Risk factors for recurrent obstetric anal sphincter injury (rOASI): a systematic review and meta-analysis

The outcome of early perineal rehabilitation in obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a single-center experience

PURPOSE

The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) on symptoms and quality of life in women who experienced third- and fourth-degree perineal tears (Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries, OASIS) during childbirth. OASIS can lead to anal incontinence and dyspareunia, having important implications regarding the quality of life and health of women but, unfortunately, there is no standard practice for postpartum care following OASIS.

METHODS

In this retrospective observational study, patients diagnosed with OASIS between January 2016 and June 2023 were enrolled. Since 2016, all women with OASIS have been routinely referred for physiatric evaluation and pelvic floor rehabilitation. Validated questionnaires (Wexner score and Marinoff scale) were administered to enrolled women to assess anal incontinence and dyspareunia.

RESULTS

The study included 148 women, of whom 88 responded to the questionnaires. Participants were divided into two groups: those who underwent PFPT (N = 68) and those who declined it (N = 20). The mean follow-up period was 1447.35 days. The Wexner score was lower in the PFPT group compared to the no-PFPT group (p = 0.050). The Marinoff score did not show a statistically significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.381).

CONCLUSION

PFPT was shown to be effective in reducing AI symptoms in women with OASIS, improving quality of life and maintaining its effects in the long term, but without providing benefits for dyspareunia. Strengths of this study include the use of validated questionnaires, the long follow-up period, and the involvement of a specialized team of physiatrists and physiotherapists.

Counseling women with obstetric anal sphincter injury - Risk of recurrence and the influence of mode of second delivery on subsequent anal incontinence - A systematic review and meta-analysis

Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) is a severe complication of vaginal delivery. Up to 50% of women with OASI will experience anal incontinence at long-term. However, it is uncertain whether an elective cesarean section (CS) in a subsequent pregnancy following OASI decreases the risk of anal incontinence. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of recurrent OASI in a subsequent pregnancy after a first delivery with OASI. Additionally, we wanted to evaluate the impact of recurrent OASI on the risk of anal incontinence, and to determine whether the CS was protective against anal incontinence in women with a first delivery with OASI. Literature searches were made in PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase, the last search was made in May 2024. Studies were screened and study quality was assessed using "SIGN - Methodology Checklist". Thirteen studies (including 3 020 897 women) were included in the meta-analysis on risk of recurrent OASI. OASI in the first delivery increased the risk of recurrent OASI in the second delivery fivefold compared to women without previous OASI OR 4.9 (95%CI 4.0-5.9). The overall risk of acquiring a recurrent OASI was 6.1% (95%CI 5.9%-6.2%). Five studies (including 2 330 women) were included in the meta-analysis assessing the effect of mode of subsequent delivery on anal incontinence. The risk of anal incontinence was non-significantly increased in women with a second vaginal delivery OR 1.1 (95%CI 0.9-1.4). Four studies (including 2 300 women) were included in the meta-analysis on the risk of developing anal incontinence after recurrent OASI. The risk of anal incontinence was increased in women with recurrent OASI compared to women with OASI in the first delivery and a subsequent delivery without OASI OR 1.6 (95%CI 1.3-2.0). In conclusion, we found an increased risk of recurrent OASI in the second delivery for women with a previous OASI, compared to women without previous OASI. The risk of anal incontinence was increased in women with recurrent OASI. The risk of new onset or worsening of anal incontinence was not associated with mode of the second delivery. Women with previous OASI should be informed about the increased risk of recurrence and that elective CS is not necessarily protective against anal incontinence.

Management After Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury: Anorectal Manometry and Symptoms Predict Long-Term Fecal Incontinence

INTRODUCTION

Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) is associated with serious morbidity and reduced quality of life. The role of anorectal manometry (ARM) to guide treatment is unclear. We aimed to define the role of ARM and symptom assessment after OASI in predicting anal incontinence at long-term follow-up.

METHODS

Prospective evaluation of 205 consecutive post-OASI women who underwent baseline ARM and symptom assessment in a tertiary setting was undertaken. Ninety-nine women were available for long-term follow-up (median 6.6 years). Associations between post-OASI ARM testing and short-term and long-term anal incontinence were examined in addition to clinical and obstetric factors.

RESULTS

Fourth degree tears and lower anal resting and squeeze pressures were associated with short-term anal incontinence. Women with anal incontinence at baseline and women with lower anal resting pressure were more likely to suffer from long-term fecal incontinence (FI). A best-fit cutoff value of 59 mm Hg for baseline anal resting pressure predicted long-term FI, and none of the short-term asymptomatic women with an anal resting pressure of >59 mm Hg reported FI at long-term follow-up.

DISCUSSION

Symptoms of anal incontinence and ARM in patients after OASI are both useful to predict subsequent long-term FI with a best-fit cutoff of 59 mm Hg for anal resting pressure. This provides rationale for routine ARM and accurate symptom assessment in all patients after OASI, to identify high-risk groups to follow and treat, and it may assist decision making regarding mode of subsequent obstetric deliveries.

Risk Factors for Wound Complications After Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury

IMPORTANCE

Wound complications after obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) can amplify morbidity and affect quality of life.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate for characteristics associated with wound complications after OASI.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with an OASI who were evaluated in a postpartum pelvic floor healing clinic between November 1, 2020, and May 16, 2023. Our primary outcome was to identify factors associated with wound complications (wound infection or breakdown, antibiotic treatment, or surgical intervention). We hypothesized that operative vaginal delivery would be associated with wound complications and that peripartum antibiotics would be protective. Statistical analyses included t tests, chi-square test, Fisher exact test, and multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of 332 patients with an OASI, 74 (22.3%) experienced a wound complication. There were 31 (9.3%) wound infections and 62 (18.7%) wound breakdowns; 50 (15.1%) patients received additional antibiotics, and 20 (6.0%) underwent additional surgical intervention. On univariate analysis, those with wound complications were older (31.9 vs 30.6 years, P = 0.01) and more likely to have had an episiotomy (23.0% vs 12.5%, P = 0.03). On multivariable logistic regression, older maternal age was associated with wound complication (odds ratio, 1.1, 95% CI, 1.01-1.13, P = 0.03), and peripartum antibiotics were associated with decreased odds of wound complication (odds ratio, 0.57, 95% CI, 0.33-0.97, P = 0.04). Patients with wound complications were more likely to undergo in-office procedures ( P < 0.001) and report postpartum pain ( P < 0.001), urinary incontinence ( P = 0.02), fecal urgency ( P = 0.02), and other symptoms ( P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Older maternal age was associated with wound complications after OASI, while peripartum antibiotics were protective. Patients with wound complications were more likely to report symptoms of pelvic floor disorders.

Educational efficacy of the simulation-based episiotomy training: a multi-center observational study

BACKGROUND

Interprofessional training programmes are now widely used for training junior doctors and nurses. This study aimed to evaluate the educational efficacy of an obstetric operative simulation programme in both junior and senior obstetricians and midwives.

METHODS

We conducted a 30-minute professional course in midwifery at three obstetric centers in Zhejiang, China. The course mainly aimed at improving the knowledge and techniques of mediolateral episiotomies (MLE). Both junior and senior obstetricians and midwives were recruited for evaluation. A questionnaire was completed by all participants at the beginning. Systematic evaluation of individual's MLE skills were compared and analysed before and after the instructional session. The primary outcome was length of the episiotomy incision (mm). The secondary outcomes were the distance from the starting point of the incision to the fourchette (mm); and the perpendicular angle of incision (degrees). Continuous variables were presented as means ± SD or medians and ranges, with Student's t-test used for comparisons between groups. Categorical variables are presented as rates, and the chi-square test was employed to assess differences between proportions. Data were analysed using SPSS statistical software (version 19), with P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Eighty-two participants (35 obstetricians and 47 midwives) joined this programme, of which, 29 were junior obstetrics professionals and 53 were senior obstetrics professionals. Midwives had more MLE training and hands-on experience than obstetricians (p < 0.01). At the end of the programme, the mean values of the three main parameters of MLE were significantly improved in most perinatal care providers. Moreover, midwives, particularly senior midwives, benefited more after the programme, with the incision length and accuracy of MLE improved significantly (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Operative obstetric simulation training with appropriate instructions should be advocated. Both junior and senior perinatal care providers can benefit from the educational programme. Senior midwives may particularly benefit in their respective fields.

Does infection with COVID-2019 during labor increase the risk for obstetric anal sphincter injuries?

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection during the peripartum period and obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted, including all singleton vaginal deliveries and cesarean deliveries due to failed vacuum extraction, between June 2020 and January 2022 at a large tertiary medical center. OASIS complication during childbirth was compared between women with and without peripartum diagnosis of COVID-19, defined as a positive polymerase chain reaction test obtained within 1 week before delivery or up to 3 days after delivery. Universal screening for COVID-19 was implemented. A logistic regression model was used to adjust for confounding variables.

RESULTS

The study included 22 911 women, among whom 468 (2.0%) tested positive for COVID-19 and 22 443 women had no COVID-19 diagnosis. After adjusting for confounding variables, peripartum infection with COVID-19 was found to be independently associated with OASIS (adjusted odds ratio 4.38, 95% confidence interval 2.00-9.61; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Infection with COVID-19 during the peripartum period significantly increases the risk for OASIS by more than fourfold. These findings emphasize the importance of understanding the impact of COVID-19 on birth complications, such as OASIS, to improve public health measures and enhance obstetric outcomes during pandemics.

