Peg-manipulation capabilities during a test of manual dexterity differ for persons with multiple sclerosis and healthy individuals

Practice-Induced Changes in Manual Dexterity of Older Adults Depend on Initial Pegboard Time

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of our study was to determine the influence of practice on the pegboard times and peg-manipulation phases of older adults who were classified as having either slow or fast initial pegboard times.

METHODS

Participants ( n = 26, 70 ± 6.6 yr) completed two evaluation sessions and six practice sessions in which they performed 25 trials (5 blocks of 5 trials) of the grooved pegboard test. All practice sessions were supervised, and the time to complete each trial was recorded. In each evaluation session, the pegboard was mounted on a force transducer so that the downward force applied to the board could be measured.

RESULTS

Participants were stratified into two groups based on the initial time to complete the grooved pegboard test: a fast group (68.1 ± 6.0 s) and a slow group (89.6 ± 9.2 s). Both groups exhibited the classic two-phase profile (acquisition + consolidation) for learning a de novo motor skill. Despite the similar learning profile for the two groups, there were differences between groups in the phases of the peg-manipulation cycle that became faster with practice. The fast group seemed to reduce trajectory variability when transporting the peg, whereas the slow group seemed to exhibit both a decrease in trajectory variability and greater precision when inserting pegs into the holes.

CONCLUSIONS

The changes underlying practice-induced decreases in grooved pegboard time differed for older adults who initially had either a fast or a slow pegboard time.

Assessment of Upper Extremity Function in Multiple Sclerosis: Feasibility of a Digital Pinching Test

BACKGROUND

The development of touchscreen-based assessments of upper extremity function could benefit people with multiple sclerosis (MS) by allowing convenient, quantitative assessment of their condition. The Pinching Test forms a part of the Floodlight smartphone app (F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland) for people with MS and was designed to capture upper extremity function.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the Pinching Test as a tool for remotely assessing upper extremity function in people with MS.

METHODS

Using data from the 24-week, prospective feasibility study investigating the Floodlight Proof-of-Concept app for remotely assessing MS, we examined 13 pinching, 11 inertial measurement unit (IMU)-based, and 13 fatigability features of the Pinching Test. We assessed the test-retest reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients [second model, first type; ICC(2,1)], age- and sex-adjusted cross-sectional Spearman rank correlation, and known-groups validity (data aggregation: median [all features], SD [fatigability features]).

RESULTS

We evaluated data from 67 people with MS (mean Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS]: 2.4 [SD 1.4]) and 18 healthy controls. In this cohort of early MS, pinching features were reliable [ICC(2,1)=0.54-0.81]; correlated with standard clinical assessments, including the Nine-Hole Peg Test (9HPT) (|r|=0.26-0.54; 10/13 features), EDSS (|r|=0.25-0.36; 7/13 features), and the arm items of the 29-item Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) (|r|=0.31-0.52; 7/13 features); and differentiated people with MS-Normal from people with MS-Abnormal (area under the curve: 0.68-0.78; 8/13 features). IMU-based features showed similar test-retest reliability [ICC(2,1)=0.47-0.84] but showed little correlations with standard clinical assessments. In contrast, fatigability features (SD aggregation) correlated with 9HPT time (|r|=0.26-0.61; 10/13 features), EDSS (|r|=0.26-0.41; 8/13 features), and MSIS-29 arm items (|r|=0.32-0.46; 7/13 features).

CONCLUSIONS

The Pinching Test provides a remote, objective, and granular assessment of upper extremity function in people with MS that can potentially complement standard clinical evaluation. Future studies will validate it in more advanced MS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02952911; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02952911.

