Inadequate responders to osteoporosis treatment: proposal for an operational definition

Treatment failure in osteoporosis: who will experience a new Fracture? TAILOR a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis treatments reduce fracture risk but cannot fully eliminate it, and the concept of treatment failure (TF) or inadequate clinical response (ICR) remains debated.

AIMS

The TAILOR study aims to assess the prevalence of ICR and TF in osteoporotic women undergoing active drug treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis.

METHODS

TAILOR is a retrospective study conducted in an Italian outpatient service. We included 415 patients with at least 12 months of treatment and up to 10 years, examining clinical characteristics predicting TF and ICR. TF was defined as the occurrence of two fragility fractures while on treatment or one fracture plus lack of variation BMD and ICR as the occurrence of a new osteoporotic fracture in treated patients according to previous literature.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients experienced fractures during the follow-up, of those, 26 (36%) were classified as TF. The clinical characteristics of patients with fractures were similar to those without, except for a longer postmenopausal period and lower lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD). Postmenopausal period was significantly longer in TF compared to ICR patients. However, no significant differences were found in baseline fractures, prescribed treatments, or fracture-free survival curves with age, postmenopausal period, BMD, and previous treatments. The clinical follow-up was longer in ICR and TF patients.

DISCUSSION

TAILOR shows a higher prevalence of ICR and TF (17.3%) compared to randomized controlled trials and real-world data, with 36% of fractures during follow-up classified as TF. Clinician decisions often led to changes in antiosteoporosis treatment, particularly in TF cases, though TF diagnosis was rarely cited explicitly in medical records.

CONCLUSION

TAILOR emphasizes that common clinical factors do not reliably predict ICR and TF. The findings highlight the complexity of determining an algorithm for the best treatment approach to prevent TF and ICR.

Pharmacogenetics of Response to Bisphosphonate Treatment in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: A Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

This study aims to investigate the effect of genetic polymorphisms of vitamin D receptor (VDR), estrogen receptor 1 (ER1), and Col1a1 on the response to bisphosphonate (BP) therapy in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (OP).

METHODS

Twenty-one women with postmenopausal OP who received alendronate, ibandronate, or zoledronic acid for one year were enrolled in this study. Bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine and femoral neck were assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry at baseline and after 12 months. Serum osteocalcin levels were measured at baseline and after 12 months. Polymorphic sites of the genes encoding ER1, VDR and Col1a1 proteins were amplified by polymerase chain reaction and examined using restriction fragment length polymorphism. Response to BP treatment and change in osteocalcin levels were compared among women with different gene polymorphisms.

RESULTS

Ratio of responders to treatment regarding improvements in the BMD of lumbar spine and femoral neck was adequate in 76% and 62%, respectively. There was no significant difference in treatment response regarding BMD in either region or change in serum osteocalcin levels among different gene polymorphisms.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings did not support the potential role of VDR BsmI, Col1a1 Sp1, ER1 PvuII, or XbaI polymorphisms in predicting the response to BP therapy in women with postmenopausal OP. Further investigation with larger prospective studies is required.

Influence of the Osteogenomic Profile in Response to Alendronate Therapy in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Postmenopausal osteoporosis is a multifactorial disease. Genetic factors play an essential role in contributing to bone mineral density (BMD) variability, which ranges from 60 to 85%. Alendronate is used as the first line of pharmacological treatment for osteoporosis; however, some patients do not respond adequately to therapy with alendronate.

AIM

The aim of this work was to investigate the influence of combinations of potential risk alleles (genetic profiles) associated with response to anti-osteoporotic treatment in postmenopausal women with primary osteoporosis.

METHODS

A total of 82 postmenopausal women with primary osteoporosis receiving alendronate (70 mg administered orally per week) for one year were observed. The bone mineral density (BMD; g/cm2) of the femoral neck and lumbar spine was measured. According to BMD change, patients were divided into two groups: responders and non-responders to alendronate therapy. Polymorphic variants in CYP19, ESR1, IL-6, PTHR1, TGFβ, OPG and RANKL genes were determined and profiles were generated from the combination of risk alleles.

RESULTS

A total of 56 subjects were responders to alendronate and 26 subjects were non-responders. Carriers of the G-C-G-C profile (constructed from rs700518, rs1800795, rs2073618 and rs3102735) were predisposed to response to alendronate treatment (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings highlight the importance of the identified profiles for the pharmacogenetics of alendronate therapy in osteoporosis.

