Thai translation and validation of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-Revised (PISQ-IR) and Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20)

Pelvic floor disorders and impact on sexual function: a cross-sectional study among non-sexually active and sexually active women

Background

Pelvic floor disorders are common and associated with impaired sexual function in women.

Aim

To assess women with pelvic floor disorders and describe factors associated with not being sexually active and those associated with sexual function in sexually active women.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted that included nonpregnant women with symptoms of pelvic floor disorders who were referred to the urogynecologic and surgical outpatient clinic at 2 Norwegian university hospitals: St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, and the University Hospital of Northern Norway, Tromsø. Women answered a questionnaire anonymously.

Outcomes

Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire-IUGA Revised.

Results

Of 157 respondents, 111 (71%) reported being sexually active (with or without a partner), and 46 (29%) reported not being sexually active. As compared with sexually active women, not sexually active women were older (mean ± SD, 60.2 ± 13.3 vs 51 ± 12.1 years; P < .001), more were menopausal (78% vs 47%, P = .001), and more had symptom debut <1 year (31% vs 9%, P < .001). They reported more distress related to pelvic floor disorders, especially pelvic organ prolapse. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, menopausal women and women with symptom debut <1 year were 4 times more likely to be not sexually active than premenopausal women (odds ratio, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.7-9.2) and women with symptom debut ≥1 year (odds ratio, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.5-10.7). In sexually active women, colorectal-anal distress was negatively associated with 5 of 6 domains of sexual function: arousal/orgasm (ß = -0.36; 95% CI, -0.02 to -0.005), partner related (ß = -0.28; 95% CI, -0.01 to -0.002), condition specific (ß = -0.39; 95% CI, -0.002 to -0.009), global quality (ß = -0.23; 95% CI, -0.02 to -0.002), and condition impact (ß = -0.34; 95% CI, -0.02 to -0.006).

Clinical Implications

Health care professionals should discuss sexual function in patients with pelvic floor disorders, especially menopausal women and women with colorectal-anal symptoms.

Strengths and Limitations

The study used condition-specific measures and recruited women from 2 university hospitals with wide range of age. Limitations include the small sample size and wide confidence intervals. The number of women who considered themselves not sexually active was low, and item nonresponse levels among these women where somewhat high. Of 625 eligible women, 200 (32%) answered the questionnaire. Sexual health and sexual function are still surrounded with taboo, and some women were probably not comfortable answering the questions.

Conclusion

Menopausal women and women with recent onset of symptoms of pelvic floor disorders are more likely to be sexually inactive, and colorectal-anal symptoms have the most negative impact on sexual function in sexually active women.

Female sexual function index for screening of female sexual dysfunction using DSM-5-TR criteria in Thai women: A prospective cross-sectional diagnostic study

Thai Female Sexual Function Index discrimination using the new Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision criteria has not been investigated. This study aimed to evaluate the Female Sexual Function Index as a tool for assessing sexual symptoms and to determine the prevalence of female sexual dysfunction in Thai women using the new Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision criteria. This prospective cross-sectional diagnostic study included sexually active women aged ≥18 years, interviewed from January to June 2023. The participants completed the Thai version of a comprehensive of the Female Sexual Function Index questionnaire encompassing general information and self-reported assessments of female sexual function, followed by a semi-structured interview of distress symptom severity. Female sexual function was determined by screening of the total Female Sexual Function Index score, whereas female sexual dysfunction was evaluated using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision criteria. Using receiver operating characteristic curves, a clinical cutoff for the Female Sexual Function Index score of 23.1 was determined to identify female sexual dysfunction (area under the curve, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.80; sensitivity, 75.6%; specificity, 67.7%; positive predictive value, 77.7%; negative predictive value, 65%). A prevalence of 40.2% for female sexual dysfunction was observed in the study population. The results of this study could be used as practical guidance for the screening of women affected by female sexual dysfunction in Thailand in the future.

Patient-reported goal achievements after pelvic floor muscle training versus pessary in women with pelvic organ prolapse. A randomised controlled trial

The aim was to assess the achievement by self-determined goals in pelvic organ prolapse (POP) participants receiving pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) compared to vaginal pessary. Forty participants with POP stage II to III were randomly allocated to pessary or PFMT. Participants were asked to list up 3 goals they expected from treatment. Thai version of Prolapse Quality of Life Questionnaire (P-QOL) and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised (PISQ-IR) were completed at 0 and 6-week period. At 6-week post-treatment, they were asked if their goals had been achieved. The totally achieved goals in the vaginal pessary group were 70% (14/20) significantly higher than PFMT group at 30% (6/20) (p = 0.01). The mean ± SD of the post-treatment P-QOL score in the vaginal pessary group was significantly lower than the PFMT group (13.90 ± 10.83 vs 22.04 ± 5.93, p = 0.01), but not different in all PISQ-IR subscales. Pessary treatment for POP yielded better total goal achievements and better quality of life than PFMT for POP treatment at a 6-week follow-up.Impact statementWhat is already known on this subject? Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) can severely affect the quality of life, causing physical, social, psychological, occupational, and/or sexual dysfunction. Individual patient goal setting and goal achievement scaling (GAS) offers a new method of patient-reported outcome measurement (PRO) in therapeutic success such as pessary or surgery in patient with POP. But there is no randomised controlled trial comparing pessary vs pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) using GAS as the outcome measurement.What do the results of this study add? The results showed that women with POP stage II to III who received vaginal pessary had higher totally goal achievements and better quality of life than the women received the PFMT at 6-week follow up.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? The information about the better goal achievements by using pessary can be used as the tools for counselling for patients with POP for selecting the choices for the treatment in the clinical setting.

Pelvic floor dysfunction: prevalence and associated factors

BACKGROUND

Pelvic floor dysfunction in women encompasses a wide range of clinical disorders: urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, fecal incontinence, and pelvic-perineal region pain syndrome. A literature review did not identify any articles addressing the prevalence of all pelvic floor dysfunctions.

OBJECTIVE

Determine the prevalence of the group of pelvic floor disorders and the factors associated with the development of these disorders in women.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This observational study was conducted with women during 2021 and 2022 in Spain. Sociodemographic and employment data, previous medical history and health status, lifestyle and habits, obstetric history, and health problems were collected through a self-developed questionnaire. The Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) was used to assess the presence and impact of pelvic floor disorders. Pearson's Chi-Square, Odds Ratio (OR) and adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) with their respective 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.

RESULTS

One thousand four hundred forty-six women participated. Urinary incontinence occurred in 55.8% (807) of the women, fecal incontinence in 10.4% (150), symptomatic uterine prolapse in 14.0% (203), and 18.7% (271) reported pain in the pelvic area. The following were identified as factors that increase the probability of urinary incontinence: menopausal status. For fecal incontinence: having had instrumental births. Factors for pelvic organ prolapse: number of vaginal births, one, two or more. Factors for pelvic pain: the existence of fetal macrosomia.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of pelvic floor dysfunction in women is high. Various sociodemographic factors such as age, having a gastrointestinal disease, having had vaginal births, and instrumental vaginal births are associated with a greater probability of having pelvic floor dysfunction. Health personnel must take these factors into account to prevent the appearance of these dysfunctions.