Incident peptic ulcers and concomitant treatment of direct oral anticoagulants and oral bisphosphonates-a real-world cohort study

Recent Advances in Molecular Pathways and Therapeutic Implications for Peptic Ulcer Management: A Comprehensive Review

Peptic ulcers, recognized for their erosive impact on the gastrointestinal mucosa, present a considerable challenge in gastroenterology. Epidemiological insights underscore the global prevalence of peptic ulcers, affecting 5-10+% of individuals, with a yearly incidence of 0.3 to 1.9 cases per thousand. Recent decades have witnessed a decline in complications, attributed to improved diagnostics and therapeutic advancements. The review deepens into H. pylori-associated and NSAID-induced ulcers, emphasizing their distinct prevalence in developing and industrialized nations, respectively. Despite advancements, managing peptic ulcers remains challenging, notably in H. pylori-infected individuals facing recurrence and the rise of antibiotic resistance. The pathophysiology unravels the delicate balance between protective and destructive factors, including the intricate molecular mechanisms involving inflammatory mediators such as TNF-α, ILs, and prostaglandins. Genetic and ethnic factors, rare contributors, and recent molecular insights further enhance our understanding of peptic ulcer development. Diagnostic approaches are pivotal, with upper gastrointestinal endoscopy standing as the gold standard. Current treatment strategies focus on H. pylori eradication, NSAID discontinuation, and proton pump inhibitors. Surgical options become imperative for refractory cases, emphasizing a comprehensive approach. Advances include tailored H. pylori regimens, the emergence of vonoprazan, and ongoing vaccine development. Challenges persist, primarily in antibiotic resistance, side effects of acid suppressants, and translating natural compounds into standardized therapies. Promising avenues include the potential H. pylori vaccine and the exploration of natural compounds, with monoterpenes showing therapeutic promise. This review serves as a compass, guiding healthcare professionals, researchers, and policymakers through the intricate landscape of peptic ulcer management.

Thinking Three-Dimensionally: A Self- and Externally-Controlled Approach to Screening for Drug-Drug-Drug Interactions Among High-Risk Populations

The global rise in polypharmacy has increased both the necessity and complexity of drug-drug interaction (DDI) assessments, given the growing potential for interactions involving more than two drugs. Leveraging large-scale healthcare claims data, we piloted a semi-automated, high-throughput case-crossover-based approach for drug-drug-drug interaction (3DI) screening. Cases were direct-acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC) users with either a major bleeding event during ongoing dispensings for potentially interacting, enzyme-inhibiting antihypertensive drugs (AHDs) (Study 1), or a thromboembolic event during ongoing dispensings for potentially interacting, enzyme-inducing antiseizure medications (ASMs) (Study 2). 3DI detection was based on screening for additional drug exposures that served as acute outcome triggers. To mitigate direct effects and confounding by concomitant drugs, self-controlled estimates were adjusted using negative cases (external "control" DOAC users with the same outcomes but co-dispensings for non-interacting AHDs or ASMs). Signal thresholds were set based on P-values and false discovery rate q-values to address multiple comparisons. Study 1: 285 drugs were examined among 3,306 episodes. Self-controlled assessments with q-value thresholds yielded 9 3DI signals (cases) and 40 DDI signals (negative cases). External adjustment generated 10 3DI signals from the P-value threshold and no signals from the q-value threshold. Study 2: 126 drugs were examined among 604 episodes. Assessments with P-value thresholds yielded 3 3DI and 26 DDI signals following self-control, as well as 4 3DI signals following adjustment. No 3DI signals met the q-value threshold. The presented self- and externally-controlled approach aimed to advance paradigms for real-world higher order drug interaction screening among high-susceptibility populations with pre-existent DDI risk.

Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug (NSAID)-, Potassium Supplement-, Bisphosphonate-, and Doxycycline-Mediated Peptic Ulcer Effects: A Narrative Review

Peptic ulcers are a common condition that arises from an imbalance between acid production and gastroduodenal protective factors. Various drugs, including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), potassium supplements, bisphosphonates, and doxycycline, can increase the development of peptic ulcers. NSAIDs are one of the most common medications prescribed for pain relief, and they also inhibit the formation of cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1). COX-1 helps in the production of mucus that lines the stomach, so by inhibiting COX-1, NSAIDs reduce the mucus produced by the stomach and increase the likelihood of gastric ulcer formation. Additionally, NSAIDs are acidic, and increasing the amount of any acid in the stomach can result in promoting ulcer development. Potassium supplements are used to reduce the effects of hypertension, decrease the development of kidney stones, and treat hypokalemia. The various types of transporters and channels used to move potassium across cell membranes increase hydrogen being pumped, increasing gastric acid production and ulcer formation. Bisphosphonates are used to treat a variety of skeletal disorders that require inhibition of osteoclast activity. Nitric oxide (NO) has been shown to have a therapeutic effect on gastric ulcers, and some bisphosphonates have been shown to decrease the production of nitric oxide, resulting in increased damage to the gastric mucosa. Finally, doxycycline is a broad-spectrum tetracycline antibiotic that is typically used to treat anthrax poisoning, skin lesions, and sexually transmitted diseases. A harmful adverse effect of doxycycline is the formation of peptic and gastric ulcers related to the drug being highly acidic once it has dissolved.

Immune function, gastrointestinal hormone levels, and their clinical significance in patients with gastric ulcers complicated with depression

BACKGROUND

Gastric ulcer (GU) is a common digestive tract disease, and medical records of GU combined with depression are increasingly common. Currently, the risk factors and pathogenesis of GU complicated with depression remain unclear. Low immune function and gastrointestinal hormone levels may also be significant risk factors. Therefore, this study explored the immune function and gastrointestinal hormone levels in patients with GU combined with depression.

AIM

To explore the immune function, gastrointestinal hormone level, and clinical significance of patients with GU combined with depression.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 300 patients with GU combined with depression admitted to Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital from January 2021 to June 2022 as the study subjects. According to the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) score, patients were divided into mild-to-moderate (n = 210) and heavy (n = 90) groups. Basic data, immune function indices [immunoglobulin A (IgA), IgM, IgG, serum CD4+ and CD8+ percentage, and CD4+/CD8+ ratio], and gastrointestinal hormone indices [serum gastrin (GAS), cholecystokinin (CCK), and motilin (MTL) levels] were collected. The basic data of the two groups were compared, and the immune function and gastrointestinal hormone indices were analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the factors influencing the severity of GU complicated with depression. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the ROC curve (AUC) were used to analyze the value of the immune function index, gastrointestinal hormone index, and combined index in predicting the severity of GU complicated with depression.

RESULTS

There were no marked differences in sex, age, body mass index, abdominal distension, abdominal pain, belching, nausea, vomiting, or sleep disorders between the heavy and mild-to-moderate groups (P > 0.05). There was a marked difference in the family history of depression between the heavy and mild-to-moderate groups (P < 0.05). There were significant differences in serum IgA and IgM levels and serum CD4+, CD8+, and CD4+/CD8+ ratios between the heavy and mild-to-moderate groups (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that IgA, IgM, GAS, and CCK serum levels influenced the severity of GU with depression (P < 0.05). The AUC of the ROC curve for serum IgA level predicting GU with depression severity was 0.808 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.760-0.857], the AUC of the serum IgM level was 0.757 (95%CI: 0.700-0.814), the AUC of the serum GAS level was 0.853 (95%CI: 0.810-0.897), the AUC of the serum CCK level was 0.762 (95%CI: 0.709-0.822), the AUC of immune function (IgA, IgM) and gastrointestinal hormone levels (GAS, CCK) for the prediction of GU with depression severity was 0.958 (95%CI: 0.933-0.976).

CONCLUSION

Important factors influencing GU complicated with depression are serum IgA, IgM, GAS, and CCK indicators. They can be used as indicators to predict the severity of GU complicated with depression.