Bone mineral density response prediction following osteoporosis treatment using machine learning to aid personalized therapy

Osteoporosis is a global health problem for ageing populations. The goals of osteoporosis treatment are to improve bone mineral density (BMD) and prevent fractures. One major obstacle that remains a great challenge to achieve the goals is how to select the best treatment regimen for individual patients. We developed a computational model from 8981 clinical variables, including demographic data, diagnoses, laboratory results, medications, and initial BMD results, taken from 10-year period of electronic medical records to predict BMD response after treatment. We trained 7 machine learning models with 13,562 osteoporosis treatment instances [comprising 5080 (37.46%) inadequate treatment responses and 8482 (62.54%) adequate responses] and selected the best model (Random Forests with area under the receiver operating curve of 0.70, accuracy of 0.69, precision of 0.70, and recall of 0.89) to individually predict treatment responses of 11 therapeutic regimens, then selected the best predicted regimen to compare with the actual regimen. The results showed that the average treatment response of the recommended regimens was 9.54% higher than the actual regimens. In summary, our novel approach using a machine learning-based decision support system is capable of predicting BMD response after osteoporosis treatment and personalising the most appropriate treatment regimen for an individual patient.

Interactions of the microbiome with pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches for the management of ageing-related musculoskeletal diseases

Despite major progress in the understanding of the pathophysiology and therapeutic options for common ageing-related musculoskeletal conditions (i.e. osteoporosis and associated fractures, sarcopenia and osteoarthritis), there is still a considerable proportion of patients who respond sub optimally to available treatments or experience adverse effects. Emerging microbiome research suggests that perturbations in microbial composition, functional and metabolic capacity (i.e. dysbiosis) are associated with intestinal and extra-intestinal disorders including musculoskeletal diseases. Besides its contributions to disease pathogenesis, the role of the microbiome is further extended to shaping individuals' responses to disease therapeutics (i.e. pharmacomicrobiomics). In this review, we focus on the reciprocal interactions between the microbiome and therapeutics for osteoporosis, sarcopenia and osteoarthritis. Specifically, we identify the effects of therapeutics on microbiome's configurations, functions and metabolic output, intestinal integrity and immune function, but also the effects of the microbiome on the metabolism of these therapeutics, which in turn, may influence their bioavailability, efficacy and side-effect profile contributing to variable treatment responses in clinical practice. We further discuss emerging strategies for microbiota manipulation as preventive or therapeutic (alone or complementary to available treatments) approaches for improving outcomes of musculoskeletal health and disease.

Effects of alendronate and calcifediol compared to alendronate and cholecalciferol in osteoporotic patients

BACKGROUND

Several formulations of vitamin D and alendronate are available for the treatment of osteoporosis. The objective of this study was to examine efficacy and safety of calcifediol (25(OH)D) compared to cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) and also the relationship between different formulations of alendronate and adverse reactions.

METHODS

We observed a population of women diagnosed with postmenopausal osteoporosis or osteopenia treated with alendronate 70 mg weekly associated to vitamin D3 or 25(OH)D at monthly total dose of 625 µg. Data collected both at baseline (T0) and at follow-up after at least 12 months of therapy (T1) were: demographic characteristics, BMI, full medical history, lumbar T-score, femur T-score, calcium, osteocalcin, alkaline phosphatase, PTH and vitamin D blood level.

RESULTS

A total of 362 patients were enrolled in the study. Alendronate 70 mg + calcifediol (A+25(OH)D) group consisted of 202 patients while 160 patients were treated with alendronate 70 mg + cholecalciferol (A+D3). In the A+25(OH)D group, we observed a significant increase in lumbar T-score value (0.26±0.35 vs. 0.13±0.3) and serum vitamin D (20.64±20.71 vs. 6.07±7.61 ng/mL) levels compared to the A+D3 group (P<0.05). The lowest incidence of gastrointestinal adverse reactions was observed among patients taking alendronate 70 mg in drinkable solution form (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Alendronate 70 mg with calcifediol gives a better outcome in the treatment of osteoporosis according to lumbar T-score and vitamin D serum level observed at one-year follow-up compared to alendronate 70 mg with cholecalciferol. Both vitamin D formulations did not show to cause hypercalcemia in this study. Alendronate 70 mg in drinkable solution form is also associated with lowest incidence of gastrointestinal adverse reactions.

Repeating Measurement of Bone Mineral Density when Monitoring with Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry: 2019 ISCD Official Position

Bone mineral density (BMD) can be measured at multiple skeletal sites using various technologies to aid clinical decision-making in bone and mineral disorders. BMD by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) has a critical role in predicting risk of fracture, diagnosis of osteoporosis, and monitoring patients. In clinical practice, DXA remains the most available and best validated tool for monitoring patients. A quality baseline DXA scan is essential for comparison with all subsequent scans. Monitoring patients with serial measurements requires technical expertise and knowledge of the least significant change in order to determine when follow-up scans should be repeated. Prior ISCD Official Positions have clarified how and when repeat DXA is useful as well as the interpretation of results. The 2019 ISCD Official Positions considered new evidence and clarifies if and when BMD should be repeated. There is good evidence showing that repeat BMD measurement can identify people who experience bone loss, which is an independent predictor of fracture risk. There is good evidence showing that the reduction in spine and hip fractures with osteoporosis medication is proportional to the change in BMD with treatment. There is evidence that measuring BMD is useful following discontinuation of osteoporosis treatment. There is less documentation addressing the effectiveness of monitoring BMD to improve medication adherence, whether monitoring of BMD reduces the risk of fracture, or effectively discriminates patients who should and should not recommence treatment following an interruption of medication. Further research is needed in all of these areas.

