Full recovery of hip muscle strength is not achieved at return to sports in patients with femoroacetabular impingement surgery

Muscle contribution to hip contact force during walking is lower in individuals with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome, compared with controls

Altered hip loading and biomechanics in individuals with femoracetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) may affect the joint's habitual mechanical environment, potentially increasing the risk of osteoarthritis . Examining differences in contributions of muscle and external loads (i.e., gravitational and intersegmental-inertial forces) to hip contact forces, compared with controls, may aid our understanding of FAIS pathomechanics and assist with the development of more effective treatments. Whole-body motion and electromyograms of 14 lower limb muscles were acquired from 41 participants with FAIS and 24 healthy controls whilst walking overground at self-selected speed. Contributions made by muscle and external (gravitational and intersegmental-inertial) forces to hip contact force during the stance phase of walking were estimated using an electromyogram-assisted neuromusculoskeletal model and compared between-groups using statistical parametric mapping. Throughout stance, muscle contributed ∼80% of hip contact force for both participants with FAIS and controls. Compared with controls, participants with FAIS generated ∼20% lower total muscle force (mean difference: -0.75 N·BW-1, 95% CI -1.13 to - 0.35, p < 0.001) primarily due to lower adductor (-0.27 N·BW-1, 95% CI -0.48 to - 0.06, p = 0.001), extensor (-0.40 N·BW-1, 95% CI - 0.65 to -0.16, p < 0.001) and flexor (-0.71 N·BW-1, 95% CI -1.07 to -0.35, p < 0.001) muscle group forces at different stages of stance. Compared with controls, lower hip contact force in participants with FAIS during the stance phase of walking were the result of lower flexor, extensor and adductor muscle forces and could be targeted in non-operative interventions (e.g., physiotherapy).

Return-to-sports criteria used by professional team physicians in elite athletes after hip arthroscopy - a qualitative study

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to explore currently utilized readiness to Return to Sport (RTS) criteria after Hip Arthroscopy (HA) used in elite athletes to gain novel insights into the RTS decision-making process of professional team physicians. The authors hypothesized that even among this group of highly specialized physicians, there exists variability of measures and criteria used to determine RTS after HA.

METHODS

A total of 15 qualitative semi-structured interviews with professional team physicians were conducted by a single trained interviewer. The interviews were used to identify team physician concepts and themes regarding the criteria used to determine RTS after HA. Themes and sub-themes were identified using a general inductive analysis and a coding process. A hierarchical approach in coding helped to link themes.

RESULTS

Four key themes and several subordinate themes were identified from the interviews that seem to influence the return to sports decision. The most important RTS criteria were muscle strength (especially symmetric hip strength and muscle bulk with low side-to-side variance compared to the contralateral side) followed by pain-free sport-specific activity (pain-free drill skills and play at a lower level), physical examination (with major emphasis on the absence of hip pain with a painless hip range of motion compared to the contralateral side), and functional testing (including full squats, Ober test, FABER test, and pain-free FADIR position).

CONCLUSION

Besides objective findings, including muscle strength, we identified time after surgery as well as subjective findings, including absence of pain and feedback of clinical team members that influence RTS decision after HA. We showed that even among specialized professional team physicians, the main criteria to RTS in these categories were not consistent necessitating the further development of specific RTS guidelines.

Strength, mobility, and functional outcomes 2.5 months after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: A Cross-sectional Study

OBJECTIVE

Short-term deficits after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) remain poorly understood. We assessed muscle strength, hip range of motion, and functional task performance 2.5 months after surgery and analyzed their association with self-reported function.

DESIGN

Cross sectional study.

PARTICIPANTS

52 patients.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Maximal isometric strength (hip flexion with both straight and flexed hip/knee, abduction and external rotation), hip range of motion (flexion, external and internal rotation), and functional tasks (bipodal/unipodal squat, bilateral vertical jump, single-leg distance hop). Between-limb differences were analyzed using paired t-tests, and the Limb Symmetry Index (LSI) was calculated.

