Medial stabilized and posterior stabilized TKA affect patellofemoral kinematics and retropatellar pressure distribution differently

No Increased Risk of Patella-Related Revisions When Comparing Ultra-Congruent versus Cruciate-Retaining Polyethylene Liners in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasties With an Unresurfaced Patella: An Australian Registry Study of 42,105 Knee Arthroplasties

BACKGROUND

Ultra-congruent (UC) polyethylene liners are designed to add additional anterior-posterior stability in primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs), compensating for actual or potential posterior cruciate ligament incompetence, somewhat like a posterior-stabilized knee. The literature supports patella resurfacing in primary posterior-stabilized compared to cruciate-retaining (CR) TKA due to higher revision rates with nonresurfaced patella. However, it is unclear if UC liners alter patella-related revisions. The aim of the study was to compare patella revision rates and survivorship of UC versus CR liners in primary TKA without patella resurfacing using two common prostheses in patients who had osteoarthritis.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort analysis of data from the Australian Orthopedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Patients who underwent primary TKA utilizing one of two common knee systems with cemented tibial fixation for osteoarthritis and did not have their patella resurfaced between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2022, were included for analysis. A total of 42,105 primary TKA procedures were included (UC, n = 18,989 and CR, n = 23,116). The risk of patella-related revision and survivorship for primary TKA procedures with UC compared to CR liners were analyzed.

RESULTS

The cumulative revision at 14 years was 5.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.7 to 6.9) and 5.4% (95% CI 4.8 to 6.1) for the CR and UC group, respectively, with no difference between groups (entire period: HR [hazard ratio] = 1.07 (95% CI 0.95 to 1.20), P = 0.256). When revision TKA for patella-related diagnoses was analyzed, there was no difference between the CR and UC groups (entire period: HR = 1.10 (95% CI 0.88 to 1.38), P = 0.406). The prosthesis-specific analyses did not produce any differences between the groups for all-cause or patella-related revisions.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of UC compared to CR liners in primary TKA without patella resurfacing was not associated with an increased rate of all-cause or patella-related revisions. Surgeons should make clinical decisions on the need for patella resurfacing based on other patient, surgical, and implant factors.

The Vega advanced third generation posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty system enables the restoration of range of motion for high demanding daily activities - A 5-years follow-up study

BACKGROUND

The Vega System® PS (Aesculap AG, Tuttlingen, Germany) is an advanced, third generation fixed implant that aims to mimic natural knee kinematics by optimizing pivotal motion while reducing surface stress. This study evaluated mid-term survival and clinical outcomes, including range of motion (ROM) of the modern posterior stabilized implant in order to analyse whether this biomechanically successful implant reaches good results in situ.

METHODS

The first 100 patients to receive the Vega PS System for total knee arthroplasty were invited to take part in this single centre, single surgeon study. Of these, 84 patients were clinically assessed 5-6 years postoperatively. Data which was obtained during this follow-up examination included revision data, range of motion and clinical scores.

RESULTS

The 5-year survival rate for exchange of any component was 97.6%, whereby two patients required replacement of the polyethylene gliding surface. Secondary patella resurfacing was performed in 7 patients. Significantly improved results in comparison to the preoperative state could be obtained at the follow-up: KOOS improved from 39.4 to 78.8, SF-12 PCS improved from 32.1 to 42 SF-12 MCS improved from 46 to 53.8 and patella pain improved from 2.7 to 0.3. The mean ROM of the 84 patients after 5 years was 133.1° and mean total KSS was 189.9.

DISCUSSION & CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates a high survival rate of the Vega PS System® and significant improvements in clinical outcomes 5 years after implantation. The obtained mean ROM indicates that this implant provides good flexibility of the knee joint, allowing a high number of activities. However, due to the rate of secondary patella implantation, routine resurfacing of the patella for all PS TKA cases is highly recommended.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02802085).

