Pharmacokinetics and protein binding of cefazolin in morbidly obese patients

The pharmacokinetics of antibiotics in patients with obesity: a systematic review and consensus guidelines for dose adjustments

Obesity can cause physiological changes resulting in antibiotic pharmacokinetic alterations and suboptimal drug exposures. This systematic review aimed to summarise the available evidence on this topic and provide guidance for dose adjustment of antibiotics in adult (age ≥18 years) patients with obesity (BMI >30 kg/m2). We searched PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL databases to find relevant studies published between database inception and Dec 30, 2023. We initially identified 6113 studies, which became 4654 studies after duplicate removal, and 128 studies were included in the final review. β-lactam antibiotics were most commonly studied (57 studies), followed by the group of glycopeptides, lipoglycopeptides, and oxazolidinones (45 studies). The certainty of evidence was low or very low for all antibiotics and a meta-analysis was not possible due to the heterogeneity of study populations and methods. Obesity modestly alters the pharmacokinetics of β-lactam antibiotics, but evidence does not support routine dose adjustments. For aminoglycosides and glycopeptides, the impact of obesity on pharmacokinetics is evident and weight-based dosing is recommended. Data are sparse for other antibiotic classes and research needs are described. In the absence of robust pharmacokinetic data, therapeutic drug monitoring can be used to guide individualised dosing.

Incidence of surgical infection in cefazolin 3 g versus 2 g for colorectal surgery in obese patients

OBJECTIVE

To compare the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) between cefazolin 3 g and 2 g surgical prophylaxis in patients weighing ≥120 kg that undergo elective colorectal surgery.

METHODS

A multicenter, retrospective cohort study was performed utilizing a validated database of elective colorectal surgeries in Michigan acute care hospitals. Adults weighing ≥120 kg who received cefazolin and metronidazole for surgical prophylaxis between 7/2012 and 6/2021 were included. The primary outcome was SSI, which was defined as an infection diagnosed within 30 days following the principal operative procedure. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify variables associated with SSI; the exposure of interest was cefazolin 3 g surgical prophylaxis.

RESULTS

A total of 581 patients were included; of these, 367 (63.1%) received cefazolin 3 g, while 214 (36.8%) received 2 g. Patients who received cefazolin 3 g had less optimal antibiotic timing (324 [88.3%] vs 200 [93.5%]; P = .043) and a higher receipt of at least 1 of the prophylaxis antibiotics after incision (22 [6%] vs 5 [2.3%]; P = .043). There was no SSI difference between cefazolin 3 g and 2 g cohorts (23 [6.3%] vs 16 [7.5%], P = .574). When accounting for age, smoking status, and surgical duration, cefazolin 3 g was not associated with a reduction in SSI (adjOR, .64; 95%CI, .32-1.29).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical prophylaxis with cefazolin 3 g, in combination with metronidazole, was not associated with decreased SSI compared to 2 g dosing in obese patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery.

Population pharmacokinetics of unbound cefazolin in infected hospitalized patients requiring intermittent high-flux haemodialysis: can a three-times-weekly post-dialysis dosing regimen provide optimal treatment?

OBJECTIVES

To describe the population pharmacokinetics of cefazolin in infected hospitalized patients requiring intermittent haemodialysis (IHD).

METHODS

This prospective population pharmacokinetic study was conducted in IHD patients prescribed cefazolin 2 g three times weekly. Plasma samples were collected at prespecified timepoints and assayed for total and unbound concentrations using validated LC. Pharmacokinetic modelling and dosing simulations were performed using Pmetrics®. PTA in plasma suitable for MSSA (unbound trough concentrations of ≥2 mg/L for the final 24 h of a 72 h interval) were simulated for different dosing regimens. A PTA of ≥95% was deemed acceptable.

RESULTS

A total of 260 cefazolin concentrations (130 total, 130 unbound) were collected from 16 patients (14 female) with a median age of 51 years. The median (IQR) pre-dialysis unbound cefazolin concentration for a 3 day dose interval trough was 17.7 (13.5-31.4) mg/L. The median (IQR) unbound fraction was 0.38 (0.32-0.46). The lowest pre-dialysis unbound concentration was 9.1 mg/L. A two-compartment model with a complex protein-binding component adequately described the data. The mean unbound cefazolin CL during IHD was 16.4 ± 4.26 L/h, compared with 0.40 ± 0.19 L/h when dialysis was off. Duration of time on haemodialysis (TOH) was the only covariate supported in the final model. The 2 g three-times-weekly regimen was associated with a PTA of 99.7% on dosing simulations to maintain unbound concentrations of ≥2 mg/L with TOH of 6 months. The 1 g three-times-weekly post-dialysis was associated with a PTA of 95.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

A 2 g three-times-weekly post-dialysis cefazolin regimen is supported for MSSA infections.

Documentation of the Patient Characteristics Morbid Obesity and Bariatric Surgery in the Hospital Information System and the Influence on the Number of Medication-Related Problems

BACKGROUND

As a result of pharmacokinetic changes, individuals with morbid obesity and/or with bariatric surgery may require dose adjustments, additional monitoring or medication should be avoided. Clinical decision support (CDS) may provide automated alerts enabling correct prescribing but requires documentation of these patient characteristics in the Hospital Information System (HIS) to prevent medication-related problems (MRPs).

