1
|
Bjelić D, Finšgar M. Bioactive coatings with anti-osteoclast therapeutic agents for bone implants: Enhanced compliance and prolonged implant life. Pharmacol Res 2022; 176:106060. [PMID: 34998972 DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2022.106060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Revised: 12/24/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The use of therapeutic agents that inhibit bone resorption is crucial to prolong implant life, delay revision surgery, and reduce the burden on the healthcare system. These therapeutic agents include bisphosphonates, various nucleic acids, statins, proteins, and protein complexes. Their use in systemic treatment has several drawbacks, such as side effects and insufficient efficacy in terms of concentration, which can be eliminated by local treatment. This review focuses on the incorporation of osteoclast inhibitors (antiresorptive agents) into bioactive coatings for bone implants. The ability of bioactive coatings as systems for local delivery of antiresorptive agents to achieve optimal loading of the bioactive coating and its release is described in detail. Various parameters such as the suitable concentrations, release times, and the effects of the antiresorptive agents on nearby cells or bone tissue are discussed. However, further research is needed to support the optimization of the implant, as this will enable subsequent personalized design of the coating in terms of the design and selection of the coating material, the choice of an antiresorptive agent and its amount in the coating. In addition, therapeutic agents that have not yet been incorporated into bioactive coatings but appear promising are also mentioned. From this work, it can be concluded that therapeutic agents contribute to the biocompatibility of the bioactive coating by enhancing its beneficial properties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dragana Bjelić
- Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Maribor, Smetanova ulica 17, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.
| | - Matjaž Finšgar
- Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Maribor, Smetanova ulica 17, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen F, Han Y, Kang Y. Bone marrow niches in the regulation of bone metastasis. Br J Cancer 2021; 124:1912-1920. [PMID: 33758331 PMCID: PMC8184962 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-021-01329-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2020] [Revised: 02/06/2021] [Accepted: 02/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The bone marrow has been widely recognised to host a unique microenvironment that facilitates tumour colonisation. Bone metastasis frequently occurs in the late stages of malignant diseases such as breast, prostate and lung cancers. The biology of bone metastasis is determined by tumour-cell-intrinsic traits as well as their interaction with the microenvironment. The bone marrow is a dynamic organ in which various stages of haematopoiesis, osteogenesis, osteolysis and different kinds of immune response are precisely regulated. These different cellular components constitute specialised tissue microenvironments-niches-that play critical roles in controlling tumour cell colonisation, including initial seeding, dormancy and outgrowth. In this review, we will dissect the dynamic nature of the interactions between tumour cells and bone niches. By targeting certain steps of tumour progression and crosstalk with the bone niches, the development of potential therapeutic approaches for the clinical treatment of bone metastasis might be feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fenfang Chen
- Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Yujiao Han
- Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Yibin Kang
- Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
- Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
- Cancer Metabolism and Growth Program, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Delaisse JM, Andersen TL, Kristensen HB, Jensen PR, Andreasen CM, Søe K. Re-thinking the bone remodeling cycle mechanism and the origin of bone loss. Bone 2020; 141:115628. [PMID: 32919109 DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2020] [Revised: 09/04/2020] [Accepted: 09/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Proper bone remodeling necessarily requires that osteoblasts reconstruct the bone that osteoclasts have resorbed. However, the cellular events connecting resorption to reconstruction have remained poorly known. The consequence is a fragmentary understanding of the remodeling cycle where only the resorption and formation steps are taken into account. New tools have recently made possible to elucidate how resorption shifts to formation, thereby allowing to comprehend the remodeling cycle as a whole. This new knowledge is reviewed herein. It shows how teams of osteoclasts and osteoblast lineage cells are progressively established and how they are subjected therein to reciprocal interactions. Contrary to the common view, osteoclasts and osteoprogenitors are intermingled on the eroded surfaces. The analysis of the resorption and cell population dynamics shows that osteoprogenitor cell expansion and resorption proceed as an integrated mechanism; that a threshold cell density of osteoprogenitors on the eroded surface is mandatory for onset of bone formation; that the cell initiating osteoprogenitor cell expansion is the osteoclast; and that the osteoclast therefore triggers putative osteoprogenitor reservoirs positioned at proximity of the eroded bone surface (bone lining cells, canopy cells, pericytes). The interplay between magnitude of resorption and rate of cell expansion governs how soon bone reconstruction is initiated and may determine uncoupling and permanent bone loss if a threshold cell density is not reached. The clinical perspectives opened by these findings are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Marie Delaisse
- Clinical Cell Biology, Department of Pathology, Odense University Hospital, Department of Clinical Research, Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
| | - Thomas Levin Andersen
- Clinical Cell Biology, Department of Pathology, Odense University Hospital, Department of Clinical Research, Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Department of Forensic Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
| | - Helene Bjoerg Kristensen
- Clinical Cell Biology, Lillebælt Hospital, Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.
