Shorter unipedal standing time and lower bone mineral density in women with distal radius fractures

Lower limb muscle strength and balance in older adults with a distal radius fracture: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Distal radius fractures are common fractures in older adults and associated with increased risk of future functional decline and hip fracture. Whether lower limb muscle strength and balance are impaired in this patient population is uncertain. To help inform rehabilitation requirements, this systematic review aimed to compare lower limb muscle strength and balance between older adults with a distal radius fracture with matched controls, and to synthesise lower limb muscle strength and balance outcomes in older adults with a distal radius fracture.

METHODS

We searched Embase, MEDLINE, and CINAHL (1990 to 25 May 2022) for randomised and non-randomised controlled clinical trials and observational studies that measured lower limb muscle strength and/or balance using instrumented measurements or validated tests, in adults aged ≥ 50 years enrolled within one year after distal radius fracture. We appraised included observational studies using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and included randomised controlled trials using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Due to the clinical and methodological heterogeneity in included studies, we synthesised results narratively in tables and text.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies (10 case-control studies, five case series, and four randomised controlled trials) of variable methodological quality and including 1835 participants (96% women, mean age 55-73 years, median sample size 82) were included. Twelve included studies (63%) assessed strength using 10 different methods with knee extension strength most commonly assessed (6/12 (50%) studies). Five included case-control studies (50%) assessed lower limb strength. Cases demonstrated impaired strength during functional tests (two studies), but knee extension strength assessment findings were conflicting (three studies). Eighteen included studies (95%) assessed balance using 14 different methods. Single leg balance was most commonly assessed (6/18 (33%) studies). All case-control studies assessed balance with inconsistent findings.

CONCLUSION

Compared to controls, there is some evidence that older adults with a distal radius fracture have impaired lower limb muscle strength and balance. A cautious interpretation is required due to inconsistent findings across studies and/or outcome measures. Heterogeneity in control participants' characteristics, study design, study quality, and assessment methods limited synthesis of results. Robust case-control and/or prospective observational studies are needed.

REGISTRATION

International prospective register of systematic reviews (date of registration: 02 July 2020, registration identifier: CRD42020196274).

Lower grip strength and dynamic body balance in women with distal radial fractures

In this case-control study, we concluded that women with distal radial fractures who were surgically treated showed lower grip strength and dynamic body balancing than those of controls. These results suggest that measurements of grip strength and dynamic body balance may be useful screening tools to assess future fracture risk.

INTRODUCTION

Patients with distal radial fractures (DRFs) are at risk of future fragility fractures. However, their physical characteristics and tendencies for falls remain unclear. We aimed to compare the physical characteristics of women with and without distal radial fractures.

METHODS

We included 128 women with a DRF as their first fragility fracture (fracture group) who underwent surgical treatment. Concurrently, 128 age- and sex-matched participants without a history of fragility fractures were selected as controls (control group). The participants underwent assessments of grip strength and the body balancing ability test. Measurements were taken twice in the fracture group, at 2 weeks and 6 months postoperatively, and once in the control group. The body balancing ability test included the Functional Reach Test, Timed Up and Go test (TUG), 2-Step test (2ST), and Timed Uni-pedal Stance test. The participants also completed questionnaires about their health.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences (p > 0.05) in patient characteristics between the groups. The fracture group showed lower grip strength across all age groups. In the DRF group, prolonged TUG time was observed at 2 weeks postoperatively in all age groups and at 6 months in participants aged 55-74 years; the 2ST score was significantly lower in participants aged between 65 and 74 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Women with DRF demonstrated lower grip strength and dynamic body balancing ability. Lower grip strength and dynamic body balancing ability were identified as significant risk factors in women with DRF, suggesting that these may be useful screening tools to assess fracture risk.

Effects of alendronate plus alfacalcidol in osteoporosis patients with a high risk of fracture: the Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial (JOINT) - 02

OBJECTIVES

The authors conducted a randomized controlled trial to clarify the efficacy and safety of alendronate plus alfacalcidol versus alendronate alone in a clinical setting.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Eligible patients were postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis who were aged 70 years or older and had several risk factors for incident fractures. The primary endpoint was prevention of incident fractures, and the anti-fracture efficacy was evaluated in relation to the baseline serum 25(OH)D level.

RESULTS

A total of 2164 patients were randomized to alendronate plus alfacalcidol (combination therapy) or alendronate alone (monotherapy). Although the overall difference in the incidence of vertebral fracture between the two groups was not significant, the combination therapy group had a significantly reduced risk of vertebral fractures after the first 6 months (HR, 0.53). In subgroup analyses, the combination therapy group was superior in the strata of number of prevalent vertebral fractures of ≥2 (HR, 0.51) and grade 3 of prevalent vertebral fractures (HR, 0.55). The rate of non-vertebral weight-bearing bone fractures was significantly lower in the combination therapy group than in the monotherapy group during the follow-up period (HR, 0.31). A lower baseline 25(OH)D level was associated with a higher incidence of non-vertebral weight-bearing bone fractures (HR, 3.42) despite alendronate use. Although one patient given the combination therapy had mild hypercalcemia, serious hypercalcemia and unknown adverse events were not encountered. Because of the limitations presented in this study, these results may not apply to female patients with longer than 2 years of treatments, and to male osteoporosis patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination therapy was no more effective for overall vertebral fracture prevention. However, subgroup analysis has shown that it was more effective for fracture prevention in patients with severe vertebral deformity, multiple prevalent vertebral fractures, and for non-vertebral weight-bearing bone fracture prevention.