The femoral insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament: a radiographic evaluation

Race and Gender Differences in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Femoral Footprint Location and Orientation: A 3D-MRI Study

OBJECTIVE

The femoral tunnel position is crucial to anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, but the ideal femoral footprint position are mostly based on small-sized cadaveric studies and elderly patients with a single ethnic background. This study aimed to identify potential race- or gender-specific differences in the ACL femoral footprint location and ACL orientation, determine the correlation between the ACL orientation and the femoral footprint location.

METHODS

Magnetic resonance images (MRIs) of 90 Caucasian participants and 90 matched Chinese subjects were used for reconstruction of three-dimensional (3D) femur and tibial models. ACL footprints were sketched by several experienced orthopedic surgeons on the MRI photographs. The anatomical coordinate system was applied to reflect the ACL footprint location and orientation of scanned samples. The femoral ACL footprint locations were represented by their distance from the origin in the anteroposterior (A/P) and distal-proximal (D/P) directions. The orientation of the ACL was described with the sagittal, coronal and transverse deviation angles. The ACL orientation and femoral footprint position were compared by the two-sided t-test. Multiple regression analysis was used to study the correlation between the orientation and femoral footprint position.

RESULTS

The average femur footprint A/P position was -6.6 ± 1.6 mm in the Chinese group and -5.1 ± 2.3 mm in the Caucasian group, (p < 0.001). The average femur footprint D/P position was -2.8 ± 2.4 mm in Chinese and - 3.9 ± 2.0 mm in Caucasians, (p = 0.001). The Chinese group had a mean difference of a 1.5 mm (6.1%) more posterior and 1.1 mm (5.3%) more proximal in the position from the flexion-extension axis (FEA). And the males have a sagittal plane elevation about 4-5° higher than females in both racial groups. Furthermore, for every 1% (0.40 mm) increase in A/P and D/P values, the sagittal angle decreased by about 0.12° and 0.24°, respectively; the coronal angle decreased by about 0.10° and 0.30°, respectively. For every 1% (0.40 mm) increase in D/P value, the transverse angle increased by about 0.14°.

CONCLUSION

The significant race- and gender-specific differences in the femoral footprint and orientation of the ACL should be taken in consideration during anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction. Furthermore, the quantitative relationship between the ACL orientation and the footprint location might provide some reference for surgeons to develop a surgical strategy in ACL single-bundle reconstruction and revision.

The Femoral Footprint Position of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Might Be a Predisposing Factor to a Noncontact Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture

BACKGROUND

Although the femoral tunnel position is crucial to anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, the recommendations for the ideal femoral footprint position are mostly based on cadaveric studies with small sample sizes, elderly patients with unknown ACL status, and 2-dimensional techniques. Furthermore, a potential difference in the femoral ACL footprint position and ACL orientation between ACL-ruptured and ACL-intact knees has not been reported in the literature.

HYPOTHESIS

The femoral ACL footprint position and ACL orientation vary significantly between ACL-ruptured and matched control ACL-intact knees.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Magnetic resonance images of the knees of 90 patients with an ACL rupture and 90 matched control participants who had a noncontact knee injury without an ACL rupture were used to create 3-dimensional models of the femur and tibia. The ACL footprints were outlined on each model, and their positions (normalized to the lateral condyle width) as well as ACL orientations were measured with an anatomic coordinate system.

RESULTS

The femoral ACL footprint in patients with an ACL rupture was located at 36.6% posterior and 11.2% distal to the flexion-extension axis (FEA). The ACL orientation was 46.9° in the sagittal plane, 70.3° in the coronal plane, and 20.8° in the transverse plane. The ACL-ruptured group demonstrated a femoral ACL footprint position that was 11.0% more posterior and 7.7% more proximal than that of the control group (all P < .01). The same patients also exhibited 5.7° lower sagittal elevation, 3.1° higher coronal plane elevation, and 7.9° lower transverse plane deviation (all P < .01). The optimal cutoff value of the femoral ACL footprint position to prevent an ACL rupture was at 30% posterior and 12% distal to the FEA.

