Bilateral distal fibula fractures in a woman on long-term bisphosphonate therapy

Fibula flap reconstruction for maxillary stage 3 medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw from recipient and donor site perspectives: a preliminary single-center study

BACKGROUND

While the surgical treatment of mandibular stage 3 medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is well-documented, research on maxillary stage 3 MRONJ is limited. Antiresorptive medications can induce MRONJ and atypical femoral fracture (AFF), but their impact on the feasibility of using fibula flaps for reconstruction remains controversial. This study aimed to assess the surgical outcomes and functional recovery of fibula flap reconstruction for maxillary stage 3 MRONJ, considering both recipient and donor site outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with maxillary stage 3 MRONJ who underwent fibula flap reconstruction. Demographic and clinical features, postoperative complications, long-term outcomes and functional recovery of both recipient and donor sites were analyzed. Long-term outcomes included the survival of fibula flaps, the incidence of fibula graft or tibia fractures, recurrence of MRONJ, and patient survival status. Function assessments focused on speech, swallowing, and ankle joint.

RESULTS

Seven patients (two with multiple myeloma, five with bone metastases) were included. Two patients experienced delayed healing at the donor site, both of whom recovered within two months postoperatively. All fibula flaps survived with primary healing. There were no recurrences of MRONJ or fractures of fibula graft or tibia. The mean speech function score was 28.00 ± 12.03, the mean swallowing function score was 2.86 ± 2.79, the mean pain score of donor site was 2.71 ± 2.29, and the mean ankle function score was 94.43 ± 4.35.

CONCLUSION

Fibula flap reconstruction is feasible for maxillary stage 3 MRONJ, yielding satisfactory surgical outcomes and functional recovery.

Atypical fractures at non-classical sites associated with anti-resorptive therapy: a systematic review

Osteoporosis is common, affecting more than 20% of women and 6% of men globally over the age of 50. Anti-resorptive drugs, bisphosphonates and denosumab, have been effective treatments for osteoporosis for more than 30 years. Rare complications of anti-resorptive therapy include medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw and atypical femur fractures (AFF). The American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) proposed a case definition for these atypical femoral fractures in 2010, which was updated in 2013. However, atypical fractures at non-classical sites have been increasingly described. We aimed to systematically identify atypical fracture cases excluded from the ASBMR AFF case definition in patients receiving anti-resorptive medication for longer than 3 yr. A structured search of electronic databases, including PubMed, Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Cochrane, and Web of Sciences, and hand-searching of conference abstracts were undertaken. All full-text articles written in English describing an atypical fracture in patients (aged >18 yr) and receiving anti-resorptive medication for >3 yr were included, with data extracted and analyzed by two independent reviewers. Sixty-six articles were identified, describing 151 cases of atypical fractures in 114 individuals. The most frequent fracture site was the ulna, followed by the tibia. All patients were taking anti-resorptive treatment prior to or at the time of fracture, most frequently alendronate monotherapy (44%). Most commonly, fractures were transverse in nature (95%), following minimal or no trauma (96%), and non-comminuted (98%) with cortical thickening of the surrounding bone (69%). Anti-resorptive treatment was ceased following an atypical fracture in the majority (89%). Atypical fractures are rare and should not deter physicians from appropriate anti-resorptive therapy for osteoporosis. However, clinicians should be alert to their presence at additional sites to the femur. An update of the current ASBMR AFF case definition to include other skeletal sites could be timely.

MANAGEMENT OF ENDOCRINE DISEASE: Atypical femoral fractures: risks and benefits of long-term treatment of osteoporosis with anti-resorptive therapy

Modern osteoporosis treatment began in the mid-1990s with the approval of amino-bisphosphonates, anti-resorptive agents that have been shown to decrease osteoporotic fracture risk by about half. In 2005, the first cases of atypical femoral fractures (AFF), occurring in the shaft of the femur, were reported. Since then, more cases have been found, leading to great concern among patients and a dramatic decrease in bisphosphonate prescribing. The pathogenesis and incidence of AFF are reviewed herein. Management and an approach to prevention or early detection of AFF are also provided. Denosumab, a more recently approved anti-resorptive medication has also been associated with AFF. Long-term management of osteoporosis and prevention of fracture are challenging in light of this serious but uncommon side effect, yet with an aging population osteoporotic fracture is destined to increase in frequency.