Machine learning algorithms predict within one size of the final implant ultimately used in total knee arthroplasty with good-to-excellent accuracy

Artificial intelligence and machine learning in knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Artificial intelligence (AI) and its subset, machine learning (ML), have significantly impacted clinical medicine, particularly in knee arthroplasty (KA). These technologies utilize algorithms for tasks such as predictive analytics and image recognition, improving preoperative planning, intraoperative navigation, and postoperative complication anticipation. This systematic review presents AI-driven tools' clinical implications in total and unicompartmental KA, focusing on enhancing patient outcomes and operational efficiency.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted across multiple databases including Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, OVID Medline, PubMed, and Web of Science, following the PRISMA guidelines for studies published in the English language till March 2024. Inclusion criteria targeted adult human models without geographical restrictions, specifically related to total or unicompartmental KA.

RESULTS

A total of 153 relevant studies were identified, covering various aspects of ML application for KA. Topics of studies included imaging modalities (n = 28), postoperative primary KA complications (n = 26), inpatient status (length of stay, readmissions, and cost) (n = 24), implant configuration (n = 14), revision (n = 12), patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) (n = 11), function (n = 11), procedural communication (n = 8), total knee arthroplasty/unicompartmental knee arthroplasty prediction (n = 6), outpatient status (n = 4), perioperative efficiency (n = 4), patient satisfaction (n = 3), opioid usage (n = 3). A total of 66 ML models were described, with 48.7% of studies using multiple approaches.

CONCLUSION

This review assesses ML applications in knee arthroplasty, highlighting their potential to improve patient outcomes. While current algorithms and AI show promise, our findings suggest areas for enhancement in predictive performance before widespread clinical adoption.

Artificial intelligence applications in the management of musculoskeletal disorders of the shoulder: A systematic review

Purpose

The aim of the present review is to evaluate and report on the available literature discussing artificial intelligence (AI) applications to the diagnosis of shoulder conditions, outcome prediction of shoulder interventions, and the possible application of such algorithms directly to surgical procedures.

Methods

In February 2024, a search of PubMed, Cochrane and Scopus databases was performed. Studies had to evaluate AI model effectiveness for inclusion. Research on healthcare cost predictions, deterministic algorithms, patient satisfaction, protocol studies and upper-extremity fractures not involving the shoulder were excluded. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tool and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions tools were used to assess bias.

Results

Thirty-three studies were included in the analysis. Seven studies analysed the detection of rotator cuff tears (RCTs) in magnetic resonance imaging and found area under the curve (AUC) values ranged from 0.812 to 0.94 for the detection of RCTs. One study reported Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristics values ranging from 0.79 to 0.97 for the prediction of clinical outcomes following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. In terms of outcomes of rotator cuff repair, an AUC value ranging from 0.58 to 0.68 was reported for prediction of patient-reported outcome measures, and an AUC range of 0.87-0.92 was found for prediction of retear rate. Five studies evaluated the identification of shoulder implant models following TSA from radiographs, with reported accuracy ranging from 89.90% to 97.20%.

Conclusion

AI application enables forecasting of clinical outcomes, permits refined diagnostic evaluation and increases surgical accuracy. While promising, the translation of these technologies into routine clinical practice requires careful consideration.

Level of Evidence

Level IV.

Size-Up, Size-Down: Accuracy of Component Sizing with Computerized Tomography and Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