Evaluation of Comprehensive Documentation After Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI) has increased in recent years, which may be due to improved recognition and documentation. There is limited evidence regarding the effects of thorough documentation of obstetric anal sphincter injury repairs on postpartum clinical outcomes. Our objectives were to (1) compare the incidence of perineal wound complications between documentation groups, (2) compare other adverse events, and (3) to describe factors associated with adequate documentation. We hypothesized that better documentation would be associated with improved clinical outcomes.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of 599 patients with OASI at a tertiary care referral center between January 2015 and December 2020. A priori definitions of documentation adequacy were utilized to stratify delivery notes. On the basis of these criteria, there were preferred, adequate, and inadequate documentation groups. Maternal characteristics, outcomes, and peripartum factors were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes between the groups. A higher degree of perineal laceration (p < 0.001), greater blood loss (p = 0.002), and the need for repairs in the operating room (p = 0.019) were significant factors associated with adequate documentation. Clinicians who were comprehensive in their documentation were more likely to refer patients to Urogynecology (p < 0.001) and to add OASI to the electronic medical record problem list (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

While certain factors are associated with adequate documentation, this did not improve clinical outcomes for OASI and further research is warranted to explore the importance of medical documentation surrounding OASI.

Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury After Episiometer-Guided Versus Conventional Episiotomy in Instrumental Deliveries: A Randomized Controlled Trial

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Guidelines recommend episiotomy for instrumental vaginal delivery with an optimal incision angle of 60° to protect the anal sphincter. The "Episiometer" is a new device promising a 60° incision angle. We compared the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) and post-repair suture angle of episiotomies made with conventional "eyeballing" versus Episiometer guided during instrumental delivery.

METHODS

We conducted this randomized controlled trial in a tertiary care teaching institute in southern India after ethical committee approval, trial registration, and informed consent. We randomized (block) 328 pregnant women aged 18 years and above with term, singleton fetuses delivered by instruments into Episiometer-guided (164) or conventional episiotomy (164) groups (allocation concealed). We compared the OASI (identified clinically) and the suture angle measured from the midline (assessor blinded) in the two groups. We followed up on the subjects at 6 and 12 weeks to assess perineal pain and fecal/flatus incontinence.

RESULTS

The incidence of OASI of 0.61% in the Episiometer group was significantly lower compared with 4.88% in the eyeballing group (Chi-squared = 5.6; p = 0.02; adjusted risk ratio = 5.9; CI 0.7-46.1; p = 0.09). A significantly higher proportion of subjects (59.1%) in the Episometer group had a post-suture angle between 36 and 40° compared with 36.6% in the eyeballing group (Chi-squared = 21.8, p < 0.001). We found no significant difference in the perineal pain or Wexner score during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The Episiometer-guided episiotomy during instrumental delivery resulted in a significantly higher suture angle and lower obstetric anal sphincter injuries than with conventional eyeballing.

Retrospective analysis of 3a obstetric anal sphincter injury repairs in a teaching hospital: Subjective and objective outcomes

INTRODUCTION

The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) recommends offering elective caesarean sections (CS) for subsequent deliveries to obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) patients with anorectal dysfunction, or abnormal endoanal ultrasonography (EA USS), and/or anal manometry (AM). (1) Asymptomatic OASI patients however, are not always offered EA USS or AM due to limited access to diagnostic resources across the United Kingdom, particularly those with 3a tears. This paper reviews subjective and objective outcomes in women with 3a tears and aims to add to the body of literature supporting good practice and management.

OBJECTIVES

Identify the incidence of defects in patients with 3a tears following a primary repair and compare the rate and extent of defects found on EA USS between symptomatic and asymptomatic women.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a retrospective study of 69 women following primary repair of 3a OASI tears in a tertiary referral perineal clinic between January 2020 and December 2022. Symptoms were evaluated using the St Mark's Score for anal incontinence (SMI) and Starck score for defects on EA USS. Findings were analyzed using R Foundation Statistical Software (version 4.2.2, 2022).

RESULTS

Out of the total, 42 % (29/69) had defects on EA USS and 30 % (21/69) of women were symptomatic. Thirty eight percent (18/48) of asymptomatic women were noted to have defects compared with 52 % (11/21) of symptomatic patients. Majority of defects were situated in the upper and mid anal canal (69 %) either as <1 hr or >3 hr hypoechoic areas. There was no significant difference in defect rate (X2 = 2.06, p = 0.15) or Starck score (2.23 v 1.53, p = 0.22) between the two groups. However those delivered by forceps (p = 0.004) and of Asian ethnicity (p = 0.01) were more likely to be symptomatic.

CONCLUSION

EA USS should be offered to all patients following an OASI, as symptoms alone are not predictive of anorectal compromise in structure and/or function. Asymptomatic patients with 3a tears should be informed that there is up to a 40% chance of finding a defect on EA USS.

Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury Care Bundle: A Quality Improvement Initiative

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The objective was to implement an evidence-based peri-partum care bundle for women sustaining obstetric anal sphincter injuries and to evaluate compliance with recommendations for antibiotics use, repair in the operating room, and follow-up before and after implementation.

METHODS

This project was reviewed by the Institutional Review Board and determined to be exempt. A clinical care bundle containing education and standardized orders in the electronic medical record was implemented. Characteristics of pre- (October 2017 to September 2019) and post-intervention (October 2019 to August 2021) cohorts were compared and compliance with recommendations for antibiotics use, surgical repair location, and follow-up were evaluated. Chi-squared, Fisher's exact, ANOVA F, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed, as indicated. Significance level was p < 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 185 cases were identified. Seventy-five percent of women were nulliparous. Mean gestational age was 39 weeks. Pre- and post-intervention groups did not differ in age, BMI, race, parity, gestational age, comorbidities, birthweight, or delivery type. Ninety-eight cases were identified pre-implementation. Eighty-six (88%) had third-degree lacerations. Post-implementation, 87 cases were identified. Seventy (80%) had third-degree lacerations (p = 0.17). Recommended antibiotic-type use improved from 35% pre-implementation to 93% post-implementation (p < 0.001). Repair in the operating room was similar pre-implementation and post-implementation (16.0% vs 12.6%, p = 0.48). Post-partum follow-up within 2 weeks improved from 16.3% pre-implementation to 52.8% post-implementation and mean time to follow-up was shorter post-implementation than pre-implementation (18 vs 33 days; both p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of an evidence-based peri-partum care bundle resulted in standardization of care in accordance with established recommendations. Compliance with recommendations for surgical repair in the operating room remained unchanged.

Obstetric anal sphincter injury in the second birth after perineal wound complication in the first birth: A nationwide register cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether perineal wound complications in the first birth, alone or in conjunction with obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI), is associated with an increased risk of OASI in the second birth.

DESIGN

Nationwide population-based cohort study.

SETTING

Sweden.

POPULATION

Women (n = 411 317) with first and second singleton vaginal births in Sweden, 2001-2019.

METHODS

Data on diagnostic codes and surgical procedures were retrieved from the Swedish Medical Birth Register and the Swedish Patient Register. A perineal wound complication was defined as wound infection, dehiscence or perineal haematoma within 2 months of childbirth.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Associations between wound complications in the first birth and OASI in the second birth were investigated with logistic regression and presented as adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).

RESULTS

In total, 2619 (0.6%) women had a wound complication in the first birth, and 5318 (1.3%) had an OASI in the second birth. Women with a wound complication but no OASI in the first birth had more than doubled odds of OASI in the second birth (aOR 2.73, 95% CI 2.11-3.53). Women with OASI and a wound complication in the first birth had almost tenfold odds (aOR 9.97, 95% CI 6.53-15.24) of recurrent OASI.

CONCLUSIONS

Perineal wound complication in the first birth increases the likelihood of OASI in a subsequent birth.

How to Avoid Becoming a Risk Factor of Fecal Incontinence Due to OASIS-A Narrative Review

Third- and fourth-degree anal sphincter injuries are among the most severe traumas women can experience during childbirth, often leading to lifelong continence issues. Despite extensive research, current repair techniques are often inadequate, failing to provide long-term efficiency. The repair of OASIS tends to worsen with time as fecal or anal incontinence increases. This article presents the risk factors for primary repair failure differently from those previously described in the literature, specifically focusing on avoidable risk factors related to obstetricians and surgeons who perform OASIS repair. After reviewing the literature, the following risk areas were identified and described: recurrent OASIS, pitfalls of the current WHO classification, surgical techniques, place in which the repair should be performed, surgical training, factors related to low volumes of patients with grade III-IV injuries, timing of the repair, and failure of primary repair.

Current update on the role of endoanal ultrasound: a primer for radiologists

Endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) is a valuable imaging modality for the evaluation of anal and perianal pathologies. It provides detailed information about the anatomy and physiology of the anorectal region and has been used in pre-and post-operative settings of anorectal pathologies. EAUS is not only useful in the evaluation of benign pathologies but also in loco-regional staging of anal and rectal tumors. EAUS has several advantages over MRI, including reduced cost, better patient tolerance, and improved scope of application in patients with contraindications to MRI. Despite its benefits, EAUS is not widely performed in many centers across the globe. This article aims to educate radiologists, trainees, and surgeons about the indications, contraindications, patient preparation, imaging technique, and findings of EAUS. We will also highlight the technical difficulties, diagnostic challenges, and procedural complications encountered during EAUS, along with a comparative analysis of EAUS with other imaging approaches.