RESULTS

The operated hip showed lower hip flexion strength (LSI = 88.4%; ES = -0.549; p < 0.001) and reduced range of motion (LSI = 75.4-92.4%; ES = -0.479 to -1.02; all p < 0.01) compared to the non-operated hip. Functional task performance did not differ between operated and non-operated hips (all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Patients showed alterations in hip flexion strength and range of motion post-surgery, but functional task performance was unaffected. Targeted assessment and intervention may be needed to improve outcomes after surgery for FAIS.

Six-month rehabilitation following surgical hip dislocation for femoroacetabular impingement restores the preoperative strength of most hip muscles, except for external rotators

The aim of this study was to evaluate the bilateral changes in hip muscle strength after a 6-month rehabilitation period for patients undergoing surgical hip dislocation (SHD) to treat femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). We conducted a retrospective analysis on a cohort of 22 patients (mean ± SD age: 26 ± 7, 68% male) who underwent SHD for FAIS between March 2020 and January 2023 at La Tour Hospital. Bilateral isometric strength of eight hip muscle groups (abductors, adductors, hamstrings, quadriceps, extensors, flexors, internal, and external rotators) was assessed using a handheld dynamometer before surgery, and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. After 6 months of rehabilitation, only the external rotators were weaker compared to preoperative levels (-13% ± 23%, P = .021). Strength levels were similar to preoperative levelsfor adductors (-2% ± 21%, P = .309), internal rotators (0% ± 25%, P = .444), quadriceps (0%± 23%, P = .501), hamstrings (7%± 20%, P = .232), extensors (7%± 19%, P = .336), flexors (8%± 34%, P = .781), and abductors (8% ± 25%, P = .266). At 6 months, 59% (abductors) to 82% (adductors) of patients did not achieve a clinically relevant strength improvement (>15%) compared to their preoperative status for aforementioned muscles. Additionally, 50% of the cohort experienced a clinically relevant loss of strength in the external rotators at 6 months post-surgery. To conclude, after SHD, most FAIS patients regained their preoperative strength for all muscle groups except the external rotators with a 6-month rehabilitation program. However, the effectiveness of the rehabilitation protocol varies on an individual level.

Outcomes and complications of hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: A narrative review

Hip arthroscopy has emerged as the primary surgical intervention for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome (FAIS), a common cause of hip pain in young adults, particularly athletes. This narrative review examines the long-term outcomes, complications, and debates surrounding arthroscopic management of FAIS. Key findings include sustained improvements in patient-reported outcomes, return to sport, and functional recovery, particularly in younger patients and those with cam-type FAIS. However, some patients may eventually require total hip arthroplasty (THA), highlighting the variability in long-term durability. Complications, though infrequent, remain a significant concern, with the most common being transient neuropathy due to prolonged traction, heterotopic ossification, and iatrogenic cartilage damage. Recent studies emphasize the importance of patient selection, with younger patients, those with capsular closure, and those without pre-existing osteoarthritis showing superior outcomes. Additionally, sex-based differences suggest females may experience higher complication rates, though they often report better functional improvements post-surgery. Areas of ongoing debate include the role of labral debridement versus repair, the optimal management of mixed-type FAIS, and the potential benefits of adjunctive procedures such as ligamentum teres debridement. Future research should focus on refining surgical techniques and identifying patient-specific factors to further optimize outcomes. Despite its complexities, hip arthroscopy remains an effective treatment for FAIS, though individualized treatment plans are crucial to addressing the unique needs of each patient. By synthesizing current evidence, this review aims to guide clinicians in optimizing FAIS management and identifying areas for future research.

Hip Arthroscopy Followed by 6-Month Rehabilitation Leads to Improved Periarticular Muscle Strength, Except for Abductors and External Rotators

Purpose

To evaluate the variations in hip muscles strength following arthroscopy and 6-month rehabilitation in patients treated for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI).

