Good results after treatment of RAMP lesions in association with ACL reconstruction: a systematic review

Both Hamstring and Quadriceps Tendon Autografts Offer Similar Functional Outcomes After Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Patients Aged 50 Years or Older

PURPOSE

To compare the outcomes of hamstring tendon (HT) and quadriceps tendon (QT) autografts for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in patients aged 50 years or older in terms of patient-reported functional outcomes, graft failure rates, complications, return to sports activity, and sports preference.

METHODS

Between 2010 and 2022, prospectively collected data were obtained from an institutional database. Patients aged 50 years or older who underwent primary arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with either HT or QT autograft and had a minimum 2-year follow-up were included. Patients with concomitant meniscal, cartilage, and medial collateral ligament injuries were also included. Patients undergoing revision ACL reconstruction, those undergoing primary ACL reconstruction with a graft other than HT or QT autograft, and those with contralateral knee injuries or ipsilateral osteoarthritis (Ahlbäck stage ≥2) were excluded. Patients were evaluated in terms of the Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity level, and visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain before injury and at 2-year follow-up, as well as graft failure, QT rupture, and return to sport. The Mann-Whitney test was used to analyze unpaired samples, whereas the Friedman test was used to analyze variables over time. The χ2 statistic test was used to determine differences in categorical data between groups.

RESULTS

The number of patients in the QT and HT groups was 85 and 143, respectively. In the QT and HT groups, the mean age was 54.4 years (range, 50-65 years) and 56.4 years (range, 50-65 years), respectively, and 49% and 51% of patients were men, respectively. The 2 groups did not differ significantly in terms of age, sex, time from injury to surgery, and concomitant injuries. No significant differences in preinjury patient-reported outcome measures, consisting of the Lysholm score, Tegner activity level, and VAS pain score, were found between the 2 groups (P > .05). At the 2-year follow-up, the Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity level, and VAS pain score improved to preinjury levels and no significant differences in preinjury and 2-year follow-up functional scores were noted between the 2 groups (P > .05). Furthermore, at the 2-year follow-up, the Lysholm score and VAS pain score did not show significant differences (P = .390 and P = .131, respectively) between the QT and HT groups. Similarly, no differences in Tegner activity level were observed between the HT and QT groups at the 2-year follow-up. No significant differences in terms of the minimal clinically important difference were detected between the 2 groups for the Lysholm knee score (P = .410) and Tegner activity level (P = .420). The 2 groups did not differ in terms of patients' percentage of sports participation at baseline and at the 2-year follow-up (P > .05). A significant decrease (P = .01) in participation in skiing/snowboarding was reported in the HT group at the 2-year follow-up compared with baseline (116 patients [81%] vs 98 patients [69%]). No case of graft failure or QT rupture was reported in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using HT or QT autografts in athletically active patients aged 50 years or older provides satisfactory patient-reported functional outcomes and allows recovery of the preinjury level of activity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Editorial Commentary: Medial Meniscal Ramp Tears Require Comprehensive Evaluation and Treatment

Various classifications have been proposed for medial meniscal ramp tears, but none have been subjected to validation, reliability, or outcome analysis. A medial meniscal ramp tear is a peripheral detachment of the posterior horn of the meniscus due to either a tear of the meniscocapsular junction or the meniscotibial ligament, or both. Ramp tears are commonly found in association with anterior cruciate ligament rupture. The fascial expansion of the semimembranosus tendon is attached to the posterior horn of the medial meniscus; excessive anterior translation of the tibia stimulates the semimembranosus to contract, resulting in a ramp tear. Risk factors include deep and superficial medial collateral ligament injuries, steep medial tibial slope, flatter lateral tibial slope, varus alignment greater than 3°, posteromedial tibial bone contusion on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), Segond fracture, and a chronic injury (3 months or more from injury). Untreated ramp lesions are associated with increased anterior knee laxity, which may increase the risk of anterior cruciate ligament graft failure. Diagnosis of a ramp tear is not always straightforward. MRI has only moderate sensitivity because the posterior capsule tightens in extension, reducing meniscocapsular separation. High-resolution MRI with the knee in flexion can improve accuracy. Nevertheless, the gold standard for diagnosis is arthroscopy. Unstable tears should be repaired, and as the meniscocapsular junction has good vascularity, some stable tears may heal after abrasion or trephination. A good classification system should characterize a problem, determine the best treatment, and predict the outcome. Classification systems also aid the consistent reporting and comparison of clinical data.

Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Improves Sexual Health Postoperatively

Purpose

To investigate changes in sexual function and quality of life following arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction.

Methods

Patients aged between 18 and 45 years who underwent PCL reconstruction were considered for inclusion. At the time of hospital admission, each patient was asked to complete the New Sexual Satisfaction Scale-Short Form, before injury (preinjury) and at the time of hospital admission (preoperative). In addition, patients were followed for a minimum of 24 months (final follow-up). Quality of life was measured using the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Quality of Life Questionnaire at hospital admission (preoperative) and at the 24-month follow-up visit (final follow-up).

Results

A total of 35 patients were included in the study; 24 (68.6%) were male, and 11 were female (31.4%). The mean age at the time of surgery was 29.23 ± 7.52 years, and the mean follow-up duration was 52.97 ± 22.69 months. In all patients, the hamstring tendon was used. Sexual activity at the last follow-up visit was significantly different from that preoperatively (P = .024), while no difference was observed between the preinjury and last follow-up values (P = . 243). Sexual activity was more frequent before injury than preoperatively (P = . 009). Quality of life at the last follow-up visit was significantly better than that preoperatively (P < .001).

Conclusions

Reconstructive surgery after PCL injury improves the sexual health of patients regardless of age or sex.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

High-grade medial femoral condyle and medial tibial plateau bone bruises predict ramp lesions of the medial meniscus in patients with anterior cruciate ligament tears: A prospective clinical and MRI evaluation

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate potential predictive diagnostic variables on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for medial meniscus ramp tears in the presence of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear.

Methods

Patients aged ≥16 years undergoing arthroscopic anatomic hamstring single-bundle ACL reconstruction between July 2016 and September 2020 from a single centre were prospectively enroled with a diagnosis based on clinical and MRI evaluations. Demographic data such as age, gender, dominant limb and time from injury to surgery were recorded. Clinical assessments included Lachman and pivot shift tests. Imaging assessments involved grading bone bruises on MRI using the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) scale. Statistical analysis was conducted using parametric tests and regression analysis with a p value of less than 0.05, which is considered significant.

Results

The final sample consisted of 108 patients, with a concomitant ACL tear and medial meniscus ramp tear present in 53 (49.1%) patients. In the univariate regression analysis, a higher grade of the medial femoral condyle and medial tibial plateau bone bruises was highly associated with the diagnosis of an ACL tear with a concomitant ramp tear (p = 0.006, β = 0.151 and p < 0.001, β = 0.172, respectively). In the univariate regression analysis, a higher grade of the medial femoral condyle and medial tibial plateau bone bruise was associated with the diagnosis of ACL tear with a concomitant ramp tear (p = 0.006, β = 0.151 and p < 0.001, β = 0.172, respectively).

Conclusion

In this prospective series of patients with ACL tears, 49% were found to have concomitant medial meniscal ramp tears. The finding of medial tibial plateau or medial femoral condyle bone bruising was predictive of ramp tear. The presence of this bone bruising pattern along with a high-grade Lachman and/or pivot shift examination, a medial meniscus ramp tear should be suspected.

Level of Evidence

Level II, prospective cohort study.

