Lateral tibial plateau autograft in revision surgery for failed medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

HEALTH MONITORING AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IN PLATFORM SPORTS TOURISM BASED ON CELL PHONES AND INTERNET OF THINGS

ABSTRACT Introduction: The prospect of high income brought about by economic development has made it possible for more people to join platform sports tourism to maximize their quality of life and spiritual experience. However, health problems in this modality are frequent. Objective: To verify the impacts of a cloud-based health monitoring and management system, using mobile devices and the Internet of Things, on the health problems of platform sports tourism. Methods: Systematic technical research combined with technology preceded the design of the functional module of the platform sports tourism health monitoring and management system through analysis of the demand for health monitoring and management. Finally, the platform sports tourism health monitoring was validated through system testing. Results and Conclusion: The effectiveness and test results of the management system show that the accuracy of physiological signals reaches 90%. Level of evidence II; Therapeutic studies - investigation of treatment outcomes.

Effect of bone density and cement morphology on biomechanical stability of tibial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) offers good long-term survivorship and superior kinematics and function compared with total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, revision rates are higher with aseptic loosening representing a major cause. Biomechanical stability depends on cement penetration. The goal of this study was to analyze the influence of cement morphology and bone density on primary stability of tibial UKA under physiological loading conditions in human tibiae.

METHODS

Thirty-six tibial trays were implanted in fresh-frozen human cadaver knees and tested for primary stability using dynamic compression-shear testing. Prior to implantation, bone density had been quantified for all 18 tibiae. Postoperatively, cement penetration has been assessed on frontal cuts based on eight predefined parameters. The influence of bone density and cement morphology on biomechanical stability was determined using correlation and linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

Mean failure load was 2691 ± 832.9 N, mean total cement thickness was 2.04 ± 0.37 mm, mean cement penetration was 1.54 ± 0.33 mm and mean trabecular bone mineral density (BMD) was 107.1 ± 29.3 mg/ml. There was no significant correlation between failure load and cement morphology (P > .05). Failure load was significantly positive correlated with trabecular BMD (r = 0.843; P < .0001) and cortical BMD (r = 0.432; P = .0136).

CONCLUSIONS

Simulating physiological loading conditions, the failure load of tibial UKA is linearly dependent on the trabecular BMD. The observed parameters of cementation morphology seem capable of preventing failure at the bone-cement interface before inherent bone stability is reached. Further research is required to assess the usefulness of a preoperative assessment of bone quality for patient selection in UKA.

A meta-analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty revised to total knee arthroplasty versus primary total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

This study was performed to compare the clinical outcomes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) revised to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) versus primary TKA.

METHODS

Relevant trials were identified via a search of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and PubMed from inception to 17 June 2017. A meta-analysis was performed to compare postoperative outcomes between revised UKA and primary TKA with respect to the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, Knee Society Score (KSS), mean polyethylene thickness, hospital stay, revision rate, range of motion (ROM), and complications.

RESULTS

Five of 233 studies involving 536 adult patients (revised UKA group, n = 209; primary TKA group, n = 327) were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The primary TKA group had better WOMAC scores, KSS, and ROM than the revised UKA group (P < 0.05). Compared with primary TKA, revision of UKA to TKA required more augments, stems, and bone grafts and a thicker polyethylene component (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the revision rate, hospital stay, or complications (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Conversion of UKA to TKA is associated with poorer clinical outcomes than primary TKA. Furthermore, we believe that conversion of UKA to TKA is more complicated than performing primary TKA. Revision UKA often requires more augments, stems, and bone grafts and thicker polyethylene components than primary TKA. However, patients who undergo conversion of UKA to TKA have similar hospital stay, complications, and revision rate as patients who undergo primary TKA.

Conversion of a unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to a total knee arthroplasty: can we achieve a primary result?

OBJECTIVES

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a potential treatment for isolated bone on bone osteoarthritis when limited to a single compartment. The risk for revision of UKA is three times higher than for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this review was to discuss the different revision options after UKA failure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A search was performed for English language articles published between 2006 and 2016. After reviewing titles and abstracts, 105 papers were selected for further analysis. Of these, 39 papers were deemed to contain clinically relevant data to be included in this review.

RESULTS

The most common reasons for failure are liner dislocation, aseptic loosening, disease progression of another compartment and unexplained pain. UKA can be revised to or with another UKA if the failure mode allows reconstruction of the joint with UKA components. In case of disease progression another UKA can be added, either at the patellofemoral joint or at the remaining tibiofemoral joint. Often the accompanying damage to the knee joint doesn't allow these two former techniques resulting in a primary TKA. In a third of cases, revision TKA components are necessary. This is usually on the tibial side where augments and stems might be required.

CONCLUSIONS

In case of failure of UKA, several less invasive revision techniques remain available to obtain primary results. Revision in a late stage of failure or because of surgical mistakes might ask for the use of revision components limiting the clinical outcome for the patients. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B(1 Supple A):65-9.