Perineoplasty for anal incontinence after obstetric anal sphincter injury repair: a case report

BACKGROUND

The rectal and vaginal walls are typically sutured if severe perineal lacerations with rectal mucosal damage occur during vaginal delivery. In case of anal incontinence after the repair, re-suturing of the anal sphincter muscle is standard procedure. However, this procedure may not result in sufficient improvement of function.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 41-year-old woman underwent suture repair of the vaginal and rectal walls for fourth-degree perineal laceration at delivery. She was referred to our department after complaining of flatus and fecal incontinence. Her Wexner score was 15 points. Examination revealed decreased anal tonus and weak contractions on the ventral side. We diagnosed anal incontinence due to sphincter dysfunction after repair of a perineal laceration at delivery. We subsequently performed sphincter re-suturing with perineoplasty to restructure the perineal body by suturing the fascia located lateral to the perineal body and running in a ventral-dorsal direction, which filled the space between the anus and vagina and increased anal tonus. One month after surgery, the symptoms of anal incontinence disappeared (the Wexner score lowered to 0 points), and the anorectal manometry values increased compared to the preoperative values. According to recent reports on the anatomy of the female perineal region, bulbospongiosus muscle in women does not move toward the midline to attach to the perineal body, as has been previously believed. Instead, it attaches to the ipsilateral surface of the external anal sphincter. We consider the fascia lateral to the perineal body to be the fascia of the bulbospongiosus muscle.

CONCLUSIONS

In a case of postpartum anal incontinence due to sphincter dysfunction after repair of severe perineal laceration, perineoplasty with re-suturing an anal sphincter muscle resulted in improvement in anal sphincter function. Compared to conventional simple suture repair of the rectal wall only, this surgical technique may improve sphincter function to a greater degree.

Irritable bowel syndrome worsens faecal incontinence after primary repair of major obstetric anal sphincter injuries

AIM

Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) occur in approximately 3%-6% of vaginal deliveries and are the leading risk factor for late-onset faecal incontinence, which is an underdiagnosed pathology. The aim of this work was to use a validated scoring system to quantify the effect of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) on the severity of faecal incontinence symptoms after primary repair of major OASIS (Grade IIIb-IV).

METHOD

A prospective cohort study was performed on all women who underwent primary repair of major OASIS over a 6-year period. They were assessed with ultrasonography within 12 weeks. Two control groups (who did not have OASIS) were women who underwent elective caesarean section and primigravid women. Questionnaires were sent at least 12 months after delivery, or at first consultation for primigravids, which generated the main outcome measures: Cleveland Clinic faecal incontinence severity scores and the presence of IBS based on Rome III criteria.

RESULTS

There was a total of 211 patients included in the three groups and the mean follow-up time was 26 months after sphincter repair. Ultrasonographic sphincter defects were detected in 37% but did not affect the faecal incontinence score (p = 0.47), except in patients with IBS. Within each group, patients with IBS had significantly worse faecal incontinence than those without. Women with both OASIS and IBS had the most severe faecal incontinence scores.

CONCLUSION

OASIS has a limited negative effect on faecal incontinence, independent of whether residual ultrasonographic sphincter defects are present. However, the presence of IBS has a significant compounding effect on faecal incontinence in OASIS patients. The effect of IBS on faecal incontinence is also notable in caesarean section patients and primigravids, suggesting that IBS is an independent risk-factor that should have its place in predelivery assessment and counselling.

The prevention of perineal trauma during vaginal birth

Perineal trauma after vaginal birth is common, with approximately 9 of 10 women being affected. Second-degree perineal tears are twice as likely to occur in primiparous births, with a incidence of 40%. The incidence of obstetrical anal sphincter injury is approximately 3%, with a significantly higher rate in primiparous than in multiparous women (6% vs 2%). Obstetrical anal sphincter injury is a significant risk factor for the development of anal incontinence, with approximately 10% of women developing symptoms within a year following vaginal birth. Obstetrical anal sphincter injuries have significant medicolegal implications and contribute greatly to healthcare costs. For example, in 2013 and 2014, the economic burden of obstetrical anal sphincter injuries in the United Kingdom ranged between £3.7 million (with assisted vaginal birth) and £9.8 million (with spontaneous vaginal birth). In the United States, complications associated with trauma to the perineum incurred costs of approximately $83 million between 2007 and 2011. It is therefore crucial to focus on improvements in clinical care to reduce this risk and minimize the development of perineal trauma, particularly obstetrical anal sphincter injuries. Identification of risk factors allows modification of obstetrical practice with the aim of reducing the rate of perineal trauma and its attendant associated morbidity. Risk factors associated with second-degree perineal trauma include increased fetal birthweight, operative vaginal birth, prolonged second stage of labor, maternal birth position, and advanced maternal age. With obstetrical anal sphincter injury, risk factors include induction of labor, augmentation of labor, epidural, increased fetal birthweight, fetal malposition (occiput posterior), midline episiotomy, operative vaginal birth, Asian ethnicity, and primiparity. Obstetrical practice can be modified both antenatally and intrapartum. The evidence suggests that in the antenatal period, perineal massage can be commenced in the third trimester of pregnancy to increase muscle elasticity and allow stretching of the perineum during birth, thereby reducing the risk of tearing or need for episiotomy. With regard to the intrapartum period, there is a growing body of evidence from the United Kingdom, Norway, and Denmark suggesting that the implementation of quality improvement initiatives including the training of clinicians in manual perineal protection and mediolateral episiotomy can reduce the incidence of obstetrical anal sphincter injury. With episiotomy, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics recommends restrictive rather than routine use of episiotomy. This is particularly the case with unassisted vaginal births. However, there is a role for episiotomy, specifically mediolateral or lateral, with assisted vaginal births. This is specifically the case with nulliparous vacuum and forceps births, given that the use of mediolateral or lateral episiotomy has been shown to significantly reduce the incidence of obstetrical anal sphincter injury in these groups by 43% and 68%, respectively. However, the complications associated with episiotomy including perineal pain, dyspareunia, and sexual dysfunction should be acknowledged. Despite considerable research, interventions for reducing the risk of perineal trauma remain a subject of controversy. In this review article, we present the available data on the prevention of perineal trauma by describing the risk factors associated with perineal trauma and interventions that can be implemented to prevent perineal trauma, in particular obstetrical anal sphincter injury.

Pregnancy, parturition and postpartum considerations among patients with vulvar lichen sclerosus: A retrospective cross-sectional online survey

OBJECTIVE

Characterise VLS and obstetric considerations among women during pregnancy, parturition and postpartum.

DESIGN

Retrospective cross-sectional online survey, 2022.

SETTING

International, English-speakers.

POPULATION

Self-identified individuals aged 18-50 diagnosed with VLS with symptom onset prior to pregnancy.

METHODS

Participants recruited from social media support groups and accounts, completed a 47-question survey including yes/no, multiple answer, and free-text responses. Data were analysed with frequency, means and the Chi-square test.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

VLS symptom severity, mode of delivery, perineal laceration, source and sufficiency of information provided about VLS and obstetrics, anxiety about delivery, and postpartum depression.

RESULTS

Of 204 responses, 134 met inclusion criteria, encompassing 206 pregnancies. Mean respondent age was 35 years (SD 6) and mean age of VLS symptom onset, diagnosis and birth, was 22 (SD 8), 29 (SD 7) and 31 (SD 4) years, respectively. Symptoms decreased in 44% (n = 91) of pregnancies and increased during the postpartum period in 60% (n = 123). In all, 67% (n = 137) of pregnancies resulted in vaginal birth and 33% (n = 69) in caesarean birth. Anxiety for delivery due to VLS symptoms was reported by 50% (n = 103); 31% (n = 63) experienced postpartum depression. Of respondents previously diagnosed with VLS, 60% (n = 69) used topical steroids prior to pregnancy, 40% (n = 45) were treated during pregnancy and 65% (n = 75) postpartum. In all, 94% (n = 116) reported receiving an insufficient amount of information on the topic.

CONCLUSION

In this online survey, we found reported symptom severity remained unchanged or decreased during pregnancy, but increased postpartum. Use of topical corticosteroids decreased during pregnancy compared with before and after pregnancy. Half of the respondents reported anxiety regarding VLS and delivery.

Predicting perineal trauma during childbirth using data from a general obstetric population

Background

Perineal trauma is a common complication of childbirth and can have serious impacts on long-term health. Few studies have examined the combined effect of multiple risk factors. We developed and internally validated a risk prediction model to predict third and fourth degree perineal tears using data from a general obstetric population.

Methods

Risk prediction model using data from all singleton vaginal deliveries at Cork University Maternity Hospital (CUMH), Ireland during 2019 and 2020. Third/fourth degree tears were diagnosed by an obstetrician or midwife at time of birth and defined as tears that extended into the anal sphincter complex or involved both the anal sphincter complex and anorectal mucosa. We used univariable and multivariable logistic regression with backward stepwise selection to develop the models. Candidate predictors included infant sex, maternal age, maternal body mass index, parity, mode of delivery, birthweight, post-term delivery, induction of labour and public/private antenatal care. We used the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve C-statistic to assess discrimination, and bootstrapping techniques were used to assess internal validation.

Results

Of 8,403 singleton vaginal deliveries, 8,367 (99.54%) had complete data on predictors for model development. A total of 128 women (1.53%) had a third/fourth degree tear. Three variables remained in the final model: nulliparity, mode of delivery (specifically forceps delivery or ventouse delivery) and increasing birthweight (per 100 gram increase) (C-statistic: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.71, 0.79). We developed a nomogram to calculate individualised risk of third/fourth degree tears using these predictors. Bootstrapping indicated good internal performance.

Conclusions

Use of our nomogram can provide an individualised risk assessment of third/fourth degree tears and potentially aid counselling of women on their potential risk.

