Tegaserod for dyspepsia and reflux symptoms in patients with chronic constipation: an exploratory open-label study

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Sustained-Release Formula of Mosapride-Plus-Esomeprazole Combination Therapy to Esomeprazole Monotherapy in Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

We aimed to evaluate whether adding a sustained-release (SR) formula of mosapride to proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) would be more effective in controlling symptoms than PPI alone in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Sixty patients with heartburn and/or regurgitation were randomly assigned to two groups: mosapride SR 15 mg combined with esomeprazole 20 mg once daily (ME group) and esomeprazole 20 mg once daily alone (E group). The primary endpoint was the complete-resolution rate of GERD symptoms after eight-week medication, and the secondary endpoints were the complete-resolution rate of GERD symptoms after four-week medication, symptom-improvement rates ≥ 50% after four- and eight-week medication, and change in reflux-disease-questionnaire (RDQ) and GERD-health-related quality-of-life (GERD-HRQL) scores from baseline at four- and eight-week medication. No significant differences in complete-symptom-resolution rates at eight weeks and four weeks or in the changes in RDQ and GERD-HRQL scores from baseline at four- and eight-week medication were observed between the ME and E groups. The symptom-improvement rate of ≥50% after four and eight weeks was comparable between both groups. Adding mosapride SR to esomeprazole in patients with GERD provides no additional benefits in controlling GERD symptoms.

Comparing the Effect of Psyllium Seed on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease With Oral Omeprazole in Patients With Functional Constipation

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most common gastrointestinal diseases. Several studies have been carried out on the treatment of symptoms associated with GERD. The present study aimed to compare the effect of Psyllium seed and oral omeprazole on GERD in patients with functional constipation. In this trial, 132 patients were divided into 2 groups. The impact of omeprazole and Psyllium seed on the treatment and recurrence of GERD was studied. Among the patients, the rate of response to treatment was 89.2% (n = 58) in the Psyllium seed group, while in omeprazole group, it was 94% (n = 63; P = .31). The recurrence rates of Psyllium seed and omeprazole groups were 24.1% (n =14) and 69.8% (n = 44), respectively (P < .001). The results showed that treatment of functional constipation by Psyllium seed in patients with GERD leads to improvement of GERD and its recurrences in comparison with omeprazole.

Proton pump inhibitors for functional dyspepsia

BACKGROUND

Functional dyspepsia (FD or non-ulcer dyspepsia) is defined as continuous or frequently recurring epigastric pain or discomfort for which no organic cause can be found. Acid suppressive therapy, including proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), has been proposed as a therapeutic option in FD, but its efficacy remains controversial. While PPIs are generally considered safe and well tolerated, they have been associated with adverse events, especially in the long term. For this reason, decisions on whether to initiate or continue PPI therapy should be made based on an appropriate clinical indication. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to evaluate whether PPI therapy provides symptomatic relief in FD.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors in the improvement of global symptoms of dyspepsia and quality of life compared to placebo, H2 receptor antagonists or prokinetics, in people with functional dyspepsia.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched in the following electronic databases: the Cochrane Library (to May 2017), MEDLINE (OvidSP; to May 2017), Embase (OvidSP; to May 2017), and SIGLE grey literature (up to May 2017) and clinical trial registries; we handsearched abstracts from conferences up to May 2017. We screened non-systematic reviews, systematic reviews and guidelines to identify any additional trials. We contacted trialists to obtain missing information.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any PPI with placebo, H2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) or prokinetics for the treatment of FD of at least two weeks' duration. Participants were adults (aged 16 years or greater) with an adequate diagnosis of FD (any validated criteria such as Rome I, II, III or Lancet Working Group).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed eligibility and trial quality, and extracted data. We collected data on dyspeptic symptoms, quality of life and number of overall adverse events. Specific adverse events were beyond the scope of this review.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 25 RCTs from 27 papers (with 8453 participants) studying the effect of PPIs versus placebo, H2RAs or prokinetics for improvement of global symptoms of dyspepsia and quality of life in people with FD. Low-dose PPIs had similar efficacy as standard-dose PPIs, therefore we combined these subgroups for the analysis. PPI was more effective than placebo at relieving overall dyspepsia symptoms in people with FD (risk ratio (RR) 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82 to 0.94; participants = 6172; studies = 18; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 11; moderate quality evidence). PPIs may have little or no effect compared with H2RAs (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.04; participants = 740; studies = 2; low quality evidence), and may be slightly more effective than prokinetics (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.99; participants = 1033; studies = 5; NNTB 16; low quality evidence) at relieving overall dyspepsia symptoms in people with FD. PPIs plus prokinetics have probably little or no effect compared with PPIs alone at relieving overall dyspepsia symptoms (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.08; participants = 407; studies = 2; moderate quality evidence).There was no difference when subgrouped by Helicobacter pylori status, country of origin, or presence of reflux or Rome III subtypes. There were no differences in the number of adverse events observed between PPIs and any of the other treatments. There were fewer adverse events in the combination of PPI plus prokinetics compared to prokinetics alone (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.93; participants = 407; studies = 2; moderate quality evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is evidence that PPIs are effective for the treatment of FD, independent of the dose and duration of treatment compared with placebo. PPIs may be slightly more effective than prokinetics for the treatment of FD; however, the evidence is scarce. The trials evaluating PPIs versus prokinetics are difficult to interpret as they are at risk of bias. Although the effect of these drugs seems to be small, the drugs are well tolerated.