Metabolic costs of walking and arm reaching in persons with mild multiple sclerosis

Movement slowness is a common and disruptive symptom of multiple sclerosis (MS). A potential cause is that individuals with MS slow down to conserve energy as a behavioral adjustment to heightened metabolic costs of movement. To investigate this prospect, we measured the metabolic costs of both walking and seated arm reaching at five speeds in persons with mild MS (pwMS; n = 13; 46.0 ± 7.7 yr) and sex- and age-matched controls (HCs; n = 13; 45.8 ± 7.8 yr). Notably, the cohort of pwMS was highly mobile and no individuals required a cane or aid when walking. We found that the net metabolic power of walking was approximately 20% higher for pwMS across all speeds (P = 0.0185). In contrast, we found no differences in the gross power of reaching between pwMS and HCs (P = 0.492). Collectively, our results suggest that abnormal slowness of movement in MS-particularly reaching-is not the consequence of heightened effort costs and that other sensorimotor mechanisms are playing a considerable role in slowing.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) often move more slowly than those without the disease. A possible cause is that movements in MS are more energetically expensive and slowing is an adaptation to conserve metabolic resources. Here, we find that while walking is more costly for persons with MS, arm-reaching movements are not. These results bring into question the driving force of movement slowness in MS and implicate other motor-related networks contributing to slowing.

Effects of HIV infection, antiretroviral therapy, and immune status on the speed of information processing and complex motor functions in adult Cameroonians

HIV-associated neurocognitive deficits include impaired speed-of-information processing (SIP) and motor functions. There is lack of Cameroonian adult norms for assessing SIP or motor functions. This study of 683 Cameroonians (320 HIV+, 363 HIV-) establishes demographically-adjusted norms for six SIP [Wechsler-Adult-Intelligence-Scale (WAIS)-III Digit Symbol (WAIS-IIIDS) and Symbol Search (WAIS-IIISS), Stroop Color-Naming, Stroop Word-Reading, Trail-Making Test-A (TMT-A), Color Trails-1 (CTT1)], and two motor function [Grooved Pegboard-dominant (GP-DH) and non-dominant (GP-NDH) hands] tests. We assessed viral effects on SIP and motor functions. HIV-infected persons had significantly lower (worse) T scores on GP-DH, WAIS-IIIDS, Stroop Word-Reading, TMT-A; lower motor and SIP summary T scores. Significantly higher proportion of cases (20.7%) than controls (10.3%) had impaired SIP. Male cases had better T scores than female cases on GP-NDH, WAIS-IIIDS, WAIS-IIISS, TMT-A, CTT1; better SIP summary T scores. Antiretroviral therapy (ART) was associated with significantly better T scores on GP-NDH, WAIS-IIIDS, Stroop Color-Naming; better motor and SIP summary T scores. Cases with higher CD4 had better T scores on WAIS-IIIDS, TMT-A, CTT1; better SIP summary T scores. Overall, we demonstrate that HIV infection in Cameroon is associated with deficits in SIP and motor functions; ART and higher CD4 are associated with better cognitive performance. We provide SIP and psychomotor functions normative standards, which will be useful for neurobehavioral studies in Cameroon of diseases affecting the brain.

Sensory nerve stimulation causes an immediate improvement in motor function of persons with multiple sclerosis: A pilot study

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis (MS) symptoms reported in the first year of the disease include sensory impairment, fatigue, reduced mobility, and declines in hand function. The progressive reduction in motor function experienced by persons living with MS is invariably preceded by changes in sensory processing, which are strongly associated with the declines in both walking performance and manual dexterity.

AIMS

To assess the influence of concurrent sensory stimulation using augmented transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (aTENS) applied to leg and hand muscles on clinical tests of motor function in individuals whose mobility was compromised by MS.

