Repair of a recurrent rectovaginal fistula with a biological graft

Minimally invasive treatment of mid-low rectovaginal fistula: a transanal endoscopic surgery study

BACKGROUND

Treatment of rectovaginal fistulas (RVFs) is extremely difficult. No standard surgical procedure is accepted worldwide. The aim of this article was to evaluate a minimally invasive procedure for the repair of mid-low rectovaginal fistula.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of 17 patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery for the repair of mid-low rectovaginal fistulas (located in the lower or middle one-third of the vaginal wall) at our center between August 2016 and October 2018. The anal approach was adopted for 12 patients: 6 patients were treated directly by rectal mucosal advancement flap (RMAF) with transanal endoscopic surgery (TES), while the other 6 patients underwent initial TES exploration followed by RMAF procedure under direct vision. The vaginal approach was adopted for 5 patients: 3 patients were treated under TES directly and the other 2 were treated under direct vision after initial TES exploration. A total of 9 (52.94%) patients received diverting ileostomy-5 anal approach patients and 4 vaginal approach patients.

RESULTS

Median age of the patients was 46 years (range 10-76 years), and median BMI was 21.9 (range 17.9-28.1). Median operative time was 75 min (range 60-120 min), and median duration of postoperative hospital stay was 8 days (range 6-15 days). Recurrence was seen in 3/12 anal approach patients vs. 0/5 vaginal approach patients. Both the median preoperative and the median postoperative Wexner score were 0 (range 0-2). The median follow-up time was 8 months (range 2-24). No severe complications occurred in any patient.

CONCLUSION

The TES procedure for the treatment of mid-low rectovaginal fistulas avoids any incision of the abdomen and perineal area and appears to be a safe and feasible procedure. This minimally invasive technique is still evolving and is likely to gain wide acceptance in the near future.

Endoscopic management of colovaginal fistulas in advanced cancer patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Colovaginal fistula (CVF) in cancer patients can cause significant morbidity. In addition to causing local symptoms and infections, the constant stool leakage contributes to a poor quality of life, psychological distress, and possible social isolation. Patients with CVFs often have advanced disease, poor nutrition, and complex anatomy, making them poor candidates for major surgical interventions. Advancement in endoscopic tools has made endoscopic management possible. Endoscopic management is less invasive, is associated with prompt recovery, and can significantly improve the quality of life of patients and possibly allow them to resume systemic therapy.

METHODS

In this video case series, 3 cases of CVF patients treated endoscopically are presented to demonstrate the use of the currently available tools and techniques. The strategy used for the closure of the 3 CVFs was dependent on the size and etiology of the fistulas.

RESULTS

Technical and clinical success was achieved in all 3 situations. There were no procedure-related adverse events.

CONCLUSION

These cases demonstrate the use of the cap to perform vaginal endoscopy; the use of the over-the-scope clips, covered stents, and endoscopic suturing; and how they can facilitate the closure of fistulas in patients who are poor surgical candidates.

Radiation-induced rectovaginal fistulas in locally advanced gynaecological malignancies-new patients, old problem?

PURPOSE

Radiation-induced rectovaginal fistula (RI-RVF) is a chronic and serious condition with a significant influence on quality of life. The aim of this study is to evaluate the results of surgical treatment of rectovaginal fistulas of patients previously undergoing radiotherapy.

METHODS

Fifty patients treated in the Gynaecological Radiotherapy Unit for gynaecologic malignancy and in the Department of General and Colorectal Surgery for RI-RVF between 2003 and 2013 were enrolled into a prospectively maintained database and underwent regular follow-up examinations in an outpatient clinic, during which surgical outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

Median age was 60 years (range 40-84 years). Cervical cancer was the most common cause of radiotherapy. Median time of fistula development after radiotherapy was 20 months (range 5-240 months). In 48 (96%) patients, only faecal diversion could be performed, while two patients underwent rectal resection. The fistula healed in six patients. Factors that correlated with fistula healing were a distance from the anal verge above 7 cm (p = 0.007 OR 18 95%CI 2.2609-14.3062) and creation of loop ileostomy (p = 0.08 OR 17 95%CI 1.2818-23.9701), whereas a prolonged course of radiotherapy of more than 6 weeks (p = 0.047) correlated negatively. In multivariate analysis, only distance from the anal verge remained significant (p = 0.031 OR 2.35 95%CI 1.0422-5.2924).

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment of radiation-induced rectovaginal fistulas needs to be tailored individually to each patient. Faecal diversion remains the simplest and safest method of treating RI-RVF, especially in the group of patients who cannot undergo complicated surgical procedures, and offers acceptable quality of life.

Successful repair of recurrent rectovaginal fistula by stratified suture using transanal endoscopic microsurgery: A CARE-compliant case report

BACKGROUND

Rectovaginal fistulas (RVFs) are abnormal connections between the rectum and vagina. Although many surgical approaches to correct them have been attempted, management of RVFs still remains a challenge, especially for recurrent RVFs.

METHODS

In the present study, we report a case in a 22-year-old female with a chief complaint of obvious passages of flatus or stool through the vagina for 10 years. She had suffered a vaginal trauma from a violent accident 10 years prior, and gradually noticed the uncontrollable passage of gas or feces from the vagina 2 weeks later.The patient underwent a transvaginal direct repair surgery at local hospital 9 years ago, but the symptoms recurred 1 month after the surgery. After 2-years monitoring, the patient underwent another transvaginal repair surgery (fistulectomy followed by direct suture) at another hospital, but the fistula recurred again. We initially performed a temporary protective transversostomy upon admission. After 8-months of observation, a methylene blue test was conducted and the diagnosis of recurrent RVF was confirmed. Subsequently, we performed a successful repair by stratified suture using transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). The scar tissue on the posterior wall of the vagina and the anterior wall of the rectum were meticulously excised until the margin of the excisional line showed healthy tissue. In addition, the fistulous tract was completely removed. The edges of the fistula on the posterior wall of the vagina were closed by simple continuous suturing, and the rectal anterior wall was sutured in the same manner.

RESULTS

During a 1-year follow-up period, the fistulae were not recurrent and no complication such as incontinences or rectal bleeding were found. The latest Wexner score was 3.

CONCLUSION

We present a case of successful treatment with stratified suture using TEM throughout the procedure. We strongly recommend this efficient and minimally invasive procedure for recurrent RVFs.

Is biological mesh interposition a valid option for complex or recurrent rectovaginal fistula?

AIM

Many surgical techniques are available for the treatment of rectovaginal fistula (RVF). There is hitherto little information on its treatment by biological mesh interposition. The aim of the present study was to analyse our results of RVF treatment using biological mesh interposition.

METHOD

Patients with RVF undergoing biological mesh interposition were identified. Success was defined by the absence of a diverting stoma and/or any vaginal discharge of faeces, flatus or mucous discharge.

RESULTS

Ten women [median age 39 (24.5-65) years] were included. Nine (90%) had recurrent RVF, and the median number of previous attempts at closure was 2.5 (0-8). The main cause of RVF was Crohn's disease (40%). All patients had faecal diversion. No intra-operative complications occurred from mesh interposition. Seven (70%) patients developed postoperative morbidity which was major (Dindo III) in two (20%). The primary success rate was 20% (2/10) but final success rate was achieved in 70% after reoperation with other procedures at 11.1 (2.7-13.1) months of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The study has shown disappointing results with biological mesh interposition for RVF with a healing rate lower than achieved by gracilis muscle interposition.