The effect of sacral neuromodulation on pregnancy: a systematic review

Migration of a sacral neuromodulation electrode after vaginal delivery in a female patient with non-obstructive urinary retention

Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is a well-established treatment in the management of refractory overactive bladder (OAB), non-obstructive retention, and fecal incontinence. However, the use and management of SNM in pregnant women remains elusive. We present a noteworthy case involving a patient diagnosed with Clara-Fowler syndrome who underwent SNM during the early stages of pregnancy. The sacral neuromodulator remained activated throughout the pregnancy upon patient's request. After vaginal delivery the patient encountered device dysfunction, ultimately attributed to electrode migration. After repositioning of a new electrode in the contralateral sacral root, the patient successfully recovered spontaneous voiding with no post void residual. This case suggests that SNM may not have detrimental effects on pregnancy or fetal development. However, the intricate physiological changes associated with pregnancy and vaginal delivery may contribute to electrode migration, warranting careful consideration in the management of pregnant patients undergoing SNM.

Bladder pain syndrome and pregnancy

Bladder pain syndrome (BPS) is a poorly understood condition. In pregnancy, lower urinary tract symptoms and pain are common, but the possibility of BPS is rarely considered and almost never explored. The consequences of BPS on pregnancy and vice versa are poorly understood, and management options appear to be limited. This article reviews the current evidence to allow us to better counsel, investigate, diagnose and manage patients with suspected or known BPS who fall pregnant or who are considering pregnancy. MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed were searched for a combination of mesh terms of keywords: 'cystitis', 'interstitial', 'bladder', 'pain' and 'pregnancy'. Relevant articles were identified, reviewed and further relevant articles identified from the references. CONCLUSION: BPS symptoms are very common in pregnancy, with limited data suggesting significant negative effects on the woman and pregnancy. There are safe options for investigation, diagnosis and management in pregnancy. There is a need to raise awareness of the impact of BPS symptoms in pregnancy and the available options for diagnoses and management, improving patient experience and outcomes. PATIENT SUMMARY: Patients with BPS or symptoms akin to BPS need not be abandoned in pregnancy. There is data to support them in making decisions around investigation and management in pregnancy.

Neurostimulation for Chronic Low Back Pain during Pregnancy: Implications for Child and Mother Safety

Pain therapy for low back pain in pregnancy is a very topical issue. In fact, it is necessary to balance the patient's needs to control pain with the need to manage a pregnancy without negative effects on the fetus. We report a case of a 37-year-old woman with low back pain treated with neurostimulation before pregnancy. She described severe chronic low back pain unresponsive to pharmacologic treatments. We first implanted a subcutaneous stimulator into the patient, and then a definitive stimulator resulting in excellent pain control. The improvement in her quality of life allowed the woman to become pregnant. We decided to stop neurostimulation with the patient during pregnancy. The patient completed her pregnancy without complications and the baby was born healthy. During the pregnancy, the woman took only paracetamol when needed. However, this painful symptomatology, completely anecdotal, is not attributable solely to the previous spine problem but probably also to the changes occurring during pregnancy. At the end of pregnancy, the neurostimulator was reactivated without any discomfort for the patient, who is now pain free. This case report provides a first line of evidence of a possible treatment of low back pain in women intending to become pregnant, with risk-free management for both the patient and the child.

Sacral Neuromodulation in Pregnant Women—A Case Report and Literature Review

Millions of women around the world suffer from an overactive bladder and urinary retention. A significant number of them are of reproductive age. For 25 years, SNM has been an effective therapy for treatment-resistant hyperactive bladder and idiopathic urinary retention. The paper presents a case of a 35-year-old pregnant woman with an overactive bladder resistant to pharmacological treatment, who responded positively to sacral neuromodulation. The patient decided against deactivating the neuromodulator and, after an uneventful course of pregnancy, she gave birth by a caesarean section to a healthy female infant. The use of SNM in pregnant patients remains a constant clinical challenge. The current literature was reviewed, but published studies do not provide a clear answer. Further studies with a long follow-up period are necessary to determine more accurately the effects of SNM therapy on the fetus and the course of pregnancy. Currently, it is recommended to deactivate SNM during pregnancy. However, it seems that an individual approach to the patient with information on the risks and benefits of continuing or discontinuing therapy should be the current procedure.