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective is to determine the proportion of patients with documentation of the patient characteristics morbid obesity and bariatric surgery in the HIS. The secondary objective is to compare the proportion of patients with an MRP in the group with versus without documentation. Also, the type and severity of MRPs and the medication involved are determined.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was performed. Patients admitted to the hospital were identified as morbidly obese and/or with bariatric surgery. In the identified patients, the proportion of patients with documentation of the patient characteristics in the HIS was evaluated as primary outcome. Subsequently, patient records were reviewed for MRPs, which were categorized and associated medication was registered. For the primary objective, descriptive statistics was used. For the secondary outcome, the Fisher's exact test was used.

RESULTS

In 43 (21.4%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 15.7%-27.1%) of 201 included patient (113 morbid obesity, 70 bariatric surgery and 18 both), the patient characteristics were documented. An MRP occurred in 2.3% versus 13.9% (P = 0.032) of patients with and without documentation, respectively. The most common MRP was underdosing in morbid obesity, while in patients with bariatric surgery it was prescription of contra-indicated medication.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

The proportion of patients with documentation of the patient characteristics bariatric surgery and/or morbid obesity in the HIS is low, which appears to be associated with more MRPs. To improve medication safety, it is important to document these patient characteristics.

Impact of Obesity on Hepatic Drug Clearance: What are the Influential Variables?

Drug clearance in obese subjects varies widely among different drugs and across subjects with different severity of obesity. This study investigates correlations between plasma clearance (CLp) and drug- and patient-related characteristics in obese subjects, and evaluates the systematic accuracy of common weight-based dosing methods. A physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling approach that uses recent information on obesity-related changes in physiology was used to simulate CLp for a normal-weight subject (body mass index [BMI] = 20) and subjects with various severities of obesity (BMI 25-60) for hypothetical hepatically cleared drugs with a wide range of properties. Influential variables for CLp change were investigated. For each drug and obese subject, the exponent that yields perfect allometric scaling of CLp from normal-weight subjects was assessed. Among all variables, BMI and relative changes in enzyme activity resulting from obesity proved highly correlated with obesity-related CLp changes. Drugs bound to α1-acid glycoprotein (AAG) had lower CLp changes compared to drugs bound to human serum albumin (HSA). Lower extraction ratios (ER) corresponded to higher CLp changes compared to higher ER. The allometric exponent for perfect scaling ranged from -3.84 to 3.34 illustrating that none of the scaling methods performed well in all situations. While all three dosing methods are generally systematically accurate for drugs with unchanged or up to 50% increased enzyme activity in subjects with a BMI below 30 kg/m2, in any of the other cases, information on the different drug properties and severity of obesity is required to select an appropriate dosing method for individuals with obesity.

Interspecies variability in protein binding of antibiotics basis for translational PK/PD studies-a case study using cefazolin

For antimicrobial agents in particular, plasma protein binding (PPB) plays a pivotal role in deciphering key properties of drug candidates. Animal models are generally used in the preclinical development of new drugs to predict their effects in humans using translational pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD). Thus, we compared the protein binding (PB) of cefazolin as well as bacterial growth under various conditions in vitro. The PB extent of cefazolin was studied in human, bovine, and rat plasmas at different antibiotic concentrations in buffer and media containing 20-70% plasma or pure plasma using ultrafiltration (UF) and equilibrium dialysis (ED). Moreover, bacterial growth and time-kill assays were performed in Mueller Hinton Broth (MHB) containing various plasma percentages. The pattern for cefazolin binding to plasma proteins was found to be similar for both UF and ED. There was a significant decrease in cefazolin binding to bovine plasma compared to human plasma, whereas the pattern in rat plasma was more consistent with that in human plasma. Our growth curve analysis revealed considerable growth inhibition of Escherichia coli at 70% bovine or rat plasma compared with 70% human plasma or pure MHB. As expected, our experiments with cefazolin at low concentrations showed that E. coli grew slightly better in 20% human and rat plasma compared to MHB, most probably due to cefazolin binding to proteins in the plasma. Based on the example of cefazolin, our study highlights the interspecies differences of PB with potential impact on PK/PD. These findings should be considered before preclinical PK/PD data can be extrapolated to human patients.

Morphomics-informed population pharmacokinetic and physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling to optimize cefazolin surgical prophylaxis

INTRODUCTION

Cefazolin is the leading antibiotic used to prevent surgical site infections worldwide. Consensus guidelines recommend adjustment of the cefazolin dose above and below 120 kg without regard to body composition. Algorithms exist to repurpose radiologic data into body composition (morphomics) and inform dosing decisions in obesity.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the current standard of body weight to morphomic measurements as covariates of cefazolin pharmacokinetics and aid dose stratification of cefazolin in patients with obesity undergoing colorectal surgery.

METHODS

This prospective study measured cefazolin plasma, fat, and colon tissue concentrations in colorectal surgery patients in order to develop a morphomics-informed population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model to guide dose adjustments. A physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was also constructed to inform tissue partitioning in morbidly obese patients (n = 21, body mass index ≥35 kg/m2 with one or more co-morbid conditions).

