Patient-specific prediction of joint line convergence angle after high tibial osteotomy using a whole-leg radiograph standing on lateral-wedge insole

Postoperative patient-reported outcome measures after medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy was improved by decreased joint line convergence angle

PURPOSE

To evaluate the relationship between pre- and postoperative joint line convergence angle (JLCA) changes and patient-reported outcome measures related to medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO).

METHODS

Sixty-one patients (71 knees) who underwent MOWHTO were examined. Preoperative and 2-year postoperative radiographic parameters (hip-knee-ankle angle, weight-bearing line ratio, medial proximal tibial angle and JLCA) were measured, and knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome scores (KOOS) were assessed. Patients were divided into two groups: group D (decreased JLCA compared with preoperative status) included 44 knees with a ΔJLCA < 0° and group I (increased JLCA and no-change JLCA compared with preoperative status) included 27 knees with a ΔJLCA ≥ 0°. KOOS sub-scores and the proportion of patients whose improvement exceeded the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) were compared between both groups using Student's t tests, Mann-Whitney U tests and chi-square tests. Multiple regression analysis was performed to determine the factor that had an influential effect on the postoperative KOOS total.

RESULTS

Significant differences in 2-year postoperative KOOS were observed between the two groups, including total, symptom, pain and activities of daily living scores. Group D had significantly more patients who achieved MCID for both KOOS symptoms and pain scores than group I did. Multivariate analysis indicated that JLCA change and body mass index were significantly associated with the postoperative KOOS total.

CONCLUSION

Patients with decreased JLCA had better 2-year post-MOWHTO KOOS and better symptom and pain improvements. Therefore, strategies that reduce JLCA are crucial to improving clinical outcomes, and efforts should be made to improve JLCA in surgical techniques.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level Ⅳ, Case series.

Intraoperative femurofibular angle combined with tibiofibular angle measurement has fewer correction errors in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy

AIM

This study aimed to verify the accuracy of intraoperative femurofibular angle combined with tibiofibular angle (FFA-TFA) measurement and compare it with traditional alignment line methods in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO).

METHODS

A total of 174 knees of 122 patients undergoing OWHTO and using an alignment line or FFA-TFA measurement as an index of optimal correction were included in this retrospective study. The intraoperative alignment line passed through the targeted weight-bearing line (WBL) of the tibial plateau in the alignment line group. The intraoperative FFA-TFA aligned to the preplanned FFA-TFA angle in the FFA-TFA group. WBL, FFA, TFA, and knee joint-line convergence angle of the femur and tibia were assessed as radiological results preoperatively and one year after surgery. The Knee Society Score and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities were assessed as objective clinical results.

RESULTS

Postoperative WBL in the FFA-TFA group was closer to the target WBL than in the alignment line group (FFA-TFA vs alignment line group: 1.43 ± 1.20% vs 3.82 ± 3.29%; P < 0.001). The FFA-TFA group had fewer over-correction and under-correction rates than the alignment line group (28.7% and 12.6% vs 11.5% and 3.40%; P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in the clinical results between the two groups one year after surgery (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The intraoperative measurement of FFA-TFA had fewer complications in terms of under-correction and over-correction compared with the alignment line measurement. No significant differences between the two methods were observed in clinical results one year after surgery.

Preoperative joint line obliquity, a newly identified factor for overcorrection, can be incorporated into a novel preoperative planning method to optimise alignment in high tibial osteotomy

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to analyse the factors associated with additional postoperative alignment changes after accurate bony correction by selecting only patients with well-performed bony correction as planned and develop a method of incorporating significant factors into preoperative planning.

METHODS

Among 104 consecutive patients who underwent medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) between October 2019 and July 2022, 61 with well-performed bony corrections were retrospectively reviewed. The major criterion for well-performed bony correction was a difference of <1° between the simulated medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and the actual postoperative MPTA as measured in three dimensions. Radiographic parameters, such as the joint line convergence angle (JLCA) and joint line obliquity (JLO), were measured preoperatively and postoperatively, utilising standing and supine whole lower extremity anteroposterior, valgus and varus stress radiographs. Multiple linear regression analysis identified the factors affecting alignment changes, and a prediction model was developed. A method for applying this prediction model to preoperative planning was proposed.

