Fracture liaison service model: project design and accreditation

Examining Romosozumab Adherence and Side Effects in Osteoporotic Patients After Surgical Fracture Fixation: A Comparative, Descriptive, and Hypothesis-Generating Study with Non-Fractured Controls

OBJECTIVES

The study aims to evaluate adherence to Romosozumab treatment in osteoporotic patients after surgical fracture fixation and compare side effects with non-fractured controls on the same therapy.

METHODS

This retrospective case-control study was conducted at the Orthopaedic Department of Policlinico Universitario di Roma "Tor Vergata", following the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. It included postmenopausal women aged over 60, with the case group receiving Romosozumab after fracture fixation, and the control group consisting of women on Romosozumab therapy without fracture fixation. Exclusion criteria included psychiatric conditions, contraindications to Romosozumab, high-energy trauma, or other bone metabolism disorders. Data on fractures, surgeries, FRAX (Fracture Risk Assessment Tool) scores, BMD (Bone Mineral Densit) values, and follow-up details were collected. Side effects, including nasopharyngitis and severe events like hypocalcemia, stroke, and myocardial infarction, were recorded. Adherence was assessed via pharmacy records and patient interviews during routine clinical follow-up visits. Statistical analysis was performed using descriptive statistics, t-tests, and chi-square tests.

RESULTS

The study included 25 patients, with 12 in the surgical group and 13 in the conservative treatment group. The surgical group had a mean age of 67.3 years and a follow-up of 374 days, while the conservative group had a mean age of 76.4 years and a follow-up of 287 days. The surgical group underwent various fracture treatments, including femoral, humeral, and distal radius fractures, while the conservative group was treated with immobilization. There were no significant differences in FRAX scores or BMD values between the two groups. Vitamin D levels increased significantly in both groups after supplementation, but parathyroid hormone levels showed no difference. No new fractures occurred, and surgical patients had no delayed union or nonunion, though two had superficial wound infections.

CONCLUSIONS

Both groups adhered well to Romosozumab therapy, with no severe side effects; minor side effects included myalgia in the surgical group and shoulder arthralgia in the conservative group. Romosozumab is well-tolerated and adherent in osteoporotic patients after osteosynthesis surgery, with adverse events similar to non-fractured individuals. While the study design is appropriate, multicenter trials would improve the sample size and allow for subgroup analysis based on fracture type and demographics.

An insight for Fracture Liaison Service implementation: a qualitative study from a developing country

INTRODUCTION /OBJECTIVE

Osteoporosis often goes undetected until the first fracture, significantly increasing the risk of subsequent fractures. The Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) model aims to prevent secondary fractures and improve osteoporosis management. This study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current status of FLS implementation in Iran, applying the essential elements outlined in the FLS framework.

METHOD

This qualitative study used framework analysis to explore key components of the FLS framework from the perspectives of Iranian experts. Semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted over a 3-month period. Collaborative scenario synthesis was employed to accurately reflect the complexities of FLS operations.

RESULTS

A total of 13 participants with an average practical experience of 3.2 years contributed to the study. The results covered the people involved, needed information, locations, timeframes, and operational details of FLS stages, as well as quality improvement. The study confirmed the FLS framework's applicability in describing an implemented FLS and highlighted areas for improvement, such as coordinator training, role clarification, and data management issues.

CONCLUSION

Given the scarcity of comprehensive studies on FLS within Iran's context and the recent growth and expansion of FLS initiatives in the country, this study offers insights into FLS implementation from the perspective of experts, serving as a guiding resource for future initiatives in this domain. Future research may benefit from developing tailored questionnaires based on the FLS framework to gather insights from a larger population for a better assessment. Key points • Iran lacks specialized training programs for FLS coordinators. Developing these programs is crucial, particularly for healthcare professionals from non-nursing specialties. • There is a lack of clarity regarding the timeline for each stage of the FLS process. A context-specific timeline is needed to optimize service implementation and workflow. • There are inaccuracies in coding patient information that pose significant challenges, potentially undermining hospital statistics and the quality of FLS data.

Taking care of inpatients with fragility hip fractures: the hip-padua osteosarcopenia (Hip-POS) fracture liaison service model

PURPOSE

Osteoporotic fragility fractures (FF), particularly those affecting the hip, represent a major clinical and socio-economic concern. These fractures can lead to various adverse outcomes, which may be exacerbated by the presence of sarcopenia, especially among older and frail patients. Early identification of patients with FF is crucial for implementing effective diagnostic and therapeutic strategies to prevent subsequent fractures and their associated consequences.

METHODS

The Hip-POS program, implemented at Azienda Ospedale-Università Padova, is a Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) program to evaluate patients aged > 50 years old admitted with fragility hip fractures, involving an interdisciplinary team. After the identification of patients with hip fractures in the Emergency Department, a comprehensive evaluation is conducted to identify risk factors for further fractures, and to assess the main domains of multidimensional geriatric assessment, including muscle status. Patients are then prescribed with anti-fracture therapy, finally undergoing periodic follow-up visits.

RESULTS

During the first five months, a total of 250 patients were evaluated (70.4% women, median age 85 years). Following assessment by the Hip-POS team, compared to pre-hospitalization, the proportion of patients not receiving antifracture therapy decreased significantly from 60 to 21%. The prescription rates of vitamin D and calcium increased markedly from 29.6% to 81%.