RESULTS

Morphomics and pharmacokinetic data were available in 58 patients with a median [min, max] weight and age of 95.9 [68.5, 148.8] kg and 55 [25, 79] years, respectively. The plasma-to-subcutaneous fat partition coefficient was predicted to be 0.072 and 0.060 by the PopPK and PBPK models, respectively. The estimated creatinine clearance (eCLcr ) and body depth at the third lumbar vertebra (body depth_L3) were identified as covariates of cefazolin exposure. The probability of maintaining subcutaneous fat concentrations above 2 μg/mL for 100% of a 4-h surgical period was below 90% when eCLcr ≥105 mL/min and body depth_L3 ≥ 300 mm and less sensitive to the rate of infusion between 5 and 60 min.

CONCLUSIONS

Kidney function and morphomics were more informative than body weight as covariates of cefazolin target site exposure. Data from more diverse populations, consensus on target cefazolin exposure, and comparative studies are needed before a change in practice can be implemented.

Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cefazolin using total and unbound serum concentrations in patients with high body weight

The objective of this study was to evaluate the steady state pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cefazolin in patients with a high body weight. Cefazolin was administered by 0.5-h infusions to 11 patients with total body weight (TBW) ≥120 kg receiving 3 g q8h, and 12 patients with TBW <120 kg receiving 2 g q8h. Total and unbound serum concentration-time data obtained from serial blood samples were analysed simultaneously by population pharmacokinetic modelling using NONMEM. Probability of target attainment (PTA) was calculated for various dosing regimens through Monte Carlo simulations based on the cumulative percentage of the dosing interval that the unbound concentration exceeds the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value for the pathogen at steady state (fT_MIC) ≥40%, ≥60% and 100%. A two-compartment model with non-linear protein binding and allometric scaling of the central volume of distribution using TBW best characterized both total and unbound concentration-time data. Unbound clearance was significantly associated with creatinine clearance, and maximum protein binding constant was significantly associated with serum albumin concentration and body mass index (P <0.05). Based on unbound concentration-time profiles, all simulated regimens achieved PTA >90% at MIC values ≤2 mg/L using fT_MIC ≥40%, at MIC values ≤1 mg/L using fT_MIC ≥60%, and at MIC values ≤0.5 mg/L using fT_MIC of 100%. At fT_MIC ≥60%, 0.5-h infusion of cefazolin 1 g q8h achieved PTA <90% at MIC values ≥2 mg/L in patients with TBW≥120 kg; however, prolonged-infusion and higher-dose regimens improved PTA to >90%. Overall, cefazolin pharmacokinetics are altered considerably in obese patients. Higher-dose and/or prolonged-infusion cefazolin regimens should be considered in patients with TBW ≥120 kg, particularly those with less-susceptible Gram-negative infections.

Simple determination of urine cefazolin concentration in pediatric patients with urinary tract infections using high-performance liquid chromatography

Recently, global health concerns regarding increasing multidrug resistance have arisen. This study aimed to develop a simple, inexpensive, and rapid high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet (HPLC-UV) method for determining urinary concentrations of a 1st generation cephem antibiotic in pediatric patients with urinary tract infections (UTIs). HPLC-UV was used to analyze urinary cefazolin concentrations at a detection wavelength of 254 nm. The assay used contained 10-fold diluted urine with an internal standard (cephapirin). The standard calibration curve for cefazolin was linear in the concentration range of 31.25-500 μg/mL (r² >0.999). The retention times of cefazolin and the internal standard were 4.2 and 4.9 min, respectively. The within-day and between-day coefficients of variation were at these concentrations ranged 1.2-15.2 and 5.5-19.2 %, respectively. The urinary cefazolin concentration of a pediatric patient with a UTI was 1,476.6 μg/mL, which was over 700-fold higher than the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of cefazolin (≤ 2 μg/mL). The developed method is applicable to the confirmation of appropriate use for UTIs treatment as a therapeutic drug monitoring of cefazolin. Therefore, the findings of this study may contribute to the appropriate use of antibiotics to prevent antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in pediatric patients with UTIs.

Plasma and Interstitial Fluid Pharmacokinetics of Prophylactic Cefazolin in Elective Bariatric Surgery Patients

Guidelines for surgical prophylactic dosing of cefazolin in bariatric surgery vary in terms of recommended dose. This study aimed to describe the plasma and interstitial fluid (ISF) cefazolin pharmacokinetics in patients undergoing bariatric surgery and to determine an optimum dosing regimen. Abdominal subcutaneous ISF concentrations (measured using microdialysis) and plasma samples were collected at regular time points after administration of cefazolin 2 g intravenously. Total and unbound cefazolin concentrations were assayed and then modeled using Pmetrics. Monte Carlo dosing simulations (n = 5,000) were used to define cefazolin dosing regimens able to achieve a fractional target attainment (FTA) of >95% in the ISF suitable for the MIC for Staphylococcus aureus in isolates of ≤2 mg · L-1 and for a surgical duration of 4 h. Fourteen patients were included, with a mean (standard deviation [SD]) bodyweight of 148 (35) kg and body mass index (BMI) of 48 kg · m-2. Cefazolin protein binding ranged from 14 to 36% with variable penetration into ISF of 58% ± 56%. Cefazolin was best described as a four-compartment model including nonlinear protein binding. The mean central volume of distribution in the final model was 18.2 (SD 3.31) L, and the mean clearance was 32.4 (SD 20.2) L · h-1. A standard 2-g dose achieved an FTA of >95% for all patients with BMIs ranging from 36 to 69 kg · m-2. A 2-g prophylactic cefazolin dose achieves appropriate unbound plasma and ISF concentrations in obese and morbidly obese bariatric surgery patients.