Methods

A retrospective analysis was carried out on a series of patients who were arthroscopically treated for FAI at La Tour Hospital between 2020 and 2022. Bilateral isometric strengths of 8 hip-related muscles (abductors, adductors, hamstrings, quadriceps, extensors, flexors, internal and external rotators) were assessed using a handheld dynamometer before surgery and postoperatively after 6 months of rehabilitation in terms of relative strength changes between time points.

Results

A total of 29 patients (aged 26.9 ± 7.1 years, 86% of women) were included. Except for the abductors, which remained of comparable strength than before surgery, a statistically significant (P < .05) increase in hip muscle strength on the operated side could be noted at 6 postoperative months for hamstrings (9% ± 17%, P = .041), quadriceps (11% ± 27%, P = .045), extensors (17% ± 32%, P = .006), flexors (17% ± 29%, P = .003), adductors (18% ± 23%, P < .001), and internal rotators (32% ± 36%, P < .001). The proportion of patients who reached a strength level above their preoperative status ranged from 62% (quadriceps) to 86% (adductors and flexors), depending on the muscle studied. The external rotators were the only muscles that remained significantly weakened at 6 months on both operated (-13% ± 26%, P = .002) and nonoperated (-17% ± 25%, P < .001) sides, with a decrease beyond 15% in almost half of the patients (45% and 48%, respectively).

Conclusions

Arthroscopic treatment followed by 6-month rehabilitation granted to most FAI patients a higher strength level for several hip muscles, except for abductors and external rotators, which remained comparable and weakened, respectively.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Majority of competitive soccer players return to soccer following hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement: female and older aged players are less likely to return to soccer

PURPOSE

To determine return to soccer rates and soccer performance in a large cohort of competitive soccer players after hip arthroscopic surgery for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and to identify possible risk factors associated with not returning to soccer.

METHODS

An institutional hip preservation registry was retrospectively reviewed for patients identified as competitive soccer players who underwent primary hip arthroscopy for FAI performed between 2010 and 2017. Patient demographics and injury characteristics as well as clinical and radiographic findings were recorded. All patients were contacted for return to soccer information using a soccer-specific return to play questionnaire. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify potential risk factors for not returning to soccer.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven competitive soccer players (119 hips) were included. 32 players (37%) underwent simultaneous or staged bilateral hip arthroscopy. The mean age at surgery was 21.6 ± 7.0 years. Overall, 65 players (74.7%) returned to soccer, of which 43 players (49% of all included players) returned to pre-injury level of play or better. Most common reasons for not returning to soccer were pain or discomfort (50%) followed by fear of re-injury (31.8%). The mean time to return to soccer was 33.1 ± 26.3 weeks. Among 22 players who did not return to soccer, 14 (63.6%) reported satisfaction from surgery. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed female players (odds ratio [OR] = 0.27; confidence interval [CI] = 0.083 to 0.872; p = 0.029) and older aged players (OR = 0.895; 95% CI = 0.832 to 0.963; p = 0.003) were less likely to return to soccer. Bilateral surgery was not found to be a risk factor.

CONCLUSION

Hip arthroscopic treatment for FAI in symptomatic competitive soccer players allowed three-quarters of them to return to soccer. Despite not returning to soccer, two-thirds of players who did not return to soccer were satisfied with their outcome. Female and older aged players were less likely to return to soccer. These data can better guide clinicians and soccer players with realistic expectations related to the arthroscopic management of symptomatic FAI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Hip muscle strength in male and female patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: Comparison to healthy controls and athletes

OBJECTIVES

To examine hip muscle strength deficits in patients with femoroacetabular impingent syndrome (FAIS), with special emphasis on potential sex- and comparison-related (between-subject vs within-subject) differences.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional comparative study.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty FAIS patients (20 women), 40 healthy controls (20 women) and 40 athletes (20 women).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Hip abduction, adduction and flexion isometric strength was tested using a commercially-available dynamometer. Two between-subject comparisons (FAIS patients vs controls and FAIS patients vs athletes) and one within-subject comparison (inter-limb asymmetry) of strength deficits were conducted, based on the calculation of respective percent differences.