CONCLUSIONS

We introduced the Hip-POS program for the care of older adults with hip fractures. We aspire that our model will represent a promising approach to enhancing post-fracture care by addressing the multifactorial nature of osteoporosis and its consequences, bridging the gap in secondary fracture prevention, and improving patient outcomes.

Three-year follow-up of a novel orthopedic ward fracture liaison services (OWFLS) model

OBJECTIVE

We established an orthopedic ward fracture liaison services (OWFLS) model and evaluated its role in improving detection rates of bone metabolic markers, treatment rates, and long-term treatability.

METHODS

This observational retrospective cohort study included 120 patients aged >50 years hospitalized for primary osteoporotic fracture from January 2018 to January 2019 (group A: not included in OWFLS). Group B (included in OWFLS) comprised 120 patients from February 2019 to February 2020. We compared rates of bone metabolic index testing, treatment, and adherence; symptomatic improvement; and recurrent fracture between groups.

RESULTS

Rates of bone metabolism index testing (50% vs. 0%) and medication use (94.2% vs. 64.2%) were significantly higher after OWFLS implementation. There was no significant difference in adherence rates at 3 months between groups (97.3% vs. 93.5%). Adherence rates at 1 and 3 years were better in group B than A (73.5% vs. 51.9%; 57.5% vs. 26%, respectively). Recurrence of bone pain at 1 and 3 years was significantly lower in group B than A (20.4% vs. 46.8%; 45.1% vs. 76.6%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

OWFLS improved the detection rate of bone metabolism indicators, treatment rate, and patient adherence and reduced recurrence of bone pain. OWFLS may be suitable for settings lacking human resources.

Effect of a Multicomponent Intervention with Tele-Rehabilitation and the Vivifrail© Exercise Programme on Functional Capacity after Hip Fracture: Study Protocol for the ActiveFLS Randomized Controlled Trial

INTRODUCTION

Hip fractures are the most common fracture leading to hospitalization and are associated with high costs, mortality rates and functional decline. Although several guidelines exist for preventing new fractures and promoting functional recovery, they tend to focus on osteoporosis treatment and do not take into account the complexity of frailty in older adults and geriatric syndromes, which are important factors in individuals at risk of suffering from frailty fractures. Moreover, most health systems are fragmented and are incapable of providing appropriate management for frail and vulnerable individuals who are at risk of experiencing fragility fractures. Multicomponent interventions and physical exercise using tele-rehabilitation could play a role in the management of hip fracture recovery. However, the effectiveness of exercise prescription and its combination with a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is still unclear.

METHODS

This randomized clinical trial will be conducted at the Hospital Universitario de Navarra (Pamplona, Spain). A total of 174 older adults who have suffered a hip fracture and fulfil the criteria for inclusion will be randomly allocated to either the intervention group or the control group. The intervention group will receive a multicomponent intervention consisting of individualized home-based exercise using the @ctive hip app for three months, followed by nine months of exercise using Vivifrail. Additionally, the intervention group will receive nutrition intervention, osteoporosis treatment, polypharmacy adjustment and evaluation of patient mood, cognitive impairment and fear of falling. The control group will receive standard outpatient care according to local guidelines. This research aims to evaluate the impact of the intervention on primary outcome measures, which include changes in functional status during the study period based on the Short Physical Performance Battery.

DISCUSSION

The findings of this study will offer valuable insights into the efficacy of a comprehensive approach that considers the complexity of frailty in older adults and geriatric syndromes, which are important factors in individuals at risk of suffering from frailty fractures. This study's findings will contribute to the creation of more effective strategies tailored to the requirements of these at-risk groups.

Dementia and Hip Fractures: A Comprehensive Review of Management Approaches

» The elderly population is the fastest growing demographic, and the number of dementia cases in the United States is expected to double to 10 million by 2050.» Patients with dementia are at 3× higher risk of hip fractures and have higher morbidity and mortality after hip fractures.» Hip fracture patients with dementia benefit from early analgesia and timely surgical fixation of fracture.» Early and intensive inpatient rehabilitation is associated with improved postoperative outcomes in patients with dementia.» Coordination of care within a "orthogeriatric" team decreases mortality, and fracture liaison services show potential for improving long-term outcomes in hip fracture patients with dementia.

The role of the fracture liaison service in the prevention of atypical femoral fractures

Osteoporosis and fragility fractures (FFs) are considered critical health problems by the World Health Organization (WHO) because of high morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. The occurrence of a FF raises the risk of a subsequent fracture (refracture). The hip is the most common site of fragility refracture, and its onset is associated with a further increase in patient's morbidity, mortality, and socioeconomic burden. Therefore, the prevention of refracture is essential. In this context, fracture liaison service (FLS) demonstrated to be able to reduce FF risk and also improve patients' adherence to anti-osteoporotic treatments, particularly for bisphosphonates (BPs). However, long-term and high adherence to BPs may lead to atypical femoral fractures (AFFs). These latter are tensile side stress fractures of the femur, with high rates of complications, including delayed and non-healing. An effective FLS should be able to prevent both FF and AFF. A comprehensive and interdisciplinary approach, through the involvement and education of a dedicated team of healthcare professionals (i.e. orthopedic, geriatrician, primary care physician, rehabilitation team, and bone nurse) for evaluating both FF and AFF risks might be useful to improve the standard of care.