Adherence to dosing schedule of denosumab therapy for osteoporosis during COVID-19 lockdown: an electronic medical record and pharmacy claims database study from Asia

The evaluation of an osteoporosis medication management service in community pharmacy, a cohort study

Background: Effective treatment of osteoporosis is hindered by poor adherence and lack of persistence with medical therapy. Interventions can be designed to elicit and address patients' concerns about side effects and promote self-management. Objective(s): The aim was to develop and evaluate the impact of a community pharmacy-based medication management intervention on patients' adherence to osteoporosis medicines using both objective and subjective measures of adherence. Secondary aims were to report the proportion of patients that had been referred to their General Practitioner (GP) for assistance with osteoporosis management, and to measure patients' experiences with the service. Methods: This study used a cohort design. Community pharmacy dispensing data were obtained as an objective measure of adherence. Self-reported beliefs about medicines (Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire) and self-reported adherence (Medication Adherence Reporting Scale 5) were also collected. Data were collected and compared between baseline, 4 weeks after intervention, and endpoint (approximately a year after intervention). Analysis of correlations between measures was also conducted. GP referral percentage and perceived service quality scale (pSQS-SF6) was obtained. Results: Pharmacists and support staff from 26 Australian community pharmacies were recruited and trained to implement the service, and 107 patients were recruited. Of these, 71 were available for follow-up interviews by research team at 4 weeks, and 54 at the endpoint. No changes were found in pre-post analysis for the objective or self-reported measures of adherence. Patients' concerns about osteoporosis medicines were lower at 4 weeks and at the study endpoint compared to baseline. Uptake of pharmacists' referrals to patients' GPs was 48.1% by 4 weeks. Patient experience was rated highly (median pSQS-SF6 = 6.5/7). Conclusions: This study demonstrates the potential of community pharmacy interventions designed to optimize medication adherence by eliciting patients' thoughts and feelings about using osteoporosis medicines and addressing them using motivational interview techniques.

On-time denosumab dosing recovered rapidly during the COVID-19 pandemic, yet remains suboptimal

Timely administration of denosumab every 6 mo is critical in osteoporosis treatment to avoid multiple vertebral fracture risk upon denosumab discontinuation or delay. This study aimed to estimate the immediate and prolonged impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the timing of denosumab doses. We identified older adults (≥66 yr) residing in the community who were due to receive denosumab between January 2016 and December 2020 using Ontario Drug Benefit data. We completed an interrupted time-series analysis to estimate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020) on the monthly proportion of on-time denosumab doses (183 +/-30 d). Analyses were stratified by user type: patients due for their second dose (novice users), third or fourth dose (intermediate users), or ≥5th dose (established users). In additional analyses, we considered patients living in nursing homes, switching to other osteoporosis drugs, and reported trends until February 2022. We studied 148 554 patients (90.9% female, mean [SD] age 79.6 [8.0] yr) receiving 648 221 denosumab doses. The average pre-pandemic proportion of on-time therapy was steady in the community, yet differed by user type: 64.9% novice users, 72.3% intermediate users, and 78.0% established users. We identified an immediate overall decline in the proportion of on-time doses across all user types at the start of the pandemic: -17.8% (95% CI, -19.6, -16.0). In nursing homes, the pre-pandemic proportion of on-time therapy was similar across user types (average 83.5%), with a small decline at the start of the pandemic: -3.2% (95% CI, -5.0, -1.2). On-time therapy returned to pre-pandemic levels by October 2020 and was not impacted by therapy switching. Although on-time dosing remains stable as of February 2022, approximately one-fourth of patients in the community do not receive denosumab on-time. In conclusion, although pandemic disruptions to denosumab dosing were temporary, levels of on-time therapy remain suboptimal.

The interruption of romosozumab treatment during COVID lockdown among US post-menopausal women enrolled in Medicare

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of the COVID lock-down on treatment interruptions of romosozumab, a first in class biologic therapy, administered by healthcare providers once monthly.

