Assessing the relative contribution of vision to odometry via manipulations of gait in an over-ground homing task

A systematic review of human odometry

Human odometry refers to an individual's ability to travel between locations without eyesight and without designating a conscious effort toward spatially updating themselves as they travel through the environment. A systematic review on human odometry was completed for the purpose of establishing the state-of-the-art of the topic, and based on this information, develop meaningful hypotheses using Strong Inference. The following databases were searched up to February 16, 2023, and accessed through University of Nebraska at Omaha proxied databases: IEEEXplore, PsycArticles, PsycInfo, PubMed Central, SCOPUS, and Web of Science. Of the 7,060 articles reviewed, 23 met our inclusion criteria and were accumulated for their contents and quality. Methodologies, limitations, strengths, and future solutions based on those 23 articles are discussed. In summary, young healthy adults are the typical population examined, and distance perception can be manipulated with distance or gait type. Odometry can be studied using simple measurement tools, participants are often given 3-4 attempts to correctly perceive an average distance of 14.3 m, and the average article is of moderate quality with a mean score of 6.13. Many literature gaps, variability in methodology, and insufficient detail, can be amended by the addition of slightly more detailed manuscripts in future publications.

Homing tasks performed using variations of crawling gait patterns reveal a role for attention in podokinetic path integration

Self-motion can be perceived via podokinetic information, that is, based upon the movements of the legs during legged locomotion. This information can be integrated in order to perceive a path of travel through the environment (i.e., via podokinetic path integration). Two types of podokinetic information have been distinguished by analyzing the patterns of bias that result from manipulating the gait patterns used in direct-route homing tasks. Each type of podokinetic information has been associated specific groupings of gaits that support equivalent perceptual measurements of self-motion. Specifically, gaits are grouped if they can be varied across the outbound and inbound phases of a homing task (e.g., walking outbound and jogging inbound) and the accuracy of homing task performances does not differ from matched-gait control conditions. Recently, it was theorized that different types of podokinetic information are related to the differences in the kinematic form of limb motions in these groupings of gaits. Here we test an alternative hypothesis, namely that attention plays a role in selecting the type of podokinetic information. In three experiments, we manipulated the crawling gait patterns used in direct-route homing tasks. Consistent with our hypotheses, we observe that self-motion is equivalently measured via crawling movement patterns that (1) have distinct kinematic forms, but that similarly direct participants' attention onto controlling the swing phase trajectories of their arms, and (2) have distinct inter-limb coordination patterns (i.e., pace vs. trot), but do not require attention to be specifically focused upon swing phase arm trajectories.

Homing tasks and distance matching tasks reveal different types of perceptual variables associated with perceiving self-motion during over-ground locomotion

Self-motion perception refers to the ability to perceive how the body is moving through the environment. Perception of self-motion has been shown to depend upon the locomotor action patterns used to move the body through the environment. Two separate lines of enquiry have led to the establishment of two distinct theories regarding this effect. One theory has proposed that distances travelled during locomotion are perceived via higher order perceptual variables detected by the haptic perceptual system. This theory proposes that two higher order haptic perceptual variables exist, and that the implication of one of these variables depends upon the type of gait pattern that is used. A second theory proposes that self-motion is perceived via a higher order perceptual variable termed multimodally specified energy expenditure (MSEE). This theory proposes that the effect of locomotor actions patterns upon self-motion perception is related to changes in the metabolic cost of locomotion per unit of perceptually specified traversed distance. Here, we test the hypothesis that the development of these distinct theories is the result of different choices in methodology. The theory of gait type has been developed based largely on the results of homing tasks, whereas the effect of MSEE has been developed based on the results of distance matching tasks. Here we test the hypothesis that the seemly innocuous change in experimental design from using a homing task to using a distance matching task changes the type of perceptual variables implicated in self-motion perception. To test this hypothesis, we closely replicated a recent study of the effect of gait type in all details bar one-we investigated a distance matching task rather than a homing task. As hypothesized, this change yielded results consistent with the predictions of MSEE, and distinct from gait type. We further show that, unlike the effect of gait type, the effect of MSEE is unaffected by the availability of vision. In sum, our findings support the existence of two distinct types of higher order perceptual variables in self-motion perception. We discuss the roles of these two types of perceptual variables in supporting effective human wayfinding.

On the psychological origins of tool use

The ubiquity of tool use in human life has generated multiple lines of scientific and philosophical investigation to understand the development and expression of humans' engagement with tools and its relation to other dimensions of human experience. However, existing literature on tool use faces several epistemological challenges in which the same set of questions generate many different answers. At least four critical questions can be identified, which are intimately intertwined-(1) What constitutes tool use? (2) What psychological processes underlie tool use in humans and nonhuman animals? (3) Which of these psychological processes are exclusive to tool use? (4) Which psychological processes involved in tool use are exclusive to Homo sapiens? To help advance a multidisciplinary scientific understanding of tool use, six author groups representing different academic disciplines (e.g., anthropology, psychology, neuroscience) and different theoretical perspectives respond to each of these questions, and then point to the direction of future work on tool use. We find that while there are marked differences among the responses of the respective author groups to each question, there is a surprising degree of agreement about many essential concepts and questions. We believe that this interdisciplinary and intertheoretical discussion will foster a more comprehensive understanding of tool use than any one of these perspectives (or any one of these author groups) would (or could) on their own.