Editorial Commentary: Medial Meniscal Ramp Lesions in the Setting of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears Contribute to High-Grade Anterior and Rotatory Laxity That Are Normalized by Repair

Meniscal ramp lesions are reported to occur in 9% to 42% of anterior cruciate ligament tears. Biomechanical research shows that the presence of a meniscal ramp lesion, in the setting of an anterior cruciate ligament tear, leads to increased knee anteroposterior and rotatory laxity when compared with an uninjured medial meniscus. This finding also has been verified clinically. Repair of ramp lesions has been shown to improve biomechanics. Accordingly, the influence of meniscal ramp lesions on knee laxity necessitates a comprehensive physical examination, imaging review, and diagnostic arthroscopy to support identification and treatment of these injuries. Arthroscopic probing is required to assess ramp lesion stability. It is generally accepted that up to 30% of ramp lesions are unstable and warrant repair, as determined by tear ≤1 cm, displacement into the medial compartment with probing, and extension beyond the lower pole of the femoral condyle.

Comparison of the effects of endobutton continuous loop and adjustable zip loop devices on bone tunnel enlargement and clinical results in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A retrospective observational study

It was aimed to reveal the effects of 2 different techniques [Endobutton Continuous Loop (CL), ZipLoop technique] used for graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction on bone tunnel enlargement and clinical results. Patients who underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendon graft due to ACL rupture between January 2016 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The study included 80 patients who were operated on by the same surgical team in the same clinic. Forty patients who underwent repair using the suspension system ZipLoop technique were classified as Group 1, and 40 patients who underwent repair using the Endobutton CL technique were classified as Group 2. Plain radiography and MRI were used to evaluate bone tunnel widening. Visual analog scale (VAS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) knee assessment score, and Lysholm scores were evaluated at the last follow-up to evaluate clinical outcomes. When bone tunnel enlargement was evaluated between the groups, femoral and tibial tunnel enlargement was found to be greater and statistically significant in Group 2 patients in direct radiography measurements. No statistically significant difference was found in tunnel enlargement in MRI measurements (P > .05). However, in MRI measurements, the graft apex-tunnel apex distance was found to be greater and statistically significant in Group 2 patients (P < .05). When the clinical results of both groups were compared, no statistically significant difference was found in VAS, IKDC and Lsyholm scores (P > .05). The graft fixation method affects bone tunnel enlargement. However, it was observed that this had no effect on clinical results.

[Revision of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Interpretation of the consensus by the European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy (ESSKA)]

Revision of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is more challenging than primary ACL reconstruction and often yields less favorable outcomes. The European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy (ESSKA) has established a consensus regarding preoperative diagnosis, assessment, and selection criteria for ACL revision surgery. This consensus addresses 18 key issues that are most pertinent to clinical practice, providing guiding recommendations aimed at improving the prognosis of ACL revisions.

Multiple secondary stabiliser injuries increase rotational instability in anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees

PURPOSE

Medial meniscus ramp lesions (MMRLs), lateral meniscus posterior root tears (LMPRTs), and anterolateral complex injuries (ALCIs) are major secondary stabiliser injuries associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. This study aimed to investigate the effect of the number of secondary stabiliser injuries on knee instability in ACL injuries.

METHODS

Patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction between January 2017 and May 2023 were enroled in this study. Exclusion criteria encompassed patients with other ligament injuries, a history of contralateral knee injury, hyperextension, flexion contracture and meniscus injuries other than MMRL or LMPRT. Ultimately, 158 patients (mean age: 25.3 years; 81 males and 77 females) were included in this study, and the presence of MMRL, LMPRT and ALCI was investigated. Patients were categorised into four groups based on the number of ACL and secondary stabiliser injuries: single (isolated ACL injury), dual, triad and tetrad. Subsequently, the groups were compared regarding pivot shift grade, quantitative rotational instability measured using an inertial sensor, and anterior tibial translation (ATT).

RESULTS

Secondary stabiliser injuries identified included ALCI 85 (53.8%), MMRL 58 (36.7%) and LMPRT 23 (14.6%). The distribution of patients in the single, dual, triad and tetrad groups was 45 (28.5%), 68 (43.0%), 37 (23.4%) and 8 (5.1%), respectively. High-grade pivot shifts were observed in 33.3% (15 out of 45) of the single group, 63.2% (43 out of 68) of the dual group, 67.6% (25 out of 37) of the triad group, and 100% (8 out of 8) of the tetrad group. Quantitative evaluations using the inertial sensor revealed significantly lower acceleration in the isolated ACL injury group compared to the other groups (p < 0.05). No significant difference was observed in ATT measurements (n.s.).

CONCLUSION

The combination of secondary stabiliser injuries led to higher instability. Therefore, it is important to carefully diagnose these injuries and devise appropriate treatment plans, particularly in cases of high knee instability.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III diagnostic.

Unrepaired ramp lesions are associated with a higher risk of secondary medial meniscus bucket handle tear compared to lateral meniscus bucket handle tear after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Purpose

To compare the risk of a secondary bucket handle tear (BHT) of the medial and lateral menisci after an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with an unrecognized ramp lesion. The hypothesis was that an unrecognized ramp lesion would be associated with a secondary medial meniscus BHT more often than a lateral meniscus BHT.

Methods

A retrospective review of adults aged 18 or older who experienced a meniscal BHT after ACLR was conducted. An analysis of the clinical and radiological data from initial injury to revision surgery was completed. Two experts retrospectively documented the prevalence of ramp lesions present on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at the time of the index ACLR. The predictive value of a ramp lesion for BHT laterality was evaluated using logistic regression.

Results

Seventy-six patients, 46 in the medial BHT group and 30 in the lateral BHT group, were included. A ramp lesion was present on the preoperative MRI in 33 patients in the medial BHT group compared to 13 in the lateral BHT group (p = 0.02, odds ratio: 3.2, 95% confidence interval: 1.2-8.0). In the logistic regression analysis, the only independent factor that predicted the occurrence of a medial BHT compared to a lateral BHT was the presence of a ramp tear on preoperative MRI before the index ACL surgery (logworth = 1.59; p = 0.03).

Conclusion

After a primary ACLR, an untreated ramp lesion was associated with a post-operative medial BHT more often than a lateral BHT. Unrepaired ramp lesions may be a risk factor for subsequent medial meniscus BHT after primary ACLR.

Level of Evidence

Level IV.

Effect of Ramp Lesions on Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Background

Ramp lesions (RLs) associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury increase knee instability. However, whether RLs should be treated surgically remains unclear.

Purpose/Hypothesis

This study aimed to investigate the presence of RLs and compare the knee stability between patients who underwent surgical repair for unstable RLs and those who received nonoperative management for stable RLs. It was hypothesized that there would be a correlation between RLs and knee instability and that RL repair would improve postoperative knee stability.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

Overall, 180 patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendon graft were included in this study. The decision to perform surgical intervention for RLs was based on the size and instability of the RL. Knee stability was evaluated using the KT-1000 arthrometer for side-to-side difference at the manual maximum, as well as the Lachman and pivot-shift tests. Linear and logistic regression analyses were employed to examine factors associated with knee instability.

Results

Arthroscopy confirmed RLs in 59 patients (32.8%), with a higher prevalence among women; of this total, 33 patients (55.9%) were treated nonoperatively and 26 (44.1%) underwent repair. Although the preoperative side-to-side difference in laxity in the patients with RL was significantly greater than that in patients without RL (P = .01), no significant clinical differences were observed for the preoperative Lachman test (P = .50) and pivot-shift test (P = .36). No secondary meniscal injuries occurred during the follow-up period. There were no significant differences in postoperative laxity between patients with and without RLs.