METHODS

We used Medicare data from 1/1/2017 to 9/30/2021 to identify women age ≥65 initiating romosozumab between 4/1/2019 and 6/30/2021. Patient demographics, provider specialty, and baseline comorbidities were identified. Romosozumab dispensations were grouped into five 6-month periods based on the dispensing date from FDA licensure to the end of the data (Period 1 to 5). "Treatment interruption" was defined as any interval gap between 2 dispensations >60 days. The numbers of treatment interruption event were aggregated per period per patient. Mixed effect Poisson regression with patient-level random effects was performed, including an interaction term between Period and number of prior doses.

RESULTS

There were 12,216 romosozumab new users identified. A total of 2724 treatment interruption events were identified among 2229 romosozumab users. After adjustment, comparing with the period immediately before the lockdown (Period 2: 2019-10-1-2020-3-30), the IRRs (95 % CI) for treatment interruption were 0.49 (0.29, 0.81), 1.65 (1.48, 1.85), 1.79 (1.60, 2.01), and 1.67 (1.49, 1.87) for periods 1, 3, 4, and 5, respectively, per 1 prior dose change (p < 0.01 for all IRRs), where Periods 3, 4, and 5 were post-lockdown.

CONCLUSION

Compared to the pre-COVID period, the lockdown negatively impacted the continuity of romosozumab treatment among Medicare beneficiaries. Prioritizing in-time assistance for patients receiving a provider-administered parenteral therapy is critical when patients' in-person access to their provider is compromised.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Adherence to Denosumab Therapy: A Single Center Study

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective comparative study of denosumab therapy adherence before and during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on denosumab therapy adherence in Japan.

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE

Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody for osteoporosis treatment. Delayed denosumab injections are associated with reduced treatment responses, which was a concern during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

Participants included 376 patients who received denosumab (60 mg every 6 months) from January 2013 to June 2021. The time from therapy initiation to discontinuation was used to measure persistence, and that between initial and subsequent injections was used to determine adherence. The pandemic period was from March 2020 to December 2021.

RESULTS

Patients were divided into those treated after March 2020 (pandemic group, n=244) and those who discontinued treatment before March 2020 (non-pandemic group, n=132). Non-persistent cases accounted for 154, including 24 (20%), 64 (19%), and 66 (53%) aged ≤59 years, 60-79 years, and ≥80 years, respectively. The overall persistence rate at 78 months was 59.2%. Postponed cases were significantly lower in the non-pandemic group than in the pandemic group (8% vs. 15%, p =0.042). Postponement with a delay of 1-2 months did not significantly differ between the two groups, but with a significant difference for a delay of ≥3 months (0% vs. 36%, p =0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

Denosumab adherence remained constant but postponed cases significantly increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. Better communication by health providers on denosumab adherence and alternative administration may reduce dosing interruptions in similar pandemic situations.

Drug adherence and treatment duration for denosumab and mortality risk among hip fracture patients

This study aimed to assess the impact of drug adherence and treatment duration for denosumab on mortality risk after hip fracture surgery. Lower all-cause mortality risk was associated with drug intervals of 7 months or less and longer treatment duration. The study highlights the importance of proper denosumab administration.

PURPOSE

Prescription of anti-osteoporotic medications (AOMs) after osteoporotic hip fracture may increase bone mineral density (BMD) and decrease mortality risk. However, few studies have been conducted on drug adherence and treatment duration for denosumab, a popular choice among AOMs. This study aimed to assess the impact of denosumab adherence and treatment duration on the mortality risk of hip fracture patients after surgery.

METHODS

We conducted a cohort study using nationwide population data from National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) in Taiwan. Patients newly diagnosed with osteoporosis and hip fracture between 2008 and 2019 who used denosumab after surgery were included. We assessed drug adherence, treatment duration, and other parameters associated with patient outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 21,316 patients diagnosed with osteoporotic hip fractures were included. Compared with a > 7-month drug interval for denosumab, an interval of ≤ 7 months led to lower all-cause mortality risk (hazard ratio (HR): 0.60, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.57 ~ 0.64). Patients with denosumab treatment for over 1, 2, and 3 years had lower all-cause mortality risk (HR&CI: 0.68 (0.64 ~ 0.73), 0.48 (0.43 ~ 0.53), 0.29 (0.26 ~ 0.33)) than those with treatment duration < 1 year. Analysis after excluding short-term death yielded similar results. Analysis of causes of death also showed that good adherence and longer duration were associated with reduced mortality due to cancer and cardiovascular disease.