Templating prior to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can help to improve surgical efficiency and potentially improve alignment and outcomes. The purpose of this article is to evaluate the ability of computed tomography (CT)-based preoperative templating to accurately predict implant sizes. A total of 724 Stryker MAKO robotic-assisted TKA cases were retrospectively evaluated from a prospectively collected database between January 2020 and October 2023. Cases were performed by one of three adult reconstruction fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons from a health system that includes an academic level one trauma center, an ambulatory surgery center, and a community hospital. Out of the 724 cases, 391 were preoperatively templated independently by the surgeon and the company representative (MAKO Product Specialist [MPS]). The remaining 333 cases were only templated prior to incision by the MPS. Final implant sizes of the tibial and femoral components were compared to preoperative templates. The MPS was able to preoperatively predict the final tibial and femoral implants within one size in 97.2 and 97.8% of cases, respectively. A surgeon and MPS combined preoperative templating increased accuracy to predict the final tibial and femoral implants within one size in 98.9 and 99.5% of cases, respectively. Height and weight were positively correlated with the final implant size (p < 0.001). Non-surgeons can reliably predict implanted components in CT-based preoperative templating in the majority of cases, which is further enhanced by surgeon review and adjustments. In no cases in our series were the final size components implanted greater than two sizes larger or smaller. Our findings suggest that there is opportunity to avoid waste by processing fewer trial implants and transporting fewer components. This would likely decrease overall case cost and improve efficiency in the operating room. Level of evidence: III (retrospective cohort).

Clinical validation of a deep learning-based approach for preoperative decision-making in implant size for total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Orthopedic surgeons use manual measurements, acetate templating, and dedicated software to determine the appropriate implant size for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aimed to use deep learning (DL) to assist in deciding the femoral and tibial implant sizes without manual manipulation and to evaluate the clinical validity of the DL decision by comparing it with conventional manual procedures.

METHODS

Two types of DL were used to detect the femoral and tibial regions using the You Only Look Once algorithm model and to determine the implant size from the detected regions using convolutional neural network. An experienced surgeon predicted the implant size for 234 patient cases using manual procedures, and the DL model also predicted the implant sizes for the same cases.

RESULTS

The exact accuracies of the surgeon's template were 61.54% and 68.38% for predicting femoral and tibial implant sizes, respectively. Meanwhile, the proposed DL model reported exact accuracies of 89.32% and 90.60% for femoral and tibial implant sizes, respectively. The accuracy ± 1 levels of the surgeon and proposed DL model were 97.44% and 97.86%, respectively, for the femoral implant size and 98.72% for both the surgeon and proposed DL model for the tibial implant size.

CONCLUSION

The observed differences and higher agreement levels achieved by the proposed DL model demonstrate its potential as a valuable tool in preoperative decision-making for TKA. By providing accurate predictions of implant size, the proposed DL model has the potential to optimize implant selection, leading to improved surgical outcomes.

Leveraging transfer learning for predicting total knee arthroplasty failure from post-operative radiographs

Purpose

The incidence of both primary and revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is expected to rise, making early recognition of TKA failure crucial to prevent extensive revision surgeries. This study aims to develop a deep learning (DL) model to predict TKA failure using radiographic images.

Methods

Two patient cohorts who underwent primary TKA were retrospectively collected: one was used for the model development and the other for the external validation. Each cohort encompassed failed and non-failed subjects, according to the need for TKA revision surgery. Moreover, for each patient, one anteroposterior and one lateral radiographic view obtained during routine TKA follow-up, were considered. A transfer learning fine-tuning approach was employed. After pre-processing, the images were analyzed using a convolutional neuronal network (CNN) that was originally developed for predicting hip prosthesis failure and was based on the Densenet169 pre-trained on Imagenet. The model was tested on 20% of the images of the first cohort and externally validated on the images of the second cohort. Metrics, such as accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiving operating characteristic curve (AUC), were calculated for the final assessment.

Results

The trained model correctly classified 108 out of 127 images in the test set, providing a classification accuracy of 0.85, sensitivity of 0.80, specificity of 0.89 and AUC of 0.86. Moreover, the model correctly classified 1547 out of 1937 in the external validation set, providing a balanced accuracy of 0.79, sensitivity of 0.80, specificity of 0.78 and AUC of 0.86.

Conclusions

The present DL model predicts TKA failure with moderate accuracy, regardless of the cause of revision surgery. Additionally, the effectiveness of the transfer learning fine-tuning approach, leveraging a previously developed DL model for hip prosthesis failure, has been successfully demonstrated.