The risk of subsequent osteoporotic fractures is decreased in subjects experiencing fracture while on denosumab: results from the FREEDOM and FREEDOM Extension studies

This post-hoc analysis queried whether women experiencing fracture on denosumab indicates inadequate treatment response or whether the risk of subsequent fracture remains low with continuing denosumab. Results showed that denosumab decreases the risk of subsequent fracture and fracture sustained while on denosumab is not necessarily indicative of inadequate treatment response.

INTRODUCTION

This analysis assessed whether a fracture sustained during denosumab therapy indicates inadequate treatment response and if the risk of a subsequent fracture decreases with continuing denosumab treatment.

METHODS

In FREEDOM, a clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of denosumab, postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were randomized to placebo or denosumab for 3 years. In the 7-year FREEDOM Extension, all participants were allocated to receive denosumab. Here we compare subsequent osteoporotic fracture rates between denosumab-treated subjects during FREEDOM or the Extension and placebo-treated subjects in FREEDOM.

RESULTS

During FREEDOM, 438 placebo- and 272 denosumab-treated subjects had an osteoporotic fracture. Exposure-adjusted subject incidence per 100 subject-years was lower for denosumab (6.7) vs placebo (10.1). Combining all subjects on denosumab from FREEDOM and the Extension for up to 10 years (combined denosumab), 794 (13.7%) had an osteoporotic fracture while on denosumab. Of these, one or more subsequent fractures occurred in 144 (18.1%) subjects, with an exposure-adjusted incidence of 5.8 per 100 subject-years, similar to FREEDOM denosumab (6.7 per 100 subject-years) and lower than FREEDOM placebo (10.1 per 100 subject-years). Adjusting for prior fracture, the risk of having a subsequent on-study osteoporotic fracture was lower in the combined denosumab group vs placebo (hazard ratio [95% CI]: 0.59 [0.43-0.81]; P = 0.0012).

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate that denosumab decreases the risk of subsequent fracture and a fracture sustained while on denosumab is not necessarily indicative of inadequate treatment response.

Treatment of osteoporosis with recombinant parathyroid hormone, utilisation of total body DXA to observe treatment effects on total body composition and factors determining response to therapy

PURPOSE

Recombinant parathyroid hormone (rPTH) increases bone mineral density (BMD). However, certain other potential effects of rPTH remain to be studied. The aim of this study is to identify whether bone turnover markers, relevant biochemical parameters or total body fat and muscle composition affect the response to rPTH and to establish if these parameters in particular change during treatment.

METHODS

One hundred seventy-two participants were treated with rPTH, and 128 subjects who fully complied with the therapy and completed their investigations including biochemical bone markers and total body composition at baseline, 6 months and 1 year of the treatment were divided into responder and non-responder groups. A total body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanner was used to assess the body muscle, fat and bone composition.

RESULTS

rPTH significantly increased BMD spine at 1 year (p = 0.000). Twenty-four-hour urinary calcium was significantly increased at 6 months in the responder group (p = 0.00). There was a trend to an increase in the fat and muscle mass (p = 0.52 and 0.45, respectively), and it was not negatively affected by rPTH. Bone turnover markers (P1NP and OC) did not show statistically significant difference over time between responders and non-responders (p = 0.74 and p = 0.19, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Hypercalciuria which is a frequent feature in osteoporotic population may predict non-responders at 6 months of rPTH, and it may help to optimise individual patient's treatment. Unlike endogenous PTH in pathological conditions, rPTH is anabolic to bone and has no detrimental effects on the body fat and muscle composition.

Adherence to osteoporosis medicines in Estonia-a comprehensive 15-year retrospective prescriptions database study

Some patients do not take medicines as they are supposed to. Our research showed that in Estonia, one fifth of patients did not start treatment with osteoporosis medicines and only 20% used the medicines for at least 3 years as they should. This induces unnecessary costs to the healthcare system.

PURPOSE

Medication non-adherence is the number one reason for not obtaining the expected clinical effect of medicines. With osteoporosis treatment, it has been shown that both implementation of treatment and persistence influence the risk of fractures significantly. Long-term adherence to medication in Estonia is to be determined with this study.