Diagnosis of maternal birth trauma by pelvic floor ultrasound

BRIEF SUMMARY

Maternal somatic birth trauma due to vaginal delivery is more common than generally assumed and an important cause of future morbidity. Maternal birth trauma may involve both psychological and somatic morbidity, some of it long-term and permanent. Somatic birth trauma is now understood to encompass not just episiotomy, perineal tears and obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI), but also trauma to the levator ani muscle, termed 'avulsion'. This review will focus on recent developments in the imaging diagnosis of maternal birth trauma, discuss the most important risk factors and strategies for primary and secondary prevention. Translabial and exo-anal ultrasound allow the assessment of maternal birth trauma in routine clinical practice and enable the use of levator avulsion and anal sphincter trauma as key performance indicators of maternity services. This is likely to lead to a greater awareness of maternal birth trauma amongst maternity caregivers and improved outcomes for patients, not the least due to an increasing emphasis on patient autonomy and informed consent in antenatal and intrapartum care.

Anthropometric Features and Third-Fourth Degree Perineal Tears

The main objective of this study was to evaluate the association between maternal and fetal anthropometric characteristics and third- and fourth-degree perineal tears. This retrospective cohort study considered all consecutive pregnancies from 2011 to 2017 at a single Institution. The inclusion criteria were: singletons who delivered vaginally during the study period, the presence of information on maternal pre-pregnancy weight, maternal height, and weight of the newborn. The feto-maternal body-mass index (BMI) was calculated as neonatal weight in kg on maternal height in squared meters (kg/m²). In total, 5397 singleton-term pregnancies were included; the prevalence of third-fourth-degree perineal tears was 0.47%. The most predictive factors were: nulliparity, feto-maternal BMI, neonatal weight, gestational age at delivery, and neonatal head circumference. After adjustment in multivariate analysis, the only independent predictors were nulliparity and fetomaternal BMI. The AUC of the final multivariate model was 73.54% (95% CI 65.65-81.42). Furthermore, feto-maternal BMI and gestational age had a significant direct correlation. Nulliparity and feto-maternal BMI are the two best predictors for third and fourth-degree perineal tears in our setting. Confirming this association in future research and integrating it into a decision algorithm on delivery timing could reduce obstetric damage to the anal sphincter.

Late preterm delivery has a distinctive second-stage duration and characteristics

BACKGROUND

Late preterm neonates born between 34.0 and 36.6 weeks' gestation are at increased risk for short- and long-term morbidity and mortality when compared with their term counterparts. Currently, no separate labor curve is available for late preterm births, and this group's optimal duration of the second stage of labor has never been defined separately.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the second stage duration between late preterm and term births.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective study from May 2014 until May 2021. Eligible were women with a singleton pregnancy, vertex presentation, spontaneous or induced onset of labor, and those who delivered vaginally beyond 34.0 weeks of gestation. The primary outcome of our study was to compare and characterize the second stage of labor duration between late preterm and term births.

RESULTS

We analyzed 962 late preterm and 9476 term vaginal deliveries. Women who delivered during the late preterm period were more likely to be multiparous (52.4% vs 45.2%; P<.001) and fewer required oxytocin during labor (41.2% vs 54.4%; P<.001) or used epidural analgesia (75.2% vs 83.6%; P<.001). The overall mean duration of the second stage of labor was significantly shorter in the late preterm period than at term (1.08±1.09 hours vs 1.49±1.22 hours; P<.001). This was even more pronounced for nulliparous women (1.05±1.00 hours vs 2.10±1.17 hours; P<.001). Among multiparous women, epidural use significantly affected the duration of the second stage of labor, and the second stage was relatively longer during the late preterm period than at term in this subgroup (1.16 vs 0.5 hours; P<.001). Using a multivariate Cox regression, variables such as maternal age (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.04), parity (hazard ratio, 4.11; 95% confidence interval, 3.65-4.63), preterm birth (hazard ratio, 2.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-3.10), and birthweight at delivery (hazard ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.30) shortened the second stage, whereas induction of labor (hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.86) and epidural use (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.86) extended its total duration. Regardless of parity, lower rates of operative vaginal deliveries were observed in the late preterm period than at term (3.7% vs 15.5%; P<.001). This period was also associated with lower rates of third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations (0.2% vs 2.2%; P<.001) but higher rates of chorioamnionitis (1.7% vs 0.1%; P<.001), Apgar score at 5 minutes <7 (1.0% vs 0.2%; P<.001), and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (19.3% vs 1.0%; P<.001).

CONCLUSION

Women who delivered vaginally during the late preterm period had a distinctive second-stage duration. Primarily, it was shown to be significantly shorter for nulliparous and multiparous women. Future studies should further clarify the optimal duration of this stage in relation to neonatal outcomes at such a vulnerable period.

Factors that influence pregnant women's decision on mode of delivery after previous obstetric anal sphincter injury

PURPOSE

Maternal request for caesarean section (CS) is increasing. One common reason is following a previous obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI). We aim to understand which factors bear the greatest influence in driving this women's decision-making process once they are pregnant after having sustained an OASI.

METHODS

Pregnant women with a previous OASIS who were attending their first antenatal appointment were deemed eligible and were asked to complete two questionnaires on their preferred mode of delivery (MoD) and ongoing pelvic floor symptomatology. Data were analysed with descriptive and inferential statistics using SPSS, and results were presented both quanti- and qualitatively.

RESULTS

Data from 63 participants was included in the final analysis. Most women had experienced 3A/3B OASIS (n = 49, 77.78 %), and they were more likely to report bladder pain and difficulties with voiding than those with major tears (p < 0.05). The type of tear did not impact directly on the preferred MoD. However, women still experiencing bladder pain were more likely to request a CS (p < 0.05). Even though all participants who attended a perineal trauma clinic postpartum found it helpful, they reported that ultimately the decision on how to deliver was theirs, and their ideas and concerns played the greatest influence.

CONCLUSION

Pregnant women with ongoing urinary symptoms rather than sexual or bowel dysfunction seem to favour a planned CS, regardless of the severity of their previous tear. Postpartum follow-up in a perineal trauma clinic is extremely valuable but even more is the need to understand women's motivations to support them make an informed decision.

The association between episiotomy or OASIS at vacuum extraction in nulliparous women and subsequent prelabor cesarean delivery: A nationwide observational study

INTRODUCTION

Severe perineal injuries at childbirth affect women's postnatal health, including future childbirths. First births with vacuum extraction carry an increased risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). Lateral or mediolateral episiotomy at vacuum extraction may decrease the risk of OASIS. Our aim was to assess whether lateral or mediolateral episiotomy, or OASIS, at vacuum extraction in nulliparous women is associated with prelabor cesarean delivery in the subsequent childbirth.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a nationwide observational study using data from the Swedish Medical Birth Register, including women having a first birth with vacuum extraction and a second birth in 2000-2014. Both births were live, single, cephalic, ≥34 gestational weeks without malformations. The association between episiotomy or OASIS in the first birth and prelabor cesarean delivery in the second birth was examined using univariate and multivariate logistic regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting, and interaction analysis. Main outcome measure was prelabor cesarean delivery in the second birth.

RESULTS

In total, 44 656 women with vacuum extraction at their first birth were included. The rate of prelabor cesarean delivery in the second birth was 5.9% (824 of 13 950) in women with episiotomy, compared with 6.0% (1830 of 30 706) in women without episiotomy. Thus, women with episiotomy did not have an increased risk of prelabor cesarean delivery (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.00, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.83-1.20) compared with women without episiotomy. For comparison, the rate of prelabor cesarean delivery in the second birth was 20.6% (1275 of 6176) in women with OASIS, compared with 3.6% (1379 of 38 480) in women without OASIS (aOR 6.57, 95% CI 5.97-7.23). There was no interaction between episiotomy and OASIS.

CONCLUSIONS

Lateral or mediolateral episiotomy at vacuum extraction in nulliparous women did not increase the risk of prelabor cesarean delivery in the subsequent childbirth. OASIS increased the odds of prelabor cesarean delivery more than sixfold.

Predicting perineal trauma during childbirth using data from a general obstetric population

Background: Perineal trauma is a common complication of childbirth and can have serious impacts on long-term health. Few studies have examined the combined effect of multiple risk factors. We developed and internally validated a risk prediction model to predict third and fourth degree perineal tears using data from a general obstetric population. Methods: Risk prediction model using data from all singleton vaginal deliveries at Cork University Maternity Hospital (CUMH), Ireland during 2019 and 2020. Third/fourth degree tears were diagnosed by an obstetrician or midwife at time of birth and defined as tears that extended into the anal sphincter complex or involved both the anal sphincter complex and anorectal mucosa. We used univariable and multivariable logistic regression with backward stepwise selection to develop the models. Candidate predictors included infant sex, maternal age, maternal body mass index, parity, mode of delivery, birthweight, post-term delivery, induction of labour and public/private antenatal care. We used the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve C-statistic to assess discrimination, and bootstrapping techniques were used to assess internal validation. Results: Of 8,403 singleton vaginal deliveries, 8,367 (99.54%) had complete data on predictors for model development. A total of 128 women (1.53%) had a third/fourth degree tear. Three variables remained in the final model: nulliparity, mode of delivery (specifically forceps delivery or ventouse delivery) and increasing birthweight (per 100 gram increase) (C-statistic: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.71, 0.79). We developed a nomogram to calculate individualised risk of third/fourth degree tears using these predictors. Bootstrapping indicated good internal performance. Conclusions: Use of our nomogram can provide an individualised risk assessment of third/fourth degree tears and potentially aid counselling of women on their potential risk.