Prophylactic Cefazolin Dosing in Obesity-a Systematic Review

Currently, there is no consensus on whether a standard 2-g prophylactic cefazolin dose provides sufficient antimicrobial coverage in obese surgical patients. This systematic review analysed both outcome and pharmacokinetic studies, aiming to determine the appropriate cefazolin dose. A systematic search was conducted using 4 databases. In total, 3 outcome and 15 pharmacokinetic studies met the inclusion criteria. All 3 outcome studies concluded that there is no need for increased dose. Also, 9 pharmacokinetic studies reached this conclusion; however, 6 pharmacokinetic studies recommended that 2-g dose is insufficient to achieve adequate plasma or tissue concentrations. The stronger body of evidence supports that 2-g dose of cefazolin is sufficient for surgery lasting up to 4 h; however, large-scale outcome studies are needed to confirm this evidence.

An Overview of the Protein Binding of Cephalosporins in Human Body Fluids: A Systematic Review

Introduction: Protein binding can diminish the pharmacological effect of beta-lactam antibiotics. Only the free fraction has an antibacterial effect. The aim of this systematic literature review was to give an overview of the current knowledge of protein binding of cephalosporins in human body fluids as well as to describe patient characteristics influencing the level of protein binding. Method: A systematic literature search was performed in Embase, Medline ALL, Web of Science Core Collection and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials with the following search terms: "protein binding," "beta-lactam antibiotic," and "body fluid." Only studies were included where protein binding was measured in humans in vivo. Results: The majority of studies reporting protein binding were performed in serum or plasma. Other fluids included pericardial fluid, blister fluid, bronchial secretion, pleural exudate, wound exudate, cerebrospinal fluid, dialysate, and peritoneal fluid. Protein binding differs between diverse cephalosporins and between different patient categories. For cefazolin, ceftriaxone, cefpiramide, and cefonicid a non-linear pattern in protein binding in serum or plasma was described. Several patient characteristics were associated with low serum albumin concentrations and were found to have lower protein binding compared to healthy volunteers. This was for critically ill patients, dialysis patients, and patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass during surgery. While mean/median percentages of protein binding are lower in these patient groups, individual values may vary considerably. Age is not likely to influence protein binding by itself, however limited data suggest that lower protein binding in newborns. Obesity was not correlated with altered protein binding. Discussion/Conclusion: Conclusions on protein binding in other body fluids than blood cannot be drawn due to the scarcity of data. In serum and plasma, there is a large variability in protein binding per cephalosporin and between different categories of patients. Several characteristics were identified which lead to a lower protein binding. The finding that some of the cephalosporins display a non-linear pattern of protein binding makes it even more difficult to predict the unbound concentrations in individual patients. Taken all these factors, it is recommended to measure unbound concentrations to optimize antibiotic exposure in individual patients. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, identifier (CRD42021252776).

Population pharmacokinetic model of cefazolin in total hip arthroplasty

Cefazolin is an antibiotic recommended for infection prevention in total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, the dosing regimen necessary to achieve therapeutic concentrations in obese patients remains unclear. The aim of this study was to conduct a population analysis of cefazolin pharmacokinetics (PK) and assess whether cefazolin administration should be weight adapted in THA. Adult patients undergoing THA surgery received an injection of 2000 mg of cefazolin, doubled in the case of BMI > 35 kg/m² and total body weight > 100 kg. A population PK study was conducted to quantify cefazolin exposure over time compared to the therapeutic concentration threshold. A total of 484 cefazolin measurements were acquired in 100 patients, of whom 29% were obese. A 2-compartment model best fitted the data, and creatinine clearance determined interpatient variability in elimination clearance. Our PK simulations using a 2000 mg cefazolin bolus showed that cefazolin concentrations remained above the threshold throughout surgery, regardless of weight or renal function. A 2000 mg cefazolin single injection without adaptation to weight or renal function and without intraoperative reinjection was efficient in maintaining therapeutic concentrations throughout surgery. The optimal target concentration and necessary duration of its maintenance remain unclear.

Surgical site infection rate is higher following hip and knee arthroplasty when cefazolin is underdosed

PURPOSE

While many guidelines recommend higher doses of cefazolin for patients with higher body weights, there are scant outcome data showing the benefit of higher doses. Surgical site infection (SSI) rates by dose of cefazolin used for surgical prophylaxis after hip or knee arthroplasty were analyzed.

METHODS

Analysis of patient data entered into New Zealand's national, prospective, surveillance and quality improvement SSI Improvement Programme database for the period July 2013 through December 2017 was conducted. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Healthcare Safety Network SSI definitions were used, and patients were followed for 90 days after surgery. Underdosing was defined as use of 1 g of cefazolin in patients weighing 80 kg or more or a cefazolin dose of <3 g in those weighing 120 kg or more.

RESULTS

There were 38,288 procedures where cefazolin was used for prophylaxis; patient body weight was known for all these procedures. Of the 1,840 patients who received 1 g of cefazolin, 676 (37%) weighed 80 kg or more. Of the 2,011 patients weighing 120 kg or more, 1,464 (73%) were underdosed. After multivariable analysis, male gender, higher total surgical risk scores, performance of revision and hip arthroplasties, and cefazolin underdosing were associated with higher SSI rates. For the 2,106 underdosed patients, the odds ratio for SSI was 2.19 (95% confidence interval, 1.61-2.99; P < 0.0001). The number of higher-weight patients needed to treat to prevent 1 SSI was 83, with an estimated cost of <NZ$500 to prevent 1 infection costing an estimated NZ$40,000.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty and with weights of ≥80 kg and those with weights of ≥120 kg should receive cefazolin doses of 2 g and ≥3 g, respectively, for SSI prophylaxis. The question of whether a dose of ≥4 g is needed in patients weighing 120 kg or more or who are above a given body mass index threshold (eg, >35 kg/m2 or >40 kg/m2) remains unanswered.