METHODS

A 15-year retrospective study was carried out in order to establish initiation, implementation, and persistence of Estonian patients. All new users of osteoporosis medicines were analyzed for all prescriptions they received during the study period. Sufficient adherence to treatment was defined as a patient being dispensed 80% or more prescribed doses for at least 1 year.

RESULTS

The study period was from 2001 to 2015. Patients (24,652) were included in the study. Of the patients, 93.7% (n = 23,091) were women and 6.3% (n = 1564) were men. Eighteen percent (4636) were dispensed only one prescription. Of the patients, 44.2% included in the study had medication possession ratio (MPR) ≥80% over follow-up period; 8922 (36.2%) who were prescribed from 2001 to 2015 persisted for 1 year with MPR ≥80% and 19.8% persisted for 3 years. Forty percent of expenditure on osteoporosis medication was made for treatment courses with insufficient adherence.

CONCLUSIONS

There is room for improvement in Estonia with medication adherence relating to all three aspects that determine adherence-initiation, implementation, and persistence. This means further efforts are to be made to educate patients and healthcare professionals on realizing the importance of good adherence.

Thai Osteoporosis Foundation (TOPF) position statements on management of osteoporosis

The adjusted incidence rate of hip fracture in Thailand has increased more than 31% from 1997 to 2006. Mortality and morbidity after hip fracture are also high. One year mortality after a hip fracture has increased from 18% in 1999 to 21% in 2007. The Thai Osteoporosis Foundation (TOPF) developed the first Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) in 2002 and keeps updating the CPG since then. This latest version of the CPG is our attempt to provide comprehensive positional statement on the diagnosis, prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in Thailand. The study group who revised this position statement contains experts from the TOPF, Four Royal Colleges of Thailand, includes the Orthopaedic Surgeons, Gynecologists and Obstetricians, Physiatrists, Radiologists and 2 Associations of Endocrinologists and Rheumatologists which have involved in the management of patients with osteoporosis.

Proportion and Characteristics of Patients in Sweden Remaining at High Risk of Fracture Despite Prior Treatment

PURPOSE

Fragility fractures are a clinical consequence of osteoporosis (OP). Evidence suggests however, current OP treatments may be inadequate in reducing fracture risk. The purpose of this study was to estimate the proportion and characteristics of Swedish patients who remain at high risk of fracture after 2 years of treatment, as evidenced by osteoporotic bone mineral density (BMD), a decrease in BMD, or the occurrence of new fractures.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, descriptive analysis of a subset of participants obtained from a Swedish osteoporosis patient registry from 1991 to 2009. Patients were required to be osteoporotic, to be treatment naive at baseline, to have returned for at least 1 follow-up visit, and to have reported osteoporosis treatment use for ≥2 years after the baseline visit with a BMD T score. Two overlapping cohorts remaining at high risk of fracture were defined using the BMD T score measured after 2 years of treatment from baseline. The osteoporosis cohort comprised patients who remained osteoporotic, whereas the BMD decrease cohort included patients whose total hip or lumbar spine T score decreased by ≥3%.

FINDINGS

A total of 3292 osteoporotic patients were identified in the registry, of whom 392 met the study inclusion criteria. The mean (SD) patient age was 68.3 (8.5) years, with most patients being female (92.3%). Among all patients, 297 (75.8%) remained osteoporotic after at least 2 years of treatment, 90 (23.0%) experienced a BMD decrease of ≥3%, and 23 (5.9%) reported an incident fracture between the baseline and first follow-up visit. More than three-quarters (76.8%) of all patients reported taking bisphosphonates, whereas only 72.4% and 47.8% reported this in the osteoporosis and BMD decrease cohorts, respectively. Raloxifene was the only nonbisphosphonate used, with 24.2% of all patients reportedly taking it.

IMPLICATIONS

This study highlighted that despite 2 years of osteoporosis treatment, a high percentage of patients remain at high risk of fracture. There is a need for improved treatment strategies that reduce fracture risk and improve patient outcomes in the real-world setting.

The effect of vitamin D and bisphosphonate on fracture healing: An experimental study

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of the using bisphosphonate, vitamin D, and a combination of bisphosphonate and vitamin D on fracture healing, by comparison of radiological and histological findings of the study groups and a control group.

METHODS

A total of 24 rats were randomly divided into 4 groups. A mid-third fracture was created in the femur of all rats. Saline was administered to Group A, bisphosphonate (Alendronate) to Group B, bisphosphonate (Alendronate) + vitamin D (Calcitriol) to Group C and vitamin D (Calcitriol) to Group D. All preparations were administered orally for 28 days.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference was determined between the groups in respect of the effect on fracture healing according to radiological findings. The histological findings of fracture healing showed Groups B and C to be significantly more advanced than Group A (p = 0.017, p = 0.009). However no significant difference was found in Group D comparison with Group A (p = 0.224).