RESULTS

Preoperative JLCA on standing (preJLCAstd ), preoperative JLCA on 0° valgus stress radiograph (vgJLCA0 ), and preoperative JLO (preJLO) were significantly correlated with JLCA change (∆JLCA) (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.006). The prediction model was estimated as ∆JLCA = 0.493 × (vgJLCA0 ) - 0.727 × (preJLCAstd ) + 0.189 × (preJLO) - 1.587 in. (R = 0.815, modified R2  = 0.646, p < 0.001). The proposed method resulted in a reduced overcorrection rate (p = 0.003) and an improved proportion of acceptable alignments (p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

PreJLCAstd , vgJLCA0  and preJLO can be used to estimate ∆JLCA. PreJLO was recently identified as a significant factor associated with additional alignment changes. Utilising the proposed preoperative planning and a prediction model with these factors shows promise in calibrating postoperative alignment after MOWHTO.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Potential anatomic risk factors resulting oversized postoperative medial proximal tibial angle after double level osteotomy

BACKGROUND

Double level osteotomy (DLO) has been introduced to prevent increased postoperative joint line obliquity. However, although DLO is planned, knees with postoperative medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) > 95° in preoperative surgical planning are present. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate risk factors for an MPTA > 95° in preoperative surgical planning for DLO in patients with varus knee osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

A total of 168 knees that underwent osteotomies around the knee for varus knee OA were enrolled. The hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), weight-bearing line (WBL) ratio, mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), joint line convergence angle (JLCA) and mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA) were measured on preoperative radiographs. The postoperative WBL ratio was planned to be 62.5%. When the postoperative mMPTA was more than 95° in isolated high tibial osteotomy (HTO), (DLO) was planned so that the postoperative mLDFA was 85°, and residual deformity was corrected by HTO. Knees with postoperative mMPTA ≤ 95° and > 95° were classified into the correctable group and uncorrectable group, respectively.

RESULTS

DLO was required in 101 knees (60.1%). Among them, 41 knees (40.6%) were classified into the uncorrectable group. Binomial logistic regression analysis showed that preoperative JLCA and mMPTA were independent predictors in the uncorrectable group.

CONCLUSIONS

Even with DLO, postoperative mMPTA was more than 95° in approximately 40% of cases. Preoperative increased JLCA and decreased mMPTA were risk factors for a postoperative mMPTA of > 95° after DLO.

Pre-surgery HKA angle and WBL percentage are nearly perfectly correlated to the Miniaci angle when planning open wedge high tibial osteotomies

PURPOSE

To investigate the conversion formulas between the Miniaci angle, pre-surgery parameters, and changes in pre-surgery parameters in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO), including hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, weight-bearing line (WBL) percentage, mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA), ΔHKA angle, ΔWBL percentage, ΔmMPTA, and other parameters.

METHODS

From January 2012 to December 2019, 247 lower limbs of 144 patients with medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis combined with proximal tibia vara were enrolled. Inclusion criteria were adults, medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis, Kellgren-Lawrence classification grade ≤ Ⅲ, mMPTA ≤85° and mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) is normal (85°-90°), and patella facing anterior in the bipedal standing position. Exclusion criteria were history of fracture, trauma, or orthopaedic surgery; developmental dysplasia of the hip or femoral head necrosis; femoral bowing deformity; deformity of the tibial shaft; and leg length discrepancy. Using standing whole-leg radiographs (WLRs), an OWHTO simulation was performed to determine the Miniaci angle by delivering the WBL to the Fujisawa point. The relationship of the Miniaci angle, the pre-surgery parameters, and the changes in pre-surgery parameters were analysed by spearman's correlation and linear regression analyses. The relationship between the post-surgery HKA angle and pre-surgery parameters was analysed by multiple linear regression model.

RESULTS

The Miniaci angle showed a near perfect correlation with the pre-surgery HKA angle (y=-1.05x+192.10, r²=0.99), pre-surgery WBL percentage (y=-0.25x+15.14, r²=0.97), ΔHKA angle (y=1.04x-0.03, r²=1.00), ΔWBL percentage (y=0.25x-0.52, r²=0.97), and ΔmMPTA (y=1.04x-0.03, r²=1.00). The ΔHKA angle showed nearly perfect correlation with the ΔmMPTA (y=1.00x, r²=1.00), and ΔWBL percentage (y=0.24x-0.47, r²=0.97).

CONCLUSIONS

The pre-surgery HKA angle, pre-surgery WBL percentage, ΔHKA angle, ΔWBL, and ΔmMPTA percentage are nearly perfectly correlated to the Miniaci angle, while the ΔmMPTA and ΔWBL percentage are nearly perfectly correlated to the ΔHKA angle.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

With the conversion formulas determined in the current study, surgeons can calculate the Miniaci angle based on the pre-surgery parameters without the assistance of digital software for complex surgical simulation. The Miniaci angle is closely related to the gap of the medial opening wedge. Based on the Miniaci angle and the depth of the osteotomy, surgeons can calculate the gap required prior to surgery using trigonometric functions and then simply measure the gap during surgery.