Conclusion

Although the presence of RLs was associated with preoperative knee instability, contrary to the hypothesis, RLs were not associated with postoperative knee instability. Stable RLs are clinically benign lesions that may tend to heal spontaneously after appropriate anatomic ACL reconstruction. Therefore, RLs may not require aggressive treatment if they are small and stable.

Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma in meniscal repair surgery: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

This study's primary objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) administration for meniscal injuries treated with meniscal repair procedures (sutures), using radiologic measures and clinical scales. The secondary objective was to identify potential bias-inducing elements in the analyzed studies.

METHODS

In December 2023, a systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Scopus for randomized controlled trials. This review compares PRP with placebo. Three studies were finally selected. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's Risk of Bias Tool 2. Radiologic evaluation of meniscal healing was measured with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and arthroscopic studies, while clinical evaluation was performed using four scales [Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), visual analog scale (VAS), International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index (WOMAC)] and by recording the incidence of complications.

RESULTS

The three selected studies included 139 patients; of these, 76 (54.7%) were randomly assigned to the intervention group (PRP injection) and 63 (45.3%) to the control group (placebo). The mean age of the intervention group was 37.4 ± 7.5 years, while the mean age of the control group was 36.5 ± 9.2 years. There were 41 female patients (29.5%). The median follow-up duration was 27.58 ± 17.3 months. MRI evaluation did not show a significant improvement in the PRP group in any of the studies (p-value = 0.41-0.54). However, when assessed by the cumulative evaluation of MRI and arthroscopy, the cumulative failure rate was significantly better in the PRP group (p-value = 0.04-0.048). One study that evaluated isolated arthroscopy also showed significant improvement in the PRP group (p = 0.003). Regarding the VAS scale, no study demonstrated a significant difference, except for one study that showed significant improvement after 6 months and in the difference between the 3rd and 6th months. The KOOS scale yielded conflicting results; one study showed no significant difference, while the other two indicated significant improvement. The IKDC and WOMAC scales were evaluated in two studies, showing opposite results. All included studies reported no complications, and one study indicated no increased risk in the treatment group.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this review indicate the necessity for further studies to make a definitive statement about the effectiveness of PRP administration in meniscal repair processes. Level of evidence Systematic review and meta-analysis of articles of level 1.

Comparing Postoperative Outcomes of Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and the "Terrible Triad" Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Medial Meniscus Ramp and Lateral Meniscus Root Repairs

Background

A new "terrible triad" has been reported to be an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear with a concomitant medial meniscus ramp tear and lateral meniscus root tear. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for isolated ACL reconstruction (ACLR) versus an ACLR with concomitant medial meniscus ramp and lateral meniscus root repairs are not well known.

Purpose

To compare postoperative outcomes between isolated ACLR and ACLR with concomitant medial meniscus ramp and lateral meniscus root repairs.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

An initial cohort of 1228 patients with ACLRs were retrospectively identified between April 2016 and November 2021. A total of 41 patients with isolated ACLR (isolated cohort) were age and sex matched to 41 patients who had an ACLR with concomitant medial meniscus ramp and lateral meniscus root repairs (triad cohort). Patients in the triad cohort were identified consecutively by date of surgery. Preoperative and ≥2-year postoperative PROs were evaluated to compare the isolated cohort with the triad cohort. Statistical analysis was performed with unpaired t tests and chi-square tests.

Results

Both the isolated cohort and triad cohort demonstrated significant differences between preoperative and postoperative PROs in all questionnaire categories assessed. Postoperative scores for the International Knee Documentation Committee (isolated, 88.8; triad, 86.2; P = .392), Cincinnati (isolated, 91.1; triad, 88.1; P = .295), and Lysholm (isolated, 92.1; triad, 90.1; P = .472) PROs demonstrated no significant differences between the cohorts. No significant difference was found between the isolated and triad cohorts for all preoperative questionnaire categories. Additionally, no significant difference was found in revision or reoperation rates between isolated and triad patients (P = .733).

Conclusion

No significant differences in PROs were found at minimum follow-up of 2 years postoperatively between the patients who underwent isolated ACLR (isolated cohort) and those who underwent ACLR with concomitant medial meniscus ramp and lateral meniscus root repairs (triad cohort). Inferior outcomes were not observed in the triad cohort when revision rates, reoperation rates, and postoperative PROs were compared. Given the optimistic short-term outcomes for isolated versus triad ACLR patients and the known biomechanical consequences of these untreated meniscal injuries, medial meniscus ramp and lateral meniscus root repairs should be performed when encountered concurrently with an ACL tear when possible.

Ramp lesions of the medial meniscus are associated with greater preoperative anterior knee laxity in anterior cruciate ligament injury

PURPOSE

To assess the incidence of ramp lesions in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries and to compare preoperative knee laxity between the patients with and without ramp lesions by using an electromagnetic measurement system (EMS).

METHODS

Two hundred six patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction with preoperative EMS measurements were retrospectively enrolled in the present study. The diagnoses of the ramp lesions were made by arthroscopic inspections. The patients with ramp lesions and no other meniscal lesions were allocated to 'ramp group', and the patients without any meniscal lesions were allocated to 'control group'. Before ACL reconstruction under general anaesthesia, the side-to-side difference (SSD) in anterior tibial translation (ATT) during Lachman test (mm) and tibial acceleration (m/s2) of posterior tibial reduction during the pivot-shift test was measured using the EMS. The SSD in tibial internal/external rotation angle (°) at 30, 60 and 90 were further measured using the EMS. The SSD in ATT using KT-2000 was also measured. Knee laxity measurements were compared between two groups using unpaired Student's t test.

RESULTS

Ramp lesions were observed in 30 patients (14.7%). Subsequently, 17 patients were allocated to 'ramp group' and 77 patients to 'control group', and there were no statistical differences with regard to background demographics. ATT-SSD during Lachman test was significantly greater in 'ramp group' (9.1 [95% confidence interval, CI: 5.7-12.5] mm vs. 6.2 [95% CI: 5.1-7.3] mm, p = 0.037). However, SSD in ATT with KT-2000, tibial acceleration during pivot-shift test, and SSD in tibial rotational angles were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Presence of ramp lesion was associated with increased anterior knee laxity during Lachman test, suggesting ramp lesions may need to be addressed at the time of ACL reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear: Individualized Indications for Non-Operative Management

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture represents a common sports injury that is mostly managed operatively. However, non-operative treatment can also play a role, despite the limited high-quality published data on ACL tear management. Both methods have shown favorable outcomes, but clear guidelines based on high-quality research are lacking. Several factors should be considered and discussed with the patient before deciding on the best treatment method. These include patient characteristics and expectations, concomitant injuries, and clinical evaluation, with laxity or/and instability being one of the most essential parameters examined. This should eventually lead to an individualized approach for each patient to ensure the best possible outcome. This review aims to delve into all parameters that are related to ACL rupture and guide physicians in choosing the most appropriate treatment method for each patient.

New Graft Choices for ACL Reconstruction: Update Article

Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a common procedure for injuries to this ligament, especially in athletes. There are different types of grafts used, and the choice depends on several factors. Autologous grafts, from the patients themselves, are the most common option, with rapid incorporation and a lower failure rate. Allografts from donors have their role in specific cases. Synthetic grafts, used in the 1980s, have advantages such as the absence of morbidity at the donor site, but studies have shown long-term complications. Hybrid grafts, combining autologous grafts and allografts, have gained interest, allowing a larger diameter and reducing morbidity. Peroneus longus tendon autograft has received attention, with positive results, good knee function and less hypotrophy of the thigh at the donor site. Autologous quadriceps tendon graft has gained popularity, with results comparable to patellar and flexor tendon grafts, lower morbidity at the donor site and a lower rate of re-rupture. The choice of graft has evolved, with autologous flexor grafts being preferred for less active patients and patellar grafts with bone fragments for high-performance athletes. Allografts, synthetic and hybrid grafts have their role in specific circumstances. The choice must be based on scientific evidence, considering advantages and disadvantages. ACL reconstruction is a complex procedure that requires individual considerations to select the most appropriate graft.

