An algorithm using the early changes in PINP to predict the future BMD response for patients treated with daily teriparatide

Responders and non-responders to romosozumab treatment

INTRODUCTION

Romosozumab is an anti-sclerostin antibody drug with potent bone formation-promoting and bone resorption-inhibiting properties. It enhances bone mineral density and has a novel effect in preventing fractures. However, there have been reports of non-responders to romosozumab.

FINDINGS

If the least significant change is defined as 3%, only 2-12% of patients with spine osteoporosis are non-responders, and romosozumab is highly effective in this population. Low-type 1 amino-terminal propeptide (P1NP) levels during the early treatment phase are associated with non-responders early in treatment. The researchers found a cutoff value of 50.3 μg/L of P1NP in the first month of treatment. In contrast, hip osteoporosis does not respond (54-57% of the time). Low P1NP levels at the start of treatment increase the risk of non-responders. The cutoff value for P1NP was reported as 53.7 μg/L at the beginning of treatment. However, failure to meet these cutoff values does not necessarily indicate that the patient is a non-responder and does not justify a change in drug administration.

CONCLUSIONS

In spine osteoporosis, romosozumab demonstrates high effectiveness, with approximately 2-12% of patients showing no response. However, in hip osteoporosis, approximately 54-57% do not respond to the treatment with romosozumab.

Association between P1NP value and increases in bone mineral density in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis treated with romosozumab

OBJECTIVES

The present study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of treatment with romosozumab for 1 year and association between bone turnover markers and changes in bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

METHODS

Participants were 53 treatment-naïve postmenopausal osteoporosis patients. Correlations of per cent changes (Δ) in lumbar (L) and total hip (TH) BMD 12 months after initiating romosozumab with baseline demographic factors and parameters of N-terminal propeptide of Type 1 collagen (P1NP) and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-5b at baseline and Months 1, 3, and 6 were assessed. Multiple regression analysis was performed on factors significantly correlated with ΔL-BMD and ΔTH-BMD at Month 12.

RESULTS

ΔL-BMD and ΔTH-BMD at Month 12 were 17.5% and 8.1%, respectively. Multiple regression analysis revealed that a high P1NP value at Month 3 predicted large increases in L-BMD and TH-BMD at Month 12. High total amount of P1NP values from baseline to Month 6 was associated with large increases in L-BMD and TH-BMD at Month 12 and was most strongly correlated with the P1NP value at Month 3.

CONCLUSIONS

A high P1NP value at Month 3 predicted large increases in both L-BMD and TH-BMD at Month 12 in postmenopausal osteoporosis patients treated with romosozumab.

Analyzing the factors associated with efficacy among teriparatide treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

BACKGROUND

Teriparatide (TPTD) is a widely used anabolic agent for the treatment of osteoporosis. Several factors have been identified to be related to bone mineral density (BMD) increase in anti-osteoporosis treatment with other agents; however, there has been no systematic analysis to summarize the associated determinants of BMD reaction to daily teriparatide treatment.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we performed a comprehensive investigation involving not only clinical data but also several relevant lifestyle factors to be examined for their potential contribution to BMD response. This post-hoc analysis included 258 post-menopaused patients with osteoporosis who received TPTD at 20 µg/day for 12 months. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to distinguish the response variables of lumbar spine (LS) BMD transformation, the principal outcome measure of efficacy, from the baseline at 12 months.

RESULTS

Twelve months of TPTD treatment resulted in an absolute 0.39 ± 0.37 increase in T-score of LS BMD. Gastrointestinal disease, prior bisphosphonate or glucocorticoid treatment, no vitamin K2 supplementation, low levels of serum 25(OH)D and PINP, weak increment of PINP and β-CTX at 3 months, unhealthy lifestyle (excessive smoking, tea, coffee, and drinking), vegetarian diet pattern, low ALT level, and high BMD at baseline were determined by univariate analyses to be related to the weak reaction of TPTD treatment (P < 0.10). In the multiple regression model, postmenopausal women with vitamin K2 supplementation, higher baseline serum 25(OH)D level, and higher PINP concentration at 3 months indicated a good reaction of LS BMD at 12 months (P < 0.05). Patients with gastrointestinal disease, prior bisphosphonate and glucocorticoid treatment, vegetarian diet pattern, and higher baseline BMD were significantly more likely to have a lower absolute LS BMD response compared to patients without these characteristics (P < 0.05). Further analysis confirmed the negative effect of unhealthy lifestyle on TPTD treatment.