RESULTS

For all hip muscle groups, women were 14-18% weaker than men (p < 0.001), but no sex-related interactions were observed. For all hip muscle groups, FAIS patients were 16-19% weaker than controls (p = 0.001) and 24-30% weaker than athletes (p < 0.001). For FAIS patients, the involved hip abductors were 8.5% weaker than the uninvolved ones (p = 0.015), while no inter-limb asymmetry was observed for the other hip muscles.

CONCLUSION

Sex had no influence on hip muscle strength deficits in FAIS patients while a major impact of comparison method/group was observed. Hip abductors showed consistent deficits for all comparison methods, suggestive of a possible greater impairment compared to hip flexors and adductors.

Evolution of Hip Muscles Strength in Femoroacetabular Impingement Patients Treated by Arthroscopy or Surgical Hip Dislocation: A Retrospective Exploratory Study

Hip arthroscopy and surgical hip dislocation (SHD) can be adequate surgical options for patients suffering from femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome, but there is to date no published data on their impact on hip muscles strength. The purpose of this retrospective study was, therefore, to evaluate it on a consecutive series of 50 FAI patients treated either by arthroscopy (n = 29, aged 27.4 ± 7.5 years, 76% of women) or SHD (n = 21, aged 25.9 ± 6.5 years, 38% of women) at La Tour Hospital between 2020 and 2021. The bilateral isometric strengths of eight hip-related muscles were evaluated before and three months after surgery (halfway through the rehabilitation program). For arthroscopy, a statistically significant (p < 0.05) reduction in hip muscles strength could be noted on the operated hamstrings (1.49 ± 0.43 vs. 1.39 ± 0.38 Nm/kg), flexors (1.88 ± 0.46 vs. 1.73 ± 0.41 Nm/kg), abductors (1.97 ± 0.42 vs. 1.72 ± 0.40 Nm/kg) and external rotators (1.17 ± 0.40 vs. 1.04 ± 0.37 Nm/kg). The abductors were the most affected muscles, with 45% of the patients suffering from a strength reduction ≥15%. The non-operated external rotators were also affected but to a lesser extent (1.21 ± 0.38 vs. 1.10 ± 0.36 Nm/kg). For SHD, a statistically significant strength reduction could be noted on the operated extensors (2.28 ± 0.84 vs. 2.05 ± 0.70 Nm/kg), abductors (1.87 ± 0.49 vs. 1.65 ± 0.41 Nm/kg), quadriceps (2.96 ± 0.92 vs. 2.44 ± 0.89 Nm/kg), external rotators (1.16 ± 0.42 vs. 0.93 ± 0.36 Nm/kg) and internal rotators (1.26 ± 0.38 vs. 0.96 ± 0.30 Nm/kg). The internal rotators were the most affected muscles, with 75% of the patients suffering from a strength reduction ≥15%. To conclude, particular attention should be paid to operated abductors for patients treated by arthroscopy as well as operated internal/external rotators, abductors and quadriceps for those treated by surgical hip dislocation. It reinforces that a rehabilitation method based on isolated muscle reinforcement and functional exercises that goes beyond three postoperative months is needed.

Do femoral version abnormalities play a role in hip function of patients with hip pain?

BACKGROUND

A high prevalence of femoral version abnormalities has been observed in hip pain patients, with impact on hip range of motion and muscle strength that should be elucidated.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study. Thirty-one patients with hip pain (16 men and 15 female) were subjected to Biplanar X-Rays to quantify femoral version using three-dimensional measurements. The 62 hips were divided into normal version (10-20°, n = 18), anteverted (>20°, n = 19), and retroverted (<10°, n = 25). Joint range of motion for flexion, internal rotation, and external rotation was assessed through digital goniometry. Maximal isometric hip strength (flexion, extension, internal rotation, external rotation at 0° and 30°, abduction, adduction) was evaluated through hand-held dynamometry. Hip rotation index was calculated as external rotation minus internal rotation.