Substantial Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury during Vacuum Assisted Delivery: An Obstetrical Issue or Device Related?

BACKGROUND

Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) might be associated with long-term urinary and anorectal morbidities. The aim of the study was to investigate the risk factors and clinical implications of OASIS associated with vacuum-assisted deliveries versus normal vaginal deliveries.

METHODS

A series of 413 consecutive OASIS cases were retrospectively analyzed. A comparison was made between OASIS cases diagnosed following vacuum-assisted deliveries versus OASIS cases diagnosed following normal vaginal deliveries. Multivariable analysis was used to study the association between vacuum-assisted deliveries and superficial (3A and 3B) versus deep (3C and 4) perineal tears.

RESULTS

The study population comprised 88,123 singleton vaginal deliveries. Diagnosis of OASIS was made in 413 women (0.47% of the total cohort), 379 (91.8%) of whom had third-degree tears and 34 (8.2%) of whom had fourth-degree tears. Among the 7410 vacuum-assisted deliveries, 102 (1.37%) had OASIS, whereas, among the 80,713 normal vaginal deliveries, only 311 (0.39%) had OASIS. In a multivariate analysis, only vacuum-assisted delivery was found to be associated with a significant risk of deeper (3C or 4) perineal tears (OR = 1.72; 95% CI 1.02-2.91; p = 0.043).

CONCLUSIONS

Vacuum-assisted instrumental intervention is a significant risk factor for OASIS and especially for deeper tears, independent of other maternal and obstetric risk factors.

Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury recurrence: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Women with previous obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs) are at a higher risk of recurrence in the subsequent pregnancy, which may lead to the development or worsening of anal incontinence. Due to a lack of evidence, few recommendations can be made about the factors that may affect the risk of OASI recurrence.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate potential risk factors for recurrent OASIs.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Studies up to May 2019 were identified from PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and ISI Web of Science.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies assessing the impact of risk factors on OASI recurrence in subsequent pregnancies were included. Reviews, letters to the editor, conference abstracts, book chapters, guidelines, Cochrane reviews, and expert opinions were excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted by two independent reviewers. Odds ratio and standardized mean difference were chosen as effect measures. Pooled estimates were calculated using the random-effects model.

MAIN RESULTS

The meta-analysis showed that maternal age, gestational age, occiput posterior presentation, oxytocin augmentation, operative delivery, and shoulder dystocia were associated with the risk of recurrent OASIs in the subsequent delivery.

CONCLUSION

Prenatal and intrapartum risk factors are associated with recurrence of OASI. PROSPERO registration no. CRD42020178125.

Comparison of the outcomes of overlapping and direct apposition sphincteroplasty techniques in anal sphincter repair

OBJECTIVES

Sphincteroplasty is of great importance in the repair of anal sphincter damage. In the present study, we compared the results of overlapping sphincteroplasty and direct apposition techniques used in anal sphincter repair.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between 2011 and 2021, 36 patients underwent sphincteroplasty for anal sphincter injury and were analysed retrospectively. Sex, age, etiologic factors, repair technique, degree of laceration, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, time between injury and repair, follow-up time and postoperative Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score (CCIS) were recorded for analysis, and the two techniques were compared statistically using SPSS statistics, Version 17.0.

RESULTS

Of the sample, 31 were females and five were males, with a mean age of 31.50 ± 6.7 years. The etiologic factors were obstetric trauma in 25 patients, perianal interventions in seven patients and other traumas in four patients. The overlapping technique was applied to 14 patients and the direct apposition technique was applied to 22 patients. Mean postoperative CCIS of all cases was 5.53 ± 2.59, and was significantly lower in those who underwent overlapping sphincteroplasty technique than those who underwent apposition repair (p= 0.006). It was observed that postoperative CCIS decreased as the time between sphincter injury and repair decreased (p <0.001; r= 0.625).

CONCLUSION

It is vital to repair anal sphincter damage as early as possible. The overlapping sphincteroplasty and direct apposition methods can both be considered safe for anal sphincter repair although in terms of faecal incontinence, the outcomes of overlapping sphincteroplasty are better than those of the direct apposition technique.

[Postpartum fecal incontinence. State of the problem]

A review of the current national and foreign literature is devoted to epidemiology, risk factors, causes, diagnosis and modern treatment approaches for fecal incontinence (FI). Incidence of FI in early and delayed period after childbirth is 30% or more. At the same time, up to 87% of postpartum injuries of anal sphincter remain undiagnosed. Importantly, routine caesarean section does not reduce the risk of incontinence. In addition to typical complaints of spontaneous gas and stool, diagnosis of FI after childbirth includes transrectal ultrasound, MRI, anorectal manometry and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency testing. Survey of proctologists from different regions of Russia revealed a high demand from medical community for educational programs devoted to diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation of patients with postpartum perineal injuries.

Risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries at the time of admission for delivery: A clinical prediction model

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate a model to predict obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) using only information available at the time of admission for labour.

DESIGN

A clinical predictive model using a retrospective cohort.

SETTING

A US health system containing one community and one tertiary hospital.

SAMPLE

A total of 22 873 pregnancy episodes with in-hospital delivery at or beyond 21 weeks of gestation.

METHODS

Thirty antepartum risk factors were identified as candidate variables, and a prediction model was built using logistic regression predicting OASIS versus no OASIS. Models were fit using the overall study population and separately using hospital-specific cohorts. Bootstrapping was used for internal validation and external cross-validation was performed between the two hospital cohorts.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Model performance was estimated using the bias-corrected concordance index (c-index), calibration plots and decision curves.

RESULTS

Fifteen risk factors were retained in the final model. Decreasing parity, previous caesarean birth and cardiovascular disease increased risk of OASIS, whereas tobacco use and black race decreased risk. The final model from the total study population had good discrimination (c-index 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75-0.78) and was able to accurately predict risks between 0 and 35%, where average risk for OASIS was 3%. The site-specific model fit using patients only from the tertiary hospital had c-stat 0.74 (95% CI 0.72-0.77) on community hospital patients, and the community hospital model was 0.77 (95%CI 0.76-0.80) on the tertiary hospital patients.

CONCLUSIONS

OASIS can be accurately predicted based on variables known at the time of admission for labour. These predictions could be useful for selectively implementing OASIS prevention strategies.

Is there an Association between Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Prediction and Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury?

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to estimate whether there is an association between the predicted probability of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery (VBAC) and the occurrence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS).

STUDY DESIGN

This was a single-site retrospective cohort study of all women with a singleton vaginal birth after a previous cesarean section between January 2011 and December 2016. Women were divided into four ordinal groupings by the predicted probability of achieving vaginal birth after cesarean using the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network VBAC calculator (less than 41%, 40.1-60%, 60.1-80%, and greater than 80%). The primary outcome was OASIS, defined as a 3rd or 4th degree perineal laceration. Bivariable and multivariable analyses were used to examine the association between predicted VBAC probability and OASIS.

RESULTS

In total, 1,411 women met inclusion criteria and 73 (5.2%) sustained OASIS. The median predicted probability of VBAC was lower in women with OASIS compared with those without OASIS (60% [interquartile range {IQR}: 48-70%] vs. 66% (IQR: 52-80%), p = 0.02]. On bivariable and multivariable logistic regression, predicted probability of VBAC was associated with increased odds of OASIS (less than 41% probability: adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 3.18, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.90-11.21; 41-60% probability: aOR: 3.76, 95% CI: 1.34-10.57; 61-80% probability aOR: 3.47, 95% CI: 1.25-9.69) relative to women with a predicted probability of VBAC of greater than 80%.

CONCLUSION

Having a lower predicted probability of VBAC is associated with an increased risk of OASIS at the time of a VBAC relative to those with greater than 80% predicted probability. Incorporation of this aspect of maternal morbidity may inform risk-stratification at the time of trial of labor after cesarean, as well as the choice of performing an operative vaginal delivery.

KEY POINTS

· Predicted probability of VBAC is associated with OASIS.. · Low predicted probability of VBAC is associated with increased odds of OASIS.. · Forceps delivery was associated with the highest odds of OASIS..

Modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury in a Norwegian Region: a case-control study

Background

Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) is a common and severe complication of vaginal delivery and may have short- and long-term consequences, including anal incontinence, sexual dysfunction and reduced quality of life. The rate of OASI varies substantially between studies and national birth statistics, and a recent meta-analysis concluded that there is a need to identify unrecognized risk factors. Our aim was therefore to explore both potential modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors for OASI.

Methods

We performed a case–control study in a single center maternity clinic in South-Eastern Norway. Data were extracted retrospectively from an institutional birth registry. The main outcome measure was the occurrence of the woman’s first-time 3^rd or 4^th degree perineal lesion (OASI) following singleton vaginal birth after 30 weeks’ gestation. For each woman with OASI the first subsequent vaginal singleton delivery matched for parity was elected as control. The study population included 421 women with OASI and 421 matched controls who gave birth during 1990–2002. Potential risk factors for OASI were assessed by conditional logistic regression analyses.