Level of Evidence

Level III, diagnostic study.

Development of an artificial intelligence model for predicting implant size in total knee arthroplasty using simple X-ray images

BACKGROUND

Accurate estimation of implant size before surgery is crucial in preparing for total knee arthroplasty. However, this task is time-consuming and labor-intensive. To alleviate this burden on surgeons, we developed a reliable artificial intelligence (AI) model to predict implant size.

METHODS

We enrolled 714 patients with knee osteoarthritis who underwent total knee arthroplasty from March 2010 to February 2014. All surgeries were performed by the same surgeon using implants from the same manufacturer. We collected 1412 knee anteroposterior (AP) and lateral view x-ray images and retrospectively investigated the implant size. We trained the AI model using both AP and lateral images without any clinical or demographic information and performed data augmentation to resolve issues of uneven distribution and insufficient data. Using data augmentation techniques, we generated 500 images for each size of the femur and tibia, which were then used to train the model. Using data augmentation techniques, we generated 500 images for each size of the femur and tibia, which were then used to train the model. We used ResNet-101 and optimized the model with the aim of minimizing the cross-entropy loss function using both the Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) and Adam optimizer.

RESULTS

The SGD optimizer achieved the best performance in internal validation. The model showed micro F1-score 0.91 for femur and 0.87 for tibia. For predicting within ± one size, micro F1-score was 0.99 for femur and 0.98 for tibia.

CONCLUSION

We developed a deep learning model with high predictive power for implant size using only simple x-ray images. This could help surgeons reduce the time and labor required for preoperative preparation in total knee arthroplasty. While similar studies have been conducted, our work is unique in its use of simple x-ray images without any other data, like demographic features, to achieve a model with strong predictive power.

Reliable prediction of implant size and axial alignment in AI-based 3D preoperative planning for total knee arthroplasty

The size and axial alignment of prostheses, when planned during total knee replacement (TKA) are critical for recovery of knee function and improvement of knee pain symptoms. This research aims to study the effect of artificial intelligence (AI)-based preoperative three dimensional (3D) planning technology on prosthesis size and axial alignment planning in TKA, and to compare its advantages with two dimensional (2D) X-ray template measurement technology. A total of 60 patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) who underwent TKA for the first time were included in the AI (n = 30) and 2D (n = 30) groups. The preoperative and postoperative prosthesis size, femoral valgus correction angle (VCA) and hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) were recorded and compared between the two groups. The results of the University of Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and the American Knee Association Score (AKS) were evaluated before surgery, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery. The accuracy of prosthesis size, VCA and HKA prediction in AI group was significantly higher than that in 2D group (P < 0.05). The WOMAC and AKS scores in AI group at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after surgery were better than those in 2D group (P < 0.05). Both groups showed significant improvement in WOMAC and AKS scores at 12 months follow-up. AI-based preoperative 3D planning technique has more reliable planning effect for prosthesis size and axial alignment in TKA.

The accuracy of preoperative implant size prediction achieved by digital templating in total knee arthroplasty is not affected by the quality of lateral knee radiographs

Background

Digital templating software can be used for preoperative implant size prediction in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the accuracy of its prediction is reported to be low, and the impact of radiograph quality is unclear.

Purpose

To investigate on the application of lateral knee radiograph quality criteria for knee rotation (KR) and knee abduction/adduction (KA) and their impact on the accuracy of final implant size prediction achieved by preoperative digital templating for TKA.

Methods

A total of 191 radiographs of patients undergoing TKA were allocated into four groups according to their KR as measured at the posterior femoral condyles and their KA as measured at the distal femoral condyles on lateral knee radiographs: group A (KR ≤ 5 mm, KA ≤ 5 mm), B1 (KR > 5 mm, KA ≤ 5 mm), B2 (KR ≤ 5 mm, KA > 5 mm) and B3 (KR > 5 mm, KA > 5 mm). Preoperative templating of femoral and tibial implant size using digital templating software was carried out by two observers. Correlation coefficients (CCs) between planned and final implant size, percentage of cases with planned to final size match as well as percentage of cases within ±1 and ±2 of planned to final size were reported according to groups.