CONCLUSION

The ACL femoral footprint position might be a predisposing factor to an ACL rupture. Patients with a >30% posterior and <12% distal position of the femoral ACL footprint from the FEA might have a 51.2-times increased risk of an ACL rupture.

The capsular line reference, a new arthroscopic reference for posterior/anterior femoral tunnel positioning in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Femoral malposition is the first cause for graft rupture during ACL reconstruction. Arthroscopic landmarks can be difficult to identify. So, landmark has to be found for reliable tunnel placement. A proximal-distal reference was described as "Apex reference" reported by Hart et al. but no posterior/anterior reference exists in the literature. The purpose of this study was to do a 3D CT-scan assessment of the femoral tunnel positioning using the Capsular Line Reference (CLR) as a landmark for posterior/anterior placement in ACL reconstruction. We hypothesized the CLR could provide a precise and reliable antero/posterior femoral tunnel positioning less than 2 mm from the Bernard & Hertel posterior quarter.

METHODS

Seven cadaveric knee specimens with a mean age of 79.2 ± 11 years were used. Using standard approaches, the CLR was identified corresponding to a white line (the capsule) appearing at the posterior border of the femoral condyle after bony debridement of the medial and posterior part of the lateral femoral condyle. The center of the tunnel was marked. An inside-out technique with anteromedial drilling technique was performed using an 8-mm diameter reamer. The distal femurs were sawed and a CT-scan was done for each specimen to obtain 3-dimensional image reconstructions. These 3D reconstructions were analyzed to measure the position tunnel center on the posterior/anterior axis and the distance from the posterior/anterior quadrant according to the Bernard & Hertel method.

RESULTS

The mean position for the posterior/anterior axis was 27.0 ± 1.8% (25-28.9) with a median of 26.9%. The position from the first quarter of the Bernard & Hertel method was 0.9 ± 0.8 mm (0-1.8) with a median of 0.8 mm.

CONCLUSION

The CLR is a reliable and reproducible arthroscopic landmark to place the femoral tunnel for ACL reconstruction in the anterior/posterior axis. Proximal/distal position depends on the choice of the surgeon to reproduce anteromedial or posterolateral fibers.

Radiographic positions of femoral ACL, AM and PL centres: accuracy of guidelines based on the lateral quadrant method

PURPOSE

Femoral tunnel positioning is an important factor in anatomical ACL reconstructions. To improve accuracy, lateral radiographic support can be used to determine the correct tunnel location, applying the quadrant method. Piefer et al. (Arthroscopy 28:872-881, 2012) combined various outcomes of eight studies applying this method to one guideline. The studies included in that guideline used various insertion margins, imaging techniques and measurement methods to determine the position of the ACL centres. The question we addressed is whether condensing data from various methods into one guideline, results in a more accurate guideline than the results of one study.

METHODS

The accuracy of the Piefer's guideline was determined and compared to a guideline developed by Luites et al. (2000). For both guidelines, we quantified the mean absolute differences in positions of the actual anatomical centres of the ACL, AM and PL measured on the lateral radiographs of twelve femora with the quadrant method and the positions according to the guidelines.

RESULTS

The accuracy of Piefer's guidelines was 2.4 mm (ACL), 2.7 mm (AM) and 4.6 mm (PL), resulting in positions significantly different from the actual anatomical centres. Applying Luites' guidelines for ACL and PL resulted in positions not significantly different from the actual centres. The accuracies were 1.6 mm (ACL) and 2.2 mm (PL and AM), which were significantly different from Piefer for the PL centres, and therefore more accurate.