Results

The mean incidence of OASI was 3.4% of vaginal deliveries, but it increased from 1.9% to 5.8% during the study period. In the final multivariate regression model, higher maternal age and birthweight for primiparous women, and higher birthweight for the multiparous women, were the only non-modifiable variables associated with OASI. Amniotomy was the strongest modifiable risk factor for OASI in both primi- (odds ratio [OR] 4.84; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.60–9.02) and multiparous (OR 3.76; 95% CI 1.45–9.76) women, followed by augmentation with oxytocin (primiparous: OR 1.63; 95% CI 1.08–2.46, multiparous: OR 3.70; 95% CI 1.79–7.67). Vacuum extraction and forceps delivery were only significant risk factors in primiparous women (vacuum: OR 1.91; 95% CI 1.03–3.57, forceps: OR 2.37; 95% CI 1.14–4.92), and episiotomy in multiparous women (OR 2.64; 95% CI 1.36–5.14).

Conclusions

Amniotomy may be an unrecognized independent modifiable risk factor for OASI and should be further investigated for its potential role in preventive strategies.

Risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury among women who birth vaginally after a prior caesarean section: A state-wide cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) has been suggested to be associated with an increased risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury (compared with primiparous women who birth vaginally). However, prior studies have been small, or used outdated methodology. We set out to validate whether the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury among women having their first VBAC is greater than that among primiparous women having a vaginal birth.

DESIGN

State-wide retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Victoria, Australia.

POPULATION

All births (455,000) between 2009-2014.

METHODS

The risk of severe perineal injury between first vaginal birth and first vaginal birth after previous caesarean section was compared, after adjustment for potential confounding variables. Covariates were examined using logistic regression for categorical data and Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous data. Missing data were handled using multiple imputation; the analysis was performed using regression adjustment and Stata v16 multiple imputation and teffects suites.

RESULTS

Women having a VBAC (n=5,429) were significantly more likely than primiparous women (n=123,353) to sustain a 3^rd or 4^th degree tear during vaginal birth (7.1 vs 5.7%, p<0.001). After adjustment for mode of birth, body mass index, maternal age, infant birthweight, episiotomy and epidural, there was a 21% increased risk of severe perineal injury (relative risk 1.21 (95%CI 1.07 - 1.38)).

CONCLUSIONS

Women having their first vaginal birth after caesarean section have a significant increased risk of sustaining a 3^rd or 4^th degree tear, compared with primiparous women having a vaginal birth. Patient counselling and professional guidelines should reflect this increased risk.

Obstetric anal sphincter injury events prior and after Episcissors-60 implementation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of Episcissors-60 upon obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) reduction in nulliparous women.

STUDY DESIGN

Independent literature search for relevant studies was performed up to 30th May 2021 on five databases: Embase (OVID), MEDLINE (R) (OVID), CAB Abstracts (OVID), ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar. The primary outcome was to assess OASIS events prior and after Epi-60 implementation in clinical practice in natural births (NB), whilst secondary outcomes included overall operative vaginal delivery (OVD) %/spontaneous vaginal deliveries (SVD) % deliveries, episiotomy rates and operator satisfaction. All included studies (retrospective, prospective and time-series) examined the effect of Episcissors-60 implementation upon observed OASIS %.

RESULTS

A total of 14,027 nulliparous females were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, study heterogeneity was high at I²: 79% with collectively fair quality of studies, as assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Overall, this analysis highlights significant differences of OASIS events that might suggest their implementation as standard practice [RD -0.02, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.00; P = 0.03].

CONCLUSION

The present analysis highlights significant differences of OASIS events pre- and post- Epi-60, that may suggest Episcissors-60 implementation as standard practice. Nonetheless, to ensure data integrity, well reported observational studies and robust randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are required prior to introduction of Epi-60 as standard episiotomy technique in clinical practice.

Recognition and Management of Pelvic Floor Disorders in Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period

Often considered a condition of aging women, pelvic floor disorders may initially present in pregnancy and postpartum, having a negative impact on quality of life during this important time in a woman's life. This review outlines the clinical approach to implementing pelvic health into obstetric care through education and promotion of pelvic health in pregnancy, screening for pelvic floor disorders routinely, and providing support through resources, treatment, and referrals if pelvic floor disorders develop during pregnancy and postpartum.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries: New Evidence and Perspectives

Perineal injury during childbirth is a common event with important morbidity associated in particular with third-and-fourth degree perineal tears (also referred to as obstetric anal sphincter injuries-OASIS). Early diagnosis of these damages is mandatory to define a prompt therapeutic strategy and thus avoid the development of late-onset consequences, such as faecal incontinence. For this purpose, various diagnostic exams can be performed after a thorough clinical examination. The management of OASIS includes several measures and should be individualized according to the timing and features of the clinical presentation.

Female sexual function and quality of life after pelvic floor surgery: a prospective observational study

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Knowledge about the impact of pelvic floor surgery on sexual function is limited and inconsistent. A prospective study assessed the impact of surgery for prolapse (POP) or stress urinary incontinence (SUI) on sexual function and determined the biopsychosocial predictors for changes in sexual function after surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sexually active women scheduled for correction of POP and/or SUI were recruited over a 6-month period. Consenting participants were asked to complete the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12) to evaluate sexual function. The King's Health Questionnaire and Prolapse Quality-of-Life Questionnaire were used to assess UI and POP symptoms and their impact on quality of life (QoL), respectively. Women were reviewed over a period of 1 year post-surgery.

RESULTS

Ninety-one patients were followed up over 1 year. After stratification into only or both SUI and POP surgery, global sexual function improved significantly in each group (p < 0.001). The improvement in the overall QoL score after pelvic surgery showed a significant correlation with the improvement in global sexual function (SUI group: r = - 0.38, p < 0.01; POP group: r = - 0.44, p < 0.05). For women undergoing SUI surgery, only educational level and prior hysterectomy had a significant association with improved sexual function. For women undergoing POP surgery with or without SUI surgical repair, no sociodemographic characteristics were preditive of improvement of sexual function.

CONCLUSIONS

Significantly improved sexual function was observed 1 year after pelvic floor surgery, and the improvement was predicted by other social and physical factors in addition to normal functional anatomy.

Symptoms of fecal incontinence two decades after no, one, or two obstetrical anal sphincter injuries

BACKGROUND

The long-term effects of 1 or 2 consecutive obstetrical anal sphincter injuries on bowel continence are still inadequately investigated, and published results remain contradictory.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to present detailed descriptive measures of the current bowel incontinence 20 years after the first birth in women who had 2 vaginal deliveries with and without sphincter injuries.

STUDY DESIGN

Birth register data were used prospectively and linked to information from a questionnaire survey about current symptoms. Women with 2 singleton vaginal births, from 1992 to 1998, and no further births were retrieved and surveyed by the Swedish Medical Birth Register and Statistics Sweden in 2015. A simple random sample of 11,000 women was drawn from a source cohort of 64,687 women. The cumulative effect was studied in all women with a repeat sphincter injury from 1987 to 2000. Postal and web-based questionnaires were used. The study population consisted of 6760 women with no sphincter injury, 357 with 1 sphincter injury, and 324 women with 2 sphincter injuries. Women with 2 deliveries without sphincter injuries aged 40 to 60 years as reference, were compared with those of women that sustained 1 or 2 consecutive sphincter injuries. Here, third- and fourth-degree perineal tears were presented as 1 group. Fecal incontinence was defined as current involuntary leakage of solid or liquid stool, with and without concomitant leakage of gas. The Fisher exact test and the Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare the results of the 2 groups. The trend was analyzed using the Mantel-Haenszel statistics. Logistic regression models obtained the estimated age-related probability of fecal incontinence components.

RESULTS

The risk of sphincter injury at first delivery was 3.9%, and the risk of a repeat sphincter injury was 10.0% (odds ratio, 2.70; 95% confidence interval, 1.80-4.07). The overall prevalence of fecal incontinence in women without sphincter injuries was 11.7%, which doubled to 23.8% (odds ratio, 2.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.75-2.94) in those with 1 sphincter injury and more than tripled to 36.1% (odds ratio, 3.97; 95% confidence interval, 3.11-5.07) after 2 sphincter injuries (trend P<.0001). The proportion of women with severe fecal incontinence increased 3-fold and 5-fold from 1.8% after no obstetrical anal sphincter injury to 5.4% (95% confidence interval, 3.3-8.2) and 9.0% (95% confidence interval, 6.1-12.6) after 1 or 2 obstetrical anal sphincter injuries, respectively (trend P<.0001). In women without sphincter injuries, the estimated probability of fecal incontinence increased from 7.0% at the age of 40 years to 19.8% at the age of 60 years. In contrast, in women with 1 or 2 sphincter injuries, the estimated probability of fecal incontinence increased from 26.1% and 33.3%, respectively, at the age of 40 years to 36.8% and 48.8% at the age of 60 years. The prevalence of fecal incontinence increased after 52 years of age in women with 1 or 2 sphincter injuries. The dominant types of leakage in women with fecal incontinence were the combination of liquid stool and gas, and the triple combination consisting of solid and liquid stools and gas. The triple combination increased from 18.9% in those without sphincter injury to 28.2% in women with 2 injuries (trend P=.0204).

CONCLUSION

The risk of sustaining a repeat sphincter injury at the second delivery was almost tripled compared with the risk at the first delivery. Furthermore, 1 or 2 sphincter injuries brought severe long-term consequences for bowel continence. Accidental leakage of stool and gas increased with each sphincter injury, and the effect was proportionally cumulative. After the age of 52 years, the prevalence of fecal incontinence seemed to accelerate.

Severe Perineal Trauma in a Brazilian Southeastern Tertiary Hospital: A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of severe perineal trauma (obstetric and anal sphincter injury [OASIS]) in a tertiary high-risk pregnancy facility and the associated factors.

