Medium-term outcomes after robotic-assisted lateral suspension with mesh for advanced multi-compartmental prolapse

Comparison of laparoscopic lateral suspension and high uterosacral ligament suspension for apical prolapse: a retrospective clinical study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this retrospective clinical study is to assess clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction between laparoscopic lateral suspension (LLS) with mesh and laparoscopic high uterosacral ligament suspension (LHUS) for apical prolapse with or without anterior prolapse.

METHODS

Patients who underwent LLS with mesh or LHUS from 2019 to 2023 at the Second West China Hospital of Sichuan University were enrolled in this retrospective study. The objective outcomes were evaluated on the basis of the anatomical success rate according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP-Q). The subjective outcomes were assessed using the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) questionnaire, Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7), Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) scores, and complications rate. Complications were defined according to the Clavien-Dindo scale. The outcomes of the postoperative 3, 6, and 12 months were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The objective and subjective outcomes indicated improvements in both groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the change of subjective outcomes. The short-term objective and subjective outcomes for both techniques were found to be comparable. The anatomical success rate for apical and anterior prolapse was 93.85% in the LHUS group and 93.44% in the LLS group at a median follow-up of 12 months. LLS demonstrated a superior effect on the degree of postoperative point Ba (the distance from the most protruding point to the hymen on the anterior vaginal wall) improvement compared with LHUS.

CONCLUSIONS

LHUS and LLS are both effective, safe surgical techniques for the treatment of apical prolapse, with or without concomitant anterior prolapse, exhibiting low complication rates and high short-term anatomical cure rates. LLS demonstrated certain advantages over LHUS in terms of anterior prolapse improvement and symptom relief.

A modified laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh for apical and anterior pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective cohort study

Introduction

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP), a common and benign condition, is characterized by the descent of one or more aspects of the vagina and uterus. A wide variety of mesh-based surgical techniques have been proved to be effective in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

Aim

To evaluate the efficacy of a modified laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh (mLLSM) in patients with apical and anterior pelvic organ prolapse.

Material and methods

All patients diagnosed with apical and anterior pelvic organ prolapse underwent a modified laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh (mLLSM). Perioperative parameters including surgical time, blood loss and complications were recorded. At the minimal 12-month follow-up, primary outcome measures included both anatomical and functional points. The anatomical cure rate was evaluated using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Questionnaire (POP-Q) assessment. Patient satisfaction was evaluated using questionnaires.

Results

Mean surgical time was 91.56 ±15.33 min; mean estimated blood loss was 55.42 ±36.73 ml; no intraoperative complications were noted in the perioperative period. After a minimal 12-month follow-up period, rates of anatomical success and subjective satisfaction were 96.33% and 94.50%, respectively. Symptom severity and quality of life also improved significantly.

Conclusions

We found mLLSM to be a safe and effective treatment for patients suffering apical and anterior pelvic organ prolapse. We found mLLSM to result in excellent outcomes and fewer mesh complications, underscoring its potential as an alternative treatment option for the management of apical and anterior pelvic organ prolapse.

Minimal Invasive Abdominal Sacral Colpopexy and Abdominal Lateral Suspension: A Prospective, Open-Label, Multicenter, Non-Inferiority Trial

BACKGROUND

Abdominal minimally invasive surgery has become increasingly prominent for the treatment of prolapse. Abdominal sacral colpopexy (ASC) is the gold standard for the treatment of advanced apical prolapse; however, alternative surgical approaches such as the abdominal lateral suspension (ALS) have been developed to improve patient outcomes. This study aims to determine whether ALS improves outcomes compared to ASC in multicompartmental prolapse patients.

METHODS

A prospective, open-label, multicenter, non-inferiority trial was conducted in 360 patients who underwent ASC or ALS for the treatment of apical prolapse. The primary outcome was anatomical and symptomatic cure of the apical compartment at 1-year follow-up; secondary outcomes included prolapse recurrence, re-operation rate, and post-operative complications. A 300-patient cohort was subdivided into 200-patients who underwent ALS and 100-patients who underwent ASC. The confidence interval method was used to calculate the p-value of non-inferiority.

RESULTS

At the 12-months follow-up, the objective cure rate of the apical defect was 92% for ALS and 94% for ASC (recurrence rates were 8% and 6%, respectively, and the p-value for non-inferiority was <0.01). The mMesh complication rates were 1% and 2% for ALS and ASC, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that the ALS technique is not inferior to the gold standard ASC for the surgical treatment of apical prolapse.

Robotically assisted laparoscopic lateral suspension: a step-by-step approach aiming to standardize a novel procedure

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The aim of this video is to show a step-by-step approach to robotically assisted laparoscopic lateral suspension for pelvic organ prolapse aiming to standardize this procedure.

METHODS

This video shows a robotically assisted laparoscopic approach to a POP-Q stage 3 prolapse with a combined anterior and apical defect. First, the trocars are positioned, with one 8-mm trocar, two lateral trocars 5 cm above the anterior-superior iliac spine, and a 10-mm assistant trocar either paraumbilically or suprapubically. Second, the uterovesical pouch is dissected up to 2 cm above the level of the bladder neck. The mesh is then fixed to the vesicovaginal fascia and to the isthmus uteri. Next, a laparoscopic forceps is inserted retroperitoneally through the lateral trocars and the lateral arms of the mesh are pulled retroperitoneally. The peritoneum of the uterovesical fold is sutured, including round ligament plication. Finally, the lateral arms of the peritoneum are fixed to the peritoneum of the abdominal wall.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotically assisted laparoscopic lateral suspension is a safe alternative to laparoscopic and robotically assisted laparoscopic sacropexy and very well suited for uterine-preserving POP surgery. This video contributes to the standardization of this procedure, and we believe our video to be useful in helping urogynecologists to perform this innovative procedure.