CONCLUSIONS

Condensing the outcomes of multiple studies using various insertion margins, imaging techniques and measurement methods, results in inaccurate guidelines for femoral ACL tunnel positioning at the lateral view.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

An accurate femoral tunnel positioning for anatomical ACL reconstruction is a key issue. The results of this study demonstrate that averaging of various radiographic guidelines for anatomical femoral ACL tunnel placement in daily practice, can result in inaccurate tunnel positions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic study, Level 1.

Femoral Tunnel Positioning in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Anteromedial Portal versus Transtibial Technique-A Randomized Clinical Trial

Purpose  The purpose of this study was to investigate, through three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT), the accuracy of femoral tunnel positioning in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, comparing transtibial (TT) and anteromedial (AM) techniques. Methods  We evaluated postoperative 3D-CT scans of 26 patients treated with ACL reconstruction with hamstrings autograft using a low accessory AM portal technique and 26 treated with the TT technique. The position of the femoral tunnel center was measured with the quadrant method. Results  Using quadrant method on CT scans, femoral tunnels were measured at a mean of 32.2 and 28.1% from the proximal condylar surface (parallel to Blumensaat line) and at a mean of 31.2 and 15.1% from the notch roof (perpendicular to Blumensaat line) for the AM and TT techniques, respectively. Conclusion  The AM portal technique provides more anatomical graft placement than TT techniques. Level of Evidence  Level I, randomized clinical study.

Anatomic placement of the femoral tunnel by a modified transtibial technique using a large-offset femoral tunnel guide: A cadaveric study

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess whether the use of a 10 mm-offset femoral tunnel guide with lateral rotation allows more anatomic placement of femoral tunnel compared to the conventional seven millimeters-offset guide in transtibial anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

METHODS

Sixteen knees from eight cadavers were employed. Four guide pins were inserted using a seven millimeters- or 10mm-offset transtibial femoral tunnel guide with or without lateral rotation technique in each knee. The pin positions were assessed by the quadrant method. Femoral tunnels were then reamed along the guide pins inserted through the laterally rotated guides: seven millimeters-offset for right knees and 10 mm- offset for left knees. The percentages of the coverage of native ACL femoral footprints were analyzed.

RESULTS

Lateral rotation of the seven millimeters- & 10mm-offset guides placed the pins more posteriorly (lower) by 15.7% and 24.5%, respectively (p<0.001). Laterally rotated 10 mm-offset guides placed the guide pins more distally by 6.2% and more posteriorly by 6.6% than laterally rotated seven millimeters-offset guides. Laterally rotated seven millimeters- & 10 mm-offset guides resulted in average coverage of 52.3% and 61.8% of the native ACL femoral footprints, respectively (p<0.001). The lengths of the tunnels were acceptable.

CONCLUSION

Compared to the conventional seven millimeters-offset guide, the use of a 10mm-offset femoral tunnel guide with lateral rotation allows more anatomic placement of femoral tunnel in transtibial ACL reconstruction.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Anatomic single bundle ACL reconstruction by transtibial technique seems feasible by using the technique described in this study.

A Systematic Review of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Femoral Footprint Location Evaluated by Quadrant Method for Single-Bundle and Double-Bundle Anatomic Reconstruction

PURPOSE

To unravel the standard position of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) femoral origin and deduce practical arthroscopic localization and postsurgical evaluation method.

METHODS

Two independent reviewers searched PubMed using the terms ACL, footprint, femur, etc. We included studies published since January 1, 2000, in which the results were measured by Bernard's quadrant method. This method consists of 4 distances, including total diameter of lateral condyle along Blumensaat's line (distance t), maximum intercondylar notch height (distance h), distance from center of footprint to proximal border (distance x), and distance from center of footprint to Blumensaat's line (distance y). The data of included studies were combined to calculate theoretical centers and standard area for both ACL as a whole bundle and as anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) bundles individually. Finally, we translated the combined data to arthroscopic localization and postsurgical evaluation.