Gastrointestinal symptoms associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease, and their relapses after treatment with proton pump inhibitors: A systematic review

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common functional gastrointestinal disorder with significant effects on the quality of life. The burden of GERD is soaring in Asia. Preventing symptom relapse is a therapeutic goal in GERD patients. Since proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are the first-line treatment of GERD, drug failure has become a major problem in the treatment procedure. We reviewed the literature in order to find articles related to comorbidities and symptoms affecting GERD from 1980 to 2015 via PubMed and Google Scholar using keywords such as ‘Gastroesophageal reflux disease’, ‘Gastrointestinal symptoms’ and Boolean operators (such as AND, OR, NOT). Due to the cost of PPI therapy and the high rate of GERD relapse after PPI therapy, demand for continuing this type of treatment is decreasing. Thus, we need to discover new approaches to treat the disease and also investigate the relationship between the treatment of GERD and its comorbidities and symptoms such as functional constipation.

Proton pump inhibitors for functional dyspepsia

BACKGROUND

Functional dyspepsia (FD or non-ulcer dyspepsia) is defined as continuous or frequently recurring epigastric pain or discomfort for which no organic cause can be found. Acid suppressive therapy, including proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), has been proposed as a therapeutic option in FD, but its efficacy remains controversial. While PPIs are generally considered safe and well tolerated, they have been associated with adverse events, especially in the long term. For this reason, decisions on whether to initiate or continue PPI therapy should be made based on an appropriate clinical indication. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to evaluate whether PPI therapy provides symptomatic relief in FD.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors in the improvement of global symptoms of dyspepsia and quality of life compared to placebo, H2 receptor antagonists or prokinetics, in people with functional dyspepsia.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched in the following electronic databases: the Cochrane Library (to January 2016), MEDLINE (OvidSP; to February 2016), Embase (OvidSP; to February 2016), and SIGLE grey literature (up to February 2016) and clinical trial registries; we handsearched abstracts from conferences up to February 2016. We screened non-systematic reviews, systematic reviews and guidelines to identify any additional trials. We contacted trialists to obtain missing information.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any PPI with placebo, H2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) or prokinetics for the treatment of FD. Participants were adults (aged 16 years or greater) with an adequate diagnosis of FD (any validated criteria such as Rome I, II, III or Lancet Working Group).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed eligibility, trial quality and extracted data. We collected data on dyspeptic symptoms, quality of life and number of overall adverse events. Specific adverse events were beyond the scope of this review.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 23 RCTs from 22 papers (with 8759 participants) studying the effect of PPIs versus placebo, H2RAs or prokinetics for improvement of global symptoms of dyspepsia and quality of life in people with FD. Low-dose PPIs had similar efficacy as standard-dose PPIs, therefore we combined these subgroups for the analysis. Two to eight weeks of therapy with PPI was slightly more effective than placebo at relieving overall dyspepsia symptoms in people with FD (risk ratio (RR) 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82 to 0.94; participants = 5968; studies = 16; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 13; moderate quality evidence). PPIs may be slightly more effective than H2RAs (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.04; participants = 740; studies = 2, NNTB 13; low quality evidence), and slightly more effective than prokinetics (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.00; participants = 892; studies = 4; NNTB 20; low quality evidence) at relieving overall dyspepsia symptoms in people with FD. PPIs plus prokinetics were possibly slightly more effective than PPIs alone at relieving overall dyspepsia symptoms (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.08; participants = 407; studies = 2; NNTB 18; moderate quality evidence).The was no difference when subgrouped by Helicobacter pylori status, country of origin, or presence of reflux or Rome III subtypes. There were no differences in the number of adverse events observed between PPIs and any of the other treatments.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is evidence that PPIs are effective for the treatment of FD, independent of the dose and duration of treatment compared with placebo. PPIs may be slightly more effective than H2RAs for the treatment of FD; however, the evidence is scarce. The trials evaluating PPIs versus prokinetics are difficult to interpret as they are at risk of bias. Although the effect of these drugs seems to be small, the drugs are well tolerated.