CONCLUSION

Our results emphasize the significance of a comprehensive assessment of clinical or lifestyle-related characteristics of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in the management of TPTD therapy in routine care.

Genome-wide association study identifies genetic variants which predict the response of bone mineral density to teriparatide therapy

OBJECTIVES

Teriparatide (TPTD) is an effective treatment for osteoporosis but the individual response to therapy is variable for reasons that are unclear. This study aimed to determine whether the response to TPTD might be influenced by genetic factors.

METHODS

We searched for predictors of the response of bone mineral density (BMD) to TPTD using a two-stage genome-wide association study in 437 patients with osteoporosis from three referral centres. Demographic and clinical data including the response of BMD to treatment at the lumbar spine and hip were extracted from the medical records of each participant.

RESULTS

Allelic variation at rs6430612 on chromosome 2, close to the CXCR4 gene was associated with the response of spine BMD to TPTD at a genome wide significant level (p=9.2×10^-9 beta=-0.35 (-0.47 to -0.23)). The increase in BMD was almost twice as great in AA homozygotes at rs6430612 as compared with GG homozygotes with intermediate values in heterozygotes. The same variant was also associated with response of femoral neck and total hip BMD (p=0.007). An additional locus on chromosome 19 tagged by rs73056959 was associated with the response of femoral neck BMD to TPTD (p=3.5×10^-9, beta=-1.61 (-2.14 to -1.07)).

CONCLUSIONS

Genetic factors influence the response to TPTD at the lumbar spine and hip with a magnitude of effect that is clinically relevant. Further studies are required to identify the causal genetic variants and underlying mechanisms as well as to explore how genetic testing for these variants might be implemented in clinical practice.

Factors associated with bone response to teriparatide in young postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

INTRODUCTION

To investigate the factors associated with changes in vertebral bone mineral density during teriparatide treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Single centre, longitudinal study involving 145 osteoporotic postmenopausal women treated with teriparatide. Clinical evaluation, bone mineral density (BMD) measurements assessment and laboratory analyses were performed at baseline then after 12 and 18 months of treatment. Bone non-response to treatment was defined as no significant increase in BMD at 18 months as compared to baseline.

RESULTS

Of the 145 women initially included, 109 completed the 18-month course of the treatment. 75% of them had a history of prior osteoporotic treatment. Baseline mean age was 60 ± 8 years. Mean baseline vertebral T-score was - 3.7 ± 0.7 and 83 (76%) women had suffered at least one vertebral fracture. At the end of treatment, 18 women (17%) were classified as non-responders. In the responder group (n = 91), vertebral BMD increased by 0.091 ± 0.04 g/cm2 (12.2 ± 5.3%). Clinical characteristics, baseline BMDs and the percentage of women previously treated with bisphosphonates as well as the duration of prior treatment did not significantly differ between the two groups of responders and non-responders. At baseline, non-responders had significant mean lower C-terminal fragment of type 1 collagen (CTX) values than responders (p < 0.01). Only baseline CTX values (r = 0.30 p < 0.01) were independently correlated to vertebral BMD changes during teriparatide treatment.

CONCLUSION

A minority of treated women had no vertebral densitometric gain after 18 months of teriparatide therapy. Low levels of baseline bone remodeling were the main factor associated with poor response to treatment.

Association between P1NP and bone strength in postmenopausal women treated with teriparatide

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between P1NP and bone strength in postmenopausal women treated with teriparatide.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study enrolled 248 postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis treated with teriparatide. Procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP) were assessed at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months. Lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN), and total hip (TH) bone mineral density (BMD) and LS trabecular bone score (TBS) were measured by Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at baseline and 12 months.

RESULTS

With teriparatide use, P1NP levels increase and peaked at 6 months. Significant increase in LS and hip BMD and LS TBS were also noted. The percentage change or absolute change >10 μg/L in PINP at 3 months was only related to changes in LS BMD at 12 months. With a median baseline P1NP level was 65.5 ng/mL, we found no correlation between P1NP and LS and hip BMD nor LS TBS. There was no association between LS TBS and axial BMD. After treatment, there was also no significance between the changes in TBS and axial BMD. Over the study period, 83.9% of the 248 participants were persistent with teriparatide at 3 months, 77.8% at 6 months, and 67.3% women at 12 months.

CONCLUSION

P1NP levels may provide a signal of osteoporosis risk but is not related to bone strength. Early changes in P1NP may offer information regarding subsequent BMD response so standardized monitoring of P1NP levels at baseline and at 3 months should be considered during osteoporosis therapy. As an additional benefit, serum level monitoring during treatment may also improve medication persistence.