An automatic measurement system of distal femur morphological parameters using 3D slicer software

In the field of joint surgery, the computer-aided design of knee prostheses suitable for the Chinese population requires a large quantity of anatomical knee data. In this study, we propose a new method that uses 3D Slicer software to automatically measure the morphological parameters of the distal femur. First, 141 femur samples were segmented from CT data to establish the femoral shape library. Next, balanced iterative reducing and clustering using hierarchies (BIRCH) combined with iterative closest point (ICP) and generalised procrustes analysis (GPA) were used to achieve fast registration of the femur samples. The statistical model was automatically calculated from the registered femur samples, and an orthopaedic surgeon marked the points on the statistical model. Finally, we developed an automatic measurement system using 3D Slicer software, and a deformable model matching method was applied to establish the point correspondence between the statistical model and the other samples. By matching points on the statistical model to corresponding points in other samples, we measured all other samples. We marked six points and measured eight parameters. We evaluated the performance of automatic matching by comparing the points marked manually with those matched automatically and verified the accuracy of the system by comparing the manual and automatic measurement results. The results indicated that the average error of the automatic matching points was 1.03 mm, and the average length error and average angle error measured automatically by the system were 0.37 mm and 0.63°, respectively. These errors were smaller than the intra-rater and inter-rater errors measured manually by two different surgeons, which showed that the accuracy of our automatic method was high. Taken together, this study established an accurate and automatic measurement system for the distal femur based on the secondary development of 3D Slicer software to assist orthopaedic surgeons in completing the measurements of big data and further promote the improved design of Chinese-specific knee prostheses.

Ultracongruent insert design is a safe alternative to posterior cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty: 5-year results of a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

If substitution of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty is necessary, there are two options available: posterior stabilized (PS) design with a post-cam mechanism or anterior-lipped ultracongruent (UC) inserts. UC inserts have the advantage that no femoral box is necessary and a standard femoral component can be used. The aim of this study was to compare the range of motion (ROM) and patient-reported outcome (PRO) after UC and PS fixed-bearing TKA. Better ROM in PS TKA and no difference in PRO between both designs was hypothesized.

METHODS

A randomized controlled trial with 127 patients receiving a fixed-bearing UC or PS design of the same knee system was performed. Nine patients died and there were four revision surgeries. 107 patients completed the 5-year follow-up. Patient-reported outcome was assessed. Patellofemoral problems were evaluated using selected applicable questions of the Oxford Knee Score (getting up from a table, kneeling, climbing stairs).

RESULTS

Surgical time was 10 min shorter in the UC group (p < 0.001). After 5 years, both groups demonstrated good knee function and health-related quality of life without significant differences between the groups. Both groups demonstrated a high satisfaction score and the majority of patients would undergo this surgery again. Patellofemoral problems were recognized more frequently in the PS group (p = 0.025).

CONCLUSION

Both designs demonstrated similar good results after 5 years. Stabilization with an anterior-lipped UC insert can be considered a safe alternative to the well-established PS design if cruciate substitution is necessary.

Influence of Patellar Morphology Classified by Wiberg Classification on Knee Joint Function and Patellofemoral Tracking After Total Knee Arthroplasty Without Patellar Resurfacing

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the influence of patellar morphology on knee joint function and patellofemoral tracking in patients with primary osteoarthritis after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) without patellar resurfacing.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of 156 patients with primary osteoarthritis who underwent TKA without patellar resurfacing from April 2018 to July 2019. As per Wiberg classification, patients were divided into Wiberg type I (group A, n = 38), II (group B, n = 88), and III (group C, n = 30) groups. The clinical data, postoperative follow-up data, and radiological data between three groups were compared.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in the HSS score and Feller score between the three groups before surgery and at each follow-up point after surgery (P > .05). At the last follow-up, there were no significant differences in the height and relative thickness of the patella between the three groups (P > .05). However, the incidence of anterior knee pain was significantly higher in group C than in the group B (P < .05). The patellar tilt angle was significantly larger in group C than in the groups A and B (both P < .05). The patellar facet angle was significantly larger in group A than in group B and C, which was also significantly larger in group B than in group C (both P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Patients with three different morphologic types of the patella both exhibited improved knee joint function after TKA, however, patients with Wiberg type Ⅲ patella were more prone to have poor patellofemoral tracking and anterior knee pain after surgery.