Chronic pulmonary microaspiration: high-resolution computed tomographic findings in 13 patients

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to describe the high-resolution computed tomography (CT) manifestations of chronic pulmonary microaspiration, a condition characterized by recurrent subclinical aspiration of small droplets of gastric contents or foreign particles into the lungs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the CT findings in 13 consecutive patients with clinical (n=13) and histologic (n=1) diagnosis of chronic pulmonary microaspiration. Twelve patients presented with persistent cough, but none had a clinical history of acute aspiration. One patient was asymptomatic. All patients had volumetric CT of the chest reconstructed using thin sections (1 to 1.3 mm) at the time of diagnosis. The CT scans were interpreted by 3 chest radiologists who reached a final decision by consensus.

RESULTS

All 13 patients had centrilobular nodules and ground-glass opacities that involved mainly the dependent lung regions in 11 patients and had a random distribution in 2. Other common findings included branching opacities (n=10), small foci of consolidation (n=7), septal lines (n=5), and bronchiectasis (n=7). The 13 patients had at least 1 risk factor for aspiration including gastroesophageal reflux (n=9), hiatus hernia (n=6), esophageal dysfunction (n=3), oropharyngeal dysphagia (n=1), esophageal carcinoma (n=1), and use of sedatives (n=2).

CONCLUSIONS

The high-resolution CT manifestations of chronic pulmonary microaspiration consist mainly of centrilobular nodules and ground-glass opacities that tend to involve predominately the dependent regions. Branching opacities and small foci of consolidation are seen in the majority of cases.

A randomized trial of 5-hydroxytryptamine4-receptor agonist, YKP10811, on colonic transit and bowel function in functional constipation

BACKGROUND & AIMS

YKP10811, a selective agonist of the serotonin 5-hydroxytryptamine-4 receptor, increases gastrointestinal (GI) motility. We investigated the safety and effects of YKP10811 on GI and colonic transit and bowel movements (BMs) in patients with functional constipation in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

METHODS

Patients with functional constipation, based on the Rome III criteria, were assigned randomly to groups given YKP10811 10 mg (n = 15), 20 mg (n = 16), 30 mg (n = 15), or placebo (n = 11) daily for 8 days. Transit of solids was measured by validated scintigraphy at baseline and on days 7 to 9. Patients kept diaries on days 1 to 9, recording time to first BM, number of BMs/day, and stool consistency (based on the Bristol Stool Form Scale). To evaluate safety, we collected data on adverse events and clinical laboratory test and electrocardiograms results. The primary efficacy end points were determined from an intent-to-treat analysis assessing colonic transit at 24 hours and the half-time (t1/2) of gastric emptying, using analysis of covariance models. Secondary efficacy end points included measures of colonic transit (geometric center at 4 and 24 hours), small-bowel transit (based on colon filling at 6 hours), t1/2 of ascending colon emptying, and bowel functions. We used the Dunnett test to compare the effects of each dose with placebo. A per-protocol analysis (PPA) assessed the t1/2 of gastric emptying and time to first BM using proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Fifty-five participants completed the study. YKP10811 was associated with a significant acceleration in colon filling at 6 hours (P < .05), t1/2 of ascending colon emptying, and colonic transit at 24 and 48 hours, as well as increased stool consistency over 8 days (based on intent-to-treat analysis). In general, the 10-mg and 20-mg doses were the most effective in accelerating colonic transit. No serious adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

YKP10811, a selective agonist of the serotonin receptor 5-hydroxytryptamine-4, accelerates GI and colonic transit and improves bowel functions in patients with functional constipation, compared with placebo. ClinicalTrial.Gov: NCT01523184.

Randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of mosapride plus omeprazole combination therapy to omeprazole monotherapy in gastroesophageal reflux disease

OBJECTIVE

We investigated whether the prokinetic activity of mosapride, a 5-hydroxytryptamine 4 receptor agonist, in combination with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) would ameliorate symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in Japanese patients.