CONCLUSION

According to the histological findings, advanced fracture healing was seen in the groups administered with bisphosphonate or combined bisphosphonate and vitamin D compared to the use of vitamin D alone and the control group. It was concluded that bisphosphonate treatment combined with vitamin D can be used safely without any negative effect on fracture healing.

Circulating sclerostin and estradiol levels are associated with inadequate response to bisphosphonates in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

INTRODUCTION

The biological mechanisms associated with an inadequate response to treatment with bisphosphonates are not well known. This study investigates the association between circulating levels of sclerostin and estradiol with an inadequate clinical outcome to bisphosphonate therapy in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

METHODS

This case-control study is based on 120 Spanish women with postmenopausal osteoporosis being treated with oral bisphosphonates. Patients were classified as adequate responders (ARs, n=66, mean age 68.2±8 years) without incident fractures during 5 years of treatment, or inadequate responders (IRs, n=54, mean age 67±9 years), with incident fractures between 1 and 5 years of treatment. Bone mineral density (DXA), structural analysis of the proximal femur and structural/fractal analysis of the distal radius were assessed. Sclerostin concentrations were measured by ELISA and 17β-estradiol levels by radioimmunoassay based on ultrasensitive methods.

RESULTS

In the ARs group, sclerostin serum levels were significantly lower (p=0.02) and estradiol concentrations significantly higher (p=0.023) than in the IRs group. A logistic regression analysis was performed, including as independent variables in the original model femoral fracture load, 25 hydroxyvitamin D, previus history of fragility fracture, sclerostin and estradiol. Only previous history of fragility fracture (OR 14.04, 95% CI 2.38-82.79, p=0.004) and sclerostin levels (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02-1.20, p=0.011), both adjusted by estradiol levels remained associated with IRs. Also, sclerostin concentrations were associated with the index of resistance to compression (IRC) in the fractal analysis of the distal radius, a parameter on bone microstructure.

CONCLUSIONS

Sclerostin and estradiol levels are associated with the response to bisphosphonate therapy in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Osteoporotic fracture rate among women with at least 1 year of adherence to osteoporosis treatment

PURPOSE

In clinical trials, bisphosphonate therapy reduces but does not eliminate the risk of fracture. The objective of this retrospective observational study was to examine fracture rates among women who were adherent to bisphosphonate therapy for at least 1 year.

METHODS

We studied outcomes for women ≥50 years old who received their first osteoporosis therapy as an oral bisphosphonate during 2002-2008 and were enrolled in a large claims database for ≥3 consecutive years, including a baseline year before and 2 years after the index prescription (thus, the full study period was 2001-2010). Adherence during the first year of therapy was defined as a medication possession ratio (MPR) ≥80% (total number of days' supply/365 days × 100%).

RESULTS

Of the 62,446 women who met the eligibility criteria, 26,852 (43%) had an MPR ≥80% for osteoporosis therapy during year 1. In year 2, the fracture rate was 52/1000 patient-years. Fragility fractures were recorded for 1292 patients (4.8%) during the baseline year (before initiating therapy); for 1051 patients (3.9%) during year 1 (adherence year); and for 871 patients (3.2%) during year 2. Significant predictors of fracture in year 2 were older age, higher comorbidity score, comorbid inflammatory joint disease, and prior fragility fracture during the baseline year or first year of treatment. The primary limitation of these results is the scope of the claims database, which did not provide information on bone mineral density, supplemental use of calcium or vitamin D, or reasons for initiating oral bisphosphonates.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite being adherent to bisphosphonate treatment for 1 year, 3.2% of women experienced a fracture in the subsequent year. These results suggest an unmet need in patients with osteoporosis and an opportunity for newer therapies to help address this need.

Factors associated with bisphosphonate treatment failure in postmenopausal women with primary osteoporosis

Among 97 postmenopausal women with primary osteoporosis, adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and good compliance to a 36-month bisphosphonate treatment, the 25.8% of patients are inadequate responders. Current smoking and a bone turnover in the upper part of the normal range increase the risk of treatment failure.

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the prevalence of the bisphosphonate treatment failure and its possible associated factors in women with primary osteoporosis (PO).

METHODS

We studied 97 previously untreated postmenopausal women with PO and fragility fractures and/or a FRAX® 10-year probability of a major osteoporotic fracture ≥ 7.5%, before and after a 36-month treatment with alendronate or risedronate and adequate vitamin D supplementation with good compliance. At baseline and after 36 months, lumbar spine (LS) and femoral bone mineral density (BMD) were assessed by Dual X-ray absorptiometry and vertebral fractures by spinal radiographs. Spinal deformity index (SDI) was calculated. Treatment failure was defined by the presence of ≥ 2 incident fragility fractures and/or a BMD decrease greater than the least significant change.