Results

Group A showed the highest percentage of cases with matching planned to final femoral implant size (45%) and the highest percentage of cases with ±1 planned to final implant size (86%) as compared to B1 (match 28%, ±1 84%), B2 (match 41%, ±1 84%) and B3 (match 35%, ±1 78%). CCs for planned to final implant size were reported at >0.75 in all groups. No statistically significant difference in the CCs of planned to final implant size amongst groups was found.

Conclusion

The accuracy of implant size prediction achieved by preoperative digital templating for TKA is neither affected by KR nor KA on lateral knee radiographs.

Level of evidence

Level III.

Orthopaedic surgeons display a positive outlook towards artificial intelligence: A survey among members of the AGA Society for Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the perspective of orthopaedic surgeons on the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) and to evaluate the influence of experience, workplace setting and familiarity with digital solutions on views on AI.

Methods

Orthopaedic surgeons of the AGA Society for Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery were invited to participate in an online, cross-sectional survey designed to gather information on professional background, subjective AI knowledge, opinion on the future impact of AI, openness towards different applications of AI, and perceived advantages and disadvantages of AI. Subgroup analyses were performed to examine the influence of experience, workplace setting and openness towards digital solutions on perspectives towards AI.

Results

Overall, 360 orthopaedic surgeons participated. The majority indicated average (43.6%) or rudimentary (38.1%) AI knowledge. Most (54.5%) expected AI to substantially influence orthopaedics within 5-10 years, predominantly as a complementary tool (91.1%). Preoperative planning (83.8%) was identified as the most likely clinical use case. A lack of consensus was observed regarding acceptable error levels. Time savings in preoperative planning (62.5%) and improved documentation (81%) were identified as notable advantages while declining skills of the next generation (64.5%) were rated as the most substantial drawback. There were significant differences in subjective AI knowledge depending on participants' experience (p = 0.021) and familiarity with digital solutions (p < 0.001), acceptable error levels depending on workplace setting (p = 0.004), and prediction of AI impact depending on familiarity with digital solutions (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The majority of orthopaedic surgeons in this survey anticipated a notable positive impact of AI on their field, primarily as an assistive technology. A lack of consensus on acceptable error levels of AI and concerns about declining skills among future surgeons were observed.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, cross-sectional study.

Accuracy and clinical role of digital templating for total knee arthroplasty performed on haemophilic knees

INTRODUCTION

In total knee arthroplasty (TKA), choosing the correct implant size is important. There is lack of data on accuracy of templating on haemophilic knees. Our aim was to test the accuracy of 2D digital templating for TKA on haemophilic arthropathy (HA) of knee.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

TKAs performed on HA between January 2011 and January 2022 were screened. Osteoarthritis (OA) group was created as control group by a one-to-one matching regarding type of implant used. Intra- and interobserver correlations were measured in HA, then correlation between templated and implanted sizes was investigated in four assessments (femur AP, femur lateral, tibia AP, tibia lateral), then compared with OA group. Fifty-eight knees in each group included.

RESULTS

Regarding intraobserver correlation in HA, there was excellent correlation for femur AP [.93 (.73-.98)], femur lateral [.98 (.91-.99)], and tibia AP (1.0) templating. Regarding interobserver correlation in HA, excellent correlation was observed for femur lateral [.93 (.74-.98)] and tibia AP templating [.90 (.65-.97)]. Regarding correlation of templated and applied sizes in HA; tibia AP, tibia lateral and femur lateral templating showed good correlation [.81 (.70-.89), .86 (.77-.91), .79 (.67-.87) while femur AP templating showed moderate correlation [.67 (.50-.79)]. Comparing HA and OA, there was no difference in correlation levels regarding femur AP, femur lateral, tibia AP and tibia lateral templating (p = .056, p = .781, p = .761, p = .083, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Although 2D digital templating shows comparable correlation in HA and OA, clinical applicability of templating on HA appears to be limited in its current state.