The patellofemoral morphology and the normal predicted value of tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance in the Chinese population

Background

Our objective was to obtain normal patellofemoral measurements to analyse sex and individual differences. In addition, the absolute values and indices of tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distances are still controversial in clinical application. A better method to enable precise prediction is still needed.

Methods

Seventy-eight knees of 78 participants without knee pathologies were included in this cross-sectional study. A CT scan was conducted for all participants and three-dimensional knee models were constructed using Mimics and SolidWorks software. We measured and analysed 19 parameters including the TT-TG distance and dimensions and shapes of the patella, femur, tibia, and trochlea. LASSO regression was used to predict the normal TT-TG distances.

Results

The dimensional parameters, TT-TG distance, and femoral aspect ratio of the men were significantly larger than those of women (all p values < 0.05). However, after controlling for the bias from age, height, and weight, there were no significant differences in TT-TG distances and anterior-posterior dimensions between the sexes (all p values > 0.05). The Pearson correlation coefficients between the anterior femoral offset and other indexes were consistently below 0.3, indicating no relationship or a weak relationship. Similar results were observed for the sulcus angle and the Wiberg index. Using LASSO regression, we obtained four parameters to predict the TT-TG distance (R² = 0.5612, p < 0.01) to achieve the optimal accuracy and convenience.

Conclusions

Normative data of patellofemoral morphology were provided for the Chinese population. The anterior-posterior dimensions of the women were thicker than those of men for the same medial-lateral dimensions. More attention should be paid to not only sex differences but also individual differences, especially the anterior condyle and trochlea. In addition, this study provided a new method to predict TT-TG distances accurately.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04454-8.

Secondary Patellar Resurfacing in TKA: A Combined Analysis of Registry Data and Biomechanical Testing

The German Arthroplasty registry (EPRD) has shown that different prosthesis systems have different rates of secondary patellar resurfacing: four years after implantation, the posterior-stabilized (PS) Vega prosthesis has a 3.2% risk of secondary patellar resurfacing compared to the cruciate-retaining (CR) Columbus prosthesis at 1.0% (both Aesculap AG, Tuttlingen, Germany). We hypothesized that PS implants have increased retropatellar pressure and a decreased retropatellar contact area compared to a CR design, which may lead to an increased likelihood of secondary patellar resurfacing. Eight fresh frozen specimens (cohort 1) were tested with an established knee rig. In addition, a possible influence of the registry-based patient collective (cohort 2) was investigated. No significant differences were found in patient data–cohort 2-(sex, age). A generally lower number of PS system cases is noteworthy. No significant increased patella pressure could be detected with the PS design, but a lower contact area was observed (cohort 1). Lower quadriceps force (100°–130° flexion), increased anterior movement of the tibia (rollback), greater external tilt of the patella, and increasing facet pressure in the Vega PS design indicate a multifactorial cause for a higher rate of secondary resurfacing which was found in the EPRD patient cohort and might be related to the PS’ principle function.

Comparative study on mid- and long-term clinical effects of medial pivot prosthesis and posterior-stabilized prosthesis after total knee arthroplasty

Objective

The purpose of this study was to explore the mid-and long-term clinical effects of Chinese patients with medial pivot (MP) prosthesis and posterior-stabilized (PS) prosthesis after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), to provide a reference for the recommendation of clinical prostheses.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 802 patients who received TKA was performed from June 2010 to December 2013. A total of 432 patients received a MP prosthesis (MP group) and 375 patients received a PS prosthesis (PS group). Postoperative range of motion (ROM), clinical scores including the knee scoring system (KSS), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC), the forgotten joint score (FJS), and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.

Results

A total of 527 patients were followed up, including 290 in the MP group and 237 in the PS group. Both groups achieved satisfactory results in terms of KSS score, WOMAC score, and postoperative ROM, which were significantly improved compared with those before surgery, but the difference between the groups was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The FJS scores of the MP group and the PS group were satisfactory and no significant difference was observed (P = 0.426). Postoperative complications occurred in 5 and 11 patients in the MP group and PS group, respectively.

