Should maximal urethral closure pressure be performed before midurethral sling surgery for stress incontinence? A time to revisit

Which parameters, related to the female urethra and pelvic floor, determine therapy selection for recurrent female stress urinary incontinence: ICI-RS 2023?

INTRODUCTION

The evidence basis for therapy selection in women who have failed primary stress urinary incontinence (SUI) surgery is limited. The ICI-RS group discussed the available data at its meeting in June 2023, particularly the anatomical characteristics as assessed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound (US) modalities, functional characteristics associated with storage and voiding urodynamic assessment, as well as the patient characteristics that might influence outcomes. This paper summarizes the evidence base that supported these discussions and offers the basis for research proposals for future groups.

METHODS

A literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was performed, and the data is presented. Research questions are based on the knowledge gaps highlighted.

RESULTS

Possible MRI parameters that may influence outcomes were striated urethral sphincter volume, bladder and proximal urethral funneling, pubo-urethral ligament integrity, distance of the bladder neck below the pubococcygeal line, posterior urethra-vesical angle, and bladder neck to levator ani distance. US parameters included sling distance to the urethral lumen and pubis, sling position, bladder neck mobility, and lateral arm asymmetry, twisting, or curling. Urodynamic parameters included detrusor overactivity, Valsalva leak point pressure, maximum urethral closure pressure, and bladder outlet obstruction. Important patient parameters included body mass index, age, and previous interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

Identifying and quantifying causative factors in patients with recurrent SUI, that allow clinicians to modify subsequent treatment choices and techniques may help reduce treatment failure and complications. Formulating algorithms is the next step in optimizing patient counseling, surgical selection, and healthcare allocation.

Effect of aging on lower urinary tract symptoms and urodynamic parameters in women

OBJECTIVE

Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) are common in women. However, due to multifactorial etiologies, it is difficult to determine the prevalence, and functional changes with age. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of age on female LUTS, urethral and bladder function after their midlife.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was an observational cohort study conducted at a tertiary referral medical center. Women who visited for bothersome LUTS, valid quality of life questionnaires, and urodynamic tests were recruited into the this study. Patients The patients were divided into four groups (<50, 50-59, 60-69, and >69 years). All LUTS, and urodynamic parameters were reviewed, and compared between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 364 women were enrolled and analyzed. The urodynamic tests showed the that maximal cystometric bladder capacity, the average and maximal urine flow rate, and pressure of detrusor contractility at maximal urine flow rate were all significantly decreased with age. Besides, the voiding time, and post-voiding residual urine volume significantly increased with age. For urethral competence, the maximal urethral closure pressure deteriorated with age. All storage symptoms did not change with age, except for nocturnal enuresis. However, the effect of age on some voiding symptoms significantly increased with age, including straining to void, hesitancy, and intermittency.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower urinary tract symptoms, bladder and urethral functions change with age, particularly voiding function. Physicians should be aware of the aging process when counseling and before implementing management strategies, particularly for older people.

The role of urodynamics in the management of female stress urinary incontinence

AIM

The role of urodynamic study (UDS) in the management of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is one of the most controversial and debated topic in urogynecology. Here, we aimed to systematically assess the most relevant available evidence on urodynamics' value in the management of women with stress urinary incontinence.

METHODS

A systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement was performed in May 2018. Only randomized clinical trials, prospective studies, or retrospective studies articles evaluating the use of urodynamic studies in women with stress urinary incontinence were included.

RESULTS

After screening a total of 3055 records, 39 studies published from 1996 to 2018 were included.

CONCLUSIONS

In an uncomplicated population of women with SUI, it is not demonstrated that preoperative urodynamic evaluation can improve the outcome of continence surgery; however, UDS provides additional information regarding lower urinary tract function that could guide the physician to make the right therapeutic choice. UDS should be considered mandatory before surgery in complicated patients, but its use should also be evaluated in index patients when the results may help counseling and management of these women.