Effects of neuromodulation on treatment of recurrent anal fissure: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Anal fissure is a linear tear in the distal anoderm most frequently occurring in the posterior midline. Lateral internal sphincterotomy is considered the gold standard for the treatment of this condition. To this date, several pharmacological and neuromodulatory therapies have been tried out as alternative non-invasive treatments for anal fissures, however, the efficacy of some of these methods remains to be understood.

OBJECTIVE

the primary aim of this study was to review available literature on neuromodulatory treatments for recurrent anal fissure as a potentially effective cure for this condition.

DATA SOURCES

A search was conducted among five main online databases Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Scholar.

STUDY SELECTION

All published human studies in English literature addressing neuromodulation for the treatment of recurrent anal fissure were selected.

INTERVENTION

neuromodulation for the treatment of anal fissure. We chose to include all articles in which the authors stated that the procedure they performed was via neuromodulation technique, or that the described technique used in their study resembled the technique.

RESULT

Among a total of 3487 evaluated studies, seven represented the effects of neuro modulation on treatment of recurrent anal fissure, among which two were randomized controlled trials and the rest were prospective studies. A total of 186 patient were evaluated in these studies. The mean age of the participants was 46.97 ± 8.2. The average VAS score before intervention was 7.77 ± 2.13, which decreased to 0.31 ± 1.13 after intervention.

LIMITATIONS

limitations of this study include the lack of related articles, and data regarding this subject.

CONCLUSION

Posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) provides rapid pain relief and fissure healing especially in short-to mid-terms with little to no complications, however, using this treatment, symptoms of anal fissure do not improve as well as LIS, especially in the long-term.

Sacral neuromodulation implanted patients: Patient concerns during the COVID-19 pandemic and practical modifications

OBJECTIVE

To study the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on sacral neuromodulation (SNM) implanted patients and examine patient concerns.

METHODOLOGY

A web-based survey was sent to all SNM patients, including those with implants and who had a cancelled operation because of the pandemic. The survey consisted of 15 questions in Arabic language, which sought to evaluate outcomes, as well as patient concerns and preferences during the COVID-19 pandemic.

RESULTS

A total of 66 patients were contacted, and of which, 62 replied. Most of the patients (n = 51; 82.3%) had the device implanted, and 11 (17.7%) patients had a postponed operation secondary to the pandemic. There were 20 males and 42 females. The mean age was 34 years ± SD 16.5 (9-62 years). Indications for sacral neuromodulation therapy were refractory overactive bladder OAB 35 (56.5%), retention 17 (27.4%), OAB + retention 3 (4.8%). When questioning the effect of the lockdown on patients, most reported no effect (43.5%), while 14.5% had some programming difficulties. The patients preferred telephone calls for device emergencies and clinic follow-up with 88.7% and 98.4%, respectively. Most patients had no concerns regarding their Interstim device during the pandemic and found it manageable; 8.1% had insurance concerns due to the economic changes.

CONCLUSION

Patients with implanted SNM for lower urinary tract symptoms were mainly concerned with device programming. Telemedicine is a great solution for continuous care in this group.

Do you really want to deactivate your sacral neuromodulation device during pregnancy? A single center case series

Introduction and hypothesis

The main objective of the study is to assess the efficacy and safety of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) during pregnancy.

Methods

We retrospectively enrolled patients who underwent SNM implantation in our center and subsequently became pregnant. The indication for SNM, timing of device de-activation (if performed), course of pregnancy and urological complications, duration of labor, childbirth term, delivery mode, congenital abnormalities and SNM dysfunctions after delivery were recorded.

Results

Fourteen pregnancies were recorded among 11 women undergoing SNM. Indications for device implantation were urinary retention (7 cases) and dysfunctional voiding (4 cases). Two patients carried on two and three pregnancies, respectively, with the device turned off since the first trimester. They both had to return to self-catheterization and developed recurring urinary tract infections. No major urological complications were recorded among the remaining nine women that kept the device on during pregnancy. A cesarean section was performed in four cases for obstetric reasons, and in seven cases it was planned by the urologist and gynecologist to avoid lead damage/displacement. Three pregnancies resulted in a vaginal delivery, and no association with term of delivery or duration of labor was observed. No congenital abnormalities related to SNM or lead displacement are reported, and only one patient required device removal because of significant loss of efficacy after childbirth.

