Ipsilateral patellofemoral morphological abnormalities are more severe than those of contralateral joints in patients with unilateral patellar dislocation

Patients with bilateral patellar instability have multiple and symmetric risk factors in each knee

PURPOSE

Bilateral involvement is common in patients with patellar instability. The management of bilateral patellar instability is associated with increased complication rate. The higher complication rate in this cohort may be related to the presence of underlying anatomic risk factors. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the presence and side-to-side differences in risk factors between knees in bilateral patellar instability.

METHODS

In a retrospective study (2008-2017), demographic information, characteristics of patellar dislocation and anatomic risk factors on MRI (trochlear dysplasia, patellar height, tibial tubercle lateralization, patellar tilt, sulcus angle, bump height) were evaluated in both knees of all patients (n = 32, 15 males and 17 females) with bilateral patellar instability. The risk factors were analyzed based on established cut off values and were compared between gender, laterality and more symptomatic (index) knee. Knee symmetry and absolute differences between risk factors for both knees were analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean age of 32 patients was 14.6 ± 2.3 years. Of the 4 major anatomic risk factors, the most common were trochlear dysplasia in 59/64 (92.1%) knees and patella alta in 51/64 (79.7%) knees. Tibial tubercle lateralization was the least common risk factor being present in 8/64 (12.5%) knees. Of 64 knees, 55 (85.9%) had 2 or more risk factors and 30 (46.8%) had 3 or all 4 risk factors present. There were no significant differences in risk factors based on gender, laterality or index knee. There was symmetry between paired knees for 31/32 (96.8%) patients for trochlear depth, 29/32 (90.6%) for patellar tilt, 27/32 (84.3%) for TT-TG distance and 25/32 (78.1%) for patellar height. There were no significant differences in absolute measurements between knees for any of the risk factors.

CONCLUSION

Patients with bilateral instability had multiple risk factors, with trochlear dysplasia being the most common and increased TT-TG distance being the least common. Majority of patients had 2 or more risk factors and about half had 3 or 4 risk factors in each knee. There was symmetry between paired knees for each risk factor without any significant differences between the index knee compared to the contralateral knee.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Lateral trochlear inclination measured by the transepicondylar axis holds potential for evaluating trochlear dysplasia in patients with lateral patellar dislocation

PURPOSE

To verify that lateral trochlear inclination (LTI) measured by the transepicondylar axis can reliably be used to evaluate trochlear dysplasia (TD) on MRI and can serve as an objective indication of trochleoplasty for patients with lateral patellar dislocation (LPD).

METHODS

Eighty patients with recurrent LPD and eighty healthy subjects were included. TD, posterior condylar angle (PCA), and LTI measured by the posterior condylar reference line (LTIp), surgical transepicondylar axis (LTIs), and anatomical transepicondylar axis (LTIa) were assessed on MRI. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis were performed, the correlations and differences amongst the parameters were identified, and a binary logistic regression model was established.

RESULTS

Each measurement had excellent inter- and intra-observer agreement. The LTIp, LTIs and LTIa were smaller in the study group than in the control group, with mean differences of 9.0°, 7.2° and 7.0°, respectively (P < 0.001). The PCA was larger in patients with LPD than in the control group (P < 0.001). LTIp was associated with PCA in the study group (r = - 0.41, P < 0.001). The pathological values of LTIp, LTIs and LTIa were 11.7°, 15.3° and 17.4°, respectively. LTIs and LTIa were independent risk factors for LPD, with ORs of 7.33 (95% CI [1.06-52.90], P = 0.048) and 10.29 (95% CI [1.38-76.96], P = 0.023), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The LTI can be reliably measured by MRI, but LTIp could potentially decrease the recorded value from the actual inclination angle. LTIs and LTIa are more appropriate to serve as trochleoplasty indications for patients with LPD, which could help orthopedists with surgical decision-making.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Femoral Anteversion Measured by the Surgical Transepicondylar Axis Is Correlated with the Tibial Tubercle-Roman Arch Distance in Patients with Lateral Patellar Dislocation