RESULTS

Bisphosphonate treatment failure was observed in 25.8% of patients. Age, body mass index, years since menopause, familiar history of hip fracture, number of falls, type of bisphosphonate used, 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels (25OHVitD), BMD, SDI, and FRAX® score at baseline were not different between responders and inadequate responders. Treatment failure was associated with current smoking (OR 3.22, 95% CI 1.10-9.50, P = 0.034) and baseline alkaline phosphatase total activity levels ≥ 66.5 U/L (OR 4.22, 95% CI 1.48-12.01, P = 0.007), regardless of age, number of falls, LS BMD, and baseline SDI.

CONCLUSIONS

The 25.8 % of PO postmenopausal women inadequately responds to bisphosphonates, despite a good compliance to therapy and normal 25OHVitD levels. The current smoking and bone turnover in the upper part of the normal range are associated with the inadequate response to bisphosphonates.

Risk factors for treatment failure with antiosteoporosis medication: the global longitudinal study of osteoporosis in women (GLOW)

Antiosteoporosis medication (AOM) does not abolish fracture risk, and some individuals experience multiple fractures while on treatment. Therefore, criteria for treatment failure have recently been defined. Using data from the Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW), we analyzed risk factors for treatment failure, defined as sustaining two or more fractures while on AOM. GLOW is a prospective, observational cohort study of women aged ≥55 years sampled from primary care practices in 10 countries. Self-administered questionnaires collected data on patient characteristics, fracture risk factors, previous fractures, AOM use, and health status. Data were analyzed from women who used the same class of AOM continuously over 3 survey years and had data available on fracture occurrence. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of treatment failure. Data from 26,918 women were available, of whom 5550 were on AOM. During follow-up, 73 of 5550 women in the AOM group (1.3%) and 123 of 21,368 in the non-AOM group (0.6%) reported occurrence of two or more fractures. The following variables were associated with treatment failure: lower Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) score (physical function and vitality) at baseline, higher Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) score, falls in the past 12 months, selected comorbid conditions, prior fracture, current use of glucocorticoids, need of arms to assist to standing, and unexplained weight loss ≥10 lb (≥4.5 kg). Three variables remained predictive of treatment failure after multivariable analysis: worse SF-36 vitality score (odds ratio [OR] per 10-point increase, 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-0.95; p = 0.004); two or more falls in the past year (OR, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.34-4.29; p = 0.011), and prior fracture (OR, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.81-4.75; p < 0.0001). The C statistic for the model was 0.712. Specific strategies for fracture prevention should therefore be developed for this subgroup of patients.

Vitamin D and bone disease

Vitamin D is important for normal development and maintenance of the skeleton. Hypovitaminosis D adversely affects calcium metabolism, osteoblastic activity, matrix ossification, bone remodeling and bone density. It is well known that Vit. D deficiency in the developing skeleton is related to rickets, while in adults is related to osteomalacia. The causes of rickets include conditions that lead to hypocalcemia and/or hypophosphatemia, either isolated or secondary to vitamin D deficiency. In osteomalacia, Vit. D deficiency leads to impairment of the mineralisation phase of bone remodeling and thus an increasing amount of the skeleton being replaced by unmineralized osteoid. The relationship between Vit. D and bone mineral density and osteoporosis are still controversial while new evidence suggests that Vit. D may play a role in other bone conditions such as osteoarthritis and stress fractures. In order to maintain a “good bone health” guidelines concerning the recommended dietary intakes should be followed and screening for Vit. D deficiency in individuals at risk for deficiency is required, followed by the appropriate action.

25 hydroxyvitamin D serum levels influence adequate response to bisphosphonate treatment in postmenopausal osteoporosis

It remains unclear whether vitamin D sufficiency optimizes response to bisphosphonate (BP) treatment in postmenopausal osteoporosis. We evaluated the role and possible mechanisms of vitamin D in adequate response to standard BP treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis.

METHODS

We included 120 postmenopausal osteoporotic women (aged 68 ± 8 years) receiving BP (alendronate or risedronate) at their annual follow-up, performing complete anamnesis, including treatment adherence, use of vitamin D supplements, and previous falls and fractures during the last year. We analyzed the evolution of bone mineral density (BMD) during this period and serum PTH and 25 hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) and urinary NTx levels. Patients were classified as inadequate responders to antiosteoporotic treatment based on BMD loss>2% and/or the presence of fragility fractures during the last year.

RESULTS

Thirty percent of patients showed inadequate response to BP treatment, with significantly lower levels of 25(OH)D (22.4 ± 1.3 vs. 26.6 ± 0.3 ng/ml, p=0.01), a higher frequency of 25(OH)D levels<30 ng/ml (91% vs. 69%, p=0.019) and higher urinary NTx values (42.2 ± 3.9 vs. 30.9 ± 2.3 nM/mM, p=0.01). Patients with 25(OH)D>30 ng/ml had a greater significant increase in lumbar BMD than women with values <30 ng/ml (3.6% vs. 0.8%, p<0.05). The probability of inadequate response was 4-fold higher in patients with 25(OH)D<30 (OR, 4.42; 95% CI, 1.22-15.97, p=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Inadequate response to BP treatment is frequent in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis as is vitamin D insufficiency, despite vitamin D supplementation. Maintenance of 25(OH)D levels >30 ng/ml is especially indicated for adequate response to BP treatment.