METHODS

Thirteen persons with MS (52 ± 8 years; 6 women) and 12 age- and sex-matched healthy adults (52 ± 9 years) met the inclusion criteria. Participants visited the lab on two occasions with one week between visits. Each visit involved the participant performing four tests of motor function and completing two health-related questionnaires (PDDS and MSWS-12). The tests assessed walking performance (6-min test and 25-ft test), dynamic balance (chair-rise tes, and manual dexterity (grooved pegboard test). aTENS was applied through pads attached to the limbs over the tibialis anterior and rectus femoris muscles of the affected leg, and over the median nerve and the thenar eminence of the dominant hand. The pads were attached during both visits, but the current was only applied during the second visit. The stimulation comprised continuous asymmetrical biphasic pulses (0.2 ms) at a rate of 50 Hz and an intensity that elicited slight muscle contractions.

RESULTS

At baseline and during both treatment sessions, the performance on all four tests of motor function was worse for the MS group than the Control group. The MS group experienced significant improvements in all outcomes during the aTENS session with medium-to-large effect sizes. PDDS ratings improved (from 2.8 ± 1.3 to 2.0 ± 1.5; effect size d = -0.70) and the MSWS-12 scores declined (from 36 ± 11 to 28 ± 12; effect size d = -1.52). The concurrent application of aTENS enabled the MS group to walk further during the 6-min test (from 397 ± 174 m to 415 ± 172 m; effect size d = 0.81), to complete the 25-ft test in less time (6.7 ± 3.0 s to 6.3 ± 2.9 s; effect size d = -0.76), to increase the counts in the chair-rise test (from 11.2 ± 3.8 to 13.6 ± 4.8; effect size d = 1.52), and to perform the grooved pegboard test more quickly (from 110 ± 43 s to 99 ± 37 s; effect size d = -0.98). The only significant effect for the Control group was a significant increase in the 6-min walk distance (from 725 ± 79 to 740 ± 82 m; effect size d = 0.87).

CONCLUSIONS

Stimulation of sensory fibers with aTENS evoked clinically significant improvements in four tests of motor function and the self-reported level of walking limitations in persons who were moderately disabled by MS. Moreover, the improvements in function elicited by the concurrent application of aTENS were immediate.

Examining the Interactions Between Expectations and tDCS Effects on Motor and Cognitive Performance

Background: Despite a growing literature and commercial market, the effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) remains questionable. Notably, studies rarely examine factors such as expectations of outcomes, which may influence tDCS response through placebo-like effects. Here we sought to determine whether expectations could influence the behavioral outcomes of a tDCS intervention. Methods: Through an initial study and self-replication, we recruited 121 naïve young adults 18-34 years of age (M = 21.14, SD = 3.58; 88 women). We evaluated expectations of tDCS and of motor and cognitive performance at three times: (i) at baseline; (ii) after being primed to have High or Low expectations of outcomes; and (iii) after a single session of sham-controlled anodal tDCS over the left or right motor cortex. Before and after stimulation, participants performed the Grooved Pegboard Test and a choice reaction time task as measures of motor dexterity, response time, and response inhibition. Results: Repeated measures ANOVA revealed that participants had varying, largely uncertain, expectations regarding tDCS effectiveness at baseline. Expectation ratings significantly increased or decreased in response to High or Low priming, respectively, and decreased following the intervention. Response times and accuracy on motor and cognitive measures were largely unaffected by expectation or stimulation conditions. Overall, our analysis revealed no effect attributable to baseline expectations, belief of group assignment, or experimental condition on behavioral outcomes. Subjective experience did not differ based on expectation or stimulation condition. Conclusions: Our results suggest no clear effects of tDCS or of expectations on our performance measures, highlighting the need for further investigations of such stimulation methods.