CONCLUSION

Better drug adherence and longer duration of denosumab treatment are associated with lower all-cause mortality risk among hip fracture patients after surgery. Our study highlights the benefits of a proper time interval of denosumab administration. These findings provide important insight into management of osteoporotic hip fractures and may inform clinical practice and development of guidelines.

How the COVID-19 pandemic affected bone health: a retrospective, longitudinal study on denosumab persistence from the epicentre of European spreading

In this study, we investigated how the COVID-19 pandemic involved osteoporosis care in patients treated with denosumab. Almost a third of patients missed the prescription renewal, mandatory to obtain the subsidized drug. Among patients who suspended denosumab, more than half reported fragility fractures.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate persistence on denosumab (Dmab) treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic and the clinical effects of possible discontinuation.

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed patients affected by osteoporosis and treated with Dmab, scheduled to have the yearly renewal of prescription between March 9, 2020, and May 9, 2021, 2 months after the second pandemic wave. In June 2022, a telephone survey started, by calling all patients who missed the yearly renewal of Dmab. Predictors of missed renewal and fragility fracture occurrence were assessed by logistic analyses.

RESULTS

Patients scheduled to have a renewal of Dmab prescription during the observational period were 538 (age 75.5 ± 9.3 years, female 511). A total of 152 (28.2%) patients did not have the renewal. Patients not renewing Dmab prescription were significantly older (p = 0.01) and more frequently affected by pulmonary (p = 0.04) and cardiovascular comorbidity (p = 0.01). Telephone survey on non-persistent patients showed that 44 had died, 28 patients were missing, 23 shifted to bisphosphonate treatment, and 22 patients suspended Dmab. Following discontinuation, 12/22 patients (54.5%) reported fragility fractures; 5/22 had multiple fractures, for a total number of 18 fractures, mainly vertebral. Logistic analyses showed that the odds of Dmab withdrawal increased in older patients with pulmonary comorbidity and treated for a shorter time. Dmab discontinuation was the only variable that increased the risk of fracture.

CONCLUSION

This study provided real-world data about an impaired persistence of Dmab treatment resulting in an increased number of fragility fractures in a geographic area heavily affected by the outbreak of COVID-19.

Persistence with Denosumab in Male Osteoporosis Patients: A Real-World, Non-Interventional Multicenter Study

BACKGRUOUND

Persistence with denosumab in male patients has not been adequately investigated, although poor denosumab persistence is associated with a significant risk of rebound vertebral fractures.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 294 Korean male osteoporosis patients treated with denosumab at three medical centers and examined their persistence with four doses of denosumab injection over 24 months of treatment. Persistence was defined as the extent to which a patient adhered to denosumab treatment in terms of the prescribed interval and dose, with a permissible gap of 8 weeks. For patients who missed their scheduled treatment appointment(s) during the follow-up period (i.e., no-shows), Cox proportional regression analysis was conducted to explore the factors associated with poor adherence. Several factors were considered, such as age, prior anti-osteoporotic drug use, the treatment provider's medical specialty, the proximity to the medical center, and financial burdens of treatment.

RESULTS

Out of 294 male patients, 77 (26.2%) completed all four sequential rounds of the denosumab treatment. Out of 217 patients who did not complete the denosumab treatment, 138 (63.6%) missed the scheduled treatment(s). Missing treatment was significantly associated with age (odds ratio [OR], 1.03), prior bisphosphonate use (OR, 0.76), and prescription by non-endocrinologists (OR, 2.24). Denosumab was stopped in 44 (20.3%) patients due to medical errors, in 24 (11.1%) patients due to a T-score improvement over -2.5, and in five (2.3%) patients due to expected dental procedures.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that only one-fourth of Korean male osteoporosis patients were fully adherent to 24 months of denosumab treatment.

