1
|
Boggi U, Vistoli F, Andres A, Arbogast HP, Badet L, Baronti W, Bartlett ST, Benedetti E, Branchereau J, Burke GW, Buron F, Caldara R, Cardillo M, Casanova D, Cipriani F, Cooper M, Cupisti A, Davide J, Drachenberg C, de Koning EJP, Ettorre GM, Fernandez Cruz L, Fridell JA, Friend PJ, Furian L, Gaber OA, Gruessner AC, Gruessner RW, Gunton JE, Han D, Iacopi S, Kauffmann EF, Kaufman D, Kenmochi T, Khambalia HA, Lai Q, Langer RM, Maffi P, Marselli L, Menichetti F, Miccoli M, Mittal S, Morelon E, Napoli N, Neri F, Oberholzer J, Odorico JS, Öllinger R, Oniscu G, Orlando G, Ortenzi M, Perosa M, Perrone VG, Pleass H, Redfield RR, Ricci C, Rigotti P, Paul Robertson R, Ross LF, Rossi M, Saudek F, Scalea JR, Schenker P, Secchi A, Socci C, Sousa Silva D, Squifflet JP, Stock PG, Stratta RJ, Terrenzio C, Uva P, Watson CJ, White SA, Marchetti P, Kandaswamy R, Berney T. First World Consensus Conference on pancreas transplantation: Part II - recommendations. Am J Transplant 2021; 21 Suppl 3:17-59. [PMID: 34245223 PMCID: PMC8518376 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Revised: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 06/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The First World Consensus Conference on Pancreas Transplantation provided 49 jury deliberations regarding the impact of pancreas transplantation on the treatment of diabetic patients, and 110 experts' recommendations for the practice of pancreas transplantation. The main message from this consensus conference is that both simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) and pancreas transplantation alone can improve long-term patient survival, and all types of pancreas transplantation dramatically improve the quality of life of recipients. Pancreas transplantation may also improve the course of chronic complications of diabetes, depending on their severity. Therefore, the advantages of pancreas transplantation appear to clearly surpass potential disadvantages. Pancreas after kidney transplantation increases the risk of mortality only in the early period after transplantation, but is associated with improved life expectancy thereafter. Additionally, preemptive SPK, when compared to SPK performed in patients undergoing dialysis, appears to be associated with improved outcomes. Time on dialysis has negative prognostic implications in SPK recipients. Increased long-term survival, improvement in the course of diabetic complications, and amelioration of quality of life justify preferential allocation of kidney grafts to SPK recipients. Audience discussions and live voting are available online at the following URL address: http://mediaeventi.unipi.it/category/1st-world-consensus-conference-of-pancreas-transplantation/246.
Collapse
|
2
|
Banga N, Hadjianastassiou VG, Mamode N, Calder F, Olsburgh J, Drage M, Sammartino C, Koffman G, Taylor J. Outcome of surgical complications following simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2011; 27:1658-63. [PMID: 21903603 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfr502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation carries a higher risk of surgical complications than kidney transplantation alone. We aimed to establish the incidence of surgical complications after SPK transplantation and determine the effect on graft and patient survival. METHODS Outcomes of all SPK transplants performed at our centre were compared between patients who experienced a surgical complication (SC group) and those who did not (NSC group). RESULTS Our centre performed 193 SPK transplants in a 15-year period; 44 patients (23%) experienced a surgical complication. One-year and 5-year pancreatic graft survival was 89 and 80%, respectively; this was lower in the SC group. There was no significant difference in patient or kidney graft survival between the SC and NSC groups at 5 years (92 and 83%, respectively.) CONCLUSION Surgical complications following SPK transplantation can cause significant morbidity and adversely affect pancreas graft survival, but do not affect long-term kidney or patient survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neal Banga
- Department of Transplantation, Guys and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jahansouz C, Kumer SC, Ellenbogen M, Brayman KL. Evolution of β-Cell Replacement Therapy in Diabetes Mellitus: Pancreas Transplantation. Diabetes Technol Ther 2011; 13:395-418. [PMID: 21299398 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2010.0133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus remains one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, approximately 23.6 million people in the United States are affected. Of these individuals, 5-10% have been diagnosed with type 1 diabetes mellitus (TIDM), an autoimmune disease. Although it often appears in childhood, T1DM may manifest at any age. The effects of T1DM can be devastating, as the disease often leads to significant secondary complications, morbidity, and decreased quality of life. Since the late 1960s, surgical treatment for diabetes mellitus has continued to evolve and has become a viable alternative to chronic insulin administration. In this review, the historical evolution, current status, graft efficacy, benefits, and complications of pancreas transplantation are explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cyrus Jahansouz