METHODS

A retrospective electronic chart review on perineal lacerations was performed from the period of April 2017 to February 2019. Obstetric and anal sphincter injury was diagnosed by a rectal examination. Primary outcome was the prevalence of OASIS (third- and fourth-degree perineal tear). Independent variables were maternal, intrapartum, and neonatal characteristics. Univariate and multivariate analyses with logistic regression models were performed. A P value lower than 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

The prevalence of OASIS (third/fourth-degree laceration) was 1.51% (43/2846) in our population. Our population was mostly white (66.3%) and mostly primiparous (52.1%). By comparison, the prevalence of first/second-degree laceration was 43% (1223/2846). Selective episiotomy occurred in 18.73% (517/2761) of patients, and it was not associated with OASIS (P = 0.211). Advanced maternal age (P = 0.196), higher number of vaginal examinations (P = 0.169), fetal presentation (P = 0.533), and duration of second stage (P = 0.757) were not associated with OASIS. Univariate analysis has found that forceps delivery (odds ratio [OR], 3.68 [1.74-7.79]; P = 0.001), neonatal macrossomy (OR, 3.42 [1.02-11.43]; P = 0.045), and larger head circumference (OR, 1.15 [1.02-1.32]; P = 0.026) were risk factors for OASIS, whereas higher gravidity reduced the risk (OR, 0.61 [0.42-0.91] for OASIS. However, after multivariate analysis, only head circumference (OR, 1.86 [1.10-3.14]; P = 0.020) remained as a risk factor.

CONCLUSIONS

Larger neonatal head circumference increased in 86% the risk for severe perineal trauma in this cohort of women.

Establishing a peripartum perineal trauma clinic: a narrative review

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) is not rare, and its consequences are multiple and potentially severe, especially for young women. Some dedicated perineal clinics have been established to improve the management of OASI. Despite their obvious importance, these specific clinics are underrepresented and underdeveloped. The objectives of this review are to explore various options for developing a peripartum perineal clinic and to compare the different practices regarding the mode of delivery for subsequent pregnancies after an OASI.

METHODS

This narrative review covers information from patients' questionnaires specific to anal incontinence, anal physiology assessment, pelvic floor and anal sphincter imaging, and the arguments for choosing the mode of delivery after an OASI.

RESULTS

This review highlights the extensive range of practices regarding the delivery mode after an OASI throughout national professional organizations and experienced perineal clinics.

CONCLUSION

This review summarizes the different choices in developing a perineal clinic to facilitate their development in promoting health care and education specific for peripartum women concerning the perineal consequences of delivery for obstetrician-gynaecologists, family doctors, and residents.

Effect of a subsequent pregnancy on anal sphincter integrity and function after obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI)

Introduction and hypothesis

Endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) and anal manometry are used in the assessment women with a history of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI), both postpartum and in a subsequent pregnancy, to aid counselling regarding mode of delivery (MOD).

Methods

A prospective observational study between 2012 to 2020 was completed. Women were reviewed 3 months postpartum following OASI and in the second half of a subsequent pregnancy. Anorectal symptoms were measured using the validated St Mark’s Incontinence Score (SMIS: asymptomatic to mild symptoms = ≤ 4). Anal manometry (incremental maximum squeeze pressure [iMSP: normal = > 20 mmHg]) and EAUS (abnormal = sphincter defect > 1 h in size) were performed.

Results

One hundred forty-six women were identified and 67.8% had an anal sphincter defect ≤ 1 h in size postnatally. In those with a defect ≤ 1 h, postpartum mean iMSP and SMIS significantly improved in a subsequent pregnancy (p = 0.04 and p = 0.01, respectively). In women with a defect > 1 h, there was no significant difference between the mean iMSP or SMIS score postnatally compared to a subsequent pregnancy. At both time points, significantly more women had an anal sphincter defect ≤ 1 h and SMIS of ≤ 4 (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001 respectively) compared to those with a defect < 1 h. In addition, significantly more women had an anal sphincter defect ≤ 1 h and iMSP ≥ 20 mmHg (p < 0.001). Overall, out of the 146 women included in this study, 76 (52.1%) with a defect ≤ 1 h also had an iMSP ≥ 20 mmHg and SMIS ≤ 4 at 3 months postpartum.

Conclusions

Women who remain asymptomatic with normal anal manometry and no abnormal sphincter defects on EAUS postnatally do not need to have these investigations repeated in a subsequent pregnancy and can be recommended to have a vaginal delivery. If our protocol was modified, over half of the women in this study could have had their MOD recommendation made in the postnatal period alone.

How comparable is clinical grading of obstetric anal sphincter injury with that determined by four-dimensional translabial ultrasound?

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the agreement between grading of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI) on translabial ultrasound (TLUS), using a newly developed algorithm, and grading on postpartum examination. A secondary aim was to assess the correlation between tear severity, as defined on ultrasound, and symptoms of anal incontinence and/or fecal urgency.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of patients seen at a perineal clinic between 2012 and 2018, after recent primary repair of OASI. All patients underwent a standardized interview including the St Mark's anal incontinence test and four-dimensional TLUS. Post-processing of ultrasound volume data was performed blinded to all other data. Using tomographic ultrasound imaging, a set of eight slices was obtained, and the central six slices were evaluated for sphincter abnormalities. Slices with distortion, thinning or defects were rated as abnormal. The following algorithm was used to grade OASI: a Grade-3a tear was diagnosed if the external anal sphincter (EAS) was abnormal in < 4/6 slices; a Grade-3b tear was diagnosed if the EAS was abnormal in ≥ 4/6 slices; and a Grade-3c/4 tear was diagnosed if both the EAS and internal anal sphincter were abnormal in ≥ 4/6 slices. Clinical grading of OASI was determined according to the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists guidelines. Agreement between clinical and TLUS diagnosis of OASI was evaluated using weighted κ.

RESULTS

Of the 260 women seen during the study period, 45 (17%) were excluded owing to missing data or a repeat OASI, leaving 215 complete datasets for analysis. The average follow-up interval was 2.4 months (range, 1-11 months) after OASI and the mean age of the women was 29 years (range, 17-42 years). One hundred and seventy-five (81%) women were vaginally primiparous. OASI was graded clinically as Grade 3a in 87 women, Grade 3b in 80, Grade 3c in 29 and Grade 4 in 19. On imaging, full agreement between clinical and TLUS grading was noted in 107 (50%) women, with a weighted κ of 0.398. In 96 (45%) women, there was disagreement by one category, with a weighted κ of 0.74 and in 12 (6%) there was disagreement by two categories. Twenty-four (11%) women were found to have a normal anal sphincter on imaging. Overall, potential clinical over-diagnosis was noted in 72 (33%) women and potential under-diagnosis in 36 (17%). The seniority of the diagnosing obstetrician did not significantly alter agreement between clinical and sonographic OASI grading (κ 0.44, 0.43, and 0.34, for specialists and senior and junior residents, respectively). The association between symptoms of anal incontinence and/or fecal urgency and TLUS grading did not reach significance (P = 0.052).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical and TLUS-based grading of OASI showed fair agreement. Clinical over-diagnosis may be increasingly common in our population, although under-diagnosis may still occur in a significant minority. Copyright © 2020 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

The association between vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery and anal sphincter injury

INTRODUCTION

Vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery (VAVD) is considered a major risk factor for obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). However, it is difficult to estimate its true contribution to the occurrence of OASIS, as its performance may be confounded by other determinants. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the association of VAVD with OASIS among primiparous women compared to SVD.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study including all primiparous women who vaginally delivered a cephalic singleton gestation during the years 2011 to 2020. As VAVDs were not performed before 34 gestational weeks, we capped the cohort at this gestational age. Women were allocated into two groups: VAVDs and spontaneous vaginal deliveries (SVD). We compared women with OASIS to those without and performed a multivariate analysis including factors that were found significant in the univariate analysis. We further divided the whole cohort into different subcategories. The primary outcome was the rate of OASIS in VAVD compared to SVD.

RESULTS

Overall, 23,272 primiparous vaginal deliveries were available for evaluation. Of these, 3595 delivered by VAVD and 19,677 delivered spontaneously. OASIS occurred in 421 (1.8%) of the deliveries. OASIS were more common in VAVDs than in SVDs [83 (2.3%) vs. 338 (1.7%), respectively, OR (95% CI) 1.35 (1.06-1.72), p = 0.01]. After multivariate regression analysis, OASIS were not found to be independently associated with the mode of delivery [aOR 1.21 (95% CI) 0.88-1.68, P = 0.23]. In a categorical analysis of OASIS rates by risk factors and mode of delivery, VAVD was not associated with an increase in OASIS among women giving birth to neonates weighing > 3500 g compared to SVD [OR (95% CI) 1.02 (0.65-1.62), P = 0.90].

CONCLUSION

Among primiparous women VAVD did not increase the risk of OASIS compared to SVD.

