1
|
Birmingham TB, Primeau CA, Shariff SZ, Reid JNS, Marsh JD, Lam M, Dixon SN, Giffin JR, Willits KR, Litchfield RB, Feagan BG, Fowler PJ. Incidence of Total Knee Arthroplasty After Arthroscopic Surgery for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e246578. [PMID: 38635272 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.6578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance It is unclear whether arthroscopic resection of degenerative knee tissues among patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee delays or hastens total knee arthroplasty (TKA); opposite findings have been reported. Objective To compare the long-term incidence of TKA in patients with OA of the knee after nonoperative management with or without additional arthroscopic surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants In this ad hoc secondary analysis of a single-center, assessor-blinded randomized clinical trial performed from January 1, 1999, to August 31, 2007, 178 patients were followed up through March 31, 2019. Participants included adults diagnosed with OA of the knee referred for potential arthroscopic surgery in a tertiary care center specializing in orthopedics in London, Ontario, Canada. All participants from the original randomized clinical trial were included. Data were analyzed from June 1, 2021, to October 20, 2022. Exposures Arthroscopic surgery (resection or debridement of degenerative tears of the menisci, fragments of articular cartilage, or chondral flaps and osteophytes that prevented full extension) plus nonoperative management (physical therapy plus medications as required) compared with nonoperative management only (control). Main Outcomes and Measures Total knee arthroplasty was identified by linking the randomized trial data with prospectively collected Canadian health administrative datasets where participants were followed up for a maximum of 20 years. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to compare the incidence of TKA between intervention groups. Results A total of 178 of 277 eligible patients (64.3%; 112 [62.9%] female; mean [SD] age, 59.0 [10.0] years) were included. The mean (SD) body mass index was 31.0 (6.5). With a median follow-up of 13.8 (IQR, 8.4-16.8) years, 31 of 92 patients (33.7%) in the arthroscopic surgery group vs 36 of 86 (41.9%) in the control group underwent TKA (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.85 [95% CI, 0.52-1.40]). Results were similar when accounting for crossovers to arthroscopic surgery (13 of 86 [15.1%]) during follow-up (HR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.53-1.44]). Within 5 years, the cumulative incidence was 10.2% vs 9.3% in the arthroscopic surgery group and control group, respectively (time-stratified HR for 0-5 years, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.41-2.75]); within 10 years, the cumulative incidence was 23.3% vs 21.4%, respectively (time-stratified HR for 5-10 years, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.45-2.51]). Sensitivity analyses yielded consistent results. Conclusions and Relevance In this secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial of arthroscopic surgery for patients with OA of the knee, a statistically significant association with delaying or hastening TKA was not identified. Approximately 80% of patients did not undergo TKA within 10 years of nonoperative management with or without additional knee arthroscopic surgery. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00158431.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trevor B Birmingham
- Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
- School of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
- Bone and Joint Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| | - Codie A Primeau
- Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
- School of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
- Bone and Joint Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| | - Salimah Z Shariff
- Bone and Joint Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
- ICES Western, Lawson Health Research Institute, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
- Arthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| | - Jennifer N S Reid
- ICES Western, Lawson Health Research Institute, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jacquelyn D Marsh
- School of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
- Bone and Joint Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| | - Melody Lam
- ICES Western, Lawson Health Research Institute, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stephanie N Dixon
- ICES Western, Lawson Health Research Institute, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| | - J Robert Giffin
- Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
- Bone and Joint Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| | - Kevin R Willits
- Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
- Bone and Joint Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| | - Robert B Litchfield
- Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
- Bone and Joint Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| | - Brian G Feagan
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| | - Peter J Fowler
- Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