Poor estimates of motor variability are associated with longer grooved pegboard times for middle-aged and older adults

Goal-directed movements that involve greater motor variability are performed with an increased risk that the intended goal will not be achieved. The ability to estimate motor variability during such actions varies across individuals and influences how people decide to move about their environment. The purpose of our study was to identify the decision-making strategies used by middle-aged and older adults when performing two goal-directed motor tasks and to determine if these strategies were associated with the time to complete the grooved pegboard test. Twenty-one middle-aged (48 ± 6 yr; range 40-59 yr, 15 women) and 20 older adults (73 ± 4 yr; range 65-79 yr, 8 women) performed two targeted tasks, each with two normalized target options. Decision-making characteristics were not associated with time to complete the test of manual dexterity when the analysis included all participants, but slower pegboard times were associated with measures of greater movement variability during the target-directed actions. When the data were clustered on the basis of pegboard time rather than age, relatively longer times for the faster group were associated with greater motor variability during the prescribed tasks, whereas longer times for the slower group were associated with increased risk-seeking behavior (α) and greater variability in the targeted actions. NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study was the first to examine the association between decision-making choices and an NIH Toolbox test of manual dexterity (grooved pegboard test) performed by middle-aged and older adults. Significant associations were observed between decision-making choices and time to complete the test when the analyses were based on pegboard times rather than chronological age. This result indicates that decision-making choices of middle-aged and older adults, independent of age, were associated with time to complete a test of manual dexterity.

Peg-manipulation capabilities of middle-aged adults have a greater influence on pegboard times than those of young and old adults

Declines in manual dexterity are frequently quantified as the time it takes to complete the grooved pegboard test. The test requires individuals to manipulate 25 pegs, one at a time, by removing them from a well and inserting them into a prescribed hole. The manipulation of each peg involves four phases: selection, transport, insertion, and return. The purpose of our study was to compare the times to complete the four phases of peg manipulation and the forces applied to the pegboard during peg insertion as young, middle-aged, and old adults performed the grooved pegboard test. The relative significance of the peg-manipulation attributes for 30 young (24.0 ± 4.4 years), 15 middle-aged (46.5 ± 6.5 years), and 15 old (70.4 ± 4.0 years) adults was assessed with a multiple-regression analysis. The grooved pegboard test was performed on a force plate. Pegboard times for the old adults (81 ± 17 s) were longer than those for young (56 ± 7 s) and middle-aged (58 ± 11 s) adults. Regression analysis indicated that the explanatory variables for the pegboard times of young (R² = 0.33) and middle-aged (R² = 0.78) adults were the times for the peg insertion and return phases, whereas the predictors for old adults (R² = 0.49) were the times for the peg selection and transport phases. The relative influence of peg-manipulation capabilities on a pegboard test of manual dexterity was greater for middle-aged adults than for young and old adults.

Pulse Width Does Not Influence the Gains Achieved With Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in People With Multiple Sclerosis: Double-Blind, Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis (MS) eventually compromises the walking ability of most individuals burdened with the disease. Treatment with neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) can restore some functional abilities in persons with MS, but its effectiveness may depend on stimulus-pulse duration.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of a 6-week intervention with narrow- or wide-pulse NMES on walking performance, neuromuscular function, and disability status of persons with relapsing-remitting MS.

METHODS

Individuals with MS (52.6 ± 7.4 years) were randomly assigned to either the narrow-pulse (n = 13) or wide-pulse (n = 14) group. The NMES intervention was performed on the dorsiflexor and plantar flexor muscles of both legs (10 minutes each muscle, 4 s on and 12 s off) at a tolerable level for 18 sessions across 6 weeks. Outcomes were obtained before (week 0) and after (week 7) the intervention and 4 weeks later (week 11).

RESULTS

There was no influence of stimulus-pulse duration on the outcomes ( P > .05); thus, the data were collapsed across groups. The NMES intervention improved ( P < .05) gait speed and walking endurance, dorsiflexor strength in the more-affected leg, plantar flexor strength in the less-affected leg, force control for plantar flexors in the less-affected leg, and self-reported levels of fatigue and walking limitations.

CONCLUSION

There was no influence of stimulus-pulse duration on the primary outcomes (gait speed and walking endurance). The 6-week NMES intervention applied to the lower leg muscles of persons with mild to moderate levels of disability can improve their walking performance and provide some symptom relief.