Importance of Translabial Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Its Correlation with the POP-Q Examination: Analysis of 363 Cases

The incidence of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is increasing in our aging society. We aimed to evaluate the clinical usefulness of translabial ultrasound (TLUS) by comparing the findings of POP-Q examination and TLUS in advanced POP patients and we also aimed to evaluate the prevalence of rectocele and enterocele on the TLUS. We analyzed the TLUS and POP-Q exam findings of 363 symptomatic POP patients who visited our clinic from March 2019 to April 2021. We excluded three patients who had conditions mimicking POP, as revealed by the TLUS. The most common POP type was anterior compartment POP (68.61%), followed by apical compartment (38.61%) and posterior compartment (16.11%) POP. Agreement between the POP-Q exam and TLUS was tested using Cohen’s kappa (κ). p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The incidence of rectocele or enterocele was only 1.67% (6/360) and there was no rectocele or enterocele in most patients (246/252, 96.63%) when the POP-Q exam revealed posterior compartment POP, suggesting that they only had posterior vaginal wall relaxation. The positive predictive value of the POP-Q exam for detecting rectocele or enterocele (as revealed by TLUS) was only 2.38%, whereas the negative predictive value was 100%. In conclusion, the application of TLUS is useful in the diagnosis of POP, especially for differentiation of true POP from conditions mimicking POP. The correlation between the POP-Q exam and TLUS is low, especially in posterior compartment POP, and therefore, patients with POP-Q exam findings suggesting posterior compartment POP should undergo TLUS to check for rectocele or enterocele. The use of TLUS in the diagnosis of POP patients can improve the accuracy of the diagnosis of POP patients in conjunction with a POP-Q exam.

Laparoscopic lateral suspension for pelvic organ prolapse: A systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

Abdominal lateral suspension with mesh represents an alternative treatment to suspend the vaginal apex.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to summarize literature data regarding the anatomical and functional outcomes, and intra- and postoperative complications of this technique with minimally invasive approach (laparoscopic/robotic).

SEARCH STRATEGY

Systematic literature search using MEDLINE/PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors extracted data on baseline characteristics (age, BMI, prior pelvic reconstructive surgery, preoperative POP stage), perioperative outcomes (operative time, estimated blood loss, intraoperative and postoperative complications, admission time), objective and subjective success rate, surgical failure, time of follow-up. Data were presented descriptively.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirteen studies were included in the review. The overall number of patients for our analysis was 1066. Patients referred for laparoscopic/robotic lateral suspension were most frequently postmenopausal, aged 50 to 65 years, BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2; 22.2% were already hysterectomized, while 17% had already a previous POP surgery. Operative time ranged from 78.4 ± 29.7 to 254 ± 45 min. The overall anatomic success was more than 90% in the apical compartment and more than 88% in the anterior compartment. Subjective cure rate varies from 78.4% to 100% in medium-term follow-up. Post-operative complication grade >= 3 according to Claiven-Dindo Scale was 1.03%. Mesh erosion rate varied between 0% and 13%.

CONCLUSIONS

Results coming from our systematic review suggest safety, efficacy and feasibility of minimally invasive lateral suspension with optimal anatomical and functional outcomes. Well-designed, randomized, controlled trials are required to confirm this data.

Advantages of robotic surgery in the treatment of complex pelvic organs prolapse

Robot-assisted surgery is safe and effective to treat the complex pelvic organs prolapse (C-POP). The present study analyzes all the robotic procedures and their advantages in the treatment of C-POP performed in a Proctologic and Pelvic Floor Clinical Centre. All the patients affected by C-POP who had robot-assisted surgery were retrospective analyzed. The anatomical and functional outcomes were respectively evaluated through POP-Q grading system and Wexner score about constipation and incontinence. The satisfaction rate was investigated using a five-point scale. From September 2014 to December 2018, 229 women underwent robotic surgery. The follow-up was 12 months. There were no robot-related complications. One hematoma (4.5%) of the recto-vaginal space occurred after Robotic Ventral Rectopexy with Folded Mesh (R-VRP-FM). In the robotic assisted lateral suspension (R-ALS) group there was one case of anterior vaginal wall mesh exposure (0.9%). After the robotic ventral rectopexy (R-VRP) the recurrence rate of external rectal prolapse, internal rectal prolapse, rectocele and enterocele was respectively 6.6, 9.5, 7.4 and 9.5%. After R-VRP-FM only one cystocele (14%) and one partial rectal prolapse (25%) recurred. Vaginal bulge symptoms resolution rate was 95.4%. The mean Wexner constipation score significantly decreased after R-VRP and R-VRP-FM. Vaginal bulge symptoms improved in 98.3% of cases with any apical prolapse recurrence after robotic abdominal colposacropexy. Success rate after R-ALS was 99.1% and 96.4% for apical and anterior prolapse respectively. Robotic assistance makes some surgical steps easier and more precise and this may result in less morbidity and better results.