The efficacy and safety of a single maintenance laser treatment for stress urinary incontinence: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial

Current Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence by Bulking Agents and Laser Therapy-An Update

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) affects around 20% of women. In addition to the established suburethral sling insertion, two less invasive approaches are of interest today: urethral bulking agents and vaginal laser therapy. This review discusses articles through December 2023 identified by a PubMed literature search using the keywords "incontinence" and "bulking" or "laser". Although the two approaches are less effective than sling insertions, there are specific conditions in which one or the other technique is more advantageous. Injecting bulking agents into the urethra only takes some minutes and works without general anesthesia. The method is particularly suited for elderly, frail, or obese patients with multiple comorbidities, but is also applicable for all patients and in combination with other therapies. Generally, the safety profile is good but differs between bulking materials. Two laser types-the Erbium:YAG laser with SMOOTH-mode and the fractional ablative CO2 laser-deliver heat into the tissue to induce tissue tightening and regeneration. Intravaginal laser therapy improves mild to moderate SUI, while studies describe how intraurethral laser therapy is also beneficial for severe SUI. Young women between childbirths, as well as postmenopausal women, may benefit from laser therapy. The method is safe, can be performed on an outpatient basis, and does not require any artificial material.

Fractional CO2 laser treatment for women with stress predominant urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

To evaluate the efficacy of vaginal CO2 laser in women with stress predominant urinary incontinence (SUI) compared with the sham treatment.

METHODS

A randomized controlled trial with sham treatment was conducted between January 2019 and April 2021. Women with predominant SUI were recruited and randomized into two groups: the CO2 laser group (n = 29) and the sham group (n = 30). The International Consultation on Continence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) was used to evaluate the efficacy at 3 months postoperatively. All participants in both groups were advised to perform pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) after the intervention.

RESULTS

A total of 59 women were studied. A total of 29 women were included in the CO2 laser group and 30 women were included in the sham group. The baseline scores of the ICIQ-UI SF were similar in both groups. A significant improvement in urinary incontinence scores was found in both groups 3 months after treatment (p < 0.001). However, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups at 3 months (p = 0.8281). There were no changes in bladder neck descent or levator hiatal area immediately after intervention or 3 months after completion of treatment in either group. Most participants who received the active intervention reported mild vaginal pain during the procedure that resolved spontaneously at the end of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Fractional CO2 laser treatment does not provide any benefit over the sham technique in alleviating SUI symptoms. The improvement in SUI symptoms in both groups might be related to PFMT. This study was registered with the Thai Clinical Trial Register (TCTR20190131004).

Evaluation of Possible Side Effects in the Treatment of Urinary Incontinence with Magnetic Stimulation

Background and Objectives: Magnetic stimulation is a type of conservative treatment of urinary incontinence. Our aim was to evaluate the possible side effects of this method. Materials and Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review. The key search terms were urinary incontinence, magnetic stimulation, and female. All known synonyms were used. Results: 255 titles and abstracts were retrieved, and 28 articles met our inclusion criteria. Out of 28 studies, 15 reported no side effects, five reported side effects, and eight did not report anything. There was no significant difference in the incidence of side effects between the sham and active treatment groups. Conclusions: Side effects of magnetic stimulation in comparison to other active treatments are minimal and transient. Among the conservative UI treatment methods, magnetic stimulation is one of the safest methods for the patient and as such a suitable first step in treating UI.

Treating and Managing Urinary Incontinence: Evolving and Potential Multicomponent Medical and Lifestyle Interventions