Approaching ramp lesions from the different world of posterior knee compartment: A review of evidence with a proposal of a new classification and treatment

Ramp lesions (RLs) are peripheral lesions that occur in the posterior part of the medial meniscus or where it attaches to the joint capsule. The classification of the medial meniscus RLs has been the focus of numerous studies and publications. This review provides an overview of RL's current classification and treatment options in anterior cruciate ligament deficient knees. The study also aims to present a more practical classification system for RLs to assist in treatment decision-making. For the first time, we also presented a new surgical treatment for incomplete inferior and double-complete RL based on the posterior knee arthroscopy that provides direct access to the posterior meniscal borders, enabling effective treatment and stronger biomechanical repair.

Level of Evidence

Level V.

The Incidence of Injuries to Ramp Semimembranosus Complex Lesions After ACL Injury: An MRI Study

Background

Medial meniscal ramp lesions have recently been an area of interest because of their recognized prevalence in association with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures. Anatomically, the medial meniscal ramp is composed of the meniscocapsular ligament in continuity with the semimembranosus muscle and the meniscotibial ligament. Diagnosis of ramp semimembranosus complex (RSC) injuries remains challenging, and their prevalence is likely to be underestimated in comparison with ramp lesions.

Purpose

To determine the prevalence of RSC lesions after a complete ACL rupture.

Study Design

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

A retrospective database analysis was performed. The cohort consisted of the first 100 patients with complete ACL rupture confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) who underwent knee arthroscopy for ACL reconstruction in 2019. The semimembranosus lesions were identified using MRI by 2 independent radiologists specializing in musculoskeletal imaging. The ramp lesions were initially diagnosed using MRI and then confirmed during arthroscopy by an experienced knee surgeon. The magnitude of rotatory instability was recorded using the pivot-shift test. A multivariate analysis was used to determine the lesions associated with the semimembranosus complex.

Results

Of 100 patients, 53 showed lesions of the RSC; among them, 30 ramp lesions were confirmed after arthroscopic evaluation, and 40 semimembranosus lesions (23 without ramp lesion and 17 with ramp lesion) were found using MRI. A positive pivot shift was present in 57% of patients with combined RSC injury (P = .04) compared with 36% in patients without an RSC lesion.

Conclusion

Lesions of the RSC were found in more than half of ACL ruptures in this retrospective cohort. Rotational instability could be associated with combined ACL and RSC injury.

High incidence of RAMP lesions and a nonnegligible incidence of anterolateral ligament and posterior oblique ligament rupture in acute ACL injury

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the frequency of medial collateral ligament (MCL), posterior oblique ligament (POL) and anterolateral ligament (ALL) tears and different types of RAMP lesions of patients with verified acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

MRI was performed on patients with a clinical diagnosis of acute ACL injury. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they had an initially clinically noted ACL tear confirmed on MRI within 30 days of trauma.

RESULTS

A total of 146 patients were included in the study, 42 (28.8%) females and 104 (71.2%) males. The mean age at MRI was 27.2 ± 9.4 years, and the mean time from injury to MRI was 15.7 ± 7.8 days. Thirty-four (23.3%) patients had a complete MCL lesion, 32 (21.9%) had a complete POL lesion and 28 (19.2%) had a complete ALL lesion. One hundred and fourteen patients (78.1%) presented with RAMP lesions, while 20 (13.7%) patients reported other meniscal lesions. The mean medial and lateral tibial slopes were 4.0° ± 2.7° and 4.0° ± 3.1°, respectively. Only 10 (6.8%) patients reported no lesions associated with ACL rupture. The most common injuries were isolated RAMP type 3 (18-12.3%) and isolated RAMP type 1 (17-11.6%). Thirteen (8.9%) patients had a combination of MCL, POL and ALL rupture.

CONCLUSIONS

Isolated lesions of the ACL are extremely rare. In most cases, a single RAMP lesion should be investigated. In the presence of MCL injury, POL injury should always be suspected as well, while nearly 20% of patients present a rupture of the ALL. About one in 10 patients had three lesions (MCL, ALL and POL), and most of them had a combined RAMP lesion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Secondary Meniscectomy Rates and Risk Factors for Failed Repair of Ramp Lesions Performed at the Time of Primary ACL Reconstruction: An Analysis of 1037 Patients From the SANTI Study Group

BACKGROUND

Studies evaluating secondary meniscectomy rates and risk factors for failure of ramp repair are sparse and limited by small numbers and heterogeneity.

PURPOSES/HYPOTHESIS

The purposes were to determine the secondary meniscectomy rate for failure of ramp repair performed using a posteromedial portal suture hook at the time of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and to identify risk factors for secondary meniscectomy. It was hypothesized that patients who underwent ACLR combined with a lateral extra-articular procedure (LEAP) would experience significantly lower rates of secondary meniscectomy compared with those undergoing isolated ACLR.

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Patients undergoing primary ACLR and ramp repair between 2013 and 2020 were included in the study. Final follow-up for each patient was defined by his or her last appointment recorded in a prospective database (with a study end date of March 2023). The database and medical records were used to determine whether patients had undergone secondary meniscectomy for failure of ramp repair. Survivorship of ramp repair (using secondary meniscectomy as an endpoint) was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate analysis was used to investigate possible risk factors.

RESULTS

A total of 1037 patients were included in the study. The secondary meniscectomy rate after ramp repair was 7.7% at a mean final follow-up of 72.4 months. Patients without combined ACLR + LEAP were >2-fold more likely to undergo a secondary medial meniscectomy compared with those with combined ACLR + LEAP (hazard ratio, 2.455; 95% CI, 1.457-4.135; P = .0007). Age, sex, preoperative Tegner score, and time between injury and surgery were not significant risk factors for failure.

CONCLUSION

The rate of secondary meniscectomy after ramp repair performed through a posteromedial portal at the time of primary ACLR was low. Patients who underwent isolated ACLR (rather than ACLR + LEAP) were >2-fold more likely to undergo a secondary medial meniscectomy for failure of ramp repair. Additional risk factors for failure of ramp repair were not identified.

Using a combination of three clinical tests for detecting meniscal tears increases the accuracy of the clinical examination

BACKGROUND

Recent studies indicate that using combination of two or more clinical tests for detecting meniscal tear gets a higher sensitivity and specificity than any clinical test performed individually.

METHODS

The study involved 84 participants who were divided into two groups: the "OP group" consisting of participants diagnosed with a meniscal tear and who consequently underwent arthroscopic meniscectomy, and the "CN group" comprising of healthy participants with no history of knee injury. Two independent observers (orthopedic surgeons) recorded the results of six clinical tests: Thessaly Test, joint line tenderness, McMurray Test, Ege Test, Steinmann I Test, and atrophy of the thigh muscles. The tests were grouped into two combinations of three tests each. The first combination included Thessaly Test, joint line tenderness and McMurray Test, while the second combination comprised of remaining three tests. Cochran's Q Test was used to calculate interobserver variability for both combinations of clinical tests and for each test performed individually.