Review of Current Real-World Experience with Teriparatide as Treatment of Osteoporosis in Different Patient Groups

Teriparatide has proven effective in reducing both vertebral and non-vertebral fractures in clinical trials of post-menopausal and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Widespread adoption of Teriparatide over the last two decades means that there is now substantial experience of its use in routine clinical practice, which is summarized in this paper. Extensive real-world experience of Teriparatide in post-menopausal osteoporosis confirms the fracture and bone density benefits seen in clinical trials, with similar outcomes identified also in male and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Conversely, very limited experience has been reported in pre-menopausal osteoporosis or in the use of Teriparatide in combination with other therapies. Surveillance studies have identified no safety signals relating to the possible association of Teriparatide with osteosarcoma. We also review the evidence for predicting response to Teriparatide in order to inform the debate on where best to use Teriparatide in an increasingly crowded therapeutic landscape.

Early changes in bone turnover predict longer-term changes in bone mineral density but not trabecular bone score in frail older women

Clinicians and patients want to know if therapy is working early in their course of treatment. We found that early changes in bone turnover markers at 6 months were associated with long-term changes in bone mineral density but not trabecular bone score at 12 and 24 months.

PURPOSE

We sought to examine the association between shorter-term changes in markers of bone turnover and longer-term changes in bone mineral density (BMD) and microstructure in a cohort of frail elderly women with multiple comorbid conditions including osteoporosis.

METHODS

We performed a secondary analysis of a 2-year zoledronic acid trial for osteoporosis in 155 women residents of long-term care communities (mean age 86.9 years). We examined the association of the 6-month change in serum C-terminal crosslinking telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX) and serum intact procollagen type I N propeptide (PINP) with the 12- and 24-month changes in BMD at the spine and hip and the trabecular bone score (TBS), an indirect measure of bone microstructure.

RESULTS

For every 0.2-ng/ml 6-month CTX decrease, the corresponding increase in spine BMD at 12 and 24 months was 0.2% (p = 0.7210) and 1.1% (p = 0.0396), respectively; total hip BMD 1.1% (p = 0.0279) and 0.9% (p = 0.0716); and femoral neck BMD 1.7% (p = 0.0079) and 0.9% (p = 0.1698). Similarly, for every 20-ng/ml 6-month PINP decrease, the corresponding increase in spine BMD at 12 and 24 months was 0.9% (p = 0.0286) and 1.4% (p = 0.0012), respectively; total hip BMD 1.4% (p = 0.0005) and 1.4% (p = 0.0006); and femoral neck BMD 2.3% (p < 0.0001) and 2.0% (p < 0.0001). Bone marker changes were not consistently associated with TBS changes.

CONCLUSION

Shorter-term 6-month changes in bone turnover markers are associated with the long-term changes in BMD over 1-2 years in the spine and hip but not with TBS.

Efficacy of Switching From Teriparatide to Bisphosphonate or Denosumab: A Prospective, Randomized, Open-Label Trial

There is no consensus on an optimal treatment after daily teriparatide (TPTD). We performed a prospective, randomized, open-label, 12-month trial to investigate the efficacy of follow-up treatment after daily TPTD treatment for Japanese patients. Three-hundred patients were enrolled in this study. Patients received oral bisphosphonate (BP) including alendronate (ALN; 35 mg/week) and minodoronate (MINO; 50 mg/month), or subcutaneous denosumab (60 mg/6 month). The primary efficacy measure was bone mineral density (BMD) responses in the lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN). Lumbar spine BMD increased by 1.3 ± 5.1% in the ALN subgroups, 0.5 ± 4.6% in the MINO subgroups, and 4.3 ± 3.5% in the denosumab subgroups. Femoral neck BMD increased by 0.7 ± 4.6% in the ALN subgroups, 0.2 ± 4.6% in the MINO subgroups, and 1.4 ± 3.4% in the denosumab subgroups. Lumbar spine BMD increases were significantly greater in the denosumab subgroup than the BP subgroups. There were no significant differences in FN BMD increases among the three subgroups. Lumbar spine BMD increases were significantly greater in the denosumab subgroup than the BP subgroups, whereas FN BMD increases were not significant. Denosumab treatment was more effective in increasing BMD and therefore has the potential benefit of fracture prevention. Further research is warranted to determine the optimal treatment after daily TPTD. © 2018 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

DIAGNOSIS OF ENDOCRINE DISEASE: Bone turnover markers: are they clinically useful?