A case report: Community-acquired Pseudomonas aeruginosa necrotizing fasciitis in a morbidly obese diabetic young man can be fatal

We present a case study of a 26-year-old morbidly obese man with a three-day history of right leg pain and swelling. The swelling was associated with low grade fever. He was alert and conscious upon presentation to the hospital. His physical examination showed gross swelling of the entire right lower limb with no systemic manifestations. There was no discharge and bullae from the swelling area of the leg. He had high blood sugar and was newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus. He was diagnosed with necrotizing fasciitis. An intravenous imipenem-cilastatin 500 mg every 6 h together with clindamycin 900 mg every 8 h was started empirically. Extensive wound debridement was performed. The swab culture obtained intraoperatively grew Pseudomonas aeruginosa. He required an above knee amputation due to worsening infection despite wound debridement. Post-operatively, he developed acute kidney injury with severe metabolic acidosis, which required daily hemodialysis. However, the patient deteriorated due to septic shock with multi-organ failure, resulting in his death.

A Prospective Clinical Study Characterizing the Influence of Morbid Obesity on the Pharmacokinetics of Gentamicin: Towards Individualized Dosing in Obese Patients

Background and Objective

Gentamicin is an aminoglycoside antibiotic predominantly used in bloodstream infections. Although the prevalence of obesity is increasing dramatically, there is no consensus on how to adjust the dose in obese individuals. In this prospective clinical study, we study the pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in morbidly obese and non-obese individuals to develop a dosing algorithm that results in adequate drug exposure across body weights.

Methods

Morbidly obese subjects undergoing bariatric surgery and non-obese healthy volunteers received one intravenous dose of gentamicin (obese: 5 mg/kg based on lean body weight, non-obese: 5 mg/kg based on total body weight [TBW]) with subsequent 24-h sampling. All individuals had a normal renal function. Statistical analysis, modelling and Monte Carlo simulations were performed using R version 3.4.4 and NONMEM^® version 7.3.

Results

A two-compartment model best described the data. TBW was the best predictor for both clearance [CL = 0.089 × (TBW/70)^0.73] and central volume of distribution [V_c = 11.9 × (TBW/70)^1.25] (both p < 0.001). Simulations showed how gentamicin exposure changes across the weight range with currently used dosing algorithms and illustrated that using a nomogram based on a ‘dose weight’ [70 × (TBW/70)^0.73] will lead to similar exposure across the entire population.

Conclusions

In this study in morbidly obese and non-obese individuals ranging from 53 to 221 kg we identified body weight as an important determinant for both gentamicin CL and V_c. Using a body weight-based dosing algorithm, optimized exposure across the entire population can be achieved, thereby potentially improving efficacy and safety of gentamicin in the obese and morbidly obese population.

Trial Registration

Registered in the Dutch Trial Registry (NTR6058).

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s40262-019-00762-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Prophylactic Cefazolin Dosing and Surgical Site Infections: Does the Dose Matter in Obese Patients?

BACKGROUND

Most surgical prophylaxis guidelines recommend a 3-g cefazolin intravenous dose in patients weighing ≥ 120 kg. However, this recommendation is primarily based on pharmacokinetic studies rather than robust clinical evidence. This study aimed to compare the prevalence of surgical site infections (SSIs) in obese and non-obese patients (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m² and < 30 kg/m²), and those weighing ≥ 120 kg and < 120 kg, who received 2- g cefazolin preoperatively.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study was conducted in adult elective surgical patients. Patients receiving 2- g cefazolin were grouped as obese and non-obese, and by weight (≥ 120 kg or < 120 kg). The 90-day prevalence of SSI and potential contributing factors were investigated.

RESULTS

We identified 152 obese (median 134 kg) and 152 non-obese control (median 73 kg) patients. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, except for an increased prevalence in the obese group of diabetes (35.5% vs 13.2%; p < 0.001) and an American Society of Anaesthesiologists Score of 3 (61.8% vs 17.1%; p < 0.001). While not statistically significant, the prevalence of SSI in the obese group was almost double that in the non-obese group (8.6% vs 4.6%; p = 0.25) and in patients weighing ≥ 120 kg (n = 102) compared to those weighing < 120 kg (n = 202) (9.8% vs 5.0%; p = 0.17).

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of SSI was not significantly increased in obese patients, or those weighing ≥ 120 kg, who received cefazolin 2- g prophylactically; however, trends toward an increase were evident. Large-scale randomised trials are needed to examine whether a 2-g or 3-g cefazolin is adequate to prevent SSI in obese (and ≥ 120 kg) individuals.

