Hiatal failure: effects of pregnancy, delivery, and pelvic floor disorders on level III factors

A unified pelvic floor conceptual model for studying morphological changes with prolapse, age, and parity

Several 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional measurements have been used to assess changes in pelvic floor structures and shape. These include assessment of urogenital and levator hiatus dimensions, levator injury grade, levator bowl volume, and levator plate shape. We argue that each assessment reflects underlying changes in an individual aspect of the overall changes in muscle and fascial structures. Vaginal delivery, aging, and interindividual variations in anatomy combine to affect pelvic floor structures and their connections in different ways. To date, there is no unifying conceptual model that permits the evaluation of how these many measures relate to one another or that reflects overall pelvic floor structure and function. Therefore, this study aimed to describe a unified pelvic floor conceptual model to better understand how the aforementioned changes to the pelvic floor structures and their biomechanical interactions affect pelvic organ support with vaginal birth, prolapse, and age. In this model, the pelvic floor is composed of 5 key anatomic structures: the (1) pubovisceral, (2) puborectal, and (3) iliococcygeal muscles with their superficial and inferior fascia; (4) the perineal membrane or body; and (5) the anal sphincter complex. Schematically, these structures are considered to originate from pelvic sidewall structures and meet medially at important connection points that include the anal sphincter complex, perineal body, and anococcygeal raphe. The pubovisceral muscle contributes primarily to urogenital hiatus closure, whereas the puborectal muscle is mainly related to levator hiatus closure, although each muscle contributes to the other. Dorsally and laterally, the iliococcygeal muscle forms a shelflike structure in women with normal support that spans the remaining area between these medial muscles and attachments to the pelvic sidewall. Other features include the levator plate, bowl volume, and anorectal angle. The pelvic floor conceptual model integrates existing observations and points out evident knowledge gaps in how parturition, injury, disease, and aging can contribute to changes associated with pelvic floor function caused by the detachment of one or more important connection points or pubovisceral muscle failure.

Pelvic floor injury during vaginal birth is life-altering and preventable: what can we do about it?

Pelvic floor disorders after childbirth have distressing lifelong consequences for women, requiring more than 300,000 women to have surgery annually. This represents approximately 10% of the 3 million women who give birth vaginally each year. Vaginal birth is the largest modifiable risk factor for prolapse, the pelvic floor disorder most strongly associated with birth, and is an important contributor to stress incontinence. These disorders require 10 times as many operations as anal sphincter injuries. Imaging shows that injuries of the levator ani muscle, perineal body, and membrane occur in up to 19% of primiparous women. During birth, the levator muscle and birth canal tissues must stretch to more than 3 times their original length; it is this overstretching that is responsible for the muscle tear visible on imaging rather than compression or neuropathy. The injury is present in 55% of women with prolapse later in life, with an odds ratio of 7.3, compared with women with normal support. In addition, levator damage can affect other aspects of hiatal closure, such as the perineal body and membrane. These injuries are associated with an enlarged urogenital hiatus, now known as antedate prolapse, and with prolapse surgery failure. Risk factors for levator injury are multifactorial and include forceps delivery, occiput posterior birth, older maternal age, long second stage of labor, and birthweight of >4000 g. Delivery with a vacuum device is associated with reduced levator damage. Other steps that might logically reduce injuries include manual rotation from occiput posterior to occiput anterior, slow gradual delivery, perineal massage or compresses, and early induction of labor, but these require study to document protection. In addition, teaching women to avoid pushing against a contracted levator muscle would likely decrease injury risk by decreasing tension on the vulnerable muscle origin. Providing care for women who have experienced difficult deliveries can be enhanced with early recognition, physical therapy, and attention to recovery. It is only right that women be made aware of these risks during pregnancy. Educating women on the long-term pelvic floor sequelae of childbirth should be performed antenatally so that they can be empowered to make informed decisions about management decisions during labor.

Functional Anatomy of Urogenital Hiatus Closure: the Perineal Complex Triad Hypothesis

INTRODUCTION

Urogenital hiatus enlargement is a critical factor associated with prolapse and operative failure. This study of the perineal complex was performed to understand how interactions among its three structures: the levator ani, perineal membrane, and perineal body-united by the vaginal fascia-work to maintain urogenital hiatus closure.

METHODS

Magnetic resonance images from 30 healthy nulliparous women with 3D reconstruction of selected subjects were used to establish overall geometry. Connection points and lines of action were based on perineal dissection in 10 female cadavers (aged 22-86 years), cross sections of 4 female cadavers (aged 14-35 years), and histological sections (cadavers aged 16 and 21 years).

RESULTS

The perineal membrane originates laterally from the ventral two thirds of the ischiopubic rami and attaches medially to the perineal body and vaginal wall. The levator ani attaches to the perineal membrane's cranial surface, vaginal fascia, and the perineal body. The levator line of action in 3D reconstruction is oriented so that the levator pulls the medial perineal membrane cranio-ventrally. In cadavers, simulated levator contraction and relaxation along this vector changes the length of the membrane and the antero-posterior diameter of the urogenital hiatus. Loss of the connection of the left and right perineal membranes through the perineal body results in diastasis of the levator and a widened hiatus, as well as a downward rotation of the perineal membrane.

CONCLUSION

Interconnections involving the levator ani muscles, perineal membrane, perineal body, and vaginal fascia form the perineal complex surrounding the urogenital hiatus in an arrangement that maintains hiatal closure.