Bone turnover markers (BTMs) are useful in clinical practice as they are inexpensive, and they have proven useful for treatment monitoring and identification of poor adherence. BTMs cannot be used in individual patients for identifying accelerated bone loss or an increase in fracture risk or in deciding on the optimal therapy. They are useful for monitoring both anti-resorptive and anabolic treatment. Response can be defined as a result that exceeds an absolute target, or by a change greater than the least significant change; if such a response is not present, then poor compliance or secondary osteoporosis are likely causes. A baseline BTM measurement is not always made; in that case, a value of BTM on anti-resorptive treatment that is low or low normal or above the reference interval for anabolic therapy may be taken to indicate a satisfactory response. We provide an approach to using these bone turnover markers in clinical practice by describing algorithms for anti-resorptive and anabolic therapy and describing the changes we observe in the clinical practice setting.

The clinical benefits of denosumab for prophylaxis of steroid-induced osteoporosis in patients with pulmonary disease

Previous reports demonstrated that bone density decreased rapidly during the initial few months of steroid therapy and continued decreasing at a rate of 2 to 4% annually. Our data indicates that denosumab can also play a role in the treatment of osteoporosis in the steroid-taking population.

INTRODUCTION

Respiratory physicians are often faced with the dilemma that long-term steroid use will deteriorate bone mineral density and quality. Previous reports demonstrated that bone density decreased 8 to 12% during the initial few months of steroid therapy then continued decreasing at a rate of 2 to 4% annually. Several prospective trials revealed that denosumab increased bone density in patients with osteoporosis [2-4] and decreased the rate of occurrence of fractures. The long-term efficacy of denosumab for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, however, has not yet been proven.

MATERIALS

This has been an ongoing prospective study since 2014. In our respiratory centre, the first preventative measure used to combat glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIO) is oral bisphosphonates. Thirty-six patients were enlisted, and their treatment courses were changed from oral bisphosphonate, if administered, to the subcutaneous injection of denosumab 60 mg every 6 months, combined with a daily oral intake of DENOTAS® chewable combination tablets. The primary efficacy measures were changes in lumbar spine (LS) bone mineral density (BMD) and femoral BMD from baseline at 4, 8, 12 and 28 months.

RESULTS

At the 12-month follow-up, bone mineral density in the lumbar spine area of these patients increased by 3.2%, while bone mineral density in the hip area showed no significant increase. At the 28-month follow-up, 25 patients were still included in this study. Femoral BMD at 28 months increased significantly from the 12-month follow-up (P = 0.0259), though the first 12 months showed no significant increase. LS BMD continued to increase through the 28-month period.

CONCLUSIONS

Very little is known regarding the active prevention of GIO. Our data indicates that denosumab can play a promising role in the treatment of GIO.

Response to teriparatide in Chinese patients with established osteoporosis: osteocalcin and lumbar spine bone-mineral density changes from teriparatide Phase III study

Teriparatide is the first anabolic agent for osteoporosis, and this analysis aimed to understand responses to teriparatide in Chinese patients with established osteoporosis in subgroups. In this Phase III study of teriparatide in China, 362 patients were randomized at a 2:1 ratio to receive subcutaneous teriparatide (20 μg/day) or intranasal salmon calcitonin (200 IU/day) for 24 weeks. Teriparatide treatment produced a significantly greater increase in lumbar spine bone-mineral density (LS-BMD) in postmenopausal women than calcitonin at the 24-week end point. The relationship between osteocalcin (OCN) and LS-BMD was evaluated, and the greatest correlation was found between absolute OCN change at week 12 and percentage change in LS-BMD for patients in the teriparatide group (r=0.24, P<0.001). The correlation weakened at week 24 (r=0.16, P=0.02) and was negligibly negative for calcitonin-treated patients. Proportions of patients achieving >10 μg/L absolute OCN change from baseline in the teriparatide- and calcitonin-treated groups were 81% and 6% at week 12, respectively (P<0.001). Proportions of patients with increased LS-BMD ≥3% at week 24 from baseline were 71% and 35% in the teriparatide- and calcitonin-treated groups, respectively (P<0.001). Proportions of patients meeting both criteria were 63% for the teriparatide group and 1% for the calcitonin-treated group (P<0.001). Subgroup analysis suggested that significant increases in LS-BMD and OCN can be achieved in patients receiving teriparatide, regardless of baseline age, LS-BMD, and fracture times. The rate of treatment-emergent adverse events in each subgroup was similar to the overall analysis.

