Correction to: Age-related normative values of trabecular bone score (TBS) for Japanese women: the Japanese Population-based Osteoporosis (JPOS) study

Chemical Shift-Encoded MRI of the Lumbar Vertebral Bone Marrow for Detecting Osteoporosis With Low Trabecular Bone Quality in Patients With Breast Cancer Receiving Aromatase Inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis with low trabecular bone quality (OLB) in patients with breast cancer receiving aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy is associated with an increased risk of vertebral fractures. The capability of chemical shift-encoded MRI (CSE-MRI) in detecting OLB needs to be investigated.

PURPOSE

To assess the diagnostic performance of proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and R2* measurements from CSE-MRI for detecting OLB in postmenopausal women with breast cancer undergoing AI therapy.

STUDY TYPE

Prospective.

POPULATION

126 postmenopausal females (mean age: 69.5 ± 8.8 years) receiving AIs (average period: 41.6 ± 26.5 months) after breast cancer surgery.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

1.5-T, three-dimensional CSE-MRI (six echoes), T1-weighted Dixon, short tau inversion recovery, and diffusion-weighted images.

ASSESSMENT

Both CSE-MRI and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry were performed on the same day. Measurements included averaged PDFF, R2*, bone mineral density (BMD), and trabecular bone score (TBS) from L1 to L4 vertebrae. A T-score ≤ -2.5 from BMD measurements indicated osteoporosis, whereas T-scores of ≤ - 2.5 plus TBS ≤-3.7 indicated OLB. The diagnostic performance of PDFF, R2*, and the combination of PDFF and R2* for identifying osteoporosis or OLB was assessed.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Student's t-test; Mann-Whitney U test; χ2 or Fisher exact tests; Pearson correlation; multivariate analysis; Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis with the area under the curve (AUC); logistic regression model; intraclass correlation coefficient. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

For detecting osteoporosis, AUC values were 0.59 (PDFF), 0.66 (R2*), and 0.65 (combined PDFF and R2*). Significant mean differences were noted between patients with and without OLB for PDFF (66.11 ± 5.36 vs. 57.49 ± 6.43) and R2* (46.62 ± 9.24 vs. 63.36 ± 12.44). AUC values for detecting OLB were 0.75 (PDFF), 0.82 (R2*), and 0.84 (combined PDFF and R2*).

DATA CONCLUSION

R2* may perform better than PDFF for identifying OLB in patients with breast cancer receiving AIs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 4.

Clinical Use of Trabecular Bone Score: The 2023 ISCD Official Positions

Osteoporosis can currently be diagnosed by applying the WHO classification to bone mineral density (BMD) assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). However, skeletal factors other than BMD contribute to bone strength and fracture risk. Lumbar spine TBS, a grey-level texture measure which is derived from DXA images has been extensively studied, enhances fracture prediction independent of BMD and can be used to adjust fracture probability from FRAX® to improve risk stratification. The purpose of this International Society for Clinical Densitometry task force was to review the existing evidence and develop recommendations to assist clinicians regarding when and how to perform, report and utilize TBS. Our review concluded that TBS is most likely to alter clinical management in patients aged ≥ 40 years who are close to the pharmacologic intervention threshold by FRAX. The TBS value from L1-L4 vertebral levels, without vertebral exclusions, should be used to calculate adjusted FRAX probabilities. L1-L4 vertebral levels can be used in the presence of degenerative changes and lumbar compression fractures. It is recommended not to report TBS if extreme structural or pathological artifacts are present. Monitoring and reporting TBS change is unlikely to be helpful with the current version of the TBS algorithm. The next version of TBS software will include an adjustment based upon directly measured tissue thickness. This is expected to improve performance and address some of the technical factors that affect the current algorithm which may require modifications to these Official Positions as experience is acquired with this new algorithm.

Race/ethnic difference in trabecular bone score in midlife women: The Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN)

There was no difference in Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) comparing White and Black women after adjusting for body mass index (BMI) and diabetes status. Japanese women had lower TBS than White women. Our results diverge from established differences in fracture rates by race/ethnicity.

INTRODUCTION

The TBS was developed as an indirect measure of vertebral bone microarchitecture derived from texture analysis of lumbar spine DXA scans. There is little information on race/ethnic differences in TBS.

METHODS

We compared TBS in 656 White, 492 Black, and 268 Japanese pre- and early perimenopausal women. We used a beta version of TBS that accounts for tissue thickness using DXA measured soft tissue thickness rather than BMI. The relation between BMI and tissue thickness corrected TBS differed by BMI; we used a three-segment linear spline to adjust for BMI.

RESULTS

The women were, on average, 46.5 years of age; 50% were premenopausal. In BMI and diabetes adjusted models, there was no difference in TBS between White and Black women. TBS was modestly (2%) lower in the Japanese women compared to White women, p = 0.04. In a sensitivity analysis, restricting the analysis to those with BMI 24-31 kg/m², results were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

TBS was similar in Black and White women after accounting for tissue thickness and adjusting for BMI, diabetes, and other covariates. The Japanese women had modestly lower TBS. These results diverge from established race/ethnic differences in fracture rates and areal bone mineral density, underscoring the need for further studies.