The relationship between heavy metals and metabolic syndrome using machine learning

Background

Exposure to high levels of heavy metals has been widely recognized as an important risk factor for metabolic syndrome (MetS). The main purpose of this study is to assess the associations between the level of heavy metal exposure and Mets using machine learning (ML) method.

Methods

The data used in this study are from the national health and nutrition examination survey 2003-2018. According to the demographic information and heavy metal exposure level of participants, a total of 22 variables were included. Lasso was used to screen out the key variables, and 9 commonly used ML models were selected to establish the associations with the 5-fold cross validation method. Finally, we choose the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method to explain the prediction results of Adaboost model.

Results

11,667 eligible individuals were randomly divided into two groups to train and verify the prediction model. Through lasso, characteristic variables were selected from 24 variables as predictors. The AUC (area under curve) of the models selected in this study were all greater than 0.7, and AdaBoost was the best model. The AUC value of AdaBoost was 0.807, the accuracy was 0.720, and the sensitivity was 0.792. It is noteworthy that higher levels of cadmium, body mass index, cesium, being female, and increasing age were associated with an increased probability of MetS. Conversely, lower levels of cobalt and molybdenum were linked to a decrease in the estimated probability of MetS.

Conclusion

Our study highlights the AdaBoost model proved to be highly effective, precise, and resilient in detecting a correlation between exposure to heavy metals and MetS. Through the use of interpretable methods, we identified cadmium, molybdenum, cobalt, cesium, uranium, and barium as prominent contributors within the predictive model.

Enabling Personalized Medicine in Orthopaedic Surgery Through Artificial Intelligence: A Critical Analysis Review

» The application of artificial intelligence (AI) in the field of orthopaedic surgery holds potential for revolutionizing health care delivery across 3 crucial domains: (I) personalized prediction of clinical outcomes and adverse events, which may optimize patient selection, surgical planning, and enhance patient safety and outcomes; (II) diagnostic automated and semiautomated imaging analyses, which may reduce time burden and facilitate precise and timely diagnoses; and (III) forecasting of resource utilization, which may reduce health care costs and increase value for patients and institutions.» Computer vision is one of the most highly studied areas of AI within orthopaedics, with applications pertaining to fracture classification, identification of the manufacturer and model of prosthetic implants, and surveillance of prosthesis loosening and failure.» Prognostic applications of AI within orthopaedics include identifying patients who will likely benefit from a specified treatment, predicting prosthetic implant size, postoperative length of stay, discharge disposition, and surgical complications. Not only may these applications be beneficial to patients but also to institutions and payors because they may inform potential cost expenditure, improve overall hospital efficiency, and help anticipate resource utilization.» AI infrastructure development requires institutional financial commitment and a team of clinicians and data scientists with expertise in AI that can complement skill sets and knowledge. Once a team is established and a goal is determined, teams (1) obtain, curate, and label data; (2) establish a reference standard; (3) develop an AI model; (4) evaluate the performance of the AI model; (5) externally validate the model, and (6) reinforce, improve, and evaluate the model's performance until clinical implementation is possible.» Understanding the implications of AI in orthopaedics may eventually lead to wide-ranging improvements in patient care. However, AI, while holding tremendous promise, is not without methodological and ethical limitations that are essential to address. First, it is important to ensure external validity of programs before their use in a clinical setting. Investigators should maintain high quality data records and registry surveillance, exercise caution when evaluating others' reported AI applications, and increase transparency of the methodological conduct of current models to improve external validity and avoid propagating bias. By addressing these challenges and responsibly embracing the potential of AI, the medical field may eventually be able to harness its power to improve patient care and outcomes.

