Impact of vertical versus horizontal vaginal cuff closure on vaginal length following hysterectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized trials

Horizontal versus vertical direction of posterior vaginal wall suture after eradication of rectovaginal endometriosis: A multicenter study

OBJECTIVE

To compare safety and effectiveness of two-different directions of suturing the posterior vaginal breach (horizontal [Ho] vs vertical [Ve]) in women undergoing recto-vaginal endometriosis (RVE) nodule resection.

METHODS

A multicenter, retrospective, observational, cohort study was performed including all women of reproductive age undergoing RVE nodule resection between March 2013 and December 2018 at our tertiary centers. Patients included in the present study were divided into two groups based on the direction in suturing the posterior vaginal fornix defect, for comparisons in terms of rate of postoperative complications, pain relief, pain and anatomical recurrence, and length of hospital stay. Univariate comparisons were performed adopting the t test or the Mann-Whitney test for continuous data and the chi-square test or the Fisher exact test for categorical data, with a significant P value set to <0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 101 women were included: 67 in the Ho-group and 34 in the Ve-group. The two groups did not significantly differ in length of hospital stay (6.7 ± 6.9 vs 6.6 ± 3.3 days; P = 0.95), overall postoperative complications (32.8% vs 14.7%; P = 0.05), pain recurrence (35.8% vs 26.5%; P = 0.34) and anatomical recurrence rate (19.4% vs 23.5%; P = 0.62). Conversely, grade III complications were significantly more common in the Ho-group than in the Ve-group (22.7% vs 20%, P = 0.009), while pain relief in terms of deep dyspareunia, dyschezia, dysuria and chronic pelvic pain was more consistent in the Ve-group patients (P = 0.04, 0.04, 0.05, 0.004, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In symptomatic women undergoing RVE nodule resection, Ho suturing of the vaginal breach appears more commonly associated with severe postoperative complications and a worse pain control.

Vaginal length and sexual function after vertical versus horizontal closure of the vaginal cuff after abdominal hysterectomy: a randomised clinical trial

This randomised clinical trial aimed to evaluate the vaginal length and female sexual function after vertical and horizontal closure of the vaginal cuff after abdominal hysterectomy. The patients were allocated into two groups, vertical closure and horizontal closure groups. The vaginal length was determined using transperineal ultrasound, once preoperative and again 3 months after the operation. Female sexual function was determined using an Arabic validated female sexual function index questionnaire. Both techniques resulted in a significant shortening of the vaginal length (p-value .001). There was a significant improvement in sexual function in the vertical closure group rather than the horizontal closure one. We concluded that there was no significant difference in the vaginal length after vertical or horizontal closure of the vaginal cuff. However, female sexual function improved significantly in the vertical closure group.Trial registration number: PACTR201909573801168.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Conflicting results exist regarding the effect of different techniques of vaginal length closure on vaginal length and sexual function after hysterectomy.What do the results of this study add? There was no significant difference in the vaginal length after vertical or horizontal closure of the vaginal cuff. However, female sexual function improved significantly in the vertical closure group. This study is considered to be the first one to evaluate the correlation between the vaginal length and the female sexual function.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? The correlation between vaginal length and female sexual function needs to be evaluated in a multicenter study, recruiting larger number of sexually active women.