| | - Pia Rosgaard Jensen
- Clinical Cell Biology, Lillebælt Hospital, Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.
| | - Christina Møller Andreasen
- Clinical Cell Biology, Department of Pathology, Odense University Hospital, Department of Clinical Research, Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
| | - Kent Søe
- Clinical Cell Biology, Department of Pathology, Odense University Hospital, Department of Clinical Research, Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Søe K, Delaisse JM, Borggaard XG. Osteoclast formation at the bone marrow/bone surface interface: Importance of structural elements, matrix, and intercellular communication. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2020; 112:8-15. [PMID: 32563679 DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2020.05.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2020] [Revised: 05/17/2020] [Accepted: 05/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Osteoclasts, the multinucleated cells responsible for bone resorption, have an enormous destructive power which demands to be kept under tight control. Accordingly, the identification of molecular signals directing osteoclastogenesis and switching on their resorptive activity have received much attention. Mandatory factors were identified, but a very essential aspect of the control mechanism of osteoclastic resorption, i.e. its spatial control, remains poorly understood. Under physiological conditions, multinucleated osteoclasts are only detected on the bone surface, while their mono-nucleated precursors are only in the bone marrow. How are pre-osteoclasts targeted to the bone surface? How is their progressive differentiation coordinated with their approach to the bone surface sites to be resorbed, which is where they finally fuse? Here we review the information on the bone marrow distribution of differentiating pre-osteoclasts relative to the position of the mandatory factors for their differentiation as well as relative to physical entities that may affect their access to the remodelling sites. This info allows recognizing an "osteoclastogenesis route" through the bone marrow and leading to the coincident fusion/resorption site - but also points to what still remains to be clarified regarding this route and regarding the restriction of fusion at the resorption site. Finally, we discuss the mechanism responsible for the start of resorption and its spatial extension. This review underscores that fully understanding the control of bone resorption requires to consider it in both space and time - which demands taking into account the context of bone tissue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kent Søe
- Clinical Cell Biology, Department of Pathology, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense C, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense M, Denmark; Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense M, Denmark.
| | - Jean-Marie Delaisse
- Clinical Cell Biology, Department of Pathology, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense C, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense M, Denmark; Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense M, Denmark.
| | - Xenia Goldberg Borggaard
- Clinical Cell Biology, Department of Pathology, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense C, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense M, Denmark; Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense M, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang X, Guo B, Li Q, Peng J, Yang Z, Wang A, Li D, Hou Z, Lv K, Kan G, Cao H, Wu H, Song J, Pan X, Sun Q, Ling S, Li Y, Zhu M, Zhang P, Peng S, Xie X, Tang T, Hong A, Bian Z, Bai Y, Lu A, Li Y, He F, Zhang G, Li Y. miR-214 targets ATF4 to inhibit bone formation. Nat Med 2012; 19:93-100. [DOI: 10.1038/nm.3026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 412] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2012] [Accepted: 11/12/2012] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
6
|
Sun X, Kishore V, Fites K, Akkus O. Osteoblasts detect pericellular calcium concentration increase via neomycin-sensitive voltage gated calcium channels. Bone 2012; 51:860-7. [PMID: 22921901 DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2012.08.116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2012] [Revised: 07/31/2012] [Accepted: 08/11/2012] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
The mechanisms underlying the detection of critically loaded or micro-damaged regions of bone by bone cells are still a matter of debate. Our previous studies showed that calcium efflux originates from pre-failure regions of bone matrix and MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts respond to such efflux by an increase in the intracellular calcium concentration. The mechanisms by which the intracellular calcium concentration increases in response to an increase in the pericellular calcium concentration are unknown. Elevation of the intracellular calcium may occur via release from the internal calcium stores of the cell and/or via the membrane bound channels. The current study applied a wide range of pharmaceutical inhibitors to identify the calcium entry pathways involved in the process: internal calcium release from endoplasmic reticulum (ER, inhibited by thapsigargin and TMB-8), calcium receptor (CaSR, inhibited by calhex), stretch-activated calcium channel (SACC, inhibited by gadolinium), voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCC, inhibited by nifedipine, verapamil, neomycin, and ω-conotoxin), and calcium-induced-calcium-release channel (CICRC, inhibited by ryanodine and dantrolene). These inhibitors were screened for their effectiveness to block intracellular calcium increase by using a concentration gradient induced calcium efflux model which mimics calcium diffusion from the basal aspect of cells. The inhibitor(s) which reduced the intracellular calcium response was further tested on osteoblasts seeded on mechanically loaded notched cortical bone wafers undergoing damage. The results showed that only neomycin reduced the intracellular calcium response in osteoblasts, by 27%, upon extracellular calcium stimulus induced by concentration gradient. The inhibitory effect of neomycin was more pronounced (75% reduction in maximum fluorescence) for osteoblasts seeded on notched cortical bone wafers loaded mechanically to damaging load levels. These results imply that the increase in intracellular calcium occurs by the entry of extracellular calcium ions through VGCCs which are sensitive to neomycin. N-type and P-type VGCCs are potential candidates because they are observed in osteoblasts and they are sensitive to neomycin. The calcium channels identified in this study provide new insight into mechanisms underlying the targeted repair process which is essential to bone adaptation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuanhao Sun
- Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Delgado-Calle J, Sañudo C, Bolado A, Fernández AF, Arozamena J, Pascual-Carra MA, Rodriguez-Rey JC, Fraga MF, Bonewald L, Riancho JA. DNA methylation contributes to the regulation of sclerostin expression in human osteocytes. J Bone Miner Res 2012; 27:926-37. [PMID: 22162201 DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.1491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Sclerostin, encoded by the SOST gene, is a potent inhibitor of bone formation, produced by osteocytes, not by osteoblasts, but little is known about the molecular mechanisms controlling its expression. We aimed to test the hypothesis that epigenetic mechanisms, specifically DNA methylation, modulate SOST expression. We found two CpG-rich regions in SOST: region 1, located in the proximal promoter, and region 2, around exon 1. qMSP and pyrosequencing analysis of DNA methylation showed that region 2 was largely methylated in all samples analyzed. In contrast, marked differences were observed in region 1. Whereas the CpG-rich region 1 was hypermethylated in osteoblasts, this region was largely hypomethylated in microdissected human osteocytes. Bone lining cells showed a methylation profile between primary osteoblasts and osteocytes. Whereas SOST expression was detected at very low level or not at all by RT-qPCR in several human osteoblastic and nonosteoblastic cell lines, and human primary osteoblasts under basal conditions, it was dramatically upregulated (up to 1300-fold) by the demethylating agent AzadC. Experiments using reporter vectors demonstrated the functional importance of the region -581/+30 of the SOST gene, which contains the CpG-rich region 1. In vitro methylation of this CpG-island impaired nuclear protein binding and led to a 75 ± 12% inhibition of promoter activity. In addition, BMP-2-induced expression of SOST was markedly enhanced in cells demethylated by AzadC. Overall, these results strongly suggest that DNA methylation is involved in the regulation of SOST expression during osteoblast-osteocyte transition, presumably by preventing the binding of transcription factors to the proximal promoter. To our knowledge, our data provide first ever evidence of the involvement of DNA methylation in the regulation of SOST expression and may help to establish convenient experimental models for further studies of human sclerostin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesús Delgado-Calle
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital U.M. Valdecilla-IFIMAV, University of Cantabria, RETICEF, Santander, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kumarasinghe DD, Perilli E, Tsangari H, Truong L, Kuliwaba JS, Hopwood B, Atkins GJ, Fazzalari NL. Critical molecular regulators, histomorphometric indices and their correlations in the trabecular bone in primary hip osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2010; 18:1337-44. [PMID: 20650323 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2010.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2010] [Revised: 06/22/2010] [Accepted: 07/14/2010] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study examined differential gene expression, histomorphometric indices and relationships between these, in femoral trabecular bone from osteoarthritis (OA) patients and control (CTL) subjects, with the aim of identifying potential molecular drivers consistent with changes in structural and remodelling indices in the OA pathology. MATERIALS AND METHODS Bone samples from the intertrochanteric (IT) region were obtained from age and sex-matched cohorts of 23 primary hip OA patients and 21 CTL subjects. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and histomorphometric analysis were performed on each sample and correlations between gene expression and histomorphometric variables determined. RESULTS Alterations in gene expression, structural indices and correlations between these were found in OA bone compared to CTL. In OA bone, expression of critical regulators of osteoblast differentiation (TWIST1) and function (PTEN, TIMP4) were decreased, while genes associated with inflammation (SMAD3, CD14) were increased. Bone structural and formation indices (BV/TV, Tb.N, OS/BS) were increased, whereas resorption indices (ES/BS, ES/BV) were decreased. Importantly, significant correlations in CTL bone between CTNNB1 expression and formation indices (OS/BS, OS/BV, OV/BV) were absent in OA bone, indicating altered WNT/β-catenin signalling. TWIST1 expression and BV/TV were correlated in CTL bone, but not in OA bone, consistent with altered osteoblastogenesis in OA. Matrix metalloproteinase 25 (MMP25) expression and remodelling indices (ES/BS, ES/BV, ES/TV) were correlated only in OA pointing to aberrant bone remodelling in this pathology. CONCLUSIONS These findings indicate an altered state of osteoblast differentiation and function in OA driven by several key molecular regulators. In association with this differential gene expression, an altered state of both trabecular bone remodelling and resulting microarchitecture were also observed, further characterising the pathogenesis of primary hip OA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D D Kumarasinghe
- Bone & Joint Research Laboratory, Surgical Pathology, SA Pathology, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|