Rifer A, Stolz D, Fonseca Ulloa CA, Harz T, Rickert M, Jahnke A. Influence of muscle traction on the primary stability of a reverse humeral prosthesis.
J Orthop 2023;
41:57-62. [PMID:
37333764 PMCID:
PMC10275695 DOI:
10.1016/j.jor.2023.06.004]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Revised: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Background
Currently, the influence of muscle traction on the postoperative stability of humeral prostheses is not adequately researched. This study analyzed the prosthesis' stability in vitro during muscle traction considering different bone defect sizes.
Methods
The reverse humeral prosthesis "AEQUALIS™ ADJUSTABLE REVERSED" (Stryker) was implanted using press-fit into ten bones with a length of 200 mm and 160 mm. Subsequently, the models were torqued in 30 cycles using a universal testing machine (2 Nm - 6 Nm) and loaded axially to simulate muscle traction. The axial weight increased from 7.7 kg (pure muscle traction) over 40 kg (45-degree abduction) to 69.3 kg (90-degree abduction). The prosthesis' relative micromotion was simultaneously measured at three different measurement heights using high-sensitivity displacement transducers and compared to the relative micromotion without axial load.
Results
It was found that a larger torsional moment was associated with a larger relative micromotion in both bone defects studied. However, the influence became significant (P < 0.014) in bone models with predominantly larger defect.Furthermore, no significant influence of muscle traction on relative micromotion could be detected for the larger bone models at any of the measurement levels (P = 1.000). In contrast, smaller bones showed no significant differences in muscle traction until a torsional moment of 6 Nm (P < 0.028).
Conclusion
In conclusion, a larger torsional moment is associated with a higher relative micromotion and muscle traction, conclusively, has no effect on the primary stability of the reverse prosthesis for a 200 mm bone in vitro.
Collapse