Natural history, reasons for, and impact of low/non-adherence to medications for osteoporosis in a cohort of community-dwelling older women already established on medication: a 2-year follow-up study

The influence of patients' beliefs about medicines and the relationship with suboptimal medicine use in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review of quantitative studies

BACKGROUND

Medication use in older adults is increasing, therefore, reducing the risk of suboptimal medicine use is imperative in achieving optimal therapeutic outcomes. Research suggests that factors such as personal beliefs and beliefs about medicines may be associated with non-adherence and inappropriate medicine use.

AIM

To systematically review and identify quantitative research on the influence of beliefs about medicines and the relationship with suboptimal medicine use in older adults.

METHOD

Searches were conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO for quantitative studies (inception to March 2023).

INCLUSION CRITERIA

(1) exposure: participants' beliefs (personal, cultural, and medication-related), (2) outcomes: polypharmacy, potentially inappropriate medicines use, or non-adherence, and (3) participants: community-dwelling adults 65 years or above. Study selection, data extraction and quality appraisal (Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist) were completed independently by two investigators. Data were combined in a narrative synthesis and presented in a summary of findings table.

RESULTS

Nineteen articles were included: 15 cross-sectional and four cohort studies. Outcomes of included papers were as follows; adherence (n = 18) and potentially inappropriate medicine use (n = 1). Ten studies found stronger beliefs in the necessity of medicines and/or fewer concerns led to better adherence, with one paper contradicting these findings. Three studies did not find associations between adherence and beliefs. One study confirmed an association between unnecessary drug use and a lack of belief in a "powerful other" (e.g. doctor).

CONCLUSION

Further investigation is necessary to (1) ascertain the importance of necessity or concern beliefs in fostering adherence and, (2) examine the influence of beliefs on polypharmacy and inappropriate medicine use.

Impact of an Outpatient Fracture Liaison Service on Osteoporosis Evaluation Among Patients With Upper Extremity Fragility Fracture

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of implementation of an outpatient fracture liaison service (FLS) on completion rates of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and screening labs including 25-OH vitamin D and parathyroid hormone (PTH) in patients with upper extremity (UE) fragility fractures.

METHODS

At our institution, 367 patients were treated in 2014-2015 for UE fragility fractures of the distal radius and proximal humerus before implementation of our outpatient FLS and 395 patients in 2017-2018 after implementation. Retrospective chart review was conducted to identify completed DXA scans within 2 years of fracture treatment and completed 25-OH vitamin D and PTH labs within 1 year of fracture treatment.

RESULTS

There were no statistical differences in the demographics of patients treated for distal radial and proximal humeral fragility fractures during the 2014-2015 and 2017-2018 time periods. Implementation of the FLS resulted in a 9.9% increase (P value = .021) in completed DXA scans within 2 years of fracture treatment. Completed 25-OH vitamin D and PTH labs saw a significant increase of 17.1% and 23.8%, respectively (P values < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of an outpatient FLS can help to improve osteoporosis evaluation with completed DXA scans and 25-OH vitamin D and PTH labs.

Improving uptake of Fracture Prevention drug treatments: a protocol for Development of a consultation intervention (iFraP-D)

INTRODUCTION

Prevention of fragility fractures, a source of significant economic and personal burden, is hindered by poor uptake of fracture prevention medicines. Enhancing communication of scientific evidence and elicitation of patient medication-related beliefs has the potential to increase patient commitment to treatment. The Improving uptake of Fracture Prevention drug treatments (iFraP) programme aims to develop and evaluate a theoretically informed, complex intervention consisting of a computerised web-based decision support tool, training package and information resources, to facilitate informed decision-making about fracture prevention treatment, with a long-term aim of improving informed treatment adherence. This protocol focuses on the iFraP Development (iFraP-D) work.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The approach to iFraP-D is informed by the Medical Research Council complex intervention development and evaluation framework and the three-step implementation of change model. The context for the study is UK fracture liaison services (FLS), which enact secondary fracture prevention. An evidence synthesis of clinical guidelines and Delphi exercise will be conducted to identify content for the intervention. Focus groups with patients, FLS clinicians and general practitioners and a usual care survey will facilitate understanding of current practice, and investigate barriers and facilitators to change. Design of the iFraP intervention will be informed by decision aid development standards and theories of implementation, behaviour change, acceptability and medicines adherence. The principles of co-design will underpin all elements of the study through a dedicated iFraP community of practice including key stakeholders and patient advisory groups. In-practice testing of the prototype intervention will inform revisions ready for further testing in a subsequent pilot and feasibility randomised trial.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval was obtained from North West-Greater Manchester West Research Ethics Committee (19/NW/0559). Dissemination and knowledge mobilisation will be facilitated through national bodies and networks, publications and presentations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

researchregistry5041.