Angular accuracy of plain radiographic measurements in leg alignment: Teleoroentgenogram versus orthoroentgenogram

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy of the measurements associated with leg alignment on a teleoroentgenogram and an orthoroentgenogram.

METHODS

The models being irradiated were manufactured and represented 10° varus and 15° varus leg alignment, in which the true values of hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA), mechanical axis (MA) length, and percentage of MA (%MA) were already known. HKAA, MA length, and %MA were measured in various radiographic conditions of the teleoroentgenogram and orthoroentgenogram. Then, the differences between the radiographic measurement values and the corresponding true values were analyzed.

RESULTS

Regarding HKAA, the teleoroentgenogram provided accurate angular measurements with minimal differences between the measurement and true value in both the 10° and 15° varus models, irrespective of the radiographic condition. In the orthoroentgenogram, the modified method measured accurate HKAA; however, the standard method showed significant angular measurement errors with a 0.6° and 1.0° difference from the true value in the 10° and 15° varus models, respectively. This angular measurement error of HKAA in the standard orthoroentgenogram became significantly larger with object-to-image distance. Regarding MA length, the orthoroentgenogram exhibited accurate length measurements. In contrast, the teleoroentgenogram showed a significant length measurement error for the MA length. Regarding %MA, significant differences from the true values of 2.0% and 2.4% were observed in the modified orthoroentgenograms of the 10° and 15° varus models, respectively. The teleoroentgenogram and standard orthoroentgenogram reproduced the accurate measurement value of %MA in the 10° and 15° varus models.

CONCLUSION

A teleoroentgenogram is a reliable modality for accurate angular measurements such as HKAA and %MA. An orthoroentgenogram has the potential to measure both HKAA and length accurately if the radiographic condition was modified; however, measurement error in %MA may occur.

Knee varus alters three-dimensional ankle alignment in standing- a study with upright computed tomography

Background

For knee osteoarthritis (OA) treatment, it is important to correct the lower limb alignment including the foot. However, in the upright position, lower limb alignment is generally assessed from the body surface or radiographs, and it is a challenge to capture the exact characteristics of three-dimensional lower limb alignment. The purpose of the study was to measure lower limb alignment in patients with knee OA using upright computed tomography (CT) and radiography, and to identify features of knee joint deformity.

Methods

A total of 45 limbs in 25 patients with knee OA were enrolled. The subjects underwent both upright CT and radiography for the whole lower limb in the standing position. The joint angles were calculated on both images. The degree of knee OA was classified according to Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade by referring to radiography, which is mainly based on the degree of articular cartilage loss and severity of osteophytes, and the characteristics or correlation between knee and ankle joint in each group was investigated.

Results

In KL-I, there was an association between varus of the knee joint and internal rotation of the talocrural joint (r = 0.76, P < 0.05). In KL-II, there was an association between varus of the knee joint and eversion of the subtalar joint (r = 0.63, P < 0.05) and talocrural joint (r = − 0.65, P < 0.05). In KL-III, there was an association between varus of the knee joint and internal rotation of the subtalar joint (r = − 0.62, P < 0.05), and in KL-IV, there was an association between varus of the knee joint and internal rotation of the subtalar joint (r = − 0.58, P < 0.05).

Conclusions

The lower limb alignment of patients with knee OA in the standing position was found that as knee OA worsened, it became apparent that compensatory knee joint alignment depended on the ankle joint rather than the subtalar joint. The results may help in the rehabilitation of patients with knee OA, since the ankle joint alignment has a significant impact on the knee joint during coarse movements involving load.

Increased contact area of flange and decreased wedge volume of osteotomy site by open wedge distal tibial tuberosity arc osteotomy compared to the conventional technique

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the area of the osteotomy surface, including the flange and wedge volume, in open wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO), distal tibial tuberosity osteotomy (DTO), and distal tibial tuberosity arc osteotomy (DTAO) using tibial sawbones. It was hypothesized that the area of the osteotomy surface, including the flange, in DTAO was larger than that in OWHTO and DTO and that the wedge volume in DTAO was smaller than that in OWHTO and DTO.