Population Pharmacokinetic Study of Cefazolin Dosage Adaptation in Bacteremia and Infective Endocarditis Based on a Nomogram

Optimal dosing of continuous-infusion cefazolin can be challenging in patients being treated for bacteremia or infective endocarditis. The aim of this work is to describe and analyze the pharmacokinetics of cefazolin in those patients using a population pharmacokinetics modeling approach and to establish a nomogram to determine the optimal daily dose. Population pharmacokinetics were modeled using the Pmetrics package for R. Plasma concentrations were collected retrospectively from patients treated with continuous-infusion cefazolin for bacteremia or infective endocarditis. The influence of multiple parameters, including renal function, total body weight, body mass index, body surface area (BSA), ideal weight, lean body weight, height, and age, was tested. The probabilities of target attainment for selected target concentrations (40, 60, and 80 mg/liter) were calculated. A dosing nomogram was then developed, using the absolute value of the glomerular filtration rate (aGFR), to determine the optimal daily dose required to achieve the target concentrations in at least 90% of patients. In total, 346 cefazolin plasma concentrations from 162 patients were collected. A one-compartment model best described the data set. The only covariate was aGFR, calculated according to the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formula and the patient's body surface area, for the rate of elimination. Using the nomogram, achieving a cefazolin concentration target of 40 mg/liter with a success rate of at least 90% and with an aGFR of 30, 60, 90, and 120 ml/min requires a daily dose of 2.6, 4.3, 6.1, and 8.0 g/day, respectively. These results confirm the interest of posology adaptation of cefazolin according to aGFR.

Lack of Pharmacokinetic Basis of Weight-Based Dosing and Intra-Operative Re-Dosing with Cefazolin Surgical Prophylaxis in Obese Patients: Implications for Antibiotic Stewardship

Traditionally, there have been uniform antibiotic dosing guidelines for prophylaxis for clean-clean-contaminated surgery in both non-obese and obese adults. All other factors predisposing to surgical site infections (SSIs) being equal, over time, the preferred drug is cefazolin. The usual dose, given immediately pre-procedure, has been 1 g intravenously (IV) in non-penicillin-allergic patients, which has been highly effective, Recently, it has become common practice to use high-dose cefazolin; i.e., 3 g IV, in obese patients. This article reviews the literature on high-dose cefazolin prophylactic regimens in the obese from a pharmacokinetic (PK) point of view. There are no comparative studies to support this approach, which is based largely on the theory "more must be better." Weight-based dosing of cefazolin in the obese is flawed, because it does not take into account PK factors, which are critical in the obese. Cefazolin is a water-soluble (hydrophilic) antibiotic that does not penetrate adipose tissue regardless of IV dose. Importantly, adipose tissue is not a valid target tissue in clean-clean-contaminated SSI prophylaxis, as it does not become infected. Higher doses result in proportionately higher serum/non-adipose tissue concentrations, but adipose tissue concentrations are unaffected. Cefazolin displays time-dependent killing kinetics so that as long as serum/tissue concentrations are above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of SSI pathogens, there is no enhanced killing with higher concentrations relative to concentration-dependent antibiotics. Taking into account PK principles, a cefazolin 1 g IV bolus results in peak serum concentrations of ∼185 mcg/mL, provides at least six hours of intra-operative protection, aside from any post-antibiotic effects, and eliminates any rationale for intra-operative re-dosing for procedures lasting six hours or less. Some have argued that a cefazolin 3 g IV dose in the obese does not matter, as more must necessarily be better. However, from an antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) perspective, unneeded antibiotics are unnecessary. Moreover, the costs of cefazolin 1 g (IV push) at $0.75 versus 2 g (IV piggyback) at $ 6.83 can be significant in large centers using cefazolin prophylaxis for cardiothoracic, orthopedic, obstetric/gynecology, and bariatric surgery. Excessive antibiotics also expose the patient to potential adverse effects; i.e., Clostridium difficile. There is no dose-dependent or duration of exposure effect on resistance with one or two pre-operative or intra-operative doses. Well-done PK-based studies in obese patients clearly demonstrate the lack of benefit of using a 3-g dose or intra-operative re-dosing and show no incremental increase in adipose tissue concentrations with high doses. From an ASP point of view, antibiotic dosing recommendations should be reviewed and revised on the basis of PK principles that indicate that weight-based dosing has no basis for pre-operative prophylaxis in obese patients.

Influence of Morbid Obesity on the Pharmacokinetics of Morphine, Morphine-3-Glucuronide, and Morphine-6-Glucuronide

Introduction

Obesity is associated with many pathophysiological changes that may result in altered drug metabolism. The aim of this study is to investigate the influence of obesity on the pharmacokinetics of morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G), and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) through a combined analysis in morbidly obese patients and non-obese healthy volunteers.

Methods

In this analysis, data from 20 morbidly obese patients [mean body mass index 49.9 kg/m² (range 37.6–78.6 kg/m²) and weight 151.3 kg (range 112–251.9 kg)] and 20 healthy volunteers [mean weight 70.6 kg (range 58–85 kg)] were included. Morbidly obese patients received 10 mg of intravenous (I.V.) morphine after gastric bypass surgery, with additional morphine I.V. doses as needed. Healthy volunteers received an I.V. bolus of morphine of 0.1 mg/kg followed by an infusion of 0.030 mg kg⁻¹ h⁻¹ for 1 h. Population pharmacokinetic modeling was performed using NONMEM 7.2.