Background and Objectives: Various predisposing factors for lateral patellar dislocation (LPD) have been identified, but the relation between femoral rotational deformity and the tibial tubercle-Roman arch (TT-RA) distance remains elusive. Materials and Methods: We conducted this study including 72 consecutive patients with unilateral LPD. Femoral anteversion was measured by the surgical transepicondylar axis (S-tAV), and the posterior condylar reference line (P-tAV), TT-RA distance, trochlear dysplasia, knee joint rotation, patellar height, and hip-knee-ankle angle were measured by CT images or by radiographs. The correlations among these parameters were analyzed, and the parameters were compared between patients with and without a pathological TT-RA distance. Binary regression analysis was performed, and receiver operating characteristic curves were obtained. Results: The TT-RA distance was correlated with S-tAV (r = 0.360, p = 0.002), but the correlation between P-tAV and the TT-RA distance was not significant. S-tAV had an AUC of 0.711 for predicting a pathological TT-RA, with a value of >18.6° indicating 54.8% sensitivity and 82.9% specificity. S-tAV revealed an OR of 1.13 (95% CI [1.04, 1.22], p = 0.003) with regard to the pathological TT-RA distance by an adjusted regression model. Conclusions: S-tAV was significantly correlated with the TT-RA distance, with a correlation coefficient of 0.360, and was identified as an independent risk factor for a pathological TT-RA distance. However, the TT-RA distance was found to be independent of P-tAV.

Prediction of Subsequent Contralateral Patellar Dislocation after First-Time Dislocation Based on Patellofemoral Morphologies

The subsequent dislocation of a contralateral patellofemoral joint sometimes occurs after a first-time lateral patellar dislocation (LPD). However, the anatomic risk factors for subsequent contralateral LPD remain elusive. This study included 17 patients with contralateral LPD and 34 unilateral patellar dislocators. The anatomic parameters of the contralateral patellofemoral joints were measured using CT images and radiographs that were obtained at the time of the first dislocation. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was performed, and a binary regression model was established to identify the risk factors. The receiver operating characteristic curves and the area under the curve (AUC) were analyzed. The tibial tubercle-Roman arch (TT-RA) distance was significantly different between patients with and without contralateral LPD (24.1 vs. 19.5 mm, p < 0.001). The hip−knee−ankle (HKA) angle, patellar tilt, congruence angle, and patellar displacement were greater in the study group than in the control group (p < 0.05). The TT-RA distance revealed an OR of 1.35 (95% CI (1.26−1.44]), p < 0.001) and an AUC of 0.727 for predicting contralateral LPD. The HKA angle revealed an OR of 1.74 (95% CI (1.51−2.00), p < 0.001) and an AUC of 0.797. The Patellar tilt, congruence angle, and patellar displacement had AUC values of 0.703, 0.725, and 0.817 for predicting contralateral LPD, respectively. In conclusion, the contralateral patellofemoral anatomic parameters were significantly different between patients with and without subsequent contralateral LPD. Increased TT-RA distance and excessive valgus deformity were risk factors and could serve as predictors for contralateral LPD. At first-time dislocation, the abnormal position of the patella relative to the trochlea may also be an important cause of subsequent LPD.

Pathological Thresholds of Segmental Femoral Torsion in Patients With Patellar Dislocation: Influence on Patellofemoral Malalignment

Background

Femoral torsion can be evaluated from different femoral segments. The pathological thresholds for femoral torsion of different segments and the influence of segmental femoral torsion on patellofemoral alignment remain unknown.

Purpose

To compare femoral torsion between patients with recurrent patellar dislocation and healthy individuals, to determine the statistical physiological range and pathological thresholds of femoral torsion in different segments, and to investigate the influence of femoral torsion on patellofemoral malalignment.

Study Design

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with patellar dislocation who received surgical treatment in our department between 2019 and 2020. Healthy participants were recruited as the control group. The control patients were asymptomatic and had no history of lower extremity disorders. The differences in femoral torsion between the study and control groups were compared. The diagnostic capacity of femoral torsion in different segments and their correlation with patellar tilt were investigated. The mean value and 95% CI of femoral torsion in different segments were established using data from healthy volunteers.

Results

A total of 60 patients with patellar dislocation and 100 healthy volunteers were included in this study. The total, mid, and distal femoral torsion values differed significantly between the study and control groups (P < .01). Total femoral torsion had the highest diagnostic value (area under the receiver operating curve = 0.733). Total torsion (r = 0.432; P < .001), mid torsion (r = 0.242; P = .002), and distal torsion (r = 0.324; P < .001) showed significant correlations with patellar tilt. The pathological thresholds of excessive femoral torsion of the total, proximal, mid, and distal femoral segments were 24.73°, 46.68°, –6.55°, and 14.92°, respectively.