METHODS

Fifteen tibial sawbones were divided equally into three groups: OWHTO, DTO, and DTAO. The total area of the osteotomy surface in OWHTO, DTO, and DTAO was compared using image analysis software. The contact area of the flange and the wedge volume at wedge heights of 5, 10, and 15 mm were compared among osteotomy types. One-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to compare the total area of the osteotomy surface, the contact area of the flange, and the wedge volume at 5, 10, and 15 mm in OWHTO, DTO, and DTAO.

RESULTS

The total area of the osteotomy surface in DTO and DTAO was significantly larger than that in OWHTO (P < 0.05). The contact area of the flange in DTAO was significantly larger than that in OWHTO at each wedge height (P < 0.05). In addition, the contact area of the flange in DTAO was significantly larger than that in DTO at wedge heights of 5 and 15 mm (P < 0.05). The wedge volume in DTAO was significantly smaller than that in DTO at each wedge height (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that an increase in the flange contact area and a decrease in the wedge volume in the opening gap were found in DTAO compared to DTO. This would be an advantage for anteroposterior screw insertion from the flange to the distal tibial fragment and bone union at the osteotomy site.

Differences in preoperative planning for high-tibial osteotomy between the standing and supine positions

Introduction

Previous studies have reported that alignment changes depend on the patient’s position in orthopedic surgery. However, it has not yet been well examined how the patient’s position affects the preoperative planning in high-tibial osteotomy (HTO). Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effects of the patient’s position on preoperative planning in HTO.

Materials and methods

A total of 60 knees in 55 patients who underwent HTO were retrospectively examined. Virtual preoperative planning for medial open-wedge HTO (OWHTO), lateral closed-wedge HTO (CWHTO), and hybrid CWHTO were performed by setting the percentage of the weight-bearing line (%WBL) at 62% as an optimal alignment. The correction angle differences between the supine and standing radiographs were measured. The virtual %WBL (v%WBL) was determined by applying the correction angle obtained from the standing radiograph to the supine radiograph. The %WBL discrepancy (%WBLd) was calculated as v%WBL − 62 (%) to predict the possible correction errors during surgeries. A single regression analysis was performed to examine the correlation between the correction angle difference and %WBLd.

Results

The mean correction angle was significantly higher when the preoperative planning was based on standing radiographs than when based on supine radiographs (P < 0.001), and the mean difference was 2.2 ± 1.5°. The difference between the two conditions in the medial opening gaps for OWHTO, lateral wedge sizes (mm) for CWHTO, and hybrid CWHTO were 2.6 ± 2.0, 2.3 ± 1.6, and 1.9 ± 1.4, respectively. The mean v%WBL was 71.2% ± 7.3%, and the mean %WBLd was 10.1% ± 7.4%. A single regression analysis revealed a linear correlation between the correction angle difference and %WBLd (%WBLd = 4.72 × correction angle difference + 0.08). No statistically significant difference in the parameters was found between the supine and standing radiographs postoperatively.

Conclusions

We found significant differences in the estimated correction angles between the supine and standing radiographs in the planning for HTO. Therefore, surgeons should carefully consider the difference between supine and standing radiographs and estimate the possible correction error during surgery when planning a HTO.

Difference in the early postoperative change of the joint line convergence angle between opening wedge and closed wedge high tibial osteotomies

Background

The purpose of this study was to investigate the correction error associated with soft tissue balance in high tibial osteotomy (HTO) and the difference between opening wedge HTO (OWHTO) and closed wedge HTO (CWHTO).

Methods

A total of 170 knees of 130 patients (85 knees of 68 patients in OWHTO and 85 knees of 62 patients in CWHTO) were evaluated. Anteroposterior radiographs of the knee and full-length leg were taken preoperatively, immediately under general anesthesia postoperatively, 2 days, and 1 and 12 months postoperatively. The femorotibial angle (FTA), joint line convergence angle (JLCA), and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) were measured.

Results

The postoperative FTA was decreased from 170.5 ± 2.1° at 0 day to 168.6 ± 2.2° at 2 days in OWHTO (P < 0.05), whereas it was not changed from 168.7 ± 2.4° at 0 day to 168.1 ± 2.8° at 2 days in CWHTO. The JLCA was 4.8 ± 1.8° preoperatively, 4.2 ± 1.9° at 0 day, 2.2 ± 1.8° at 2 days (P < 0.05 vs 0 day), 2.6 ± 1.7° at 1 month, and 2.7 ± 1.6° at 12 months in OWHTO, and 7.1 ± 3.2° preoperatively, 4.1 ± 2.4° at 0 day (P < 0.05 vs preoperative), 3.4 ± 2.5° at 2 days, 3.9 ± 2.3° at 1 month, and 4.2 ± 2.6° at 12 months in CWHTO. Multiple regression analysis showed that preoperative factors affecting change of the JLCA from preoperative to postoperative 1 month were the correction angle in OWHTO (P = 0.001) and the preoperative standing JLCA in OWHTO (P < 0.001) and CWHTO (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

A significant decrease of the JLCA occurred immediately after osteotomy under anesthesia in CWHTO, whereas in OWHTO there was no decrease under anesthesia, but it decreased several days postoperatively.