- University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jiménez-Romero C, Manrique A, Meneu JC, Cambra F, Andrés A, Morales JM, González E, Hernández E, Morales E, Praga M, Gutierrez E, Moreno E. Compative study of bladder versus enteric drainage in pancreas transplantation. Transplant Proc 2010; 41:2466-8. [PMID: 19715953 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.06.164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is some controversy concerning the choice of best technique for drainage of exocrine secretions in pancreas transplantation. We compared patients with bladder drainage (BD) versus those with enteric drainage (ED). PATIENTS AND METHODS From March 1995 to September 2008, 118 patients (68 men and 50 women) of overall mean age of 37.8 +/- 7.8 years underwent pancreas transplantation. There were 109 simultaneous pancreas-kidney, and 9 pancreas after kidney procedures. Recipients were divided in a BD (n = 66 patients) and an ED group (n = 52). RESULTS Donor characteristics were similar in both groups. Thirty-two patients (48.5%) of the BD group versus none in the ED group experienced urinary tract infections (UTI; P < .001), and 16 patients (24.2%) BD versus 15 (29.4%) ED developed intraabdominal infections (P = NS). The overall rate of relaparotomies was 33.9% (n = 40): 34.8% (n = 23) in the BD versus 32.7% (n = 17) in the ED group (P = NS). Thirty patients (25.4%) lost their pancreas grafts: 21 (31.8%) in the BD group versus 9 (17.3%) in the ED group (P = .055). The acute rejection rates were 12.7%; namely, 15.2% in the BD versus 9.8% in the ED (P = NS). Three-year patient and graft survivals were equivalent in both groups: 96.1% and 65.3% in the BD versus 89.0% and 74.0% in the ED group, respectively (P = NS). CONCLUSIONS ED is a good alternative to BD for drainage of pancreatic graft exocrine secretions because both techniques have the same patient and graft survival, but BD is associated with a significantly higher rate of UTI and urologic complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Jiménez-Romero
- Servicio de Cirugía General y Trasplante de Organos Abdominales, Hospital Doce de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
|
6
|
Orsenigo E, Cristallo M, Socci C, Castoldi R, Secchi A, Colombo R, Invernizzi L, Fiorina P, Naspro R, Di Carlo V. Urological complications after simultaneous renal and pancreatic transplantation. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY = ACTA CHIRURGICA 2003; 168:609-13. [PMID: 12699096 DOI: 10.1080/11024150201680006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report the urological complications after simultaneous renal and pancreatic transplantation. DESIGN Retrospective study. SETTING Teaching hospital, Italy. SUBJECTS 143 consecutive patients having simultaneous renal and pancreatic transplantation by one of three techniques. 33 segmental pancreas with duct occlusion, 77 whole pancreas with bladder diversion, and 33 enteric diversion with systemic (n = 26) or portal venous drainage (n = 7). Urological complications were related to the pancreatic transplant, to the renal transplant, or unrelated to the transplant. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Morbidity. RESULTS After occlusion of the duct and enteric diversion, there were no urological complications related to the pancreatic transplant. On the other hand, among the 77 patients with pancreatic drainage into the bladder, urological complications were common (56/77; 73%). Complications related to the renal transplant were recorded in 6/33 (18%), 26/77 (34%) and 12/33 (36%), respectively. Complications unrelated to the transplant occurred in 6/77 patients (8%) in the bladder drainage group. Five patients after bladder drainage required cystoenteric conversion. CONCLUSIONS Enteric diversion is a safe alternative to bladder diversion and results in significantly fewer urological complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Orsenigo
- Department of Surgery, Università Vita e Salute, Milan, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Drachenberg CB, Papadimitriou JC, Farney A, Wiland A, Blahut S, Fink JC, Philosophe B, Schweitzer E, Lal T, Anderson L, Bartlett ST. Pancreas transplantation: the histologic morphology of graft loss and clinical correlations. Transplantation 2001; 71:1784-91. [PMID: 11455259 DOI: 10.1097/00007890-200106270-00014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Graft losses due to leaks, bleeding, thrombosis, infections, and early pancreatitis are grouped together under the category of technical failure. Among these complications, massive vascular thrombosis continues to be the most important cause of early graft loss due to technical failure. Pathological evaluation of most allografts lost early in the posttransplantation period shows vascular thrombosis with associated proportional parenchymal necrosis. The morphological findings in allografts that are considered to be lost due to technical failure has not been systematically addressed. In particular, the role of acute rejection in early graft loss has not been well studied. METHODS Seventy-four consecutive pancreas graft pancreatectomies were studied histologically to evaluate for thrombosis (recent versus organized), type of vessel involved by thrombosis (arteries, veins, or both), acute rejection grade, chronic rejection grade, endotheliitis, transplant arteritis, coagulation necrosis, acute