Mind the gap: Incidence of osteoporosis treatment after an osteoporotic fracture - results of the Austrian branch of the International Costs and Utilities Related to Osteoporotic Fractures Study (ICUROS)

INTRODUCTION

Despite availability of effective treatment options proven to prevent osteoporotic fractures, a huge gap in osteoporosis treatment exists. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the treatment rate after a major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) in Austria, one of the 25 wealthiest countries worldwide.

METHODS

This analysis is based on the data of the International Costs and Utilities Related to Osteoporotic Fractures Study (ICUROS), a prospective observational study assessing data from patients who suffered a MOF. We stratified these patients by treatment status at time of fracture and compared treatment use following MOF by sex as well as by fracture sites at the time of the index fracture, and 4, 12, and 18 months thereafter. Descriptive statistics, t-tests for continuous variables and chi-squared tests for nominal variables, were performed to compare treatment groups.

RESULTS

A total of 915 patients (78 % female) were recruited at 8 different trauma centers throughout Austria. At the time of fracture, 731 patients (80 %) did not receive osteoporosis treatment. In this group, follow-up analysis after 4, 12 and 18 months revealed a treatment rate of 18 %, 16 %, 15 % in women, and 8 %, 12 %, 10 % in men, respectively. In those who received osteoporosis medication at the time of fracture the treatment rate was 65 %, 54 % and 60 % in women, and comparable results in men.

CONCLUSIONS

Only 1 in 10 men, and less than 2 in 10 women of those who did not receive osteoporosis treatment at the time of fracture were prescribed an adequate osteoporosis treatment. Thus, the vast majority of patients who sustained an osteoporotic fracture and thus were at imminent risk of receiving subsequent fractures did not receive an adequate treatment. There is a clear need for the implementation of coordinated, multi-disciplinary models of care for secondary fracture prevention.

The challenge of long-term adherence: The role of bone turnover markers in monitoring bisphosphonate treatment of osteoporosis

Oral Bisphosphonates (BPs) are the mainstay of osteoporotic treatment, however long-term adherence remains a challenge, primarily owing to the chronic character of the disease and the regimen complexity. Poor compliance has been shown to have a clear link to fracture risk. The role of bone turnover markers (BTMs) as a tool to ascertain adherence and response to therapy is supported by their rapid response to treatment; a decrease in values is witnessed within days or weeks of commencing treatment. A greater reduction of serum CTX and NTX is evidenced with alendronate and ibandronate compared to risedronate. A change in bone formation BTMs appears to be related to vertebral fracture risk reduction, whereas no significant relationship is evident for hip and non-vertebral fractures. The utility of BTMs as an adjunct for monitoring withdrawal of treatment with oral BP has also been suggested. Finally, studies evaluating BTMs as an intervention, failed to demonstrate any effect on adherence. This review explores the challenge of long-term adherence with bisphosphonates and provides an analytic framework with respect to the role of BTMs in monitoring bisphosphonate treatment, adherence and the offset of treatment effect.

Understanding Patients' Perspectives and Educational Needs by Type of Osteoporosis in Men and Women and People with Glucocorticosteroid-Induced Osteoporosis: A Qualitative Study to Improve Disease Management

The aim of the study was to investigate similarities and differences in health beliefs, experiences and educational needs by type of osteoporosis (OP), particularly in people with glucocorticoid-induced OP (GIOP) and men. A qualitative study was conducted via focus groups involving post-menopausal women with or without osteoporotic fractures, osteoporotic men and people with GIOP. Fifty-three participants were included in eight groups. A wide range of health beliefs was found for all types of OP. Osteoporosis was considered a natural consequence of ageing except in men or conversely a serious disease associated with risk of new fractures and disability. GIOP patients had heterogeneous knowledge of OP and reported fewer prevention behaviours, and their quality of life was affected by the causal illness. Men had difficulties coping with the loss of their functional abilities and felt that OP was a "women's" disease. Beliefs about treatments ranged from confidence to fear of adverse effects or doubt about efficacy in all types of OP. Participants were interested in physical activity, fall prevention and diet, and preferred group sessions. GIOP patients and men had an interest in face-to-face education. Men were also interested in brief information including via the Internet. Patients' beliefs about OP differed by type of OP. Specific populations such as men or people with GIOP need particular care owing to experiences and needs. Offering group sessions in educational interventions is of interest to allow for sharing experiences and also face-to-face education for men and GIOP patients or the Internet for men.