Reliability of artificial intelligence in predicting total knee arthroplasty component sizes: a systematic review

PURPOSE

This systematic review aimed to investigate the reliability of AI predictive models of intraoperative implant sizing in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

Four databases were searched from inception till July 2023 for original studies that studied the reliability of AI prediction in TKA. The primary outcome was the accuracy ± 1 size. This review was conducted per PRISMA guidelines, and the risk of bias was assessed using the MINORS criteria.

RESULTS

A total of four observational studies comprised of at least 34,547 patients were included in this review. A mean MINORS score of 11 out of 16 was assigned to the review. All included studies were published between 2021 and 2022, with a total of nine different AI algorithms reported. Among these AI models, the accuracy of TKA femoral component sizing prediction ranged from 88.3 to 99.7% within a deviation of one size, while tibial component sizing exhibited an accuracy ranging from 90 to 99.9% ± 1 size.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated the potential of AI as a valuable complement for planning TKA, exhibiting a satisfactory level of reliability in predicting TKA implant sizes. This predictive accuracy is comparable to that of the manual and digital templating techniques currently documented in the literature. However, future research is imperative to assess the impact of AI on patient care and cost-effectiveness.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023446868.

Application of Machine Learning Algorithms for Prognostic Assessment in Rotator Cuff Pathologies: A Clinical Data-Based Approach

AIM

The overall aim of this proposal is to ameliorate the care of rotator cuff (RC) tear patients by applying an innovative machine learning approach for outcome prediction after arthroscopic repair.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We applied state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms to evaluate the best predictors of the outcome, and 100 RC patients were evaluated at baseline (T0), after 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2), 6 months (T3), and 1 year (T4) from surgical intervention. The outcome measure was the Costant-Murley Shoulder Score, whereas age, sex, BMI, the 36-Item Short-Form Survey, the Simple Shoulder Test, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score, the Oxford Shoulder Score, and the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index were considered as predictive factors. Support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbors (k-NN), naïve Bayes (NB), and random forest (RF) algorithms were employed.

RESULTS

Across all sessions, the classifiers demonstrated suboptimal performance when using both the complete and shrunken sets of features. Specifically, the logistic regression (LR) classifier achieved a mean accuracy of 46.5% ± 6%, while the random forest (RF) classifier achieved 51.25% ± 4%. For the shrunken set of features, LR obtained a mean accuracy of 48.5% ± 6%, and RF achieved 45.5% ± 4.5%. No statistical differences were found when comparing the performance metrics of ML algorithms.

CONCLUSIONS

This study underlines the importance of extending the application of AI methods to new predictors, such as neuroimaging and kinematic data, in order to better record significant shifts in RC patients' prognosis.

LIMITATIONS

The data quality within the cohort could represent a limitation, since certain variables, such as smoking, diabetes, and work injury, are known to have an impact on the outcome.

A role for artificial intelligence applications inside and outside of the operating theatre: a review of contemporary use associated with total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Artificial intelligence (AI) has become involved in many aspects of everyday life, from voice-activated virtual assistants built into smartphones to global online search engines. Similarly, many areas of modern medicine have found ways to incorporate such technologies into mainstream practice. Despite the enthusiasm, robust evidence to support the utility of AI in contemporary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains limited. The purpose of this review was to provide an up-to-date summary of the use of AI in TKA and to explore its current and future value.

METHODS

Initially, a structured systematic review of the literature was carried out, following PRISMA search principles, with the aim of summarising the understanding of the field and identifying clinical and knowledge gaps.

RESULTS

A limited body of published work exists in this area. Much of the available literature is of poor methodological quality and many published studies could be best described as "demonstration of concepts" rather than "proof of concepts". There exists almost no independent validation of reported findings away from designer/host sites, and the extrapolation of key results to general orthopaedic sites is limited.