Risk factors for prediction of inadequate response to antiresorptives

Some patients sustain fractures while on antiresorptives. Whether this represents an inadequate response (IR) to treatment or a chance event has not been elucidated. We performed a study to identify which patients are more likely to fracture while on treatment. This is a multicentric, cross-sectional study of postmenopausal women on antiresorptives for osteoporosis in 12 Spanish hospitals, classified as adequate responders (ARs) if on treatment with antiresorptives for 5 years with no incident fractures or inadequate responders (IRs) if an incident fracture occurred between 1 and 5 years on treatment. Poor compliance, secondary osteoporosis, and previous anti-osteoporosis treatment other than the assessed were exclusion criteria. Clinical, demographic, analytical, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) variables, and proximal femur structure analysis (ImaTx™) and structural/fractal analyses of distal radius were performed. A total of 179 women (76 IRs; mean (SD): age 68.2 (9.0) years; 103 ARs, age 68.5 (7.9) years) were included. History of prior fracture (p = 0.005), two or more falls in the previous year (p = 0.032), low lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) (p = 0.02), 25 hydroxyvitamin D (p = 0.017), and hip ImaTx fracture load index (p = 0.004) were associated with IR. In the logistic regression models a fracture before treatment (odds ratio [OR], 3.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.47-8.82; p = 0.005) and levels of 25 hydroxyvitamin D below 20 ng/mL (OR, 3.89; 95% CI, 1.55-9.77; p = 0.004) significantly increased risk for IR, while increased ImaTx fracture load (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93-0.99; p = 0.006; per every 100 units) was protective, although the latter became not significant when all three variables were fitted into the model. Therefore, we can infer that severity of the disease, with microarchitectural and structure deterioration, as shown by previous fracture and hip analysis, and low levels of 25 hydroxy vitamin D carry higher risk of inadequate response to antiresorptives. More potent regimes should be developed and adequate supplementation implemented to solve this problem.

[2011 Up-date of the consensus statement of the Spanish Society of Rheumatology on osteoporosis]

OBJECTIVE

Due to increasing improvement in the diagnosis, evaluation and management of osteoporosis and the development of new tools and drugs, the Spanish Society of Rheumatology (SER) has promoted the development of recommendations based on the best evidence available. These recommendations should be a reference to rheumatologists and other health professionals involved in the treatment of patients with osteoporosis.

METHODS

Recommendations were developed following a nominal group methodology and based on a systematic review. The level of evidence and degree of recommendation were classified according to the model proposed by the Center for Evidence Based Medicine at Oxford. The level of agreement was established through Delphi technique. Evidence from previous consensus and available clinical guidelines was used.

RESULTS

We have produced recommendations on diagnosis, evaluation and management of osteoporosis. These recommendations include the glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, premenopausal and male osteoporosis.

CONCLUSIONS

We present the SER recommendations related to the biologic therapy risk management.

[Osteoporosis treatment with biphosphonates: Approaches to care reality]

OBJECTIVE

Osteoporosis predominantly affects menopausal women and has a significant morbidity expressed as fractures. The study aimed to describe the types of bisphosphonates used to treat osteoporosis in post-menopausal women and to establish how treatment non-compliance affects the fracture rate.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of women on active treatment with bisphosphonates for the past five years.

LOCATION

Utebo Health Centre (Zaragoza) (16,000 inhabitants) with a general medical quota of 1,890 patients).

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 129 women who were on active treatment with bisphosphonates for five years were included.

MAIN MEASURES

The distribution by drug was analysed, as well as the percentage of women who did not comply with the treatment correctly and any identified fractures.

RESULTS

A total of 129 women on treatment were identified (13.0% of all women patients): alendronic acid (45.7%), ibandronic acid (21.7%), risedronic acid (19.4%) and alendronic acid plus cholecalciferol (13,2%). 19.4% of women stopped their treatment after at least 3 months. Thirteen hip fractures were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall treatment compliance was 80.6%, Depending on the type of bisphosphonate: alendronic acid plus cholecalciferol (88.2%), risedronic acid (88.0%), alendronic acid (78.0%), ibandronic acid (75.0%). The incidence of hip fractures was similar incidence to that observed with respect to non-compliance to treatment. Lack of therapeutic compliance is common in menopausal women, and measures should be promoted to increase effectiveness as well as to make patients aware of the importance of continuing treatment.