Isolated high tibial osteotomy is appropriate in less than two-thirds of varus knees if excessive overcorrection of the medial proximal tibial angle should be avoided

PURPOSE

To perform a detailed deformity analysis of patients with varus alignment and to define the ideal osteotomy level (tibial vs. femoral vs. double level) to avoid an oblique joint line.

METHODS

A total of 303 digital full-leg standing radiographs of patients aged 18-60 years and varus alignment [mechanical tibiofemoral varus angle (mFTA) ≥ 3°] were included. All legs were analyzed regarding mFTA, mechanical medial proximal tibia angle (mMPTA), mechanical lateral distal femur angle (mLDFA), and joint line convergence angle. Based on mFTA, varus alignment was categorized as "mild" (3°-5°), "moderate" (6°-8°), or "severe" (≥ 9°). Deformity location was determined according to the malalignment test described by Paley. Two osteotomy simulations were performed with different upper limits for mMPTA: anatomic correction (mMPTA ≤ 90°, mLDFA ≥ 85°) and overcorrection (mMPTA ≤ 95°, mLDFA ≥ 85°). If a single osteotomy exceeded these limits at the intended mFTA of 2° valgus, a double-level osteotomy was simulated. If even a double-level osteotomy resulted in deviations from the defined limits, the leg was categorized as "uncorrectable".

RESULTS

Mean mFTA was 6° ± 11° of varus (range 3°-15°). A tibial deformity was observed in 28%, a femoral deformity in 23%, a combined tibial and femoral deformity in 4%, and no bony deformity in 45%. The prevalence of a tibial deformity did not differ between varus severity groups, whereas a femoral and bifocal deformity was significantly more prevalent in knees with more distinct varus (p < 0.001). Osteotomy simulation revealed that isolated high tibial osteotomy (HTO) was appropriate in only 12% for anatomic correction, whereas a double-level osteotomy was necessary in 63%. If overcorrection of mMPTA was tolerated, the number of HTOs significantly increased to 57% (p < 0.001), whereas the number of double-level osteotomies significantly decreased to 33% (p < 0.001). Isolated DFO was considered ideal in 8% for both simulations. Significantly more knees were considered "uncorrectable" by simulating anatomic correction (18 vs. 2%; p < 0.001). A double-level osteotomy was significantly more often necessary in knees with "severe" varus (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Less than one-third of patients (28%) with mechanical varus ≥ 3° have a tibial deformity. If anatomic correction (mMPTA ≤ 90°) is intended, only 12% of patients can be corrected via isolated HTO, whereas 63% of patients require a double-level osteotomy. If slight overcorrection is accepted (mMPTA ≤ 95°), 57% of patients can be corrected via isolated HTO, whereas 33% of patients would still require a double-level osteotomy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, cross-sectional study.

Managing intra-articular deformity in high Tibial osteotomy: a narrative review

The joint line convergence angle (JLCA) has a normal range between 0° to 2°, which increases in magnitude depending on the severity and stage of osteoarthritis in the knee.

The JLCA represents the interaction of the intra-articular deformity arising from the osteoarthritis and the surrounding soft tissue laxity. Therefore, the JLCA has become a vital parameter in analysing the long leg alignment views for corrective planning before osteotomy surgery. Recent studies have considered the influence on how the preoperative JLCA is measured and its influence on achieving accurate postoperative desired correction in high tibial osteotomy surgery.

The JLCA also reflects the influence of soft tissue laxity in a lower limb malalignment and many surgeons encourage it to be taken into account to avoid non physiological correction and/or overcorrection with negatively impacted postoperative patient outcome.

This present review addressed how to obtain an accurate preoperative measurement of the JLCA, its influence on postoperative deformity analysis and how to reduce errors arising from an elevated preoperative JLCA.

We have proposed a formula to help determine the value to subtract from the planned correction in order to avoid an overcorrection when performing a corrective osteotomy.

Level of clinical evidence IV, narrative review.