The role of social constraints and catastrophizing in pelvic and urogenital pain

Empowered management for pelvic pain: The experiences of women with persistent pelvic pain participating in an online self-directed self-management program while they wait for interprofessional care

BACKGROUND

Persistent pelvic pain is pain sensed in or around the pelvis and is often associated with negative cognitive, behavioral, sexual, and emotional consequences. The lack of interprofessional persistent pelvic pain management programs that address the complex interplay of biopsychosocial factors result in lengthy wait times and negative health outcomes. Limited access to evidence informed self-management educational resources contributes to poor coping strategies. Evidence shows that self-management education and strategies support patients while they wait for care. However, very few studies explore the patient's lived experience of participating in an online educational program designed for persistent pelvic pain.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to understand the experience of women with persistent pelvic pain participating in an online, self-management education program ("Pelvic Pain Empowered Management" program) while awaiting care at an interprofessional pelvic pain clinic.

DESIGN

A descriptive qualitative approach was used to explore the experiences of women participating in an online educational program designed for cis women with persistent pelvic pain.

METHODS

We conducted semi-structured interviews with 11 women, transcribed the data verbatim using NVivo software (NVivo 12, QSR International Pty Ltd.), and analyzed inductively using previously established methods.

RESULTS

We identified four main themes relevant to women's experiences of the program: (1) the program shaped expectations around upcoming pelvic pain appointments, (2) the program content is relevant and resonates with people with lived experience of persistent pelvic pain, (3) the program enhanced understanding of persistent pelvic pain, and (4) the program empowered people with skills and strategies to better manage their persistent pelvic pain.

CONCLUSION

Our findings highlight how self-directed online patient education can be leveraged while persistent pelvic pain patients wait for care to support them in setting expectations around care and in engaging in pain self-management.

The role of catastrophizing in chronic cyclical pelvic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Dysmenorrhea (painful menstrual cramps) is one of the most common gynecological complaints in women and girls. Dysmenorrhea may be a condition itself or a result of another medical condition, including endometriosis and chronic pelvic pain. Research examining the relationship between menstrual pain ratings and catastrophizing has produced mixed results.

OBJECTIVE

To review and meta-analyze the relationship between catastrophizing and pain ratings of chronic cyclical pelvic pain.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional, longitudinal, and intervention studies that reported the relationship between menstrual/pelvic pain and catastrophizing were included. Study populations had to include healthy menstruating persons or persons with a condition associated with cyclical pelvic pain including primary dysmenorrhea, endometriosis, and/or chronic pelvic pain.

DATA SOURCES AND METHODS

A systematic search of articles published since 2012 on PubMed, PsychInfo, CINHAL, and Medline was conducted in January and rerun in November of 2022. Search terms included cyclical pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, endometriosis, pelvic pain, and catastrophizing. Data extraction was completed independently by two extractors and cross-checked for errors. A random-effects meta-regression was used to synthesize the data using restricted maximum likelihood.

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies examining 4,540 participants were included. A random effects model found a meta-correlation between catastrophizing and pain of r = .31 (95% confidence interval: .23-.40) p < .001. Heterogeneity was large and significant (I2 = 84.5%, Q(24) = 155.16, p < .001). Studies that measured general pelvic pain rather than cyclical pelvic pain specifically and those that used multi-item rather than single-item measures of pain had significantly higher correlations. Age and depression did not moderate the relationship between catastrophizing and pain.

CONCLUSION

A systematic review and meta-analysis found that catastrophizing had a small but significant positive association with pain ratings. Patients experiencing cyclical pelvic pain may benefit from interventions targeting the psychological management of pain.

REGISTRATION

This meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO on 14 January 2022. Registration number: CRD42022295328.

Pain Catastrophizing and Pain Health-Related Quality-of-Life in Endometriosis

OBJECTIVES

To determine if pain catastrophizing is independently associated with pain health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) in women with endometriosis, independent of potential confounders.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Analysis of cross-sectional baseline data from a prospective database at a tertiary referral center for endometriosis/pelvic pain. Referrals to the center were recruited between December 2013 to April 2015, with data collected from online patient questionnaires, physical examination, and review of medical records. The primary outcome was HRQoL as measured by the 11-item pain subscale of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 questionnaire. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale was the independent variable of interest. Other independent variables (potential confounders) included other psychological measures, pain severity, comorbid pain conditions, and social-behavioral and demographic variables. Multivariable linear regression was used to control for these potential confounders and assess independent associations with the primary outcome.

RESULTS

In total, 236 women were included (87% consent rate). The mean age was 35.0±7.3 years, and 98 (42%) had stage I to II endometriosis, 110 (47%) had stage III to IV endometriosis, and 28 (11%) were of unknown stage after review of operative records. Regression analysis demonstrated that higher pain catastrophizing (P<0.001), more severe chronic pelvic pain (P<0.001), more severe dysmenorrhea (P<0.001), and abdominal wall pain (positive Carnett test) (P=0.033) were independently associated with worse pain HRQoL.

DISCUSSION

Higher pain catastrophizing was associated with a reduced pain HRQoL in women with endometriosis at a tertiary referral center, independent of pain severity and other potential confounders.