RESULTS

A total of 13 studies were included. The theoretical centers of ACL as a whole bundle is 28.4% ± 5.1% (x) of distance t and 35.7% ± 6.9% (y) of distance h, whereas AM bundle is 24.2% ± 4%, 21.6% ± 5.2% (x, y) and PL bundle is 32.8% ± 4.7%, 46.7% ± 4.9% (x, y), respectively. The standard area of ACL footprint is a circle with a center of 27.53%, 35.85% (x, y), and a radius of 4.58%, 9.2% (x, y), respectively. Translation of combined data shows that under arthroscopy, for single-bundle ACL reconstruction, the midpoint of distance from border of proximal to distal articular cartilage is the center of anatomic femoral socket.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined data unravel the standard position of ACL femoral origin. It can be used by clinicians to localize anatomic tunnel both in surgery and postsurgical evaluation. For single-bundle ACL reconstruction, the midpoint of lateral femoral condyle corresponds to anatomic socket.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V, systematic review of anatomic studies.

Anatomic Placement of the Femoral Tunnels in Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Correlates With Improved Graft Maturation and Clinical Outcomes

PURPOSE

To compare maturation of reconstructed graft on second-look arthroscopy and clinical outcomes between 2 groups: the provisional anatomic (PA) group, with both the anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) femoral tunnels in their anatomic location, and the nonanatomic (NA) group, with either 1 of the 2 femoral tunnels beyond its anatomic location after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

METHODS

We enrolled 154 patients who underwent 3-dimensional computed tomography scanning and second-look arthroscopy after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. All of the patients were divided into the PA and NA groups according to the femoral tunnel position determined by the quadrant method. Graft maturation was evaluated with 3 subsections, including integrity, tension, and synovial coverage with revascularization, on second-look arthroscopy. We also compared Lachman test, pivot-shift test, KT-2000 (MEDmetric, San Diego, CA), and International Knee Documentation Committee grades at the last follow-up.

RESULTS

Of the 154 patients, 88 were classified as the PA group and 66 as the NA group by the quadrant method. A difference existed between groups for the AM tunnel position but not for the PL tunnel position. The PA group showed a higher graft maturation score (P < .001 for all comparisons) and better results according to the International Knee Documentation Committee knee rating, Lachman test, pivot-shift test, and KT-2000 assessment (P < .001 for all comparisons).

CONCLUSIONS

The PA group with anatomic femoral tunnel placement showed a higher graft maturation score on second-look arthroscopy, along with better clinical outcomes, than the NA group. There was a significant difference in the AM femoral tunnel position but not in the PL tunnel position between the 2 groups.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Complex function of the knee joint: the current understanding of the knee

Since the early years of orthopaedics, it is a well-known fact that anatomy follows function. During the evolution of mankind, the knee has been optimally adapted to the forces and loads acting at and through the knee joint. However, anatomy of the knee joint is variable and the only constant is its complex function. In contrast to the time of open surgery, nowadays the majority of reconstructive knee surgery is done arthroscopically. Keyhole surgery is less invasive, but on the backside, the knee surgeon lacks daily visualisation of the complex open anatomy. As open anatomical knowledge is less present in our daily practice, it is even more important to highlight this complex anatomy and function of the knee. It is the purpose of this review to perform a systematic review of knee anatomy, highlight the complex function of the knee joint and present an overview about recent and current knowledge about knee function. Level of evidence Systematic review, Level IV.

Radiographic Anatomy of the Native Anterior Cruciate Ligament: a Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

In an attempt to improve the accuracy and reproducibility of tunnel positioning, radiographs are being analyzed in an attempt to recreate the native anatomy of the ACL. Understanding the native ACL radiographic anatomy is an essential prerequisite to understand the relevance of postoperative tunnel position.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We performed a systematic review of the literature to delineate the radiographic location of the native ACL femoral and tibial footprints.

METHODS

A search was performed in March 2014 in PubMed, the Cochrane Collaboration Library, and EMBASE to identify all studies that evaluated the native anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) anatomy on radiographs. Various measurement methods were used in each study, and averages were obtained of the data from studies with the same measurement methods.