FINDINGS

Anteverted hips had greater internal rotation, while retroverted hips had greater external rotation (p = 0.001). Anteverted hips were weaker than retroverted hips for external rotation at 30° (p < 0.001), abduction (p = 0.006) and adduction (p < 0.001), and weaker than normal version hips for extension (p = 0.018). All three groups had different rotation index: retroverted>normal>anteverted (p < 0.001). The ordinal logistic regression found higher values of rotation index with higher probability of being retroverted (common odds ratio = 1.20). There was a strong correlation between femoral version group and rotation index (r_S = 0.76, p < 0.001). There was probability >70% of a hip being anteverted if the rotation index was <11°, and being retroverted if the index was >40°.

INTERPRETATION

Range of motion and muscle strength differed in hips with different femoral versions. The hip rotation index was a strong femoral version predictor.

Rehabilitation and Return to Sport After Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Review of the Recent Literature and Discussion of Advanced Rehabilitation Techniques for Athletes

The purpose of the article is to present an updated literature review, as well as describe our approach to rehabilitation and return to sports following hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) with labral repair. A literature review was performed to identify articles published within the last 10 years that were focused on this topic. Relevant articles were reviewed, and reference lists were searched to identify additional articles. Findings were summarized for rehabilitation phases and return-to-sports assessment. Additionally, advanced rehabilitation topics are reviewed. Several systematic reviews and individual case series were identified. There is relative uniformity concerning the use of a four-phase approach for rehabilitation. However, there is inconsistency in terms of timing and criteria for ultimate return to sport. Advanced rehabilitation topics were reviewed, and description of their relevance at various rehabilitation phases was provided. A four-phase approach to rehabilitation following hip arthroscopy for FAI is widely used with general uniformity, although the timing and level of detail concerning assessment and readiness for return to sport are variable. Advanced rehabilitation techniques may be used in select patients returning to high-level activities.

The Team Physician: Return to Play Considerations and Outcomes

Successful rehabilitation of sports-related orthopedic injuries remains a challenge for both orthopedic surgeons and their patients. Team physicians are tasked with the complex problem of minimizing time away from competition, while simultaneously mitigating the risk of reinjury. Varying levels of expectation and demand between recreational and competitive athletes coupled with the already complex nature of sports-related injuries present a multifactorial challenge for the even the most experienced physicians. In the realm of sports medicine, timing of return to sport has become a controversial yet ubiquitous criterion by which treatment outcomes are measured. While accelerated rehabilitation may be desired in many cases, surgeons must also recognize the identifiable risk factors for potential reinjury. With these principles in mind, we present a summary of the available literature on data pertaining to return to sport, with coverage of injuries commonly seen within an orthopedic sports medicine practice.

Hip Strength Before and After Arthroscopic Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and labral pathology are associated with pain, decreased function, and hip strength deficits. Existing data are in conflict regarding when hip strength normalizes following arthroscopic treatment of FAI. The objective of this study was to identify preoperative hip strength relative to the contralateral hip not undergoing surgery as well as when postoperative strength in 4 functional muscle groups normalizes following arthroscopic treatment of FAI. Ninety-eight individuals with radiographic evidence of FAI and labral pathology underwent arthroscopic labral repair. Pre-surgical hip strength testing was performed in the symptomatic "surgical hip" and the contralateral "non-surgical hip." Hip strength measurements were repeated at 8 and 16 weeks postoperatively. Significant preoperative hip strength deficits were noted in the surgical hip compared with the non-surgical hip in flexion, extension, and adduction. At 8 weeks postoperatively, hip strength in the surgical hip improved to being equivalent to that in the non-surgical hip in adduction and extension, remained equivalent to that of the non-surgical hip in abduction, and decreased in flexion relative to the non-surgical hip. At 16 weeks, hip strength remained equivalent in the surgical hip and the non-surgical hip in abduction and adduction, but the surgical hip exceeded the non-surgical hip in extension. While flexion strength improved between 8 and 16 weeks postoperatively for the surgical hip, it had not fully recovered to that of the non-surgical hip. Using a structured postoperative rehabilitation protocol, abduction strength was maintained at 8 weeks postoperatively, while adduction and extension strength had improved to those of the non-surgical hip. At 16 weeks postoperatively, hip abduction and adduction had strength equivalent to those of the non-surgical hip. Despite preoperative improvement, flexion of the surgical hip lagged behind that of the non-surgical hip 16 weeks postoperatively. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(3):148-153.].