CONCLUSION

While AI has certainly shown value in a small number of specific TKA-associated applications, the majority to date have focused on risk, cost and outcome prediction, rather than surgical care, per se. Extensive future work is needed to demonstrate external validity and reliability in non-designer settings. Well-performed studies are warranted to ensure that the scientific evidence base supporting the use of AI in knee arthroplasty matches the global hype.

Imaging in Hip Arthroplasty Management-Part 1: Templating: Past, Present and Future

Hip arthroplasty is a frequently used procedure with high success rates. Its main indications are primary or secondary advanced osteoarthritis, due to acute fracture, osteonecrosis of the femoral head, and hip dysplasia. The goals of HA are to reduce pain and restore normal hip biomechanics, allowing a return to the patient’s normal activities. To reach those goals, the size of implants must suit, and their positioning must meet, quality criteria, which can be determined by preoperative imaging. Moreover, mechanical complications can be influenced by implant size and position, and could be avoided by precise preoperative templating. Templating used to rely on standard radiographs, but recently the use of EOS^® imaging and CT has been growing, given the 3D approach provided by these methods. However, there is no consensus on the optimal imaging work-up, which may have an impact on the outcomes of the procedure. This article reviews the current principles of templating, the various imaging techniques used for it, as well as their advantages and drawbacks, and their expected results.

Meaningless Applications and Misguided Methodologies in Artificial Intelligence-Related Orthopaedic Research Propagates Hype Over Hope

There exists great hope and hype in the literature surrounding applications of artificial intelligence (AI) to orthopaedic surgery. Between 2018 and 2021, a total of 178 AI-related articles were published in orthopaedics. However, for every 2 original research papers that apply AI to orthopaedics, a commentary or review is published (30.3%). AI-related research in orthopaedics frequently fails to provide use cases that offer the uninitiated an opportunity to appraise the importance of AI by studying meaningful questions, evaluating unknown hypotheses, or analyzing quality data. The hype perpetuates a feed-forward cycle that relegates AI to a meaningless buzzword by rewarding those with nascent understanding and rudimentary technical knowhow into committing several basic errors: (1) inappropriately conflating vernacular ("AI/machine learning"), (2) repackaging registry data, (3) prematurely releasing internally validated algorithms, (4) overstating the "black box phenomenon" by failing to provide weighted analysis, (5) claiming to evaluate AI rather than the data itself, and (6) withholding full model architecture code. Relevant AI-specific guidelines are forthcoming, but forced application of the original Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis guidelines designed for regression analyses is irrelevant and misleading. To safeguard meaningful use, AI-related research efforts in orthopaedics should be (1) directed toward administrative support over clinical evaluation and management, (2) require the use of the advanced model, and (3) answer a question that was previously unknown, unanswered, or unquantifiable.

Artificial Intelligence Based Patient-Specific Preoperative Planning Algorithm for Total Knee Arthroplasty

Previous studies have shown that the manufacturer's default preoperative plans for total knee arthroplasty with patient-specific guides require frequent, time-consuming changes by the surgeon. Currently, no research has been done on predicting preoperative plans for orthopedic surgery using machine learning. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate whether artificial intelligence (AI) driven planning tools can create surgeon and patient-specific preoperative plans that require fewer changes by the surgeon. A dataset of 5409 preoperative plans, including the manufacturer's default and the plans corrected by 39 surgeons, was collected. Features were extracted from the preoperative plans that describe the implant sizes, position, and orientation in a surgeon- and patient-specific manner. Based on these features, non-linear regression models were employed to predict the surgeon's corrected preoperative plan. The average number of corrections a surgeon has to make to the preoperative plan generated using AI was reduced by 39.7% compared to the manufacturer's default plan. The femoral and tibial implant size in the manufacturer's plan was correct in 68.4% and 73.1% of the cases, respectively, while the AI-based plan was correct in 82.2% and 85.0% of the cases, respectively, compared to the surgeon approved plan. Our method successfully demonstrated the use of machine learning to create preoperative plans in a surgeon- and patient-specific manner for total knee arthroplasty.