Results

In morbidly obese patients, elimination clearance of M3G and M6G was decreased substantially compared with healthy volunteers (p < 0.001). Regarding glucuronidation, only a slight decrease in the formation of M6G and a delay in the formation of M3G was found (both p < 0.001). Obesity was also identified as a covariate for the peripheral volume of distribution of morphine (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Metabolism of morphine is not altered in morbidly obese patients. However, decreased elimination of both M3G and M6G is evident, resulting in a substantial increase in exposure to these two metabolites. A rational explanation of this finding is that it results from alterations in membrane transporter function and/or expression in the liver.

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01097148.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40262-017-0544-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Fast and sensitive HPLC/UV method for cefazolin quantification in plasma and subcutaneous tissue microdialysate of humans and rodents applied to pharmacokinetic studies in obese individuals

Antimicrobial prophylactic dosing of morbidly obese patients may differ from normal weighted individuals owing to alterations in drug tissue distribution. Drug subcutaneous tissue distribution can be investigated by microdialysis patients and animals. The need for cefazolin prophylactic dose adjustment in obese patients remains under discussion. The paper describes the validation of an HPLC-UV method for cefazolin quantification in plasma and microdialysate samples from clinical and pre-clinical studies. A C₁₈ column with an isocratic mobile phase was used for drug separation, with detection at 272 nm. Total and unbound cefazolin lower limit of quantitation was 5 μg/mL in human plasma, 2 μg/mL in rat plasma, and 0.5 and 0.025 μg/mL in human and rat microdialysate samples, respectively. The maximum intra- and inter-day imprecisions were 10.7 and 8.1%, respectively. The inaccuracy was <9.7%. The limit of quantitation imprecision and inaccuracy were < 15%. Cefazolin stability in the experimental conditions was confirmed. Cefazolin plasma concentrations and subcutaneous tissue penetration were determined by microdialysis in morbidly obese patients (2 g i.v. bolus) and diet-induced obese rats (30 mg/kg i.v. bolus) using the method. This method has the main advantages of easy plasma clean-up and practicability and has proven to be useful in cefazolin clinical and pre-clinical pharmacokinetic investigations.

Prophylactic cefazolin concentrations in morbidly obese patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy: do we achieve targets?

Morbid obesity is known to increase the risk of surgical site infections. Optimal concentrations of prophylactic antibacterial drugs are required. Using Monte Carlo simulations, the aim of this work was to build a population pharmacokinetics model for a morbidly obese population to assess a 4000-mg dose of cefazolin recommended by the guidelines and to propose new administration schemes. One hundred and seventeen morbidly obese patients (mean body mass index, 46.95 kg/m²) received 4000 mg of cefazolin intravenously before sleeve gastrectomy. Using population pharmacokinetics modelling and Monte Carlo simulations, probabilities of target attainment (PTAs) (subcutaneous tissue concentration of cefazolin above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) throughout the surgical procedure was targeted) were determined. For Staphylococcus spp. and Streptococcus spp., which are the most frequent species isolated from post-surgical infections in bariatric surgery (MIC usually ≤2 mg/L), PTA remains greater than 0.9 until 2 h after administration of 4000 mg of cefazolin. For MIC up to 4 mg/L, efficient prophylaxis was checked until 1 h after the initial administration. A 3000-mg regimen followed by a continuous infusion (1000 mg/h) achieves these two targets until 4 h after the loading dose. A 2000-mg and a 3000-mg regimen do not achieve sufficient concentrations. According to the duration of surgery and MIC values, an initial administration of 4000 mg should be sufficient, but for extended surgeries continuous infusion can be considered.

Optimal Cefazolin Prophylactic Dosing for Bariatric Surgery: No Need for Higher Doses or Intraoperative Redosing

PURPOSE

The goal of this pharmacokinetic (PK) study was to evaluate whether a single 2-g prophylactic dose of cefazolin given (IV) bolus provides effective protective cefazolin levels for prophylaxis against methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA), the primary skin pathogen in bariatric surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-seven patients having gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy received cefazolin 2-g preoperative prophylaxis. Serum, subcutaneous adipose tissue, and deep peri-gastric adipose tissue specimens were collected at incision and before skin closure. Cefazolin concentrations in serum and adipose tissue were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography.

RESULTS

Penetration of cefazolin, a water soluble antibiotic, into adipose tissue was only 6-8 % of simultaneous serum levels. However, cefazolin tissue concentrations in all adipose tissue specimens, exceeded mean MIC for MSSA.

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic cefazolin, given as a single 2 g (IV bolus 3-5 min before skin incision) was more than adequate in providing protective cefazolin levels for the duration of bariatric surgery. Cefazolin 2 g (IV dose bolus given just before skin incision) achieves protective adipose tissue levels (> MIC of MSSA) for the duration (usually < 4 h) of bariatric surgical procedures. In this study, cefazolin 2 g (IV bolus) provided protective adipose tissue levels for 4.8 h. Since cefazolin is a water soluble antibiotic (V _d = 0.2 L/Kg), penetration into adipose tissue is not V _d not dose-dependent. Extremely high-dosed cefazolin, i.e., 3 or 4 g is excessive and unnecessary for bariatric surgery prophylaxis. A single cefazolin 2 g preoperative dose also eliminates the need for intraoperative redosing at 4 h.

Cefazolin tissue concentrations with a prophylactic dose administered before sleeve gastrectomy in obese patients: a single centre study in 116 patients

BACKGROUND

In obese patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy, the blood and fatty-tissue concentrations of cefazolin required for adequate antibiotic prophylaxis are uncertain.