Efficacy of Daily Teriparatide Treatment in Low Levels of Walking State Patients

INTRODUCTION

Little is known about the efficacy of osteoporosis medication in patients with low levels of walking state, namely, influence by immobilization levels. We retrospectively compared the efficacy of the daily teriparatide therapy in patients with low and high levels of walking state to detect possible immobilization-related differences.

METHODS

We analyzed 661 patients treated with 20 μg/day of teriparatide for 24 months. We measured the changes in the bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine (LS) and of the femoral neck (FN), the changes in serum procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP) levels and urinary N-telopeptide (uNTX) excretion. To compare the results of BMD and bone turnover marker, the patients were divided into two subgroups, low levels of walking state and high levels of walking state.

RESULTS

Compared with baseline, in the low levels of walking state subgroup, the percent LS BMD and FN BMD increased significantly by 12.8 ± 8.9% and 5.0 ± 13.8% at 24 months, respectively (p < 0.01 vs baseline for LS and FN, respectively); the mean absolute LS BMD and FN BMD change was 0.101 ± 0.067 g/cm² and 0.017 ± 0.063 g/cm² at 24 months, respectively. In the high levels of walking state subgroup, the percent LS BMD and FN BMD increased significantly by 13.4 ± 9.5% and 3.1 ± 7.8% at 24 months, respectively; the mean absolute LS BMD and FN BMD change was 0.104 ± 0.068 g/cm² and 0.017 ± 0.042 g/cm² at 24 months, respectively. The increases in percent and absolute BMD in LS and FN, and the changes in PINP and uNTX were similar between the subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of the daily teriparatide treatment is similar between low levels of walking state patients and high levels of walking state patients and was not influenced by immobilization levels.

A retrospective analysis of nonresponse to daily teriparatide treatment

Some patients with osteoporosis do not respond to teriparatide treatment. Prior bisphosphonate use, lower bone turnover marker (BTMs) concentrations, and lower early increases in BTMs were significantly associated with a blunted lumbar spine (LS) bone mineral density (BMD) response to daily treatment with teriparatide, although the impact was limited.

INTRODUCTION

Some osteoporosis patients do not respond to teriparatide treatment. To better understand the factors underlying treatment nonresponses, we compared nonresponders' and responders' characteristics.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 354 male and female patients with osteoporosis who were administered teriparatide (20 μg/day) for 24 months. The patients were categorized as responders (≥3 % lumber spine (LS) bone mineral density (BMD) increase) or nonresponders (<3 % LS BMD increase), and the groups were compared.

RESULTS

The univariate analyses determined that prior bisphosphonate use, a lower baseline procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP) concentration and a lower urinary N-telopeptide of type I collagen (uNTX) concentration at baseline were significantly associated with teriparatide nonresponses, but these factors were not significant following multivariate analysis. Diminished early increases in the bone turnover markers (BTMs) were also related to nonresponses after teriparatide treatment began. In the nonresponders, the mean (standard deviation (SD)) absolute LS and femoral neck (FN) BMD changes were -0.002 g/cm(2) (0.032) and -0.010 g/cm(2) (0.045), respectively. In the responders, the mean (SD) absolute LS and FN BMD changes were 0.118 g/cm(2) (0.056) and 0.021 g/cm(2) (0.046), respectively. The serum PINP and uNTX levels increased rapidly in both groups, but the responders showed higher early absolute serum PINP and uNTX increases.

CONCLUSIONS

The factors associated with nonresponses were prior bisphosphonate use, lower baseline BTM levels, and lower early increases in the BTMs after starting teriparatide treatment, but the impact of these factors on achieving a ≥3 % LS BMD increase at 24 months was limited.

The Relationship of BMD Increases Between the First 12 Months and the Latter 12 Months by Daily Teriparatide Treatment

The degree of correlation between the first 12 months and the latter 12 months of increased bone mineral density (BMD) with teriparatide treatment is unknown. We retrospectively investigated the correlation between the first 12 months and the latter 12 months of increased BMD owing to teriparatide treatment. We retrospectively analyzed 357 patients (mean age, 78 years) with osteoporosis treated with teriparatide 20 μg/day for 24 months. The primary efficacy measure was the correlation between lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) BMD increases from baseline to 12 months and from 12 to 24 months. The correlation between the first 12 months and the latter 12 months of increased BMD was evaluated. We investigated the correlation between the increases in BMD and the baseline procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP) concentration. LS BMD significantly increased by 9.7 ± 8.3 % in the first 12 months and 3.5 ± 4.8 % in the latter 12 months. FN BMD increased by 2.2 ± 8.4 % in the first 12 months and 1.3 ± 4.9 % in the latter 12 months. Increased LS and FN BMD were not significantly correlated between the first 12 months and the latter 12 months. The serum baseline PINP concentration was correlated with the LS BMD in the first 12 months, and similarly, the PINP concentration at 12 months was correlated with the latter 12 months of increased LS BMD. Increased BMD by teriparatide treatment in the first 12 months and the latter 12 months was not significantly correlated.