Incontinence is defined by either ICS 2002 or IUGA/ICS 2010 as the involuntary loss of urine and includes urgency urinary incontinence (UUI), stress urinary incontinence (SUI) or mixed urinary incontinence (MUI). It has a high worldwide prevalence with an associated impact on quality of life. Despite existing management options for the management of urinary incontinence, patients continue to be troubled by symptoms or side effects of existing treatment. There is therefore a requirement for ongoing research into treatment options for the management of UUI and SUI, that are more effective and tolerable to patients. Advances in treatment of UUI include a more selective beta 3 agonist, Vibegron, which has less impact on cardiac function than Mirabegron. Hormonal treatment, including Ospemifene and Prasterone, may improve GSM and in turn symptoms of UUI. There are advances in the types of neuromodulators available, including those that are rechargeable at home and are MRI safe. Laser has shown promising initial results. There is developing interest in the microbiome, and how this may impact future treatment modalities. Advances in treatment of SUI include the use of mobile health applications to support delivery of pelvic floor muscle training. Litoxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, has shown promising results at phase III trials. Functional magnetic stimulation is being developed to improve contractility of pelvic floor muscles. We also discuss interventions that improve tissue elasticity and regeneration, such as platelet rich plasma, autologous stem cell transplantation, laser therapy and radiofrequency treatment, which show short term benefits.

Effect of vaginal energy-based treatment on female stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of vaginal energy-based therapies in treating female SUI.

METHODS

The PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched up to September 2022 to identify RCTs comparing energy-based therapies with placebo intervention in treating female SUI. The primary outcome was International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) score. Secondary outcomes included the 1-h pad test and cure rate.

RESULTS

A total of 577 patients from 6 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Energy-based therapies did not significantly improve the ICIQ-SF score at all visits (≤ 1 month: SMD, -0.39; 95% CI - 0.80 to 0.03; P = 0.07; 3 months: SMD, - 1.32; 95% CI - 4.07 to 1.43; P = 0.35; 6 months: SMD, - 0.39; 95% CI - 0.91 to 0.12; P = 0.14). The subgroup analysis showed that there was no significant improvement in ICIQ-SF score in the CO₂ laser group compared to the placebo group at all visits (≤ 1 month: SMD, - 0.13; 95% CI - 0.59 to 0.34; P = 0.59; 3 months: SMD, - 1.50; 95% CI - 3.91 to 0.92; P = 0.22; 6 months: SMD, 0.13; 95% CI - 0.47 to 0.72; P = 0.67). Meta-analysis was not performed in Er: YAG laser and radiofrequency therapy due to insufficient trials.

CONCLUSION

Based on the limited clinical evidence, our meta-analysis showed no prior efficacy of energy-based therapy over placebo intervention. However, the results of this meta-analysis should be taken with caution due to the limited amount of available evidence and the heterogeneity among the included studies.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022360471.

CO2 laser therapy for management of stress urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Carbon dioxide (CO2) laser therapy is an emerging treatment for women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

Objectives

To examine the efficacy of CO2 laser therapy for management of SUI-related symptoms in women.

Design

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies.

Data sources and methods

Four databases were screened until January 2023. All efficacy continuous endpoints were assessed via subtraction of the posttreatment from pretreatment values. The data were summarized as mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) using the random-effects model.

Results

A total of 15 studies with 700 patients were analyzed. CO2 laser therapy significantly decreased the 1-h pad weights at 3 months [n = 5 studies, MD = -3.656 g, 95% CI (-5.198, -2.113), p < 0.001], 6 months [n = 6 studies, MD = -6.583 g, 95% CI (-11.158, -2.008), p = 0.005], and 12 months [n = 6 studies, MD = -3.726 g, 95% CI (-6.347, -1.106), p = 0.005]. Moreover, CO2 laser therapy significantly decreased the International Consultation of Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form Scores at 3 months [n = 10 studies, MD = -4.805, 95% CI (-5.985, -3.626), p < 0.001] and 12-months [n = 6 studies, MD = -3.726, 95% CI (-6.347, -1.106), p = 0.005]. Additionally, CO2 laser therapy significantly decreased the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire scores at 6 months [n = 2 studies, MD = -11.268, 95% CI (-18.671, -3.865), p = 0.002] and 12 months [n = 2 studies, MD = -10.624, 95% CI (-18.145, -3.103), p = 0.006]. Besides, CO2 laser therapy significantly decreased the Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 scores at 3 months [n = 2 studies, MD = -21.997, 95% CI (-32.294, -11.699), p < 0.001], but not at 6 months [n = 3 studies, MD = -3.034, 95% CI (-7.357, 1.259), p = 0.169]. Lastly, CO2 laser therapy significantly increased the Vaginal Health Index Score at 6 months [n = 2 studies, MD = 2.826, 95% CI (0.013, 5.638), p = 0.047] and 12 months [MD = 1.553, 95% CI (0.173, 2.934), p = 0.027].

