU) (n = 98) and random non-ICU patients (n = 100). Differences between direct measurements using whole blood and lithium-heparin plasma were also determined. Water content, estimated by a linear combination of total protein and lipid concentrations, was used to correct indirectly measured sodium concentrations. The prevalence of pseudonatremia was evaluated in the ICU patient group.

RESULTS

An absolute difference of 3 mmol/L was observed between direct measurements using lithium-heparin plasma and whole blood, with higher concentrations in plasma. Additionally, we observed that differences between indirect and direct measurements displayed a linear relationship with the estimated water content. The prevalence of pseudohypernatremia after indirect measurements (32%) was reduced when measurements were corrected for water content (19%).

CONCLUSIONS

In critically ill patients, sodium concentrations should be preferably measured by direct measurements. Whole blood is the preferred material for these measurements. For routine sodium analyses in other patients, correction using the estimated water content appears promising in reducing the prevalence of pseudohypernatremia by indirect measurements.

Point-of-Care Versus Central Laboratory Measurements of Hemoglobin, Hematocrit, Glucose, Bicarbonate and Electrolytes: A Prospective Observational Study in Critically Ill Patients

INTRODUCTION

Rapid detection of abnormal biological values using point-of-care (POC) testing allows clinicians to promptly initiate therapy; however, there are concerns regarding the reliability of POC measurements. We investigated the agreement between the latest generation blood gas analyzer and central laboratory measurements of electrolytes, bicarbonate, hemoglobin, hematocrit, and glucose.

METHODS

314 paired samples were collected prospectively from 51 critically ill patients. All samples were drawn simultaneously in the morning from an arterial line. BD Vacutainer tubes were analyzed in the central laboratory using Beckman Coulter analyzers (AU 5800 and DxH 800). BD Preset 3 ml heparinized-syringes were analyzed immediately in the ICU using the POC Siemens RAPIDPoint 500 blood gas system. We used CLIA proficiency testing criteria to define acceptable analytical performance and interchangeability.

RESULTS

Biases, limits of agreement (±1.96 SD) and coefficients of correlation were respectively: 1.3 (-2.2 to 4.8 mmol/L, r = 0.936) for sodium; 0.2 (-0.2 to 0.6 mmol/L, r = 0.944) for potassium; -0.9 (-3.7 to 2 mmol/L, r = 0.967) for chloride; 0.8 (-1.9 to 3.4 mmol/L, r = 0.968) for bicarbonate; -11 (-30 to 9 mg/dL, r = 0.972) for glucose; -0.8 (-1.4 to -0.2 g/dL, r = 0.985) for hemoglobin; and -1.1 (-2.9 to 0.7%, r = 0.981) for hematocrit. All differences were below CLIA cut-off values, except for hemoglobin.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to central Laboratory analyzers, the POC Siemens RAPIDPoint 500 blood gas system satisfied the CLIA criteria of interchangeability for all tested parameters, except for hemoglobin. These results are warranted for our own procedures and devices. Bearing these restrictions, we recommend clinicians to initiate an appropriate therapy based on POC testing without awaiting a control measurement.

Graded interference with the direct potentiometric measurement of sodium by hemoglobin

OBJECTIVES

Sodium concentration is measured by either indirect (I_Na) or direct potentiometry (D_Na), on chemistry and gas panels, respectively. A spurious difference between these methods (ΔNa=I_Na-D_Na) can be confusing to the clinician. For example, variation in serum total protein (TP) is well known to selectively interfere with I_Na. Red cells have been suggested to interfere with D_Na, but both positive and negative interference have been reported. In this study, the effect of gas panel hemoglobin (Hb) on ΔNa was examined.

METHODS

ΔNa was calculated in 772 pairs of closely-timed chemistry and gas panels (median: 4min. apart), retrospectively collected from our critical care units, with 1 pair per patient. Hb was treated as a categorical or continuous variable and tested for linear and non-linear effects, with adjustment for 3 known influences on ΔNa-TP, bicarbonate (tCO₂), and the chemistry-gas panel glucose difference (ΔGlu).

RESULTS

Hb ranged from 3.5 to 22.0g/dL [35-220g/L]. In categorical analysis, ΔNa increased with Hb, and the effect was essentially linear. By simple regression, ΔNa rose 0.06±0.03[SE]mmol/L per 1g/dL [10g/L] increase in Hb (p<0.05), but confounding was suspected because Hb also correlated (p<10^-3) with TP, tCO₂, and ΔGlu. Using multiple regression to adjust for the confounders, ΔNa rose 0.15±0.03mmol/L per 1g/dL [10g/L] rise in Hb (p<10^-6).

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing Hb spuriously decreases D_Na and increases ΔNa. A linear correction for this artifact can reduce the discordance between I_Na and D_Na, promoting their interchangeable use.

How to Solve the Underestimated Problem of Overestimated Sodium Results in the Hypoproteinemic Patient

OBJECTIVES

The availability of a fast and reliable sodium result is a prerequisite for the appropriate correction of a patient's fluid balance. Blood gas analyzers and core laboratory chemistry analyzers measure electrolytes via different ion-selective electrode methodology, that is, direct and indirect ion-selective electrodes, respectively. Sodium concentrations obtained via both methods are not always concordant. A comparison of results between both methods was performed, and the impact of the total protein concentration on the sodium concentration was investigated. Furthermore, we sought to develop an adjustment equation to correct between both ion-selective electrode methods.

DESIGN

A model was developed using a pilot study cohort (n = 290) and a retrospective patient cohort (n = 690), which was validated using a prospective patient cohort (4,006 samples).

SETTING

ICU and emergency department at Ghent University Hospital.

PATIENTS

Patient selection was based on the concurrent availability of routine blood gas Na⁺(direct) as well as core laboratory Na⁺(indirect) results.

INTERVENTIONS

In the pilot study, left-over blood gas syringes were collected for further laboratory analysis.

MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS

There was a significant negative linear correlation between Na⁺(indirect) and Na⁺(direct) relative to changes in total protein concentration (Pearson r = -0.69; p < 0.0001). In our setting, for each change of 10 g/L in total protein concentration, a deviation of ~1.3 mmol/L is observed with the Na⁺(indirect) result. Validity of our adjustment equation protein-corrected Na⁺(indirect) = Na⁺(indirect) - 10.53 + (0.1316 × total protein) was demonstrated on a prospective patient cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

As Na⁺(direct) measurements on a blood gas analyzer are not influenced by the total protein concentration in the sample, they should be preferentially used in patients with abnormal protein concentrations. However, as blood gas analyzers are not available at all clinical wards, the implementation of a protein-corrected sodium result might provide an acceptable alternative.