Improvement of cancellous bone microstructure in patients on teriparatide following alendronate pretreatment

An increase in procollagen type I amino-terminal propeptide (PINP) early after teriparatide initiation was shown to correlate with increased lumbar spine areal BMD and is a good predictor of the anabolic response to teriparatide. Few data exist correlating PINP and bone microstructure, and no data exist in patients on teriparatide following prior potent antiresorptive treatment. This exploratory analysis aimed to investigate the effects of teriparatide on cancellous bone microstructure and correlations of bone markers with microstructure in alendronate-pretreated patients. This was a post hoc analysis of changes in bone markers and three-dimensional indices of bone microstructure in paired iliac crest biopsies from a prospective teriparatide treatment study in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis who were either treatment-naïve (TN, n=16) or alendronate-pretreated (ALN, n=29) at teriparatide initiation. Teriparatide (20μg/day) was given for 24months; biopsies were taken at baseline and endpoint, and serum concentrations of PINP and type 1 collagen cross-linked C-telopeptide (βCTX) were measured at intervals up to 24months. In the TN and ALN groups, respectively, mean (SD) increases in three-dimensional bone volume/tissue volume were 105 (356)% (P=0.039) and 55 (139)% (P<0.005) and trabecular thickness 30.4 (30)% (P<0.001) and 30.8 (53)% (P<0.001). No significant changes were observed in trabecular number or separation. In the ALN patients, 3-month change of neither PINP nor βCTX correlated with indices of cancellous bone microstructure. However, 12-month changes in biochemical bone markers correlated significantly with improvements in bone volume/tissue volume, r=0.502 (P<0.01) and r=0.378 (P<0.05), trabecular number, r=0.559 (P<0.01) and r=0.515 (P<0.01), and reduction of trabecular separation, r=-0.432 (P<0.05) and r=-0.530 (P<0.01), for PINP and βCTX, respectively. We conclude that cancellous bone microstructure improved with teriparatide therapy irrespective of prior antiresorptive use.

Safety and effectiveness of daily teriparatide in a prospective observational study in patients with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture in Japan: final report

This postmarketing surveillance study assessed the safety and effectiveness of teriparatide in patients with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture in Japan. The patients received teriparatide 20 μg daily by subcutaneous injection, for a maximum of 24 months. Safety and effectiveness analyses were based on data from 1,847 patients who were predominantly female (92.6%) with a mean age of 75.4 years. A total of 157 adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were reported in 140 (7.58%) patients; the most common ADRs were hyperuricemia, nausea, and dizziness. Only six (0.32%) patients reported serious ADRs, the most common being nausea (two patients; 0.1%). Persistence with teriparatide treatment was 60.8% and 39.1% at 18 and 24 months, respectively. There were significant increases in biomarkers for bone formation (procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase) and bone resorption (collagen type I cross-linked C telopeptide and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b) throughout the study. These were accompanied by significant increases in bone mineral density and low incidences of new vertebral and nonvertebral fractures. Patient-reported measurements for health-related quality of life revealed significant improvements from baseline in back pain and overall health-related quality of life (Short Form-8™ health survey). The results of this 24-month postmarketing surveillance study imply that teriparatide has a favorable safety profile and is effective in the treatment of patients with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture in Japan. Teriparatide may also be a useful treatment for osteoporosis in other societies with aging populations.

Usefulness of daily teriparatide treatment in elderly patients over 80 years of age

The percent and absolute lumbar spine and femoral neck bone mineral densities and procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP) and urinary N-telopeptide level increases noted after teriparatide 20 μg/day treatment for 24 months were similar in the older (age ≥ 80 years) and younger (age < 80 years) subgroups.

INTRODUCTION

Many individuals are living into their eighth and ninth decades, but little is known about the efficacy of osteoporosis medication for this population. We retrospectively compared usefulness of daily teriparatide therapy in osteoporosis patients ≥80 and <80 years to detect possible age-related differences.