RESULTS

First combination of three clinical tests when considering the combination positive if two tests are positive had high sensitivity of 95%, specificity of 90.9%, and an overall accuracy of 92.9%. Furthermore, when compared to clinical tests performed individually, the combination demonstrated superior results.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that using a combination of three clinical tests for detection of meniscal tear (Thessaly Test, joint line tenderness, McMurray Test), when considering the combination positive if two tests are positive, has greater accuracy than six clinical tests performed individually. There were no statistically significant differences between observers.

Effects of an untreated medial meniscal ramp lesion on histological deterioration findings of the medial meniscus: A study in a porcine anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction model

Purpose

To evaluate the effect of untreated medial meniscal ramp lesions (MMRLs) on the tendon graft after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and histological findings of medial meniscus (MM) in a porcine a model.

Methods

A total of 17 pigs were divided into two groups: (1) the untreated MMRL group (UM group, n = 9) and (2) intact MM group (n = 8) and euthanized 12 weeks after surgery. The specimens were then tested cyclically and loaded to failure. Side-to-side differences (SSDs) in translation under cyclic loading and structural properties were analyzed. Histological evaluation of the MM was also performed.

Results

No significant differences in the SSD in translation during the cyclic testing (UM group, 0.3 ± 0.4 mm; intact MM group, 0.1 ± 1.4 mm), upper yield load (UM group, 476.3 ± 399.9 N; intact MM group, 643.2 ± 302.9 N), maximum load (UM group, 539.5 ± 265.8 N; intact MM group, 705.8 ± 282.6 N), linear stiffness (UM group, 63.5 ± 39.0 N/mm; intact MM group, 73.7 ± 60.1 N/mm) and elongation at failure (UM group, -4.6 ± 16.3 mm; intact MM group, 2.3 ± 6.6 mm) were observed. However, the UM group had significantly worse Modified Mankin's histological grading scores (1.8 ± 0.4 [1-2] vs. 0 ± 0 [0]; p < 0.001) and Modified Copenhaver classification scores (6.6 ± 2.4 [2-9] vs. 0.7 ± 1.1 [0-3]; p < 0.001) than did the intact MM group.

Conclusion

Untreated MMRLs showed postoperative histological deterioration.

Level of Evidence

Level IV.

Risk factors and prevalence of ramp lesions in ACL ruptures: An analysis from the registry of the Francophone Arthroscopic Society

PURPOSE

The study aimed to estimate the prevalence of ramp lesions among patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and identify risk factors associated with these lesions.

METHODS

A retrospective, multicentre cohort study was conducted using data from the Francophone Arthroscopic Society's registry, including 5359 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction (ACLR) from June 2020 to June 2023. Potential risk factors for ramp lesion such as patient demographics, revision surgery, pivot shift, side-to-side anteroposterior laxity, medial collateral ligament (MCL) injury, lateral meniscal tear and the volume of ligament remnant were evaluated using multivariate regression analyses. BMI and delay to surgery were also assessed.

RESULTS

Ramp lesions were identified in 822 patients (15.3%). Univariate analysis identified male sex, younger age, revision surgery, lateral meniscal injury, percentage of ACL remnant (all p < 0.0001) and pivot shift (p = 0.0103) as significant risk factors. MCL injury was associated with a lower risk (p < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, male sex, younger age, revision surgery, lateral meniscal injury and percentage of ACL remnants remained significant risk factors, while MCL injury remained a protective factor. The anteroposterior laxity wasn't a significant predictor in either analysis. In subgroup analysis, there were no differences concerning body mass index (n.s) and the delay to surgery (n.s).

CONCLUSION

The study identified male sex, younger age, revision surgery, lateral meniscal injury and pourcentage of ACL remnant as significant risk factors for ramp lesions, with MCL injury acting as a protective factor. This will help regarding the suspicion and identification of ramp lesions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Meniscus-Related Videos on TikTok Are Widely Viewed and Shared but the Educational Quality for Patients Is Poor

Purpose

To evaluate the quality of meniscus-related TikTok videos to better understand their value for patient education.

Methods

The term "meniscus" was used as the key word for an extensive online search of video content on the TikTok on November 14, 2023. The first 100 videos were used for analysis. The duration of the videos and the number of likes, shares, and views were recorded for each video. Furthermore, videos were categorized based on the source (health workers, private user), the type of subject (patient experience, physical therapy, anatomy, clinical examination, surgical technique and injury mechanism), type of content (patient experience/testimony, education, rehabilitation), and the presence of music or voice. The quality and reliability assessments of video contents were conducted using the DISCERN instrument, the Journal of the American Medical Association benchmark criteria, and Global Quality Score.

Results

Of the 100 videos included in this study, 62 (62%) videos were published by health workers and 38 by private users (38%). Most of the information regarded patient experience (36, 36%), followed by physical therapy (32, 32%), anatomy (14, 14%), clinical examination (8, 8%), surgical technique (6, 6%), and injury mechanism (4, 4%). Video content reported patient experience in 39 (39%) videos, rehabilitation in 31 (31%) videos, and education in the remaining 30 (30%). The mean length of the videos was 39.12 ± 49.56 seconds. The mean number of views was 1,383,001.65 ± 5,291,822.28, whereas the mean numbers of comments, likes and shares were 408.53 ± 1976.90, 54,763.43 ± 211,823.44 and 873.70 ± 2,802.01, respectively. The mean DISCERN score, Journal of the American Medical Association benchmark criteria score, and Global Quality Score were 17.93 ± 5.07, 0.24 ± 0.47, and 1.15 ± 0.41, respectively.

Conclusions

Meniscus-related videos on TikTok are widely viewed and shared but the overall educational value to patients is poor.

Clinical Relevance

As patients increasingly use social media to learn about their conditions, it is important for orthopaedic health care professionals to understand the limitations of TikTok videos addressing the meniscus as potential sources of information for their patients.

Magnetic resonance imaging shows low sensitivity but good specificity in detecting ramp lesions in children and adolescents with ACL injury: A systematic review

IMPORTANCE

The diagnosis of ramp lesions can be problematic, even with arthroscopy, due to their extreme posteromedial position. Consequently, they have been colloquially referred to as the "hidden lesions" of the knee. Undiagnosed and untreated injuries in this knee region may be associated with ongoing dynamic rotational laxity of the knee after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and an increased risk of anterior cruciate ligament graft failure.

AIM

This study aimed to systematically review the literature to assess the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detecting ramp lesions in children and adolescents with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knees. It was hypothesized that MRI has poor sensitivity for identifying ramp lesions in children and adolescents.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

A systematic review was conducted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The following search terms were used in the title, abstract and keywords fields: "ramp" or "meniscus" AND "children" or "adolescents." The outcome data extracted from the studies were incidence of ramp in concomitant with ACL lesion, MRI sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV).

FINDINGS

Of the 387 patients with ACL injury, 90 were reported to have ramp lesions (23.3%). The mean age at the time of diagnosis was 15.3 ​± ​0.81 years. The mean time from injury to MRI was 116.1 ​± ​113.5 days, while the mean time from injury to surgery was 172.6 ​± ​139.1 days. The MRI taken to detect ramp lesions in the paediatric population showed a pooled sensitivity of 50%, specificity of 75%, accuracy of 70%, PPV of 41% and NPV of 79%.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The prevalence of ACL-associated ramp lesions in children and adolescents is similar to that in adult populations. Magnetic resonance imaging has low sensitivity but good specificity for assessing ramp lesions. In the presence of a posteromedial tibial bone bruise or a thin fluid signal separating the posterior horn of the medial meniscus and the posteromedial capsule a ramp lesion should always be suspected.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

STUDY REGISTRATION

PROSPERO -: CRD42023453895.