RESULTS

Fifteen papers were identified (which included data on 177 femora and 207 tibiae in total). Evaluation of the femoral footprint using the quadrant method on lateral knee radiographs showed that the average percent distance location of the anteromedial (AM) bundle and posterolateral (PL) bundle was 22.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) 16.59-28.90) and 32.5% (95% CI 27.71-37.26) from the posterior condyle, respectively, and 23.2% (95% CI 19.52-26.94) and 50.0% (95% CI 46.16-53.76) from Blumensaat's line, respectively. Using the Amis and Jacob method, the tibial footprint on the lateral knee radiograph average percent distances was 35.1% (95% CI 34.46-35.72) for the center of the AM bundle and 47.3% (95% CI 41.69-52.95) for the center of the PL bundle of the ACL. The femoral and tibial ACL footprints on the anteroposterior (AP) views of the knee were not well delineated by these studies.

CONCLUSION

The information presented in this systematic review offers surgeons another important tool for accurate ACL footprint identification.

A modified quadrant method for describing the femoral tunnel aperture positions in ACL reconstruction using two-view plain radiographs

PURPOSE

A modified quadrant method was developed for description of femoral tunnel aperture positions on the sagittal plane after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, which can be measured by using two-view radiographs. The purpose of the study is to provide a new measurement method and to evaluate the reproducibility and accuracy of the method.

METHODS

Forty-one patients who had undergone a double-bundle ACL reconstruction were investigated. Two-view plain radiographs, a 45-degree-flexion posterior-anterior standing (Rosenberg) and a lateral view, were taken at 1 year postoperatively, and the femoral tunnel positions were measured. Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility was calculated by means of intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Also, the accuracy of the method was evaluated by comparing the measurement from three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT).

RESULTS

Intra-observer reproducibility was excellent (ICC > 0.9). Inter-observer reproducibility of antero-medial (AM) tunnel position was almost perfect (ICC > 0.8) and that of postero-lateral (PL) tunnel was substantial (ICC > 0.7). The accuracy of the method was assessed by comparing the measurement from 3D-CT and was found to be almost perfect (ICC > 0.8). With the modified quadrant method, the average height of AM and PL tunnels were 17.8 and 44.4 %, respectively, and the depth of AM and PL tunnels were 25.5 and 36.7 %, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A modified quadrant method was found to have acceptable reproducibility and accuracy. The method is useful for describing the femoral tunnel aperture positions in ACL reconstruction because of its easiness and simplicity. By using this method, it is possible to analyse the femoral tunnel position even in the cases without CT analysis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Anatomic Single Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction by Low Accessory Anteromedial Portal Technique: An In Vivo 3D CT Study

Purpose

Proper femoral tunnel position is important for anatomical reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the positions of femoral and tibial tunnels created using an accessory anteromedial portal technique in single bundle ACL reconstruction.

Materials and Methods

The femoral tunnel was targeted at the mid-portion of the ACL bundles. We evaluated postoperative computed tomography scans of 32 patients treated by ACL reconstruction using a free-hand low accessory anteromedial portal technique. On the tibial side, the tunnel position was evaluated using Tsukada's method. On the femoral side, the position was evaluated using 1) the quadrant method, 2) Mochizuki's method, 3) Mochizuki's method, and 4) Takahashi's method. Tunnel obliquity was also evaluated.

Results

The mean tibial tunnel position was located at 44.6%±2.5% anterior from the anterior margin and 48.0%±3.0% in medial from the medial margin. The mean femoral tunnel position was located at the center between the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles: Quadrant method, 26.7%±2.7%/30.0%±2.9%; Watanabe's method, 37.7%±2.5%/26.6%±2.2%; Mochizuki's method, 38.7%±2.7%; Takahashi's method, 21.8%±2.2%. The mean femoral tunnel obliquity was 57.7°±6.2° in the sagittal plane and 49.9°±5.6° in the coronal plane.