METHODS

We analyzed 628 osteoporosis patients treated with teriparatide 20 μg/day for 24 months. The primary efficacy measures were changes in lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) bone mineral density (BMD) over 24 months. Changes in serum procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide levels and urinary N-telopeptide (uNTX) excretion were also measured. Patients were divided into age subgroups (older, ≥80 years; younger, <80 years) for BMD and bone turnover marker comparison.

RESULTS

In the older subgroup, the percent LS BMD significantly increased by 14.6 ± 10.4 % (mean ± SD) and FN BMD significantly increased by 4.5 ± 10.7 % at 24 months. In the younger subgroup, the percent LS BMD significantly increased by 12.2 ± 8.5 % and FN BMD significantly increased by 2.9 ± 8.3 % at 24 months. In the older subgroup, the mean absolute LS BMD change was 0.111 ± 0.071 g/cm(2) and FN BMD change was 0.019 ± 0.043 g/cm(2). In the younger subgroup, the mean absolute LS BMD change was 0.098 ± 0.065 g/cm(2) and FN BMD change was 0.016 ± 0.045 g/cm(2). The percent and absolute BMD increases in LS and FN and changes in PINP and uNTX were similar between the subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

The usefulness of daily teriparatide treatment is not age dependent.

Safety of daily teriparatide treatment: a post hoc analysis of a Phase III study to investigate the possible association of teriparatide treatment with calcium homeostasis in patients with serum procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide elevation

OBJECTIVE

Serum procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP), a representative marker of bone anabolic action, is strongly related to bone mineral density during teriparatide therapy. This post hoc study analyzed data from a Phase III study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00433160) to determine if there was an association between serum PINP elevation and serum calcium concentration or calcium metabolism-related disorders.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Japanese subjects with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture were randomized 2:1 to teriparatide 20 μg/day (n=137) or placebo (n=70) for a 12-month double-blind treatment period, followed by 12 months of open-label teriparatide treatment of all subjects.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Serum PINP levels were measured at baseline, and after 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months of treatment. Serum calcium levels were measured at baseline, and after 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 months of treatment.

RESULTS

Serum PINP increased from baseline to 1 month of treatment and then remained high through 24 months. Twenty-eight of 195 subjects experienced PINP elevations >200 μg/L during teriparatide treatment. Serum calcium concentration in both the teriparatide and placebo groups remained within the normal range. There was no clinically relevant difference in serum calcium concentration between subjects with PINP >200 μg/L and subjects with PINP ≤200 μg/L. Two subjects experienced hypercalcemia and recovered without altering teriparatide treatment. Adverse events possibly related to calcium metabolism disorders included periarthritis calcarea (one subject) and chondrocalcinosis pyrophosphate (two subjects), but neither was accompanied with a significant increase in PINP or serum calcium concentration.

CONCLUSION

Although the moderate size of this study prevented statistical analysis of any potential association between calcium metabolism-related disorders and elevated PINP, this analysis suggests that there was no association between serum PINP elevation during daily teriparatide treatment and serum calcium concentration or calcium metabolism-related disorders in Japanese subjects.

Analysis of daily teriparatide treatment for osteoporosis in men

The percent and absolute lumbar spine and femoral neck bone mineral densities and absolute procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP) increases following a 20-μg/day teriparatide treatment for 12 months were similar in men and women regardless of sex differences.

INTRODUCTION

Several placebo-controlled studies have measured the effects of daily teriparatide in men and postmenopausal women with osteoporosis but none have directly compared the effects between these groups. We retrospectively compared the effects of daily teriparatide therapy in men and postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and investigated biochemical markers of bone turnover to detect possible sex differences.

METHODS

Patients (563; 75 men and 488 women) with osteoporosis were retrospectively investigated. All patients were administered with teriparatide at 20 μg/day for 12 months. The primary efficacy measure was changed in lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) bone mineral density (BMD) after 12 months of treatment. The change in serum levels of procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP) and urinary N-telopeptide (uNTX) excretion after 4, 8 and 12 months of treatment were also measured.

RESULTS

In men, the percent LS BMD significantly increased by 11.3 ± 9.9 % (mean ± standard deviation (SD)) and the FN BMD increased by 0.4 ± 6.4 % without a significant difference at 12 months. In postmenopausal women, the percent LS BMD significantly increased by 9.6 ± 8.1 % and the FN BMD significantly increased by 2.4 ± 7.8 % at 12 months. The percent and absolute BMD increases in LS and FN between men and women were similar. The absolute increases in PINP were similar in both groups at 4, 8 and 12 months. However, the absolute increases in uNTX were significantly lower in men than in women at 8 and 12 months.