Meniscal Ramp Lesion Repair Without the Need for a Posteromedial Portal

Medial meniscal ramp injury has gained the attention of orthopaedic surgeons in recent years. It consists of a tear of the peripheral insertion of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus. Its prevalence in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction varies between 9% and 40% according to different studies. Ramp lesions cannot always be diagnosed using magnetic resonance imaging scans. To identify ramp lesions, the arthroscope should be introduced into the posteromedial compartment of the knee during the routine examination of the knee (Gillquist maneuver). Not all authors advocate systematically repairing ramp injuries of the medial meniscus, especially when these injuries are small and stable. They have historically been repaired using an outside-in technique using a hook-type suture passed through a posteromedial portal. In this study, we present our all-inside suture technique without the use of a posteromedial portal.

A High-Grade Lachman's Exam Predicts a Ramp Tear of the Medial Meniscus in Patients with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear: A Prospective Clinical and Radiological Evaluation

Background: Medial meniscus ramp tears are present in 22.9-40.8% of anterior cruciate ligament tears. The diagnosis of ramp tears is difficult on MRI, with sensitivity reported around 48%, which has recently emphasized the importance of proper arthroscopic probing for ramp tears. Methods: A prospective evaluation was performed on patients undergoing a single bundle ACL reconstruction to assess patient demographics, posterior tibial slope, posterior cruciate ligament angle, Lachman's exam, and rotational instability to determine secondary findings associated with medial meniscal ramp tears. Results: A total of 96 patients underwent ACL reconstruction, of these, 63 patients had an isolated ACL tear, and 33 patients had an ACL tear with a concomitant medial meniscus ramp tear. A high-grade Lachman's exam and male sex were associated with medial meniscus ramp tears. There were no differences in posterior tibial slope, posterior cruciate ligament angle, or rotational instability between groups. Conclusions: This study found that a high-grade Lachman's exam and male sex were significantly associated with patients with an ACL tear with a concomitant medial meniscus ramp tear. These findings suggest that an ACL tear with concomitant medial meniscus ramp tear may be better diagnosed based upon the clinical evaluation rather than other secondary radiological findings.

Editorial Commentary: Don't Neglect the Medial Side of the Knee in Patients With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury

The medial collateral ligament (MCL) of the knee, as well as the posteromedial complex (including the posterior oblique ligament [POL] and ramp lesions of the meniscus) is often considered the "neglected" ligament or corner because of the belief that these anatomic structures have enormous regenerative potential and therefore hardly ever need surgical treatment. In patients with anterior ligament cruciate (ACL) tears, the overall combined prevalence of MCL (superficial [sMCL] and deep [dMCL]) and isolated dMCL injuries is high (16.5% + 24.8% = 41.3%). In terms of the POL, with a restraint to both internal tibial rotation and valgus rotation during extension, I have some doubts regarding its role in anteromedial instability (AMRI). In fact, AMRI of the knee is caused mainly by injury to both the ACL and the MCLs, resulting in coupled anterior tibial translation and external rotation, causing the medial tibial plateau to subluxate anteriorly. The sMCL provides the most substantial restraint, and the dMCL and POL play more minor roles. Finally, in ACL-deficient knees, ramp lesions are prevalent (9.3%-24.0%), and failing to identify and treat these lesions results in knee instability. In my experience, all unstable ramp lesions should be repaired. In ACL-deficient knees in patients with a tibial slope >5°, an occult ramp lesion should be strongly suspected. In summary, the medial compartment of the knee is complex and encompasses many structures (MCL, POL, ramp, tibial slope), and I believe that we will increasingly move toward individualized treatment.

Evaluating the Reliability of YouTube as a Source of Information for Meniscal Ramp Lesions

Background

Videos uploaded to YouTube do not go through a review process, and therefore, videos related to medial meniscal ramp lesions may have little educational value.

Purpose

To assess the educational quality of YouTube videos regarding ramp lesions of the meniscus.

Study Design

Cross-sectional study.

Methods

A standard search was performed on the YouTube website using the following terms: "ramp lesion" and "posterior meniscal detachment" and "ramp" and "meniscocapsular" and "meniscotibial detachment," and the top 100 videos based on the number of views were included for analysis. The video duration, publication data, and number of likes and views were retrieved, and the videos were categorized based on video source (health professionals, orthopaedic company, private user), the type of information (anatomy, biomechanics, clinical examination, overview, radiologic, surgical technique), and video content (education, patient support, patient experience/testimony).The content analysis of the information on the videos was evaluated with the use of the DISCERN instrument (score range, 16-80), the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria (score range, 0-4), and the Global Quality Score (GQS; score range, 1-5).

Results

A total of 74 videos were included. Of these videos, 70 (94.6%) were published by health professionals, while the remaining 4 (5.4%) were published by orthopaedic companies. Most of the videos were about surgical technique (n = 36; 48.6%) and all had an educational aim (n = 74; 100%). The mean length of the videos was 10.35 ± 17.65 minutes, and the mean online period was 18.64 ± 13.85 months. The mean DISCERN score, JAMA benchmark score, and GQS were 31.84 ± 17.14 (range, 16-72), 1.65 ± 0.87 (range, 1-4), and 2.04 ± 1.21 (range, 1-5), respectively. Videos that reported an overview about ramp lesions were the best in terms of quality for DISCERN and JAMA benchmark score, while biomechanics videos were the best according to GQS. The worst category of videos was about surgical technique, with all having lower scores.

Conclusion

The educational content of YouTube regarding medial meniscal ramp lesions showed low quality and validity based on DISCERN score, JAMA benchmark score, and GQS.

Management of anterior cruciate ligament revision in adults: the 2022 ESSKA consensus: part II-surgical strategy

PURPOSE

The aim of this ESSKA consensus is to give recommendations based on scientific evidence and expert opinion to improve the diagnosis, preoperative planning, indication and surgical strategy in Anterior Cruciate Ligament revision.

METHODS

Part 2, presented herein, followed exactly the same methodology as Part 1: the so-called ESSKA formal consensus derived from the Delphi method. Eighteen questions were ultimately asked. The quality of the answers received the following grades of recommendation: Grade A (high level scientific support), Grade B (scientific presumption), Grade C (low level scientific support) or Grade D (expert opinion). All answers were scored from 1 to 9 by the raters. Once a general consensus had been reached between the steering and rating groups, the question-answer sets were submitted to the peer-review group. A final combined meeting of all the members of the consensus was then held to ratify the document.

RESULTS

The review of the literature revealed a rather low scientific quality of studies examining the surgical strategy in cases of ACL reconstruction failure. Of the 18 questions, only 1 received a Grade A rating; 5, a Grade B rating; and 9, grades of C or D. The three remaining complex questions received further evaluations for each portion of the question and were looked at in more detail for the following grades: B and D; A, C and D; or A, B, C and D. The mean rating of all questions by the rating group was 8.0 + - 1.1. The questions and recommendations are listed in the article.

