Extinction of Conditioned Responses to Methamphetamine-Associated Stimuli in Healthy Humans

Methamphetamine, amphetamine, and aggression in humans: A systematic review of drug administration studies

The relationship between amphetamine use and aggressive or violent behaviour is unclear. This review examined laboratory data collected in humans, who were administered an acute dose of amphetamine or methamphetamine, in order to investigate the link between amphetamines and aggression. It is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019127711). Included in the analysis are data from twenty-eight studies. Behavioural and/or subjective measures of aggression were assessed in one thousand and sixty-nine research participants, with limited amphetamine-use histories, following a single amphetamine dose (0-35mg). The available published evidence indicates that neither amphetamine nor methamphetamine acutely increased aggression as assessed by traditional laboratory measures. Future research should assess supratherapeutic amphetamine doses as well as include a broader range of multiple aggression measures, facilitating simultaneous assessment of the various components that comprise this complex, multifaceted construct.

Acute methylphenidate administration reduces cocaine-cue attentional bias

Mechanistic research on behavioral processes underlying substance use disorder might help identify novel targets for interventions development. Drug-related attentional bias and response inhibition deficits have received a great deal of consideration in substance use research, broadly, and cocaine use research, specifically. Studies investigating pharmacological mechanisms that may ameliorate, or further impair, these behaviors relevant to cocaine use are relatively lacking. This study evaluated the impact of acute administration of methylphenidate, a dopamine-favoring reuptake inhibitor, on both gaze-related cocaine-cue-attentional bias and cocaine-cue related disruptions in response inhibition among individuals with cocaine use disorder. Participants (N = 12; 33% female) completed a within-subject, outpatient, acute dosing study. Two sessions were completed in which methylphenidate (60 mg) or placebo were administered followed by completion of an attentional bias task using eye-tracking technology and neutral-cue and cocaine-cue response inhibition tasks. Subjective and physiological effects were also recorded. Significant cocaine cue attentional bias and response inhibition failures were observed during placebo administration. Acute methylphenidate administration reduced cocaine-cue attentional bias as measured by cocaine-cue gaze fixations (d_z = 1.04; Bayes Factor = 12.37). No statistically significant effects of methylphenidate were observed on response inhibition (Bayes Factors = 0.17-1.04). Methylphenidate produced prototypical subjective and physiological effects. Although the small sample should be considered, these findings indicate acute manipulation of dopaminergic activity reduced cue-related attentional allocation related to cocaine use disorder. Future research evaluating alternative dopaminergic agents and applications within a clinical setting are needed to determine the clinical significance of targeting this neurobehavioral mechanism.

AMPed-up adolescents: The role of age in the abuse of amphetamines and its consequences on cognition and prefrontal cortex development

Adolescent use of amphetamine and its closely related, methylated version methamphetamine, is alarmingly high in those who use drugs for nonmedical purposes. This raises serious concerns about the potential for this drug use to have a long-lasting, detrimental impact on the normal development of the brain and behavior that is ongoing during adolescence. In this review, we explore recent findings from both human and laboratory animal studies that investigate the consequences of amphetamine and methamphetamine exposure during this stage of life. We highlight studies that assess sex differences in adolescence, as well as those that are designed specifically to address the potential unique effects of adolescent exposure by including groups at other life stages (typically young adulthood). We consider epidemiological studies on age and sex as vulnerability factors for developing problems with the use of amphetamines, as well as human and animal laboratory studies that tap into age differences in use, its short-term effects on behavior, and the long-lasting consequences of this exposure on cognition. We also focus on studies of drug effects in the prefrontal cortex, which is known to be critically important for cognition and is among the later maturing brain regions. Finally, we discuss important issues that should be addressed in future studies so that the field can further our understanding of the mechanisms underlying adolescent use of amphetamines and its outcomes on the developing brain and behavior.

Neural responses to cues paired with methamphetamine in healthy volunteers

Drug cues, or conditioned responses to stimuli paired with drugs, are widely believed to promote drug use. The acquisition of these conditioned responses has been well characterized in laboratory animals: neutral stimuli paired with drugs elicit conditioned responses resembling the motivational and incentive properties of the drug itself. However, few studies have examined acquisition of conditioning, or the nature of the conditioned response, in humans. In this study, we used fMRI to examine neural responses to stimuli that had been paired with methamphetamine or placebo in healthy young adults. Participants first underwent four conditioning sessions in which visual-auditory stimuli were paired with either methamphetamine (20 mg, oral) or placebo. Then on a drug-free test day, the stimuli were presented during an fMRI scan to assess neural responses to the stimuli. We hypothesized that the stimuli would elicit drug-like brain activity, especially in regions related to reward. Instead, we found that the methamphetamine-paired stimuli, compared to placebo-paired stimuli, produced greater activation in regions related to visual and auditory processing, consistent with the drug's unconditioned effects on sensory processing. This is the first study to demonstrate conditioned neural responses to drug-paired stimuli after just two pairings of methamphetamine in healthy adults. The study also illustrates that conditioned responses may develop to unexpected components of the drug's effects.

Measuring appetitive conditioned responses in humans

Clinical and preclinical findings suggest that individuals with abnormal responses to reward cues (stimuli associated with reward) may be at risk for maladaptive behaviors including obesity, addiction and depression. Our objective was to develop a new paradigm for producing appetitive conditioning using primary (food) rewards in humans, and investigate the equivalency of several outcomes previously used to measure appetitive responses to conditioned cues. We used an individualized food reward, and multimodal subjective, psychophysiological and behavioral measures of appetitive responses to a conditioned stimulus (CS) that predicted delivery of that food. We tested convergence among these measures of appetitive response, and relationships between these measures and action impulsivity, a putative correlate of appetitive conditioning. 90 healthy young adults participated. Although the paradigm produced robust appetitive conditioning in some measures, particularly psychophysiological ones, there were not strong correlations among measures of appetitive responses to the CS, as would be expected if they indexed a single underlying process. In addition, there was only one measure that related to impulsivity. These results provide important information for translational researchers interested in appetitive conditioning, suggesting that various measures of appetitive conditioning cannot be treated interchangeably.