Effects of intravenous pamidronate on renal function, bone mineral metabolism and bone mass in patients with severe osteoporosis

INTRODUCTION

To analyze the effects of intravenous pamidronate (APD) on bone remodelling, bone mineral density (BMD), fractures and bone mineral metabolism parameters, and the rate of adverse events, with special attention to renal function, in patients with osteoporosis with intolerance and/or any contraindication to oral bisphosphonates.

METHODS

We analyzed prospectively 17 osteoporotic patients (age, 66.8 +/- 9.4 years): 65% women, 82% with prevalent vertebral fractures. All patients received APD therapy (30 mg intravenously every 3 months) and were followed up for 1 year. We analyzed serum amino-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen and urinary N-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen (as markers of bone turnover), serum calcium, phosphate, parathormone, 25OH-vitamin D, creatinine, and the creatinine clearance: at baseline, 1 week after starting APD treatment, and thereafter for every 3 months (before infusion) during 1 year. We also analyzed lumbar and femoral BMD at baseline and after 1 year, the incidence of new fractures, and the treatment-related adverse events.

RESULTS

One week after starting APD treatment, a significant decrease of N-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen (32%) (P < 0.05) and an increase of parathormone values (72%) (P < 0.01) were observed, without significant differences found thereafter. No significant differences were observed in BMD evolution and in the other parameters analyzed throughout the study, nor in impairment of renal function. Sixty-four percent of patients suffered new skeletal fractures, 41% of patients showed flu-like syndrome after APD infusion, and 1 patient was withdrawn from treatment because of adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Patients with severe osteoporosis receiving APD infusions had a high rate of fractures without significant changes in bone mass or in bone markers; nevertheless, such a therapeutic regimen showed a good renal safety profile, suggesting that APD at this dosage is safe but ineffective for treating severe osteoporosis.

Strategies for treatment to prevent fragility fractures in postmenopausal women

The objective of treatment of osteoporosis is to decrease the risk of fractures in patients at high risk for a first or subsequent fracture. The efficacy of treatment will depend on the efficiency and level of implementation of clinical case finding to select patients at risk, the results of additional investigations, the efficacy, tolerance and safety of medical intervention and the adherence to treatment during follow-up. Each of these steps is critical in treatment in daily practice. Failure to consider one or another step can result in suboptimal fracture prevention or overtreatment. The aim of case finding is to identify patients for treatment, who have disease characteristics of patients in whom fracture prevention has been demonstrated in randomised controlled trials (RCTs). These include patients with a low-trauma hip or vertebral fracture, with a low bone mineral density (BMD) or with a high risk of fracture based on the presence of clinical risk factors (CRFs) for osteoporosis and fractures such as included in the FRAX case-finding algorithm, with or without BMD. Case finding starts clinically, with systematic or opportunistic doctor- and/or patient-driven evaluation for the presence of CRFs, but its implementation is low. Further investigations aim to assess the risk of fracture(s) and to have baseline measurements for the subsequent monitoring of treatment, to exclude diseases that mimic osteoporosis, to identify the cause of osteoporosis and contributory factors and to select the most appropriate treatment. Medical intervention consists of providing information about osteoporosis to the patient, lifestyle advice, optimalisation of calcium intake and vitamin D status, fall prevention to reduce fall risk, correction of reversible contributors to secondary osteoporosis and a wide array of drugs for prevention of a first or subsequent vertebral, hip and non-vertebral, non-hip fracture. Drug treatment is based on manipulation of bone remodelling by inhibiting bone resorption (bisphosphonates, selective oestrogen-receptor modulator (SERMs), calcitonin), stimulating bone formation (parathyroid hormone) or mixed effects (strontium ranelate). Follow-up allows to check tolerance and safety, to optimise adherence and to decide about adequacy of response, duration and switching of therapy.

Assessing response to osteoporosis therapy

Patients treated with pharmacological agents to improve bone strength and reduce fracture risk may not achieve optimal skeletal benefit for reasons that include poor compliance and persistence, inadequate calcium and vitamin D intake, malabsorption, and medications or co-morbidities with adverse skeletal effects. Monitoring the effects of therapy can inform the patient and physician that the drug is having its expected skeletal response. Treatment is often monitored with serial bone mineral density (BMD) measurements using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry or bone turnover markers (BTMs). Stable or increasing BMD is associated with reduced fracture risk in clinical trials, and is considered an indication of good response to therapy in individual patients outside of clinical trials. There are many differences between subjects in clinical trials and patients being treated in clinical practice. Thus, although defining a clinical practice patient as a "nonresponder" or "suboptimal responder" to treatment is problematic, a pragmatic approach would be to consider evaluation for contributing factors and possible changes in therapy in patients who have a statistically significant decrease in BMD, do not have the expected change in BTMs, or have a fracture.