- Bone and Joint Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kuhrij LS, Marang-van de Mheen PJ, van Lier L, Alimahomed R, Nelissen RGHH, van Bodegom-Vos L. Reduction in use of MRI and arthroscopy among patients with degenerative knee disease in independent treatment centers versus general hospitals: a time series analysis. Int J Qual Health Care 2024; 36:mzae004. [PMID: 38252692 PMCID: PMC10849166 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzae004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Revised: 12/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/21/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
The use of MRI and arthroscopy are considered low-value care in most patients with degenerative knee disease. To reduce these modalities, there have been multiple efforts to increase awareness. Reductions have been shown for general hospitals (GH), but it is unclear whether this may be partly explained by a shift of patients receiving these modalities in independent treatment centers (ITCs). The aims of this study were to assess (i) whether the trend in use of MRI and arthroscopy in patients with degenerative knee disease differs between ITCs and GH, and (ii) whether the Dutch efforts to raise awareness on these recommendations were associated with a change in the trend for both types of providers. All patients insured by a Dutch healthcare insurer aged ≥50 years with a degenerative knee disease who were treated in a GH or ITC between July 2014 and December 2019 were included. Linear regression was used with the quarterly percentage of patients receiving an MRI or knee arthroscopy weighted by center volume, as the primary outcome. Interrupted time-series analysis was used to evaluate the effect of the Dutch efforts to raise awareness. A total of 14 702 patients included were treated in 90 GHs (n = 13 303, 90.5%) and 29 ITCs (n = 1399, 9.5%). Across the study period, ITCs on an average had a 16% higher MRI use (P < .001) and 9% higher arthroscopy use (P = .003). MRI use did not change in both provider types, but arthroscopy use significantly decreased and became stronger in ITCs (P = .01). The Dutch efforts to increase awareness did not significantly influence either MRI or arthroscopy use in ITCs (P = .55 and P = .84) and GHs (P = .13 and P = .70). MRI and arthroscopy uses were higher in ITCs than GHs. MRI use did not change significantly among patients ≥ 50 years with degenerative knee disease in both provider types between 2014 and 2019. MRI- and arthroscopy use decreased with ITCs on average having higher rates for both modalities, but also showing a stronger decrease in arthroscopy use. The Dutch efforts to increase awareness did not accelerate the already declining trend in the Netherlands.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurien S Kuhrij
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Section Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden 2333 ZA, the Netherlands
| | - Perla J Marang-van de Mheen
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Section Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden 2333 ZA, the Netherlands
| | - Lisanne van Lier
- Zorg & Zekerheid, Haagse Schouwweg 12, Leiden 2332 KG, the Netherlands
| | - Razia Alimahomed
- Zorg & Zekerheid, Haagse Schouwweg 12, Leiden 2332 KG, the Netherlands
| | - Rob G H H Nelissen
- Department of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden 2333 ZA, the Netherlands
| | - Leti van Bodegom-Vos
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Section Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden 2333 ZA, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
The value of reducing arthroscopic partial meniscectomy in the treatment of degenerative meniscus tears: a budget impact analysis. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2023; 39:e7. [PMID: 36650723 DOI: 10.1017/s0266462322003361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Numerous studies have shown that arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) is not (cost-) effective in patients with symptoms attributed to a degenerative meniscus tear. We aimed to assess the budget impact of reducing APM in routine clinical practice in this population. MATERIALS AND METHODS A patient-level state transition model was developed to simulate patients recently diagnosed with a degenerative meniscus tear. Three strategies were compared: "current guideline" (i.e., postpone surgery to at least 3 months after diagnosis), "APM at any time" (i.e., APM available directly after diagnosis), and "nonsurgical" (i.e., APM no longer performed). Total societal costs over 5 years were calculated to determine the budget impact. Probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses were conducted to address uncertainty. RESULTS The average cost per patient over 5 years were EUR 5,077, EUR 4,577, and EUR 4,218, for the "APM at any time," "current guideline," and "nonsurgical" strategy, respectively. Removing APM from the treatment mix (i.e., 30,000 patients per year) in the Netherlands, resulted in a reduction in health care expenditures of EUR 54 million (95 percent confidence interval [CI] EUR 38 million-EUR 70 million) compared to the "current guideline strategy" and EUR 129 million (95 percent CI EUR 102 million-EUR 156 million) compared to the "APM at any time" strategy. Sensitivity analyses showed that uncertainty did not alter our conclusions. CONCLUSIONS Substantial costs can be saved when APM is no longer performed to treat symptoms attributed to degenerative meniscus tears in the Netherlands. It is therefore recommended to further reduce the use of APM to treat degenerative meniscus tears.
