Long-term persistence with denosumab: real-world data from the Austrian Osteoporosis Clinic (AOC). A retrospective data analysis

Cost-consequence analysis of continuous denosumab therapy for osteoporosis treatment in South Korea

BACKGROUND

Insurance reimbursement provisions in South Korea limit osteoporosis medication availability for patients with T-scores exceeding - 2.5. This study aimed to evaluate the financial impact and fracture prevention of continuous denosumab therapy until a T-score>-2.0 (Dmab-C strategy), versus discontinuation of denosumab after reaching T-score>-2.5 (Dmab-D strategy) in osteoporosis patients.

METHODS

A cost-consequence analysis from a Korean healthcare system perspective was performed using a newly developed Markov model. The incidence of vertebral and non-vertebral fracture, fracture-related deaths, drug costs, and fracture-treatment costs were estimated and compared between Dmab-C and Dmab-D strategy over a lifetime in eligible patients aged 55 years.

RESULTS

Base-case analysis revealed that Dmab-C prevented 32.21 vertebral fracture (VF) and 12.43 non-VF events per 100 patients over a lifetime, while reducing 1.29 fracture-related deaths. Lifetime direct healthcare cost saving per patient was KRW 1,354,655 if Dmab-C replaces Dmab-D. When productivity losses were considered, Dmab-C saved KRW 29,025,949 per patient compared to Dmab-D. The additional treatment costs of Dmab-C could be offset by the higher subsequent treatment costs and fracture treatment costs of Dmab-D. The sensitivity analysis showed consistent patterns with results of the base-case analysis.

CONCLUSION

Continuous treatment using denosumab until osteoporosis patients achieve and maintain a T-score of -2.0 would provide greater clinical and economic benefits in terms of fracture prevention and reduced mortality risks compared to outcomes from discontinuing treatment at a T-score of -2.5 or above. This new treatment strategy would effectively lower the risk of fractures and fracture-related mortality, ultimately leading to lower medical expenses.

The role of adherence in patients with chronic diseases

In the long-term management of chronic diseases, adherence and persistence to prescribed medications are continuous challenges in order to obtain all the potential benefits of drug therapies. Suboptimal drug adherence and discontinuations of therapies remain the most frequent reasons why several diseases are poorly controlled in the population. One the main issue is that physicians are relatively limited in time and tools to detect patients with a poor adherence. The present review discusses present and future strategies that are now available or are being developed to detect and to support adherence in patients with chronic diseases and provides some simple clues to identify patients at high risk of discontinuation in the clinic.

Four-year treatment continuation rates of osteoporosis drugs with different dosing intervals throughout Japan

INTRODUCTION

There are approximately 13 million patients with osteoporosis in Japan; however, only 20% of them receive treatment. This study compared the 4-year continuation rates of osteoporosis drugs at different dosing intervals across throughout Japan.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Receipt data were analyzed to determine the continuation of osteoporosis medication in patients who began treatment at 210 hospitals throughout Japan between October 2016 and September 2017. Continuation rates were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests.

RESULTS

The 4-year continuation rates of daily, weekly, monthly, semi-annual, and yearly medications nationwide were 8.6%, 16.5%, 13.5%, 31.0%, and 26.0%, respectively. The 4-year continuation rates for semi-annual and yearly drugs were significantly higher than daily, weekly, monthly drugs.

CONCLUSION

Throughout Japan, the 4-year treatment continuation rates of daily, weekly, monthly, semi-annual, and yearly osteoporosis drugs all decreased over time. However, the continuation rates of semi-annual and yearly drugs in the fourth year were significantly higher than those for the other dosing regimens. Therefore, injectable drugs with dosing intervals ≥6 months may improve continuation rates of osteoporosis drugs. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2023; 23: 665-670.

Persistence with Denosumab in Male Osteoporosis Patients: A Real-World, Non-Interventional Multicenter Study

BACKGRUOUND

Persistence with denosumab in male patients has not been adequately investigated, although poor denosumab persistence is associated with a significant risk of rebound vertebral fractures.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 294 Korean male osteoporosis patients treated with denosumab at three medical centers and examined their persistence with four doses of denosumab injection over 24 months of treatment. Persistence was defined as the extent to which a patient adhered to denosumab treatment in terms of the prescribed interval and dose, with a permissible gap of 8 weeks. For patients who missed their scheduled treatment appointment(s) during the follow-up period (i.e., no-shows), Cox proportional regression analysis was conducted to explore the factors associated with poor adherence. Several factors were considered, such as age, prior anti-osteoporotic drug use, the treatment provider's medical specialty, the proximity to the medical center, and financial burdens of treatment.

RESULTS

Out of 294 male patients, 77 (26.2%) completed all four sequential rounds of the denosumab treatment. Out of 217 patients who did not complete the denosumab treatment, 138 (63.6%) missed the scheduled treatment(s). Missing treatment was significantly associated with age (odds ratio [OR], 1.03), prior bisphosphonate use (OR, 0.76), and prescription by non-endocrinologists (OR, 2.24). Denosumab was stopped in 44 (20.3%) patients due to medical errors, in 24 (11.1%) patients due to a T-score improvement over -2.5, and in five (2.3%) patients due to expected dental procedures.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that only one-fourth of Korean male osteoporosis patients were fully adherent to 24 months of denosumab treatment.

Association between Anti-Osteoporotic Drugs and Risk of Acute Kidney Injury: A Cross-Sectional Study Using Disproportional Analysis and a Pharmacovigilance Database

The number of fractures related to osteoporosis is expected to increase. Therefore, clarifying the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) associated with each type of anti-osteoporotic drug may avoid discontinuation of osteoporosis pharmacotherapy due to onset of AKI. This cross-sectional study using disproportional analysis and a pharmacovigilance database assessed the risk of AKI with various anti-osteoporotic drugs by analyzing data entered into the US Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from April 2014 to March 2021 and the Medical Data Vision (MDV) database in Japan in November 2021. All anti-osteoporotic drugs were investigated, including bisphosphonates, selective estrogen receptor modulators, denosumab, romosozumab, abaloparatide, and teriparatide. In the analysis of FAERS data, disproportionality for decreasing AKI was observed for oral ibandronate [reporting odds ratios (ROR) 0.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.09-0.45, P < 0.01], bazedoxifene (ROR 0.26, 95% CI 0.05-0.77, P = 0.01), and intravenous ibandronate (ROR 0.39, 95% CI 0.14-0.86, P = 0.01). In the analysis of the MDV data, the incidence of AKI was lower in patients taking intravenous ibandronate [odds ratio (OR) 0.22, 95% CI 0.06-0.89, P = 0.03], and the incidence of AKI was higher in patients taking oral alendronate (OR 2.40, 95% CI 2.08-2.77, P < 0.01). Risk of AKI may differ even among oral anti-osteoporotic drugs, and the evidence of this association should be assessed further in future drug safety studies. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.