pancreatitis, presence of infectious organisms, transplant (obliterative) arteriopathy, neoplasia, relative proportions of alpha and beta islet cells, and immunoglobulin and complement deposition. The histological findings were correlated with donor and recipient data as well as clinical presentation. RESULTS In 23 out of 39 grafts lost in the first 4 weeks posttransplantation, the only pathological changes found were vascular thrombosis and bland ischemic parenchymal necrosis. In these cases, no underlying vascular pathology or any other specific histological change was identified. Most of these grafts (78%) were lost in less than 48 hr and all in the first 2 weeks posttransplantation. Massive vascular thrombosis occurring in an otherwise histologically normal pancreas was the most common cause of graft loss in the first 4 weeks posttransplantation (59%). In most of the remaining cases (33%), although the clinical presentation suggested technical failure, there was clear histological evidence that the massive thrombosis resulted from vascular injury due to immune damage (acute and hyperacute rejection). Increased incidence of early graft thrombosis was seen in grafts from older donors and longer cold ischemia times. After the first month posttransplantation, graft pancreatectomies revealed a wider variety of pathological processes that included severe acute rejection, combined acute and chronic rejection, chronic rejection, and infections. Acute and chronic vascular thrombosis in large and small vessels was commonly seen at all times posttransplantation; chronic, organized thrombosis was strongly associated with chronic rejection. CONCLUSIONS (a) Early acute thrombosis occurring in a histologically normal pancreas defines a true technical failure. This study showed that acute rejection leading to massive thrombosis, which clinically simulates technical failure, results in a significant proportion of early graft losses. (b) Systematic histological evaluation of failed grafts is absolutely necessary for the accurate classification of the cause of graft loss. (c) There is morphological evidence that chronically ongoing thrombosis is an important, common, contributing factor for late graft loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C B Drachenberg
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 29 South Greene Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sutherland DE, Gruessner RW, Dunn DL, Matas AJ, Humar A, Kandaswamy R, Mauer SM, Kennedy WR, Goetz FC, Robertson RP, Gruessner AC, Najarian JS. Lessons learned from more than 1,000 pancreas transplants at a single institution. Ann Surg 2001; 233:463-501. [PMID: 11303130 PMCID: PMC1421277 DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200104000-00003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 412] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine outcome in diabetic pancreas transplant recipients according to risk factors and the surgical techniques and immunosuppressive protocols that evolved during a 33-year period at a single institution. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus is associated with a high incidence of management problems and secondary complications. Clinical pancreas transplantation began at the University of Minnesota in 1966, initially with a high failure rate, but outcome improved in parallel with other organ transplants. The authors retrospectively analyzed the factors associated with the increased success rate of pancreas transplants. METHODS From December 16, 1966, to March 31, 2000, the authors performed 1,194 pancreas transplants (111 from living donors; 191 retransplants): 498 simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) and 1 simultaneous pancreas-liver transplant; 404 pancreas after kidney (PAK) transplants; and 291 pancreas transplants alone (PTA). The analyses were divided into five eras: era 0, 1966 to 1973 (n = 14), historical; era 1, 1978 to 1986 (n = 148), transition to cyclosporine for immunosuppression, multiple duct management techniques, and only solitary (PAK and PTA) transplants; era 2, 1986 to 1994 (n = 461), all categories (SPK, PAK, and PTA), predominantly bladder drainage for graft duct management, and primarily triple therapy (cyclosporine, azathioprine, and prednisone) for maintenance immunosuppression; era 3, 1994 to 1998 (n = 286), tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil used; and era 4, 1998 to 2000 (n = 275), use of daclizumab for induction immunosuppression, primarily enteric drainage for SPK transplants, pretransplant immunosuppression in candidates awaiting PTA. RESULTS Patient and primary cadaver pancreas graft functional (insulin-independence) survival rates at 1 year by category and era were as follows: SPK, era 2 (n = 214) versus eras 3 and 4 combined (n = 212), 85% and 64% versus 92% and 79%, respectively; PAK, era 1 (n = 36) versus 2 (n = 61) versus 3 (n = 84) versus 4 (n = 92), 86% and 17%, 98% and 59%, 98% and 76%, and 98% and 81%, respectively; in PTA, era 1 (n = 36) versus 2 (n = 72) versus 3 (n = 30) versus 4 (n = 40), 77% and 31%, 99% and 50%, 90% and 67%, and 100% and 88%, respectively. In eras 3 and 4 combined for primary cadaver SPK transplants, pancreas graft survival rates were significantly higher with bladder drainage (n = 136) than enteric drainage (n = 70), 82% versus 74% at 1 year (P =.03). Increasing recipient age