Incidence of reoperation and wound dehiscence in patients treated for peroneal tendon dislocations: comparison between osteotomy versus soft tissue procedures

Tendoscopic peroneal retinaculum repair for recurrent peroneal tendon dislocation enables earlier return to sports than the open procedure

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether tendoscopic peroneal retinaculum repair for patients with recurrent peroneal tendon dislocation (RPTD) is more useful than an open procedure.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients with RPTD were retrospectively reviewed. Twelve patients (13 ankles) with RPTD underwent the open procedure (Group A) between 2008 and 2014, and 13 patients (14 ankles) underwent the tendoscopic procedure (Group B) between 2014 and 2017. Evaluation parameters included clinical results [the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot (JSSF) ankle-hind foot scale], operation time, complications, return to sports, and recurrence.

RESULTS

Postoperative JSSF ankle/hindfoot scale scores were significantly better than the pre-surgical scores in both groups. The mean operation time was significantly longer in Group B than in Group A (75.7 ± 20.5 vs 38.4 ± 10.5 min). There was one recurrence in Group A, but none in Group B. Group A had no complications, and Group B had one wound infection. Group B, excluding the case of infection, could return to sports earlier than Group A, excluding the recurrent case (13.4 ± 1.5 vs 12.2 ± 0.6 weeks).

CONCLUSIONS

This tendoscopic procedure needs longer operation time and is more technically demanding, but it is a useful procedure, because it is less invasive and can accelerate return to sports.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Reattachment of the superior peroneal retinaculum versus the bone block procedure for the treatment of recurrent peroneal tendon dislocation: two safe and effective techniques

PURPOSE

Clinical outcomes between reattachment of the superior peroneal retinaculum (SPR) and the bone block procedure were compared in this study to elucidate which procedure was safer and more effective.

METHODS

From 2012 to 2016, 25 patients with recurrent peroneal tendon dislocation underwent the bone block procedure (group A), and another 22 patients underwent reattachment of the SPR (group B). American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, Ankle Activity Score (AAS), time to return to sports activity, rate of return to sports level, range of motion (ROM) of the ankle, rate of recurrence, and overall patient satisfaction were collected to evaluate outcomes between the two groups.

RESULTS

In group A, 24 patients followed up at a mean period of 42.5 ± 16.7 months. The mean postoperative AOFAS score was 92.9 ± 3.9. The median time to return to sports activity was 6.0 months (IQR 4.3-6.0 months) with 19 patients (79.2%) returning to their previous sports level. Two patients experienced recurrent dislocation, and 22 patients (91.7%) were satisfied with the procedure. In group B, 20 patients followed up at a mean period of 35.8 ± 15.3 months. The mean postoperative AOFAS score was 95.0 ± 4.2. The median time to return to sports activity was 5.0 months (IQR 4.0-5.0 months) with 18 patients (90.0%) returning to their previous sports level. No recurrence was reported, and 18 patients (90.0%) were satisfied with the procedure. The time to return to sports activity in group B was significantly shorter than that in group A. There was no significant difference in complications or clinical outcomes between the two procedures.

CONCLUSION

Both procedures offered satisfactory results for recurrent peroneal tendon dislocation with low rates of recurrence and complications. However, the time to return to sports activity after the reattachment of the SPR was shorter than that after the bone block procedure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective Comparative Study, Level III.