Evaluating tissue-engineered repair material for pelvic floor dysfunction: a comparison of in vivo response to meshes implanted in rats

Tissue-engineered repair material for pelvic floor dysfunction

Pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) is a highly prevalent urogynecology disorder affecting many women worldwide, with symptoms including pelvic organ prolapse (POP), stress urinary incontinence (SUI), fecal incontinence, and overactive bladder syndrome (OAB). At present, the clinical treatments of PFD are still conservative and symptom-based, including non-surgical treatment and surgery. Surgical repair is an effective and durable treatment for PFD, and synthetic and biological materials can be used to enforce or reinforce the diseased tissue. However, synthetic materials such as polypropylene patches caused a series of complications such as mesh erosion, exposure, pain, and inflammation. The poor mechanical properties and high degradation speed of the biomaterial meshes resulted in poor anatomical reduction effect and limitation to clinical application. Therefore, the current treatment options are suboptimal. Recently, tissue-engineered repair material (TERM) has been applied to repair PFD and could markedly improve the prognosis of POP and SUI repair surgery in animal models. We review the directions and progression of TERM in POP and SUI repair. Adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) and endometrial mesenchymal stem cells (eMSCs) appear to be suitable cell types for scaffold seeding and clinical implantation. The multidisciplinary therapy approach to tissue engineering is a promising direction for tissue repair. More and longer follow-up studies are needed before determining cell types and materials for PFD repair.