Conclusions

In anatomic single bundle ACL reconstruction, the low anteromedial portal technique can restore accurate position of the native footprint. Accurate femoral tunnel position facilitates recovery of stability and decreases graft failure rate.

Radiological evaluation for conflict of the femoral tunnel entrance area prior to anterior cruciate ligament revision surgery

PURPOSE

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) revision surgery is a demanding procedure and requires meticulous pre-operative clinical and radiological assessment. In clinical practice the position of the femoral tunnel is identified mainly using plain radiographs (XR). Two-dimensional computed tomography (2D-CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are not yet routine imaging methods and are only performed in specific clinical indications or in the scientific setting. Several measurement methods describe the femoral tunnel after ACL reconstruction and indicate 'ideal or wrong' placement to the surgeon. The aim of this study is to provide a reliable measurement method to predict potential conflict between the pre-existing and the planned femoral tunnel entrance area (FTEA).

METHODS

Ten patients with primary ACL reconstruction served as a reference group to describe our desired FTEA. Their femoral tunnel positioning was measured on XR and 2D-CT according to published measurement methods. These results were compared to the FTEA measured with a new technique on 3-dimensionally reconstructed CT-images (3D-CT) based on intra-operative landmarks. Twenty patients requiring ACL revision surgery underwent identical radiological examination. The mean values of the reference group were compared to each measurement of the patients requiring revision surgery.

RESULTS

3D-CT measurements found potential conflicts in nine out of 20 patients, which all proved to be true during arthroscopic revision surgery. Only one of these patients was identified in all XR and 2D-CT measurements. In 12 out of all 30 patients some measurements on XR or 2D-CT could not be recorded.

CONCLUSION

3D-CT reconstruction shows the most accuracy in depicting conflict of the pre-existing and desired femoral tunnel prior to ACL revision surgery. The desired FTEA must be defined for each surgeon and his individual technique. In contrast, precision of conventional measurement techniques on XR and 2D-CT is low and does not qualify for this purpose.

Comparison of tunnel placements and clinical results of single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction before and after starting the use of double-bundle technique

PURPOSE

To investigate whether the locations of the grafts in single-bundle (SB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction have changed to more anatomical as the double-bundle (DB) method has become more familiar.

METHODS

Operation using anteromedial (not transtibial) portal and freehand technique [Group A (N = 25) in 2003, Group B (N = 25) in 2007]. The evaluation methods preoperatively and at the 2-year follow-up (two blinded examiners): clinical examination, stability measurement (KT-1000 arthrometer), the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), and the Lysholm knee scores. A musculoskeletal radiologist made tunnel measurements from the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

RESULTS

The average tunnel placement in the femoral side: from Blumensaat's line 27 % (Group A) and 26 % (Group B), from the posterior edge of the femur 32 % (Group A) and 29 % (Group B). The average tunnel placement in the tibial side: from the anterior edge 45 % (Group A) and 45 % (Group B), from the lateral side 57 % (Group A) and 54 % (Group B) (P = 0.024). Graft failures ending up to revision ACL surgery: 4 (Group A) and 0 (Group B) (P = 0.045). Operation time reduced 19 min (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Tunnel placement at the femoral side was already very low (anatomical) in patients operated in 2003. No significant difference was found when comparing to the patients operated in 2007. There were significantly more graft failures in the Group A, suggesting that the use of the DB method in ACL surgery in 2007 may have also improved the technique and results of the SB ACL reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prospective comparative study, Level II.

Technique for creating the anterior cruciate ligament femoral socket: optimizing femoral footprint anatomic restoration using outside-in drilling

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate and optimize anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) femoral outside-in drilling technique with a goal of anatomic restoration of the footprint morphologic length, width, area, and angular orientation.