Bone metabolism genes variation and response to bisphosphonate treatment in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis

Introduction

Long-term treatment is used in patients with osteoporosis, and bisphosphonates (BPs) are the most commonly prescribed medications. However, in some patients this therapy is not effective, cause different side effects and complications. Unfortunately, at least one year is needed to identify and confirm an ineffectiveness of BPs therapy on bone mineral density (BMD). Among other factors, a response to BPs therapy may also be explained by genetic factors. The aim of this study was to analyze the influence of SOST, PTH, FGF2, FDPS, GGPS1, and LRP5 gene variants on the response to treatment with aminobisphosphonates.

Materials and methods

Women with postmenopausal osteoporosis were included to this study if they used aminobisphosphonates for at least 12 months. Exclusion criteria were: persistence on BPs therapy less than 80%, bone metabolic diseases, diseases deemed to affect bone metabolism, malignant tumours, using of any medications influencing BMD. The study protocol was approved by the local ethics committee. The BMD at the lumbar spine and femoral neck were measured using dual x-ray absorptiometry (GE Lunar) before and at least 12 months after treatment with BPs. According to BMD change, patients were divided in two groups–responders and non-responders to BPs terapy. Polymorphic variants in SOST, PTH, FGF2, FDPS, GGPS1, and LRP5 genes were determined using PCR analysis with TaqMan probes (Thermo Scientific).

Results

In total, 201 women with BPs therapy were included in the study. No statistically significant differences were observed in age, age at menopause, weight, height, BMI and baseline BMD levels between responders (122 subjects) and non-responders (79 subjects).

As single markers, the SOST rs1234612 T/T (OR = 2.3; P = 0.02), PTH rs7125774 T/T (OR = 2.8, P = 0.0009), FDPS rs2297480 G/G (OR = 29.3, P = 2.2×10⁻⁷), and GGPS1 rs10925503 C/C+C/T (OR = 2.9; P = 0.003) gene variants were over-represented in non-responders group. No significant association between FGF2 rs6854081 and LRP5 rs3736228 gene variants and response to BPs treatment was observed. The carriers of T-T-G-C allelic combination (constructed from rs1234612, rs7125774, rs2297480, and rs10925503) were predisposed to negative response to BPs treatment (OR = 4.9, 95% CI 1.7–14.6, P = 0.005). The C-C-T-C combination was significantly over-represented in responders (OR = 0.1, 95% CI 0.1–0.5, P = 0.006).

Conclusions

Our findings highlight the importance of identified single gene variants and their allelic combinations for pharmacogenetics of BPs therapy of osteoporosis. Complex screening of these genetic markers could be used as a new strategy for personalized antiresorptive therapy.

A systematic review of factors affecting medication adherence among patients with osteoporosis

The aim of this review was to identify factors that influence patients' adherence to anti-osteoporotic therapy. Factors identified that were associated with poorer medication adherence included polypharmacy, older age, and misconceptions about osteoporosis. Physicians need to be aware of these factors so as to optimize therapeutic outcomes for patients.

INTRODUCTION

To identify factors that influence patients' adherence to anti-osteoporotic therapy.

METHODS

A systematic review of literature was performed for articles published up till January 2018 using PubMed®, PsychINFO®, Embase®, and CINAHL®. Peer-reviewed articles which examined factors associated with anti-osteoporotic medication adherence were included. Classes of anti-osteoporotic therapy included bisphosphonates, parathyroid hormone-related analogue, denosumab, selective estrogen receptor modulators, estrogen/progestin therapy, calcitonin, and strontium ranelate. Meta-analyses, case reports/series, and other systematic reviews were excluded. Identified factors were classified using the World Health Organization's five dimensions of medication adherence (condition, patient, therapy, health-system, and socio-economic domains).

RESULTS

Of 2404 articles reviewed, 124 relevant articles were identified. The prevalence of medication adherence ranged from 12.9 to 95.4%. Twenty-four factors with 139 sub-factors were identified. Bisphosphonates were the most well-studied class of medication (n = 59, 48%). Condition-related factors that were associated with poorer medication adherence included polypharmacy, and history of falls was associated with higher medication adherence. Patient-related factors which were associated with poorer medication adherence included older age and misconceptions about osteoporosis while therapy-related factors included higher dosing frequency and medication side effects. Health system-based factors associated with poorer medication adherence included care under different medical specialties and lack of patient education. Socio-economic-related factors associated with poorer medication adherence included current smoker and lack of medical insurance coverage.