CONCLUSION

ACL revision surgery, especially the surgical strategy, is a widely debated subject with many different opinions and techniques. The literature reveals a poor level of standardization. Therefore, this international European consensus project is of great importance and clinical relevance for guiding the management of ACL revision in adults.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

The Principles of Knee Joint Preservation: Operative Treatment Strategies

➤ Joint alignment, meniscal status, and ligament stability are codependent factors involved in knee joint preservation, and any injury or imbalance can impact the knee articular cartilage status and can result in adverse clinical outcomes.➤ Cartilage preservation procedures in the knee will not result in optimal outcomes if there is joint malalignment, meniscal deficiency, or ligamentous instability.➤ Lower-extremity varus or valgus malalignment is a risk factor for the failure of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. It represents an indication for a high tibial osteotomy or distal femoral osteotomy in the setting of failed ACL reconstruction, and may even be considered in patients who have an initial ACL injury and severe malalignment.➤ An elevated posterior tibial slope increases the risk of failure of ACL reconstruction, whereas a decreased posterior tibial slope increases the risk of failure of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Arthroscopic Meniscus Ramp Repair: The Shoelace Technique

Background

A "ramp lesion" is described as an injury involving the peripheral attachment of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus. Ramp lesions are associated with increased loads on anterior cruciate ligament and leads to rotatory instability of knee. During anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, failure to identify and treat ramp lesion leads to increased forces on the reconstructed graft and residual instability which ultimately increases chances for graft failure. It is important to identify the ramp lesions by looking at the posterior compartment and repair ramp lesion. Ramp lesions are still a challenge to treat due to misdiagnosis and long learning curve of current techniques. In this technique, we are presenting margin convergence shoelace technique to repair a large ramp lesion.

Indications

Isolated ramp lesions or ramp lesions associated with other ligamentous injuries.

Technique Description

Through standard anteromedial and anterolateral portals, diagnostic arthroscopy is done. Using Gillquist maneuver, posteromedial compartment is visualized to look for ramp lesion. Probing is done with 18-gauge spinal needle from posteromedial aspect of knee to look for hidden lesions and extent of tear. We use 2 additional portals, low and high posteromedial portals for ramp repair. Visualizing from anterolateral portal entry is made in the posteromedial compartment; low posteromedial portal is created at the level of meniscus; 8-mm passport cannula is inserted and used as working portal; and then, high posteromedial portal is created and used as viewing portal. Visualizing through high posteromedial portal rasping of ramp lesion is done. Now with knee scorpion loaded with 2-0 fiber wire, bites are taken along posterior margin of meniscus and capsular portion of tear edges alternatively in shoelace manner from lateral to medial. Finally, compression and knot tying are done and secured with multiple half hitches.

Results

Surgical repair of ramp lesions is associated with good healing, and it restores stability of knee. Follow-up of more than 2 years shows better functional outcome and reduced retear rates.

Discussion/Conclusion

Currently, there are a lot of techniques described for ramp repair. We present arthroscopic ramp repair with dual posteromedial portals by shoelace technique, which is a safe, easy, and cost-effective method and gives excellent results and good healing especially in larger tears.

Patient Consent Disclosure Statement

The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Revision ACL reconstruction using quadriceps, hamstring and patellar tendon autografts leads to similar functional outcomes but hamstring graft has a higher tendency of graft failure

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the differences in the patient-reported functional outcomes, and graft failure in revision ACL reconstruction using quadriceps tendon (QT), Hamstring tendon (HT) and bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autografts.

METHODS

Between 2010 and 2020, 97 patients who underwent revision ACL reconstruction (40 patients received a QT, 26 an HT and 31 a BPTB graft) met the inclusion criteria. Pre-injury and at 2-year postoperatively patients were evaluated for patient-reported functional outcomes; Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity level and VAS (visual analogue scale) for pain; and graft failure. Patient-reported outcomes and graft failure were compared between the QT, HT and BPTB groups. The patients with graft failure were not included for outcome analysis at 2-years of follow-up.

RESULTS

All three revision groups with QT, HT and BPTB autograft did not differ significantly in terms of age, sex, time from injury to surgery, concomitant injuries and single-stage or double-stage procedures (n.s.). No significant difference was found in the pre-injury patient-reported outcome; Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity and VAS for pain (n.s.) between the three groups. At the 2-year follow-up functional outcomes improved in all three groups and all the patients returned to pre-injury activity level; however, no significant difference was found in functional outcomes at the 2-year follow-up between the three groups (n.s.). Graft failure occurred in 4 (10%), 5 (19%) and 3 (10%) patients of QT, HT and BPTB groups, respectively. However, the rate of failure did not differ significantly between groups.

CONCLUSION

All three autografts (QT, HT and BPTB) demonstrated satisfactory patient-reported outcomes in revision ACL reconstruction. Compared with QT and BPTB grafts, HT graft showed a higher tendency for failure rates. With the increasing incidence of revision ACL reconstruction, surgeons should be aware of all the available graft options. The findings of this study will assist the surgeons in the graft selection for revision ACL reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Upsurge in publications on ramp lesions of the meniscus: A bibliometric study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to analyze the trends in publications on ramp lesions of the meniscus in the current literature. We hypothesized that publications on ramp lesions have increased rapidly in recent years due to increased knowledge of both clinical and radiological pathology.

METHODS

A Scopus search performed on 21/01/23 retrieved 171 documents. A similar search strategy was employed to carry out a search for ramp lesions on PubMed with no time filters and only English articles. The articles were downloaded into Excel software, and citations for PubMed articles were determined from the iCite website. Analysis was performed using Excel. Using Orange software, data mining was performed from the titles of all articles.

RESULTS

There are a total of 126 publications from 2011 to 2022 with a total of 1778 citations in PubMed. Of all publications, 72% were published in the last 3 years, from 2020 to 2022, indicating an exponential increase in interest in this subject in recent years. Similarly, 62% of the citations were aggregated by the years 2017-2020, both years included. When the journals were analyzed according to the number of citations, the American Journal of Sports Medicine (AJSM) topped with 822 citations (46% of all citations) and 25 publications, followed by Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy (KSSTA) with 27 articles and 388 citations (22% of all citations). When analyzed by citations per publication for different types of studies, randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were the most cited, with 32 citations per publication, followed by basic science articles with 31.5. Most of the basic science articles were cadaver studies examining anatomy, technique, and biomechanics. Technical notes were the third most cited at 18.64 per publication. While the USA is the country that leads publications, France is in a significant second position contributing to research on this topic, followed by Germany and Luxembourg.

CONCLUSIONS

Global trend analysis suggests that ramp lesion research has significantly increased and that the number of papers on the topic is steadily increasing. We found that the publications and citations presented a rising trend, the majority of the highly cited papers were contributed by a few centers, and the most cited were randomized clinical trials and basic science studies. The long-term outcomes of conservatively and surgically treated ramp lesions have attracted the most research interest.

Quadriceps autograft is a viable graft choice for arthroscopic ACL reconstruction in patients over 50 years of age

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the patient-reported outcomes, graft failure, quadriceps rupture and sports preference after arthroscopic ACL reconstruction in patients older than 50 years who underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with a quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft.

METHODS

Between 2010 and 2020, prospectively collected data were obtained from an institutional database. Patients older than 50 years with primary arthroscopic ACL reconstruction and a minimum of 2 years of follow-up were included. Patients undergoing a revision ACL reconstruction or undergoing a primary ACL reconstruction using a graft other than a QT autograft, and patients with a contralateral knee injury or osteoarthritis (Ahlbäck stage 2 or higher) were excluded. A minimally invasive technique was used for QT autograft harvesting. Patients were evaluated for pre-injury and 2-year follow-up Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity level, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, graft failure, quadriceps tendon rupture, and return to sport.