COVID-19 lockdown negatively impacted on adherence to denosumab therapy: incidence of non-traumatic fractures and role of telemedicine

PURPOSE

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) lockdowns have impacted on management of osteoporosis and the use of telemedicine is increasingly widespread albeit supported by little evidence so far. The aim of the study is to assess adherence to denosumab and incidence of non-traumatic fractures during the lockdown compared to the pre-COVID-19 year and to explore the effectiveness of telemedicine in the management of osteoporotic patients.

METHODS

Retrospective, longitudinal, single-center study on patients receiving subcutaneous denosumab therapy every 6 months. Each patient was scheduled to undergo 2 visits: one during the pre-COVID-19 period (March 2019-March 2020) and another visit during the lockdown period (March 2020-March 2021). Data on new fractures, adherence, risk factors for osteoporosis and the modality of visit (telemedicine or face-to-face) were collected.

RESULTS

The prevalence of non-adherent patients was higher during the lockdown (35 of 269 patients, 13.0%) than the pre-COVID-19 period (9 of 276 patients, 3.3%) (p < 0.0001). During the lockdown, the number of new non-traumatic fractures was higher than the pre-COVID-19 year (p < 0.0001): 10 patients out of 269 (3.7%) experienced a fragility fracture and 2 patients (0.7%) a probable rebound fracture during the lockdown period, whereas no patient had fragility/rebound fractures during the pre-COVID-19 period. No difference was found in the prevalence of non-adherence and new non-traumatic fractures comparing patients evaluated with tele-medicine to those evaluated with face-to-face visit.

CONCLUSION

Non-adherent patients and new non-traumatic fractures (including rebound fractures) were more prevalent during the lockdown in comparison to the pre-COVID-19 period, regardless of the modality of medical evaluation.

The efficacy of denosumab in Korean male patients with osteoporosis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Despite the prominence of denosumab as the number one prescribed anti-osteoporosis drug in Korea, the effects of denosumab in male osteoporosis patients were not researched sufficiently. Moreover, concerns on rebound vertebral fractures associated with poor denosumab adherence exist.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 147 Korean male osteoporosis patients treated with denosumab. After 12 months of treatment, 60 patients were lost during follow-up, and eight were excluded due to missing data. Out of the initial 147 patients, 79 were considered eligible for the analysis of the efficacy of denosumab. 54 patients were initially drug-naïve, and 25 had previously received bisphosphonate therapy.

RESULTS

In 54 drug-naïve patients, significant increases in bone mineral density (BMD) were observed in all measurement sites: 5.2% ± 3.7% in the lumbar spine, 2.3% ± 2.8% in the femoral neck, and 1.9% ± 2.8% in the total hip (p &lt; 0.01, respectively). Trabecular bone score showed an increase of 0.5% ± 5.8% in drug-naïve patients. Likewise, in 25 patients with previous bisphosphonate treatment, increase in BMD were observed as well: 4.8% ± 3.5% in the lumbar spine, 1.4% ± 3.6% in the femoral neck, and 0.8% ± 2.1% in the total hip (p &lt; 0.01, p = 0.06, p = 0.06, respectively). Significant declines of -55.1% ± 31.8% in C-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen (CTX), and -62.9% ± 21.3% in total procollagen 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP), in drug-naïve patients; and -37.7% ± 41.5%, in CTX and -55.4% ± 30.1%, in P1NP in patients with previous bisphosphonate treatment were exhibited after 12 months of treatment. The adherence rates of the second and third dosing schedules were 79.9% and 56.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our study indicates that denosumab is effective in increasing BMD in Korean osteoporosis males regardless of prior bisphosphonate treatment.

Dispensing anti-osteoporotic drugs changed during the COVID-19 pandemic

OBJECTIVES

Caring for osteoporosis patients has proven challenging during the COVID-19 pandemic due to repeated lockdowns in Austria. The distinct possibility of insufficient treatment regimens is therefore a matter of pressing concern. The aim of the study was to assess alterations in dispensing anti-osteoporotic drugs during the COVID-19 pandemic.