Conclusion

The clinical results of TKA with MP or PS in Chinese patients at mid- and long-term are encouraging, and no significant differences were observed between the two types of prostheses. Studies have also shown that both prostheses are safe for Chinese patients.

Decreased Survival of Medial Pivot Designs Compared with Cruciate-retaining Designs in TKA Without Patellar Resurfacing

BACKGROUND

The medial pivot TKA design was introduced in the 1990s. These are fixed-bearing, medial-conforming implants with virtually no translation in the medial part of the knee, in contrast to the flat lateral part of the insert allowing for translation similar to the native knee during flexion and extension. Most primary TKAs performed in Norway and Australia are cruciate-retaining. All of the medial pivot implants in our study are cruciate-sacrificing but without a post-cam mechanism. The medial pivot implant design was developed to more closely mimic native knee motion, in the hope of improving function, and not primarily as a more constrained knee for difficult cases. In the past 10 to 12 years, a second-generation medial-pivot design has emerged, but there are no larger registry studies on the survival of these implants. Both cruciate-retaining and medial pivot designs are reported in the Australian and Norwegian registries, allowing for large-scale, comparative survivorship studies.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Is there any difference in survival between the medial pivot design and the three most commonly used cruciate-retaining TKA designs? (2) Is there any difference in survival among the different medial pivot implant designs? (3) What are the main indications for revision of medial pivot TKAs?

METHODS

Registry data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry and Norwegian Arthroplasty Register from 2005 until the end of 2017 were used to compare the five different brands of medial pivot TKA designs (total primary TKAs assessed: 6310). In Australia, the study group of medial pivot implants represented 9% (6012 of 72,477) of the total number of cemented/hybrid TKAs without patellar resurfacing; 345 had cementless femoral components. In Norway, the study group represented 1% (298 of 47,820) of the total number of TKAs with cemented tibias without patellar resurfacing; all had cemented femoral components. The control group consisted of the three most commonly used cruciate-retaining TKA designs (n = 70,870; Australia n = 54,554; Norway n = 16,316). All TKAs used a fixed-bearing, cemented tibial component and did not involve patella resurfacing. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was assessed to estimate survivorship. We compared the groups by calculating the hazard ratios (HR) using Cox regression adjusted for age, gender and preoperative diagnosis with 95% CI. To answer our third question, we calculated the percentage of each revision indication from the total number of revisions in each group, and used a Cox regression analysis to compare revision causes and HRs. Analyses were performed separately by each registry. Accounting for competing risks (Fine and Gray) did not alter our findings [].

RESULTS

After controlling for potential confounding variables such as gender, age and preoperative diagnosis, we found an increased revision risk for the medial pivot compared with cruciate-retaining TKA designs in Australia (HR 1.4 [95% CI 1.2 to 1.7]; p < 0.001), but not in Norway (HR 1.5 [95% CI 0.9 to 2.4]; p = 0.1). Two brands of the medial pivot design reported to the AOANJRR showed an increased risk of revision compared with cruciate-retaining designs: the Advance® II MP (HR 1.7 [95% CI 1.2 to 2.6]; p = 0.004) and the GMK® Sphere (HR 2.0 [95% CI 1.5 to 2.6]; p < 0.001), whereas the MRK (HR 0.7 [95% CI 0.4 to 1.5]; p = 0.4), the Evolution® MP (HR 1.4 [95% CI 1.0 to 1.9]; p = 0.06) and the SAIPH® (HR 0.9 [95% CI 0.5 to 1.5]; p = 0.7) showed no difference. The most common reasons for revision of medial pivot implants in Australia were infection (27%), pain alone (19%), patellar erosion (13%), loosening/lysis (12%); in Norway the primary indications were loosening/lysis (28%), instability (28%), malalignment (11%) and pain alone (11%).