had an adverse effect on outcome only in SPK recipients. Vascular disease was common (in eras 3 and 4, 27% of SPK recipients had a pretransplant myocardial infarction and 40% had a coronary artery bypass); those with no vascular disease had significantly higher patient and graft survival rates in the SPK and PAK categories. Living donor segmental pancreas transplants were associated with higher technically successful graft survival rates in each era, predominately solitary (PAK and PTA) in eras 1 and 2 and SPK in eras 3 and 4. Diabetic secondary complications were ameliorated in some recipients, and quality of life studies showed significant gains after the transplant in all recipient categories. CONCLUSIONS Patient and graft survival rates have significantly improved over time as surgical techniques and immunosuppressive protocols have evolved. Eventually, islet transplants will replace pancreas transplants for suitable candidates, but currently pancreas transplants can be applied and should be an option at all stages of diabetes. Early transplants are preferable for labile diabetes, but even patients with advanced complications can benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D E Sutherland
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Affiliation(s)
- W O Bechstein
- Department of Surgery, Charité, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Friedman AL. Appropriateness and timing of kidney and/or pancreas transplants in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. ADVANCES IN RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY 2001; 8:70-82. [PMID: 11172329 DOI: 10.1053/jarr.2001.21709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Cure of diabetes through cell or organ transplantation remains an unattained but highly desirable goal. For now, prevention of end organ complications of diabetes is the most appropriate application of transplantation for patients with enough evidence of progressive disease to justify the substantial surgical and immunosuppression-based risks of pancreas transplantation. Uremic diabetics should, if possible, be offered renal transplantation, alone or in combination with pancreas transplantation, to obviate the excessive mortality associated with prolonged maintenance dialysis. Islet transplantation has been widely clinically unsuccessful but holds new promise as the therapy of choice for the future. This report reviews the history, state of the art, and selection process for timing and application of currently available transplantation modalities for diabetic patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A L Friedman
- Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bitker MO, Barrou B, Mouquet C, Benalia H, Ourahma S, Grimaldi A, Richard F, Chatelain C. [Combined renal and pancreas transplantation as treatment for chronic renal insufficiency of diabetic origin: a series of 50 consecutive transplantations]. CHIRURGIE; MEMOIRES DE L'ACADEMIE DE CHIRURGIE 1999; 124:476-83; discussion 483-4. [PMID: 10615774 DOI: 10.1016/s0001-4001(00)88269-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
STUDY AIM The aim of this study was to report the results of 50 transplantations of kidney and pancreas performed in the same surgical centre for chronic renal insufficiency of patients with insulino-dependent diabetes. PATIENTS AND METHOD From 1989 to 1999, 50 pancreatic transplantations were consecutively performed, 48 combined with a kidney transplantation and two in patients having a functioning kidney graft. The whole pancreas was transplanted in the right iliac fossa through an extraperitoneal approach with duodeno-vesical bypass of exocrine secretion. The kidney was transplanted in the left iliac fossa through a different extraperitoneal approach. Immunosuppression protocol included Azathioprine replaced by Mycophenolate Mofetil since 1996, associated with corticotherapy and Ciclosporine replaced by FK 506 since 1997. Recipients were 32 women and 18 men (mean age: 37 +/- 5 years) treated by insulinotherapy since 23 +/- 6 years and receiving 35 +/- 10 insulin units per day. Peptide C was 0.33 +/- 0.35 mg/mL and serum creatinin 726 +/- 260 mumol/L. RESULTS One patient died on d10 from pulmonary artery thrombosis due to unknown drepanocytosis. The most frequent postoperative complications were leakage of duodeno-vesical anastomosis (n = 9) decreasing in frequency with experience, reoperated with preservation of the pancreatic graft in all cases and venous thrombosis of the pancreatic graft (n = 5) with a definitive loss of function. Secondary deaths occurred at 24, 36, 48, 50, 72 months with functioning grafts in two patients. With a mean 5-year follow-up, 44 patients were alive (88% of the whole series), 34 of them with two functional grafts (68% of the whole series) Sixteen pancreas grafts were lost: three by death of the patients, eight from surgical complications, four by rejection and one by transplantectomy of a functional graft. CONCLUSION Combined kidney and pancreas transplantation is now very efficient in the treatment of diabetic renal insufficiency. Total pancreas transplantation through an extraperitoneal approach seems to be the safest method. A very strict selection of both donors and recipients is necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M O Bitker
- Clinique urologique de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|