Conclusions

The use of SNM during pregnancy appears to be safe, without morbidity for the fetus. Moreover, risks associated with switching the device off may be greater than benefits and justify maintaining the electrical stimulation throughout pregnancy.

Neuromodulation - a therapeutic option for refractory overactive bladder. A recent literature review

Overactive bladder (OAB) affects approximately 17% of the population. The treatment of this clinical condition is challenging, especially when conservative therapy is not effective. There are limited options for the treatment of recurrent OAB. Neuromodulation has taken a significant place in the therapy of recalcitrant lower urinary tract dysfunctions over the past 20 years. The aim of this study was to review the literature evaluating the different forms of neuromodulation in various urological clinical conditions and to show the future prospects of this treatment method. Further studies are necessary to determine the effectiveness of neuromodulation and to identify the prognostic factors of therapeutic success. This could be helpful in the selection of patients who will be most likely to respond positively to the treatment.

[Neuromodulation of lower urinary tract dysfunction]

Neuromodulative procedures such as transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), transcutaneous/percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS/PTNS), and sacral neuromodulation (SNM) are promising second-line treatments for refractory lower urinary tract dysfunction. Using these therapies, both storage and voiding disorders but also bowel dysfunction might be successfully treated. Although the mechanism of action of neuromodulation is not well understood, it seems to involve modulation of spinal cord reflexes and brain networks by peripheral afferents (genital/rectal, tibial and sacral afferents in the case of TENS, TTNS/PTNS, and SNM, respectively). Neuromodulative procedures might also be highly effective in the most desperate situations and further relevant developments are expected so that these innovative techniques will most likely become even more important in urology.

[Cesarean section and perineal protection: CNGOF Perineal Prevention and Protection in Obstetrics Guidelines]

OBJECTIVE

The endpoint was to assess the interest of planned cesarean section in primary and secondary obstetrical perineal prevention.

METHODS

This is a review of the literature about the impact of the mode of delivery in urinary incontinence (UI), anal incontinence (AI), pelvic organ prolapse (POP), sexual disorders de novo or prior to delivery and history of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI).

RESULTS

The studies about UI, AI and sexual disorders report a potential protective impact of cesarean section but with a possible selection bias and an inadequate comparability of the groups. Randomized trials do not report any protective effect of planned cesarean section for these 3 disorders. The literature about POP reports a higher risk for the women who delivered vaginally but still with a possible selection bias et there is no randomized trial for this outcome. About the secondary prevention of OASI, there is no evidence in the literature for a benefit of a systematic planned cesarean section for all women. For symptomatic women, the mode of delivery has to be discussed individually. In secondary prevention of UI, AI, POP and sexual disorders, there is no evidence in the literature for a benefit of planned cesarean section even if there is a history of surgical procedure for the disorder.

CONCLUSION

Planned cesarean section is not recommended in order to prevent primary or secondary obstetrical perineal disorders except for symptomatic OASI for whom an individual discussion about the mode of delivery is recommended.

International Continence Society best practice statement for use of sacral neuromodulation

AIMS

Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is an accepted therapy for a variety of conditions. However, despite over 20 years of experience, it remains a specialized procedure with a number of subtleties. Here we present the recommendations issued from the International Continence Society (ICS) SNM Consensus Panel.

METHODS

Under the auspices of the ICS, eight urologists, three colorectal surgeons and two urogynecologists, covering a wide breadth of geographic and specialty interest representation, met in January 2017 to discuss best practices for neuromodulation. Suggestions for statements were submitted in advance and specific topics were assigned to committee members, who prepared and presented supporting data to the group, at which time each topic was discussed in depth. Best practice statements were formulated based on available data. This document was then circulated to multiple external reviewers after which final edits were made and approved by the group.

RESULTS

The present recommendations, based on the most relevant data available in the literature, as well as expert opinion, address a variety of specific and at times problematic issues associated with SNM. These include the use of SNM for a variety of underlying conditions, need for pre-procedural testing, use of staged versus single-stage procedures, screening for success during the trial phase, ideal anesthesia, device implantation, post-procedural management, trouble-shooting loss of device function, and future directions for research.

CONCLUSIONS

These guidelines undoubtedly constitute a reference document, which will help urologists, gynecologists, and colorectal surgeons optimize their use of SNM for refractory urinary urgency and frequency, UUI, NOR, and FI.