RESULTS

A total of 57 patients were included in the study. The mean age of the cohort was 54.9 ± 5.2 (range 50-75). Of the 57 reconstructions, 16 (28%) were isolated ACL reconstructions, while 41 (72%) were complex reconstructions (concomitant meniscus, cartilage and/or collateral ligament injuries). At the 2-year follow-up Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity level and VAS for pain improved to pre-injury level and no significant difference was noted between pre-injury and 2-year follow-up functional scores (n.s.). No case of graft failure or quadriceps tendon rupture was reported. No significant difference was noted in the pre-injury and postoperative sports preference (n.s.) and all patients return to their desired sports activity.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction by using QT autograft in highly active older patients provides satisfactory patient-reported functional outcomes and allows recovery of the pre-injury level of activity. QT autograft is a good graft option in patients older than 50 years.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

A prospective study of arthroscopic primary ACL reconstruction with ipsilateral peroneus longus tendon graft: Experience of 439 cases

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are frequent ligamentous injuries that necessitate reconstruction in many cases. The patellar tendon and the hamstring tendon are the most frequently utilized autografts for reconstruction. However, both have certain disadvantages. We hypothesized that the peroneus longus tendon would be an acceptable graft for arthroscopic ACL reconstruction. The aim of this study is to determine whether a peroneus Longus tendon transplant is a functionally viable option for arthroscopic ACL reconstruction without compromising donor ankle activity. In this prospective study 439 individuals aged between 18 to 45 years, who underwent ACL reconstruction using ipsilateral Peroneus longus tendon autograft were observed. The injury to the ACL was initially assessed by physical examinations and further confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The outcome was assessed at 6, 12, and 24 months after the surgery using Modified Cincinnati, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), and Tegner-Lysholm scores. The donor ankle stability was evaluated using foot and ankle disability index (FADI) and AOFAS scores, as well as hop tests. Significant (P < .001) improvement in the result of the IKDC score, Modified Cincinnati, and Tegner-Lysholm score was observed at the final follow-up. The Lachman test was mildly (1+) positive only in 7.70% of cases, the anterior drawer became negative in all cases, and the pivot shift test was negative in 97.43% of cases at 24 months after the surgery. FADI and AOFAS scores for donor's ankle functional assessment were impressive, as were single hop test, triple hop test, and cross over hop test results at 2 years. None of the patients had any neurovascular deficit. However, 6 cases of superficial wound infection were observed, 4 at the port site and 2 at the donor site. All resolved after appropriate oral antibiotic therapy. The peroneus longus tendon can be considered a safe, effective, and promising graft of choice for arthroscopic primary single-bundle ACL reconstruction because it has a good functional outcome and impressive donor ankle function after surgery.

Quadriceps tendon autograft with or without bone block have comparable clinical outcomes, complications and revision rate for ACL reconstruction: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review is to report complications, graft failure, fixation methods, rehabilitation protocol, clinical and patient-reported outcomes, and return to sports with the use of quadriceps tendon graft with the bone block (QT-B) and without bone block (QT-S).

METHODS

According to the PRISMA guidelines a comprehensive search was performed across PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases from inception until April 2022. Only prospective studies using quadriceps tendon autograft with a minimum of 20 patients were considered for inclusion. The outcome measures extracted from the studies were the KT-1000, Lysholm score, Subjective and Objective IKDC, Tegner, Marx Score, complications, failures and/or revision surgery, and rate of return to sports. Cochrane risk of bias and MINORS tool were used for the risk of bias assessment of all included studies.

RESULTS

A total of 13 studies were included, consisting of 5 randomized controlled trials, 6 cohort studies, 1 case-control and 1 case series. A total of 484 patients received QT-S in 6 studies of which 224 (46.2%) were males and 212 (43.8%) females with a mean age of 21.5 ± 7.5 (range 14-58). While 243 patients received QT-B in 7 studies of which 167 (68.7%) were males and 76 (31.3%) females with a mean age of 28.9 ± 4.5 (range: 18-49). The studies analyzed had a mean MINORS score of 14.6 (range, 12-19). Both QT-B and QT-S for ACL reconstruction reported satisfactory results in terms of patient-reported outcome measures. Although, a slightly higher anterior laxity was found with the QT-S than with the QT-B.

CONCLUSION

Quadriceps tendon with a bone block (QT-B) or without bone block (QT-S) for ACL reconstruction is supported by current literature. Both grafts are safe and viable options for ACL reconstruction with comparable clinical outcomes, complications and revision rates.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO-CRD42022347134; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/.

In elite athletes with meniscal injuries, always repair the lateral, think about the medial! A systematic review

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate and compare the time required to return to sports (RTS) after surgery, the rate of revision surgery and the time required for RTS after revision surgery in elite athletes undergoing meniscal repair or partial meniscectomy, particularly analysing the difference between medial and lateral menisci. It was hypothesised that both procedures would entail similar, high rates of RTS, with the lateral meniscus exhibiting higher potential healing postprocedure compared to the medial meniscus.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted based on the PRISMA guidelines. Quality assessment of the systematic review was performed using the AMSTAR-2 checklist. The following search terms were browsed in the title, abstract and keyword fields: 'meniscus' or 'meniscal' AND 'tear,' 'injury' or 'lesion' AND 'professional,' 'elite' or 'high-level' AND 'athletes,' 'sports,' 'sportsman,' 'soccer,' 'basketball,' 'football' or 'handball'. The resulting measures extracted from the studies were the rate of RTS, level of RTS, complications, revision surgery and subsequent RTS, Tegner, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).

RESULTS

In this study, the cohort consisted of 421 patients [415 (98.6%) men and 6 (1.4%) women] with a mean age of 23.0 ± 3.0 years. All patients were elite athletes in wrestling, baseball, soccer, rugby or handball. While 327 (77.7%) patients received partial meniscectomy at a mean age of 23.3 ± 2.6 years, 94 (22.3%) patients received meniscal repair at a mean age of 22.1 ± 4.0 years. After partial meniscectomy, 277 patients (84.7%) returned to their competitive sports activity and 256 (78.3%) returned to their pre-injury activity levels. A total of 12 (3.7%) patients required revision surgery because of persistent pain [5 (1.5%) patients], chondrolysis [2 (0.7%) patients] or both chondrolysis and lateral instability [5 (1.5%) patients]. Ten (83.3%) of the twelve patients had involvement of the lateral meniscus, whereas the location of injury was not specified in the remaining two patients. After revision surgery, all patients (100%) resumed sports activity. However, after meniscal repair, 80 (85.1%) athletes returned to their competitive sports activity and 71 (75.5%) returned to their pre-injury activity levels. A total of 16 (17.0%) patients required partial meniscectomy in cases of persistent pain or suture failure. Of these, 4 (25%) patients involved lateral and medial menisci each and 8 (50%) patients were not specified. After revision surgery, more than 80.0% of the patients (13) resumed sports activity.

CONCLUSIONS

In elite athletes with isolated meniscal injury, partial meniscectomy and meniscal suture exhibited similar rates of RTS and return to pre-injury levels. Nonetheless, athletes required more time for RTS after meniscal repair and exhibited an increased rate of revision surgery associated with a reduced rate of RTS after the subsequent surgery. For lateral meniscus tears, meniscectomy was associated with a high rate of revision surgery and risk of chondrolysis, whereas partial medial meniscectomy allowed for rapid RTS but with the potential risk of developing knee osteoarthritis over the years. The findings of this systematic review suggested a suture on the lateral meniscus in elite athletes because of the high healing potential after the procedure, the reduced risk of developing chondrolysis and the high risk of revision surgery after partial meniscectomy. Furthermore, it is important to evaluate several factors while dealing with the medial meniscus. If rapid RTS activity is needed, a hyperselective meniscectomy is recommended; otherwise, a meniscal suture is recommended to avoid accelerated osteoarthritis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

STUDY REGISTRATION

PROSPERO-CRD42022351979 ( https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=351979 ).