Arthroscopy versus nonoperative treatment of symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Presently, hip arthroscopy is a widely adopted surgical intervention for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). However, there is insufficient evidence regarding which between arthroscopy and nonoperative treatment is more optimal for symptomatic FAI.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies that compared arthroscopy and nonoperative interventions for FAI treatment from inception to August 4, 2020. We included studies that directly compared surgical and nonsurgical treatment for symptomatic FAI and excluded those that did not use arthroscopic treatment as a surgical technique and studies performed on patients with concomitant diagnoses instead of pure FAI. We compared the following clinical outcome scores at 6 and 12 months of follow-up: International Hip Outcome Tool 33 (iHOT-33), hip outcome score (HOS), EuroQol-visual analog scale (EQ-VAS), modified Harris hip score (mHHS), and nonarthritic hip score (NAHS).

RESULTS

Five studies totaling 838 patients were included in the qualitative and quantitative synthesis; 382 patients underwent hip arthroscopy, and 456 patients were treated by nonoperative interventions. At 6 months of follow-up, there were no statistically significant differences in iHOT-33 ratings (mean difference [MD] = 7.92, P = .15), HOS (MD of HOS-ADL = 5.15, P = .26 and MD of HOS-Sports = 2.65, P = .79, respectively), and EQ-VAS (MD = 1.22, P = .76) between the 2 treatment strategies. At 12 months of follow-up, the arthroscopy group had a greater mean improvement in iHOT-33 score than the conservative treatment group (MD = 8.42, P = .002), but there was no difference between the groups in terms of mHHS rating (MD = -0.24, P = .83) and NAHS (MD = -2.08, P = .09).

CONCLUSION

Despite arthroscopy being associated with significantly superior iHOT-33 scores after 12 months of follow-up, we were unable to discern the difference between the treatment strategies using other scoring methods, such as HOS, EQ-VAS, mHHS, and NAHS. Further studies will be needed to conclusively determine if 1 strategy is superior to the other for treating FAI.

Return to Sport After Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery and Sport-Specific Considerations: a Comprehensive Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recent advancements in surgical technology and techniques have improved functional results for operative treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). Few studies have comprehensively evaluated the literature regarding return to sport criteria, timing, level, and rates. The purpose of this study was to review recent studies regarding return to play after surgical correction of FAIS. We will specifically evaluate the level of return to play and look to compare pre- and postoperative competition levels when available. We will also analyze timing of return to play from injury to surgery. Additionally, we will elucidate any sport-specific criteria that may determine readiness for return.

RECENT FINDINGS

Athletes with FAIS treated non-operatively have a low rate of return to sport and are often functionally limited in their level of performance. Surgical management of FAIS includes hip arthroscopy as well as open techniques. Current literature suggests a high rate of return to sport after contemporary surgery for FAIS at 87-93% overall. Rate of return to the same level of competition following surgery for FAIS is 55-83% in pooled studies. Limited evidence is available comparing postoperative rehabilitation protocols and timing of return among different sports. Operative treatment of FAIS results in high rates of return to sport and functional performance. The results of this study may help educate patients preoperatively in regard to the likelihood of functional return to sport and sport-specific considerations. Further research evaluating rehabilitation protocols and return criteria may better elucidate timing intervals for patients to maximize function while limiting complications.