The Incidence of and Predictors for Severe Perineal Trauma and Intact Perineum in Women Having a Waterbirth in England: A Hospital-Based Study

Background: To determine the incidence of and predictors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) and intact perineum in women giving birth in the water and compare with the general obstetric population. Materials and Methods: Data were retrospectively collected for women who had singleton cephalic presentation vaginal births in the water and the general obstetric population between August 2007 and December 2017. Results: We identified 1,007 women who had a waterbirth and 36,924 women from the general obstetric population. There was no significant difference in the incidence of OASIS between waterbirths and the general obstetric population (2.3% vs. 2.0%). Having a waterbirth was associated with a lower probability for an intact perineum (odds ratio [OR] = 0.83; confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.73-0.94) when compared with the general obstetric population (44.7% vs. 51.3%). Nulliparous women with a waterbirth when compared with multiparous women had an eightfold higher likelihood for the occurrence of OASIS (OR = 8.28; 95% CI: 2.64-25.86). The risk for a higher degree of OASIS was associated with increased maternal age in the total sample (OR = 1.08; 95% CI: 1.06-1.11) and with a lower body mass index (BMI) at booking in multiparous women (OR = 0.96; 95% CI: 0.92-0.99). The risk for any type of perineal trauma was associated with increased maternal age in the total sample (OR = 1.10; 95% CI: 1.07-1.13) and with a lower BMI at booking in multiparous women (OR = 0.95; 95% CI: 0.91-0.99). Conclusions: We found that giving birth in the water reduced the chance of having an intact perineum. We have also shown that nulliparity, increased maternal age in all women, and a lower BMI at booking in multiparous were associated with OASIS and lower rates of intact perineum in waterbirths.

Maternal Ethnicity and the Risk of Obstetrical Anal Sphincter Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To explore the role of maternal ethnicity as a risk factor for obstetrical anal sphincter injury (OASI).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of all women with singleton gestations who had a vaginal delivery at term, between January 2014 and October 2017, at a single center. OASI was defined as a third-degree perineal tear (anal sphincter complex) or a fourth-degree perineal tear (anorectal mucosa). The characteristics of women with and without OASIs were compared. Multiple logistic regression was performed to account for potential confounders, including ethnicity.

RESULTS

During the study period, 11 012 women were eligible for inclusion, of whom 336 (3.1%) had an OASI; 313 (93.1%) had a third-degree tear, and 23 (6.9%) had a fourth-degree tear. Women with OASIs were characterized by younger maternal age (<35 years), Asian ethnicity, nulliparity, neonatal birth weight ≥3500 grams, midline and mediolateral episiotomy, second stage of labour lasting ≥60 minutes, and assisted vaginal delivery. After adjusting for potential confounders, Asian ethnicity remained independently associated with increased risk of OASI (adjusted odds ratio 2.07; 95% CI 1.6-2.7) whereas mediolateral episiotomy was independently associated with decreased risk of OASI (adjusted odds ratio 0.64; 95% CI 0.5-0.9).

CONCLUSION

Asian ethnicity is independently associated with increased risk of OASI. Although midline episiotomy increases the risk of OASI, mediolateral episiotomy may protect against OASI, and should be considered in high-risk patients.

Anal Sphincter Injury Associated with Vaginal Twin Delivery

OBJECTIVE

Obstetric anal sphincter injury remains the most common cause of fecal incontinence in women, and research in twin pregnancies is sparse. This study aimed to examine risk factors for sphincter injury in twin deliveries over a 10-year period.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective study of twin vaginal deliveries in a tertiary-level hospital over 10 years. We examined the demographics of women who had a vaginal delivery of at least one twin. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine risk factors.

RESULTS

There were 1,783 (2.1%) twin pregnancies, of which 556 (31%) had a vaginal delivery of at least one twin. Sphincter injury occurred in 1.1% (6/556) women with twins compared with 2.9% (1720/59,944) singleton vaginal deliveries. Women with sphincter injury had more instrumental deliveries (83.3 vs. 27.6%; p = 0.008). On univariate analysis, only instrumental delivery was a significant risk factor (odds ratio: 2.93; p = 0.019).

CONCLUSION

Sphincter injury occurs at a lower rate in vaginal twin pregnancies than in singletons. No twin-specific risk factors were identified. Discussion of the risk of sphincter injury should form part of patient counseling with regard to the mode of delivery.

Patient's characteristics and incidence of fecal incontinence after primary repair of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries (OASIS) at three Indonesian tertiary hospitals in 2014-2016

Introduction

Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries (OASIS) is a common complication of vaginal delivery. The incidence was 4.53 % of total vaginal deliveries. OASIS is associated with an increased risk of fecal incontinence (FI), which affects one’s quality of life. The incidence of OASIS and FI varied from study to study. In this study, we described the characteristics of patients with OASIS at three Indonesian tertiary hospitals in 2014−2016 and FI outcome among those patients.

Methodology

This is a descriptive study on the characteristics of OASIS patients after primary repair in three tertiary hospitals: dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital, Persahabatan General Hospital and Fatmawati General Hospital from 2014 to 2016. From a total of 234 patients, only 58 patients could be contacted and interviewed using Revised Fecal Incontinence Score (RFIS) questionnaires. Out of the 58 patients, only 16 patients came for transperineal ultrasound. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.

Results

From a total of 234 patients, the mean age was 26.6 years old with a mean Body Mass Index (BMI) of 24.8 kg/m². Most of the patients were nulliparous (67.5 %) and the median duration of second stage of labor was 45 min. Episiotomy was not performed on most patients (59.4 %) and most of them underwent spontaneous vaginal delivery (65.4 %) with mean baby’s birthweight of 3217 g. From 58 interviewed patients, three patients complained of FI (5.2 %). Sixteen patients came for transperineal ultrasound examination, and only one of them had FI. Anal sphincter defects were identified in five patients, comprising three external anal sphincter (EAS) and two internal anal sphincter (IAS) defects. All five patients did not experience FI. One patient who had FI had no anal sphincter defect.

Discussion

This is a pilot study for the incidence of FI among the OASIS population in Jakarta, Indonesia. The incidence of FI observed in this study was relatively low (3 out of 58 patients) compared to other studies. This could be due to differences in study population. The fact that the patient with FI had intact anal sphincter suggests that other factors may contribute to the development of FI in addition to the integrity of the anal sphincter. These factors may include pelvic floor muscle and innervation of the surrounding tissues.

Conclusion

The outcomes of primary repair of OASIS varied between studies. Patients’ characteristics might play an important role in the development of OASIS as well as the outcome after repair. Further studies with larger sample size are needed.

Risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) and anal incontinence: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) are the commonest cause of anal incontinence in women of reproductive age. We determined the risk of anal sphincter defects diagnosed by ultrasound, and the risk of anal incontinence in (i) all women who deliver vaginally, (ii) in women without clinical suspicion of OASIS, and (iii) after primary repair of sphincter injury, by systematic review.

METHODS

We searched major databases until June 2018, without language restrictions. Random effects meta-analysis was used to obtain pooled estimates of ultrasound diagnosed OASIS and risk of anal incontinence symptoms at various time points after delivery, and of persistent sphincter defects after primary repair. We reported the association between ultrasound diagnosed OASIS and anal incontinence symptoms using relative risk (RR) with 95 % CI.

RESULTS

We included 103 studies involving 16,110 women. Of all women who delivered vaginally, OASIS were diagnosed on ultrasound in 26 % (95 %CI, 21-30, I² = 91 %), and 19 % experienced anal incontinence (95 %CI, 14-25, I² = 92 %). In women without clinical suspicion of OASIS (n = 3688), sphincter defects were observed in 13 % (10-17, I² = 89 %) and anal incontinence experienced by 14 % (95 % CI: 6-24, I² = 95 %). Following primary repair of OASIS, 55 % (46-63, I² = 98 %) of 7549 women had persistent sphincter defect with 38 % experiencing anal incontinence (33-43, I² = 92 %). There was a significant association between ultrasound diagnosed OASIS and anal incontinence (RR 3.74, 2.17-6.45, I² = 98 %).

INTERPRETATION

Women and clinicians should be aware of the high risk for sphincter defects following vaginal delivery even when clinically unsuspected. This underlines the need of careful and systematic perineal assessment after birth to mitigate the risk of missing OASIS. We also noted a high rate of persistent defects and symptoms following primary repair of OASIS. This dictates the need for provision of robust training for clinicians to achieve proficiency and sustain competency in repairing OASIS.

The use of metronidazole in women undergoing obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a systematic review of the literature

PURPOSE

Antibiotic treatment during surgical repair of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) had been a matter of debate. We aimed to review the available literature regarding the efficacy of metronidazole administration in women undergoing perineal repair following obstetric OASIS.

STUDY DESIGN

To identify potentially eligible studies, we searched PubMed, Scopus, Embase and the Cochrane Library from inception to January 13th, 2019.Reference lists of identified studies were searched. No language restrictions were applied. We used a combination of keywords and text words represented by "Metronidazole", "obstetrics", "obstetric anal sphincter injury", "OASIS", "third degree tear", "fourth degree tear", "third degree laceration", "fourth degree laceration", "antibiotic therapy", "perineal damage" and "perineal trauma". Two reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts of records retrieved from the database searches. Both reviewers recommended studies for the full-text review. Thescreen of full-text articles recommended by at least one reviewer was done independently by the same two reviewers and assessedfor inclusion in the systematic review. Disagreements between reviewers were resolved by consensus.

RESULTS

The electronic database search yielded a total of 54,356 results (Fig. 1). After duplicate exclusion 28,154 references remained. Of them, 26 were relevant to the review based on title and abstract screening. None of these articles dealt with the use of metronidazole for the prevention of infections complicating anal sphincter repair in women with OASIS. A Cochrane review addressing antibiotic prophylaxis for patients following OASIS, compared prophylactic antibiotics against placebo or no antibiotics, included only one randomized controlled trial of 147 participants. This study showed that prophylactic antibiotics (not metronidazole) may be helpful to prevent perineal wound complications following OASIS. Fig. 1 Study seection process CONCLUSION: Anaerobic infections potentially complicate wound repair after OASIS. Although scientific societies recommend the use of antibiotics for the prevention of infectious morbidity after OASIS, no study has specifically assessed the role of metronidazole.