METHODS

Patients who experienced reflux symptoms more than twice weekly were eligible for this study. In all, 60 patients were randomized to receive mosapride 5 mg thrice daily combined with omeprazole 10 mg once daily (GO group), or omeprazole alone (O group) for 4 weeks. The patients completed the frequency scale for the symptoms of GERD (FSSG) at the beginning and the end of the study. The primary outcome compared changes in the FSSG reflux-related symptom (RS) score between treatment groups during the study period.

RESULTS

The FSSG RS scores significantly decreased both in the GO group and the O group, with no differences in improvement between the groups (-5.86 for the GO group vs -4.89 for the O group, P = 0.49). In non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) patients the improvement was significantly lower than that in erosive GERD patients (-4.00 vs -7.67, P = 0.02). However, the addition of mosapride was effective in subgroup analyses of specific symptoms, such as burping.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining mosapride with PPI provided no additional amelioration of reflux symptoms compared to PPI alone. Both regimens provided less relief from reflux symptoms in NERD than in erosive GERD patients. The addition of mosapride ameliorated reflux in patients with symptoms like burping.

Medical treatments of GERD: the old and new

The mainstay of pharmacological therapy for GERD is gastric acid suppression with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), which are superior to histamine-2 receptor antagonists for healing erosive esophagitis and achieving symptomatic relief. However, up to one-third of patients may not respond to PPI therapy, creating the need for alternative treatments. Potential approaches include transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation inhibitors, augmentation esophageal defense mechanisms by improving esophageal clearance or enhancing epithelial repair, and modulation of sensory pathways responsible for GERD symptoms. This review discusses the effectiveness of acid suppression and the data on alternative pharmacological approaches for the treatment of GERD.

Influence of Weitongxiaopi Decoction on serum and gastric ghrelin and leptin in rats with functional dyspepsia

AIM: To observe the influence of Weitongxiaopi Decoction (WTXP) on serum and gastric ghrelin and leptin in rats with functional dyspepsia of liver-depression and spleen-deficiency type.

METHODS: A rat model of functional dyspepsia was established by the improved tail clamp method. The rats with functional dyspepsia were then given WTXP or cisapride (CP) for 3 wk. After the treatment, serum and gastric ghrelin and leptin were examined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and Western blot, respectively.

RESULTS: The content of serum ghrelin was significantly higher (132.7 ± 10.78 vs 103.17 ± 13.46, P < 0.01) and that of serum leptin was significantly lower (31.30 ± 5.81 vs 37.55 ± 4.32, P < 0.01) in the WTXP group than in the CP group. The expression level of gastric ghrelin was significantly higher (150.87 ± 12.76 vs 118.97 ± 8.93, P < 0.01) and that of gastric leptin was significantly lower (60.28 ± 9.28 vs 67.75 ± 5.67, P < 0.01) in the WTXP group than in the CP group.

CONCLUSION: Weitongxiaopi Decoction can increase the levels of serum and gastric ghrelin but decrease those of serum and gastric leptin in rats with functional dyspepsia.

Effects of tegaserod and erythromycin in upper gut dysmotility: a comparative study

OBJECTIVES

Tegaserod may enhance upper gut transit, but, its prokinetic effects on antral/small bowel motility and how this compares with erythromycin is unknown. We prospectively assessed and compared the effects of tegaserod and erythromycin on upper gut motility.

METHODS

In an open label, non-crossover study, 22 patients (M/F=4/18; mean age=37 years) with symptoms of upper gut dysmotility underwent 24-hour ambulatory antroduodenojejunal manometry with a six-sensor solid state probe. The effects of 12 mg oral tegaserod were compared with 125 mg intravenous erythromycin by quantifying pressure wave activity and assessing motor patterns.

RESULTS

Motor activity increased (p<0.05) in antrum, duodenum and jejunum with both drugs when compared to baseline period. The motor response with tegaserod was higher (p<0.05) in jejunum and occurred during the second or third hours, whereas with erythromycin, it was higher (p<0.05) in antrum and occurred within 30 minutes. After tegaserod, a 'fed-response' like pattern was seen whereas after erythromycin, large amplitude (>100 mmHg) antral contractions at 3 cycles per minute were seen. Following tegaserod and erythromycin, phase III MMCs occurred in 12 (55%) and 8 (36%) patients respectively (p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Both drugs increase upper gut motility and induce MMC's, but exert a differential response. Tegaserod produces a more sustained prokinetic effect in the duodenum/jejunum, whereas erythromycin predominantly increases antral motor activity.