CONCLUSION

Daily teriparatide treatment was as effective in men as in postmenopausal women regardless of sex differences.

A systematic review on the use of daily subcutaneous administration of teriparatide for treatment of patients with osteoporosis at high risk for fracture in Asia

This systematic review aimed to examine the evidence for teriparatide in Asia for osteoporosis with a high fracture risk and for exploratory (unapproved) bone-related indications. MEDLINE (1946+), EMBASE (1966+), and ClinicalTrials.gov (2008+) were searched (16 August 2013); all studies of daily subcutaneous teriparatide 20 μg for bone-related conditions from China, Hong Kong, Japan, Republic of Korea, Philippines, Singapore, and Taiwan were included. Evidence on efficacy/safety was retrieved primarily from randomized controlled trials (10 publications) of postmenopausal women from Japan and China. In these studies, teriparatide was well tolerated; subjects had significantly greater increases in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) from baseline compared with placebo, antiresorptive agents, or elcatonin/calcitonin; bone turnover markers increased from baseline and were sustained at elevated levels during teriparatide treatment. Few studies reported fracture risk, pain, or quality of life; one study showed a lower incidence of new-onset vertebral fracture with teriparatide versus antiresorptive agents. Nonrandomized studies (nine publications, one unpublished trial) conducted mainly in Taiwan, Japan, and the Republic of Korea provided supporting data for efficacy. The exploratory (unapproved) use of teriparatide (17 publications) for fracture healing and osteonecrosis of the jaw was described primarily in case reports. The clinical effectiveness of teriparatide for treatment of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis who are at high risk of fracture in Asia is focused primarily on improvements in BMD and tolerability. Recommended additional studies may include assessment of fracture risk and the effect of teriparatide on pain, quality of life, and mortality in Asia.

PINP as a biological response marker during teriparatide treatment for osteoporosis

Postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis may require treatment with the bone anabolic drug teriparatide. While changes in bone mineral density (BMD) are one measure of response, BMD changes often require a minimum of one year to observe measureable changes. Biochemical markers of bone turnover change within 1 to 3 months of initiating osteoporosis therapy. Monitoring with a marker such as procollagen type I N propeptide (PINP), an osteoblast-derived protein, during teriparatide treatment may provide clinically useful information for managing patients with osteoporosis. Clinical trials have shown consistent increases in PINP within 3 months of initiating teriparatide, increases that are significantly greater than placebo and significantly different from baseline. Increases in PINP concentrations during teriparatide treatment correlate well with increases in skeletal activity assessed by radioisotope bone scans and quantitative bone histomorphometry parameters. Individuals treated with teriparatide in clinical trials usually experienced an increase in PINP > 10 mcg/L from baseline, while those given placebo usually did not. In the clinical setting, patients experiencing a significant increase in PINP > 10 mcg/L after initiating teriparatide therapy may receive an earlier confirmation of anabolic effect, while those who do not may be assessed for adherence, proper injection technique, or undetected secondary conditions that might mitigate an anabolic response. PINP monitoring may provide information supplemental to BMD monitoring and be a useful aid in managing patients receiving anabolic osteoporosis treatment in the same way that biochemical markers of bone resorption are useful in monitoring antiresorptive therapy. This review examines PINP as a biological response marker during teriparatide treatment for osteoporosis.

Determinants associated with bone mineral density increase in response to daily teriparatide treatment in patients with osteoporosis

INTRODUCTION

Several factors associated with bone mineral density (BMD) increase are reported with daily teriparatide treatment, but there has been no systematic analysis to summarize these associations. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical determinants associated with BMD increase to daily teriparatide treatment.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study. We performed an analysis of 306 patients diagnosed with osteoporosis. Teriparatide was administered at 20μg/day for 12months. The primary efficacy measure was a change in lumbar spine (LS) BMD from baseline at 12months. To determine the response variables of BMD changes, we investigated the clinical determinants using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

There was a 9.8±8.2% increase in LS BMD after 12months. Prior bisphosphonate treatment and baseline procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP) concentration were significantly associated with LS BMD absolute response by univariate analyses. In the multiple regression model, patients with higher baseline PINP concentration had a significantly greater LS BMD absolute increase. Prior bisphosphonate use lost its correlation in the multiple regression models.

CONCLUSION

Our results showed that baseline PINP concentration was a useful predictor of LS BMD absolute increase regardless of prior treatment.