CONCLUSION

This review identified factors associated with poor medication adherence among osteoporotic patients. To optimize therapeutic outcomes for patients, clinicians need to be aware of the complexity of factors affecting medication adherence.

School-based exercise interventions effectively increase bone mineralization in children and adolescents

Osteoporosis and fragility fractures have become major global public health concerns, and they can be prevented by maximizing peak bone mass during childhood and adolescence with weight-bearing physical activity, which can result in stronger and healthier bones that significantly decrease the risk of osteoporosis and fragility fractures in adulthood and the elderly years. From a public health perspective, implementing weight-bearing physical activity for children and adolescents is best achieved with school-based exercise interventions, and a review of school-based exercise interventions was conducted to determine their effectiveness in increasing bone mineral density (BMD) and/or bone mineral content (BMC). Seventeen studies were reviewed, all school-based exercise interventions utilized jumping exercises, and 15 of the 17 studies found at least one significant increase in measures of BMD and/or BMC for the total body, and/or at the hip, vertebrae, and/or wrist. One study that found no significant differences did report significant increases in bone structural strength, and the other study with no significant differences had exercises that measured and reported the lowest ground reaction forces (GRFs) of only 2–3 times body weight (BW), whereas the other studies that showed significant increase(s) in BMD and/or BMC had exercise with measured and reported GRFs ranging from 3.5 × to 8.8 × BW. School-based exercise interventions are time- and cost-efficient and effective in increasing BMD and/or BMC in children and adolescents, but must incorporate high-intensity exercise, such as high-impact jumping of sufficient GRFs, in order to significantly increase bone mineralization for osteoporosis and fragility fracture prevention later in life.

Safety and efficacy of denosumab in osteoporotic patients previously treated with other medications: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody that received approval by the FDA for the treatment of osteoporosis in 2010. Available higher level research evidence concerns the treatment of patients that have not received any anti-osteoporotic medication in the past. Further investigation is warranted, since clinicians often face the challenge of administering the most efficacious drug in patients, pretreated with other medications.

AREAS COVERED

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of denosumab compared to other active anti-osteoporotic agents in patients formerly receiving other treatments. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) and clinicaltrials.gov up to April 2017 to identify eligible trials in patients with primary osteoporosis.

EXPERT OPINION

Our meta-analysis included 6 Randomised Controlled Trials encompassing 2968 patients formerly treated with anti-osteoporotic medications. Quantitative data synthesis demonstrated superiority of denosumab in augmenting Bone Mineral Density in all skeletal sites studied compared to controls [treatment difference in total hip: 1.59% (95% CI 1.01, 2.17)], whereas the overall incidence of serious adverse events was not increased (OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.47, p = 0.42). Future research geared towards the fracture incidence, quality of life and patient reported outcomes is warranted.

Low prevalence of osteoporosis treatment in patients with recurrent major osteoporotic fracture

The majority of patients do not receive anti-osteoporotic treatment following a major osteoporotic fracture, despite the guidelines and the availability of effective anti-osteoporotic treatments. The fight against factors limiting the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis should become a priority to improve secondary prevention after an initial osteoporotic fracture.

PURPOSE

Despite the availability of effective anti-osteoporotic treatments, osteoporosis management is currently insufficient. The main objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of anti-osteoporotic treatments introduced after an initial prior major osteoporotic fracture during hospitalization for recurring fractures.

METHODS

We conducted an observational, cross-sectional, bicentric study that included all patients aged over 50 years who were hospitalized or seen in consultation for major osteoporotic fracture.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-eight out of two hundred four (62.7%) patients had a past history of major osteoporotic fracture and therefore had an indication of treatment based on guidelines. Among these patients, only 43/128 (33.5%) had received anti-osteoporotic treatment as secondary prevention after the initial fracture. The main causes of non-prescription identified were the attending physicians' ignorance of the indication of treatment (n = 30; 35.3%), ignorance of the fracture (n = 17; 20%), and comorbidities (n = 12; 14.1%). The failure to introduce treatment was associated with the presence of comorbidities with a Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥6 (OR = 0.34 [0.16-0.73], p < 0.05), dementia (OR = 0.23 [0.08-0.72], p < 0.05), and past history of proximal femur fracture (OR = 0.20 [0.04-0.91], p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Two thirds of patients with a past history of major osteoporotic fracture presenting with a new fracture were not treated. The main reason for lack of treatment seems to stem from the incorrect assessment of the patient's fracture risk. Although major osteoporotic fracture leads to an increased risk of mortality and requires treatment, the significance of patient comorbidities was an independent risk factor leading to non-treatment.