Conclusion

CO2 laser therapy improved the SUI-related symptoms in women. To obtain solid conclusions, future studies should be well-designed with standardized settings, consistent therapeutic protocols, and long-term follow-up periods.

Vaginal Laser Therapy for Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review of Prospective Randomized Clinical Trials

The most common type of urinary incontinence in women is stress urinary incontinence (SUI) which negatively impacts several aspects of life. The newly introduced vaginal laser therapy is being considered for treating SUI. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of vaginal laser therapy for stress urinary incontinence in menopausal women. We searched the following databases: MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, Cochrane Library databases, Web of Science, clinical trial registry platforms, and Google Scholar, using the MeSH terms and keywords [Urinary Incontinence, Stress] and [(lasers) OR laser]. In our systematic review, prospective randomized clinical studies on women diagnosed with SUI as per the International Continence Society's diagnostic criteria were included. The Cochrane Risk-of-Bias assessment tool for randomized clinical trials was used to evaluate the quality of studies. A total of 256 relevant records in literature databases and registers and 25 in additional searches were found. Following a review of the titles, abstracts, and full texts, four studies involving 431 patients were included. Three studies used CO2-lasers, and one used Erbium: YAG-laser. The results of all four studies revealed the short-term improvement of SUI following both the Erbium: YAG-laser and CO2-laser therapy. SUI treatment with CO2-laser and Erbium: YAG-laser therapy is a quick, intuitive, well-tolerated procedure that successfully improves incontinence-related symptoms. The long-term impact of such interventions has not been well established as most trials focused on the short-term effects.

CO2 surgical laser for treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Stress urinary incontinence is a common condition that can be treated conservatively and/or surgically. Given the risks of surgery, developing effective nonsurgical treatment options would be beneficial. Some studies have suggested that laser therapy may improve or cure stress urinary incontinence. However, there is a lack of sham-controlled randomized controlled trials to judge treatment efficacy.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the effects of CO₂ vaginal laser vs sham therapy for treating stress urinary incontinence.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a multicenter, participant-blinded, sham-controlled, parallel group (1:1) superiority randomized controlled trial performed in outpatient clinics in 2 hospitals. We included women aged 18 to 80 years with objective and subjective stress urinary incontinence. Participants had undertaken or declined supervised pelvic floor muscle training. Intervention was performed using a CO₂ fractionated vaginal laser. Participants underwent 3 treatments, 4 weeks apart, with increasing energy and density settings. Sham treatment was performed using an identical technique with a deactivated pedal. The primary outcome was the subjective stress urinary incontinence rate (proportion with leak with cough, sneeze, or laughter) at 3 months after completion of treatment. Secondary outcomes included objective stress urinary incontinence, change in the disease-specific patient-reported outcomes, health-related quality of life, and adverse effects. Categorical outcomes were compared using the chi square test and continuous outcomes using analysis of covariance, adjusting for the baseline score.

RESULTS

There were 52 participants who received laser and 49 who received sham treatment. One participant in each group withdrew from the study before the endpoint, and 2 participants in the laser group did not participate in the follow-up visits. Participant mean age was 53 (34-79) years. Mean body mass index was 26.1 (18.1-49.6); 90% were vaginally parous. At 3 months, there was no difference between the sham and active treatment arm in subjective stress urinary incontinence (46 [96%] vs 48 [98%]; relative risk, 0.98 [95% confidence interval, 0.91-1.05]; P=.55) or in objective stress urinary incontinence (37 [80%] vs 33 [80%]; relative risk, 0.99 [95% confidence interval, 0.81-1.23]; P=.995). Patient-reported outcomes and health-related quality of life were also comparable between the groups. Vaginal bleeding occurred in 3 participants after laser and 1 participant after sham treatment. Pain during treatment did not differ between laser and sham treatment.

CONCLUSION

We were unable to show an improvement in stress urinary incontinence after CO₂ vaginal laser therapy compared with sham treatment.