METHODS

Ex vivo, computer navigation was used to create virtual 3-dimensional maps of femoral bone tunnels for ACL drill guide pin insertion paths on small, medium, and large models of averaged femora considering various pin insertion angles to the femur. We then determined which pin insertion angle resulted in an ACL femoral footprint optimally matching normal human anatomic length, width, area, and angular orientation of the footprint long axis.

RESULTS

During outside-in drilling of the ACL femoral socket, a guide pin entrance angle of 60° to a line perpendicular to the femoral anatomic axis, combined with a guide pin entrance angle of 20° to the transepicondylar axis, results in the closest approximation of the gold standard of normal anatomic morphology of the human knee ACL femoral footprint length, width, area, and angular orientation.

CONCLUSIONS

During outside-in drilling of the ACL femoral socket, a guide pin entrance angle of 60° to a line perpendicular to the femoral anatomic axis, combined with a guide pin entrance angle of 20° to the transepicondylar axis, results in optimal reconstruction of the normal human anatomic ACL femoral footprint length, width, area, and angular orientation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

We describe arthroscopic landmarks for anatomic ACL femoral socket creation that may be considered by practicing arthroscopic surgeons in the operating room, without open dissection or fluoroscopy and unaffected by type of drill guide or variations in the thickness of the femoral soft-tissue envelope.

Anterior cruciate ligament femoral footprint anatomy: systematic review of the 21st century literature

PURPOSE

The purpose of our study was to systematically review current arthroscopic and related literature and to characterize the anatomic centrum of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) femoral footprint.

METHODS

On June 2, 2011, 2 independent reviewers performed a Medline search using the terms "anterior cruciate ligament" or "ACL," "femur" or "femoral," and "anatomy" or "origin" or "footprint." We included anatomic, cadaveric, and radiographic studies of adult, human, ACL femoral anatomy. Studies not published in the English language, studies published before January 1, 2000, and review articles were excluded. References of included articles were also searched according to our inclusion/exclusion criteria. Included studies were subjectively and quantitatively synthesized to define the anatomic centrum of the ACL femoral footprint.

RESULTS

The Medline search produced 533 articles. After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria and reference search, 20 articles were included and systematically reviewed. With regard to arthroscopically measurable landmarks, the anatomic centrum of the ACL femoral footprint is, on average, (1) in the sagittal plane, 43% of the distance from the proximal articular margin (arthroscopically visualized osteochondral junction) to the distal articular margin on the lateral wall of the intercondylar notch, and (2) in the axial plane, socket radius plus 2.5 mm anterior to the posterior articular margin, with a 2.5-mm rim of bone between the posterior ACL fibers and the posterior articular cartilage margin.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that the anatomic centrum of the ACL femoral footprint is 43% of the proximal-to-distal length of lateral, femoral intercondylar notch wall and femoral socket radius plus 2.5 mm anterior to the posterior articular margin.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This systematic review of basic science studies may have clinical relevance for surgeons who believe that anatomic ACL reconstruction can result in improved outcomes.

Anatomic attachment of the ACL. Comparison between radiological and CT analysis

PURPOSE

The following hypothesis was tested: the location of the tibial and femoral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) attachments will differ according to the measurement technique (plain radiographs or CT-scan) in relation to the anatomic frame of reference.

METHODS

10 gross specimens were studied. The location of metallic reference pins implanted around the tibial and femoral ACL attachments was recorded with reference to the bone contours with a caliper on the anatomic preparation, with standard plain AP and lateral radiographs and with a CT-scan. Results were compared with appropriate statistical tests at a 0.05 level of significance.

RESULTS

The mean ratio between the antero-posterior tibia measurement and the center of the ACL tibial attachment varied from 50 to 52%. The mean ratio between the medio-lateral tibia measurement and the center of the ACL tibial attachment varied from 49 to 51%. The mean ratio between the antero-posterior femur measurement and the center of the ACL femoral attachment varied from 74 to 80%. The results were significantly different between the three techniques (respectively P = 0.003, P = 0.02 and P = 0.045).