CONCLUSIONS

The medial pivot TKA design as a group had a higher revision rate than cruciate-retaining fixed-bearing controls in TKA performed without patellar component resurfacing. By brand, the Advance II MP and the GMK Sphere had inferior survivorship, whereas the MRK, the SAIPH and the Evolution MP had no differences in survivorship compared with cruciate-retaining controls. In Australia, TKAs with the medial pivot design without patella resurfacing had a higher rate of revisions for instability, malalignment, and patella erosion. In Norway, there was an increased risk of revision for lysis and loosening compared with the cruciate-retaining design. Several of these implants had short follow-up in this study. Further registry studies with longer follow up are therefore necessary.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Impact of tibial baseplate malposition on kinematics, contact forces and ligament tensions in TKA: A numerical analysis

PURPOSE

Malposition of implant components in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has consequences on tibiofemoral kinematics, contact forces and ligament tensions. To evaluate the impact of tibial baseplate malpositioning in the same knee, we conducted a computer simulation.

METHODS

An established weight-bearing finite element model of a fixed bearing TKA was used for the computer simulation. To evaluate the influence of tibial baseplate malposition, calculations were consecutively performed in neutral position, at 3° and 6° of internal and external rotation and at 3 mm and 6 mm of medial and lateral translation.

RESULTS

The highest effect of malposition was observed for ligament tensions, with a tendency of a greater influence for the 6 mm translation compared to 6° of rotation. Changes in contact forces and tibiofemoral kinematics were according to the alterations of ligament tensions. The highest ligament tension, contact force and femoral roll-back were registered for 6 mm medialization of the tibial baseplate.

DISCUSSION

Tibial baseplate malposition effects ligament tensions, tibiofemoral contact forces and kinematics and has a risk of unfavorable clinical results due to postoperative pain, reduced range of motion, instability and a higher rate of early loosening. Therefore, surgeons should aim for a neutral position of the tibial baseplate.

Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty reproduces native patellofemoral biomechanics during deep knee flexion

PURPOSE

The implant positioning for kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA) differs fundamentally from conventional mechanically aligned TKA. This difference may affect patellofemoral (PF) biomechanics after TKA. This cadaveric study tested the hypothesis that kinematically aligned TKA would restore PF biomechanics to the native condition better than mechanically aligned TKA.

METHODS

Seven pairs (14 knees) of fresh-frozen cadavers were tested. All specimens were mounted on a customized knee-testing system and digitized using a Microscribe 3DLX instrument (Revware Inc., Raleigh, NC, USA) to measure patellar kinematics in terms of patellar varus/valgus rotation, medial/lateral position, flexion/extension rotation and proximal/distal position at knee flexion angles of 0°, 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120°. The medial and lateral PF joint contact pressure distributions at 120° of knee flexion were measured using a K-scan system (Tekscan Inc., Boston, MA, USA). All patellae remained unresurfaced. For each pair, one knee was randomly assigned to kinematically aligned TKA and the other to mechanically aligned TKA performed using the conventional measured resection technique. During kinematically aligned TKA, the amount of femur and tibia resected was equivalent to implant thickness to maintain the patient-specific joint line. All patellar kinematics were measured and compared between the native condition and after surgery.

RESULTS

The patellae of mechanically aligned TKA rotated more valgus and was positioned more laterally compared with those of kinematically aligned TKA at knee flexion angles ≥ 90°. Neither the patellar flexion/extension rotation nor the proximal/distal position differed between either prosthetic knee design and the native knee at all flexion angles. The contact pressure distribution between the medial and lateral PF joint after kinematically aligned TKA were similar to those of the native knee, while the lateral PF joint contact pressure after mechanically aligned TKA was higher than that of the native knee (p = 0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

Kinematically aligned TKA better restores patellar kinematics and PF contact pressure distribution to the native condition than mechanically aligned TKA during deep knee flexion. These findings provide clues to understand why kinematically aligned TKA is associated with less anterior knee pain and better PF functional performance compared to mechanically aligned TKA. Patients undergoing kinematically aligned TKA may experience a more normal feeling during deep knee flexion activities.