PATIENTS/METHODS

This study was a nationwide retrospective register-based observational study which included all patients in Austria aged ≥50 who received at least one prescription for anti-osteoporotic medication between January 2016 and November 2020. Pseudonymised individual-level patients' data were obtained from social insurance authorities. Anti-osteoporotic agents were divided into: (i) oral bisphosphonates, (ii) intravenous bisphosphonates, (iii) selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), (iv) teriparatide (TPTD) and (v) denosumab (DMAB). We used interrupted time series analysis with autoregressive integrated moving average models (ARIMA) to predict drug dispensing.

RESULTS

There were 2,884,374 dispensations of anti-osteoporotic drugs to 224,598 patients between 2016 and 2020. The mean monthly prescriptions for oral bisphosphonates (-14.5 %) and SERMs (-12.9 %) decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic when compared to the non-COVID-19 period. Dispensing for intravenous bisphosphonates (1.7 %) and teriparatide (9.5 %) increased. Prescriptions for DMAB decreased during the first lock-down, however increased by 29.1 % for the total observation time. The Arima models showed that in March 2020 (beginning of the 1st COVID-19 lockdown), there was a decrease of 778 dispensings, with a further increase of 14 dispensings every month for denosumab; a decrease by 178 dispensings, with a further increase of 23 dispensings every month for zolendronic acid; a decrease by 2950 dispensings, but with a further increase of 236 dispensings every other month for ibandronate and a decrease by 1443 dispensing with a further decrease of 29 dispensings for alendronate than predicted, had the lockdown not occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

The total number of prescriptions dispensed to patients treated with anti-osteoporotic medications declined rapidly during first COVID-19 lockdown. The observed decrease of DMAB during the first lockdown rebounded in the following months. Considering the massive treatment gap for osteoporosis, and the related fracture risk, clinicians should continue treatment, even during a pandemic.

The Impact of COVID-19 in Bone Metabolism: Basic and Clinical Aspects

The use of standard procedures for the diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk significantly decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic, while the incidence of fragility fractures was mostly unaltered. Both COVID-19 per se and its treatments are associated with a negative impact on bone health. Preclinical models show that mice infected with SARS-CoV2 even without symptoms display loss of trabecular bone mass two weeks post infection, due to increased numbers of osteoclasts. Osteoporosis medications do not aggravate the clinical course of COVID-19, while preclinical data suggests possible beneficial effects of some therapies. While vitamin D deficiency is clearly associated with a worse clinical course of COVID-19, evidence of improved patient outcome with vitamin D supplementation is lacking. Osteoporosis treatment should not be generally discontinued, and recommendations for substituting therapies are available. Osteoporosis therapies do not interfere with the efficacy or side-effect profiles of COVID-19 vaccines and should not be stopped or indefinitely delayed because of vaccination.

Pros and Cons of Skeletal Medications in the COVID-19 Era

Purpose of Review

This review provides an overview regarding osteoporosis therapies during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Recent Findings

The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted treatments for osteoporosis and resulted in decreased adherence particularly for parenteral regimens. Osteoporosis medications are safe and effective during the pandemic and should be continued whenever possible. Bisphosphonates have long-lasting effects on bone turnover such that delays in their administration are unlikely to be harmful to skeletal health. In contrast, interruption of denosumab treatment is strongly discouraged because of rapid loss of bone mass and an associated increased risk for rebound vertebral fractures. When osteoanabolic treatments cannot be continued during the pandemic, change to an oral bisphosphonate is advised. Preclinical data suggest possible beneficial effects of some therapies against COVID-19, but require validation in clinical studies. Vitamin D deficiency is associated with a more severe COVID-19 clinical course but data supporting improvements in outcomes with vitamin D supplementation are lacking.

Summary

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on long-term bone health remains unknown but focused interventions to ensure osteoporosis treatment initiation/maintenance should be implemented. Future studies are needed to determine whether osteoporosis medications have an impact on SARS-CoV-2 pathophysiology and COVID-19 clinical outcomes.