DISCUSSION

The paired differences were small (3% at the tibia, 6% at the femur). There was a strong correlation and a good agreement between the three techniques. It is likely that the small differences on the tibia have few, if any, clinical relevance.

CONCLUSION

Both radiographic and CT-scan measurement techniques used during the present study have the potential to be used as quality control after ACL replacement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic study-investigating a diagnostic test. Development of diagnostic criteria in a consecutive series of patients and a universally applied "gold" standard, Level II.

Radiographic description of femoral tunnel placement expressed as intercondylar clock time in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to propose an objective description of femoral tunnel position expressed as time of the intercondylar clock in ACL reconstruction using a simple radiograph for the sake of objective discussion and technical improvement. The reproducibility of the method was evaluated in double-bundle (DB) reconstructions.

METHODS

The first series of 54 knees in 54 patients who underwent primary "isometric" DB ACL reconstructions from 1995 to 2002 were randomly picked up. The second series of 48 knees in 48 patients with primary "anatomic" DB ACL reconstructions during 2007 were assessed as a recent femoral tunnel position with the same method. All DB reconstructions of ACL with the anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) bundles were performed with an arthroscopically assisted trans-tibial technique. The o'clock description of femoral tunnel placement was expressed using a weight-bearing posterior-anterior view at 45° of flexion (45° W/B PA view) of the knee. Assessment was undertaken with radiographs 1 year postoperatively.

RESULTS

The o'clock descriptions of femoral tunnel placement resulted in noon 40 min (standard deviation (SD): 10 min) for the AM bundle and one o'clock 40 min (SD: 20 min) for the PL bundle on average in the "isometric" reconstruction. In the "anatomic" reconstruction, the time descriptions of femoral tunnel placement were one o'clock 20 min (SD: 10 min) for the AM bundle and two o'clock 20 min (SD: 20 min) for the PL bundle on average. With the intra-examiner reproducibility assessment in the "anatomic" reconstruction, the differences between first and second assessments averaged 10 min (SD: 7 min) for femoral tunnel placement of the AM bundle and 12 min (SD: 9 min) of the PL bundle. Regarding the inter-examiner reproducibility, the differences between two examiners averaged 9 min (SD: 6 min) for femoral tunnel placement of the AM bundle and 14 min (SD: 9 min) of the PL bundle.

CONCLUSION

This simple radiographic assessment is reproducible and reliable for clinical use, and useful for the evaluation of ACL reconstructive procedures.

The resident's ridge as an arthroscopic landmark for anatomical femoral tunnel drilling in ACL reconstruction

The purposes of this study were to establish the technique to arthroscopically identify the resident's ridge without bony notchplasty even in patients with chronic ACL insufficiency and to elucidate if the ridge could be used as a landmark for anatomical femoral tunnel for ACL graft. There were 50 consecutive patients undergoing arthroscopic ACL reconstruction. With the thigh kept horizontal using a leg holder, a meticulous effort was made to find out a linear ridge running proximo-distal in a posterior one-third of the lateral notch wall, after removal of superficial soft tissue with radiofrequency energy. If the ridge was found, a socket with a rectangular aperture of 5 x 10 mm was created just behind the ridge. At 3-4-weeks post surgery, three-dimensional computed tomography (3-D CT) was performed to geographically identify the location of the ridge using the socket as a reference. Arthroscopically, a linear ridge running from superior-anterior to inferior-posterior on the lateral notch wall was consistently observed 7-10 mm anterior to the posterior articular cartilage margin of the lateral femoral condyle in all of the patients. The 3-D CT pictures proved the arthroscopically identified ridge to be the resident's ridge. The resident's ridge is arthroscopically identifiable after non-mechanical removal of the soft tissues without bony notchplasty. The ridge is a useful landmark for anatomical femoral tunnel drilling in arthroscopic ACL reconstruction.