Collapse
|
4
|
Rietbergen T, Marang-van de Mheen PJ, de Graaf J, Diercks RL, Janssen RPA, van der Linden-van der Zwaag HMJ, van den Akker-van Marle ME, Steyerberg EW, Nelissen RGHH, van Bodegom-Vos L, Hofstee DJ, van Geenen RCI, Koenraadt KLM, Onderwater JPAH, Kleinlugtenbelt YV, Gosens T, Klos TVS, Rijk PC, Dijkstra B, Zeegers AVCM, Hoogeslag RAG, Veld MHAHI, Polak AA, Pereira NRP, Vervest TMJS, van der Veen HC, Lopuhaä N. A tailored intervention does not reduce low value MRI's and arthroscopies in degenerative knee disease when the secular time trend is taken into account: a difference-in-difference analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2022; 30:4134-4143. [PMID: 35391552 PMCID: PMC9668785 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-022-06949-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the effectiveness of a tailored intervention to reduce low value MRIs and arthroscopies among patients ≥ 50 years with degenerative knee disease in 13 Dutch orthopaedic centers (intervention group) compared with all other Dutch orthopaedic centers (control group). METHODS All patients with degenerative knee disease ≥ 50 years admitted to Dutch orthopaedic centers from January 2016 to December 2018 were included. The tailored intervention included participation of clinical champions, education on the Dutch Choosing Wisely recommendation for MRI's and arthroscopies in degenerative knee disease, training of orthopaedic surgeons to manage patient expectations, performance feedback, and provision of a patient brochure. A difference-in-difference analysis was used to compare the time trend before (admitted January 2016-June 2017) and after introduction of the intervention (July 2017-December 2018) between intervention and control hospitals. Primary outcome was the monthly percentage of patients receiving a MRI or knee arthroscopy, weighted by type of hospital. RESULTS 136,446 patients were included, of whom 32,163 were treated in the intervention hospitals. The weighted percentage of patients receiving a MRI on average declined by 0.15% per month (β = - 0.15, P < 0.001) and by 0.19% per month for arthroscopy (β = - 0.19, P < 0.001). However, these changes over time did not differ between intervention and control hospitals, neither for MRI (β = - 0.74, P = 0.228) nor arthroscopy (β = 0.13, P = 0.688). CONCLUSIONS The extent to which patients ≥ 50 years with degenerative knee disease received a MRI or arthroscopy declined significantly over time, but could not be attributed to the tailored intervention. This secular downward time trend may reflect anoverall focus of reducing low value care in The Netherlands. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T. Rietbergen
- grid.10419.3d0000000089452978Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Section Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Postzone J10-s, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - P. J. Marang-van de Mheen
- grid.10419.3d0000000089452978Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Section Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Postzone J10-s, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - J. de Graaf
- grid.10419.3d0000000089452978Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Section Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Postzone J10-s, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - R. L. Diercks
- grid.4494.d0000 0000 9558 4598Department of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - R. P. A. Janssen
- grid.414711.60000 0004 0477 4812Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Trauma, Maxima Medical Center, Eindhoven, The Netherlands ,grid.6852.90000 0004 0398 8763Orthopaedic Biomechanics, Department Of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands ,grid.448801.10000 0001 0669 4689Chair Value-Based Health Care, Fontys University of Applied Sciences, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - M. E. van den Akker-van Marle
- grid.10419.3d0000000089452978Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Section Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Postzone J10-s, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - E. W. Steyerberg
- grid.10419.3d0000000089452978Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Section Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Postzone J10-s, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - R. G. H. H. Nelissen
- grid.10419.3d0000000089452978Department of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - L. van Bodegom-Vos
- grid.10419.3d0000000089452978Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Section Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Postzone J10-s, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|