Conclusion

Patients with patellar dislocation had greater femoral torsion than healthy individuals in multiple femoral segments. Excessive mid, distal, and total torsion was associated with more significant patellar tilt.

Femoral anteversion measured by the surgical transepicondylar axis is a reliable parameter for evaluating femoral rotational deformities in patients with patellar dislocation

PURPOSE

To verify whether femoral anteversion measured by the surgical transepicondylar axis (S-FA) is a reliable parameter for evaluating femoral rotational deformities and to provide an indication for derotational distal femoral osteotomy (DDFO) in patients with patellar dislocation.

METHODS

Ninety patients with recurrent patellar dislocation and 90 healthy individuals were enrolled. The S-FA, the femoral anteversion measured by posterior condylar reference line (P-FA), the length of posterior femoral condyles, and the posterior condylar angle (PCA) were assessed by CT images. The unpaired t test and Pearson correlation analysis were conducted. Receiver operating characteristic curves and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the diagnostic capacity of the parameters. The pathological value of the measurements was determined, and a binary regression model was established.

RESULTS

The S-FA and P-FA were greater in the study group (14.2 ± 7.7° and 19.7 ± 7.3°, respectively) than in the control group (7.2 ± 8.0° and 12.2 ± 8.2°, respectively) (P < 0.001). The lateral/posterior condyle was shorter in patients with patellar dislocation (21.2 ± 2.5 mm) than in healthy individuals (23.5 ± 2.7 mm) (P = 0.001). The P-FA was correlated with PCA in the study group (P < 0.001). The S-FA and P-FA had AUCs of 0.734 and 0.767 for patellar dislocation, respectively. The pathological values of the S-FA and P-FA were 20.4° and 25.8°, respectively. The S-FA revealed a significant OR of 10.47 (P = 0.014) for patellar dislocation.

CONCLUSION

The S-FA is a reliable parameter for identifying femoral rotational deformities in patients with patellar dislocation. DDFO is recommended when a pathological S-FA (> 20.4°) is presented.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective cohort study (diagnostic), level II.

Remnant preserving ACL reconstruction with a functional remnant is related to improved laxity but not to improved clinical outcomes in comparison to a nonfunctional remnant

PURPOSE

The Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) remnant has been pointed out as a ligamentization enhancer. Nonetheless, the remaining tissue can be functional if it still provides some stability or nonfunctional. This study intends to compare the clinical results and knee stability of functional vs. nonfunctional remnant preservation ACL reconstruction (ACLR).

METHODS

One hundred and seventy-five patients with ACL injuries were included and underwent remnant preservation ACLR. They were divided into two groups accordingly to remnant tissue functionality: functional (Group F) and nonfunctional (Group NF). Primary outcome was defined as patient reported outcomes measured with Lysholm, IKDC and Tegner continuous scales and improvements. Secondary outcomes comprised of Lachman test, anterior drawer test, pivot shift test, extension and flexion deficit, graft coverage by remnant preserved tissue and failure rate (persistent instability or new ACL lesion). Menisci lesions, cartilage lesions and time to surgery were also recorded for each group.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-four patients were available at a mean of 30.2 ± 10.1 months: 69 Functional and 75 Nonfunctional. Lysholm, IKDC and Tegner functional outcomes demonstrated no difference between the groups, Functional compared to Nonfunctional: 88.4 ± 10.5 vs. 92.2 ± 4.9, n.s. and 83.2 ± 11.3 vs. 87 ± 5.3, n.s. and 6 (5-10) vs. 6 (5-9), n.s., respectively. Lysholm and IKDC functional outcomes improvements demonstrated differences between the groups: Functional compared to Nonfunctional (39.3 ± 9.4 vs. 42.3 ± 7.4, p = 0.014 and 37.7 ± 10 vs. 41.0 ± 6.6, p = 0.032); however, they were not clinically significant. Functional group showed more stability on physical examination pre- and post-operatively (p < 0.001, p < 0.001). There was no difference regarding extension deficit (n.s.); however, functional group had more flexion deficit (p = 0.02). Nonfunctional group had better graft coverage (p = 0.001). There was no difference regarding failure rate: 4% vs. 9%, (n.s.).

CONCLUSION

Both remnant preservation ACLR techniques were able to achieve satisfactory functional outcomes. A functional remnant was not related to improved functional outcomes in comparison to a nonfunctional remnant; however, it was related to less laxity pre and postoperatively and inferior graft coverage.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.