METHODS

This was a single centre prospective study in obese (Group A: 40≤ BMI ≤50 kg m^-2) and severely obese (Group B: 50< BMI ≤65 kg m^-2) patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Blood and fatty-tissue samples were collected after a cefazolin 4 g i.v. injection. The primary aim was to compare cefazolin concentrations in subcutaneous fatty tissue with a targeted tissue concentration of 4 μg g^-1 according to Staphylococcus aureus resistance breakpoint.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixteen patients were included: 79 in Group A and 37 in Group B. At the beginning of the surgery, cefazolin concentration in subcutaneous fatty tissue was 12.2 (5.4) μg g^-1 in Group A and 12 (6.1) μg g^-1 in Group B (P=0.7). At the end, cefazolin concentrations in subcutaneous fatty tissue were 9.0 (4.9) and 7.8 (4.2) μg g^-1 in Groups A and B, respectively (P=0.2). The plasma concentration of free cefazolin during surgery was higher in Group A than in Group B (P<0.0001). Fatty-tissue concentrations of 95% and 83% patients in Groups A and B, respectively, were above S. aureus resistance breakpoint.

CONCLUSIONS

After a 4 g dose, the concentrations of cefazolin in fatty tissue were above the 4 μg g^-1 tissue concentration target, providing adequate antibiotic tissue concentrations during bariatric surgery. As cefazolin concentration in fatty tissue is a surrogate endpoint, the results should be considered in conjunction with the results on free cefazolin concentrations in subcutaneous tissue.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT01537380.

Drug Dosing in Obese Children: Challenges and Evidence-Based Strategies

With the alarming increase of obesity in children, pediatricians are increasingly being confronted with difficult dosing decisions. Many drug labels do not provide specific dosing instructions for children who are obese. In this article, we describe the physiologic parameters altered by obesity and their influences on drug disposition and effect. We review the principles of allometry, and the key pharmacokinetic parameters that can be used to derive age appropriate dosing regimens. Last, we illustrate how appropriate weight descriptors can be selected, and how important PK parameters can be extrapolated for dosing in obese children when pediatric pharmacokinetic information is available.

Prevention of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Examining the Recent Guidelines

BACKGROUND

The global rise in infectious disease has led the Center for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization to release new guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infection.

METHODS

In this article, we summarize current recommendations based on level of evidence, review unresolved and unaddressed issues, and supplement them with new literature.

RESULTS

Although the guidelines discuss major issues in reducing surgical site infection, many questions remain unanswered.

CONCLUSION

These guidelines will hopefully help in setting a standard of care based on best evidence available and focus investigators on areas where evidence is lacking.

Clinical on-site monitoring of ß-lactam antibiotics for a personalized antibiotherapy

An appropriate antibiotherapy is crucial for the safety and recovery of patients. Depending on the clinical conditions of patients, the required dose to effectively eradicate an infection may vary. An inadequate dosing not only reduces the efficacy of the antibiotic, but also promotes the emergence of antimicrobial resistances. Therefore, a personalized therapy is of great interest for improved patients' outcome and will reduce in long-term the prevalence of multidrug-resistances. In this context, on-site monitoring of the antibiotic blood concentration is fundamental to facilitate an individual adjustment of the antibiotherapy. Herein, we present a bioinspired approach for the bedside monitoring of free accessible ß-lactam antibiotics, including penicillins (piperacillin) and cephalosporins (cefuroxime and cefazolin) in untreated plasma samples. The introduced system combines a disposable microfluidic chip with a naturally occurring penicillin-binding protein, resulting in a high-performance platform, capable of gauging very low antibiotic concentrations (less than 6 ng ml^-1) from only 1 µl of serum. The system's applicability to a personalized antibiotherapy was successfully demonstrated by monitoring the pharmacokinetics of patients, treated with ß-lactam antibiotics, undergoing surgery.

The Surgical Infection Society Revised Guidelines on the Management of Intra-Abdominal Infection

BACKGROUND

Previous evidence-based guidelines on the management of intra-abdominal infection (IAI) were published by the Surgical Infection Society (SIS) in 1992, 2002, and 2010. At the time the most recent guideline was released, the plan was to update the guideline every five years to ensure the timeliness and appropriateness of the recommendations.

METHODS

Based on the previous guidelines, the task force outlined a number of topics related to the treatment of patients with IAI and then developed key questions on these various topics. All questions were approached using general and specific literature searches, focusing on articles and other information published since 2008. These publications and additional materials published before 2008 were reviewed by the task force as a whole or by individual subgroups as to relevance to individual questions. Recommendations were developed by a process of iterative consensus, with all task force members voting to accept or reject each recommendation. Grading was based on the GRADE (Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) system; the quality of the evidence was graded as high, moderate, or weak, and the strength of the recommendation was graded as strong or weak. Review of the document was performed by members of the SIS who were not on the task force. After responses were made to all critiques, the document was approved as an official guideline of the SIS by the Executive Council.

RESULTS

This guideline summarizes the current recommendations developed by the task force on the treatment of patients who have IAI. Evidence-based recommendations have been made regarding risk assessment in individual patients; source control; the timing, selection, and duration of antimicrobial therapy; and suggested approaches to patients who fail initial therapy. Additional recommendations related to the treatment of pediatric patients with IAI have been included.

SUMMARY

The current recommendations of the SIS regarding the treatment of patients with IAI are provided in this guideline.

Effect of Maternal Obesity on Maternal-Fetal Transfer of Preoperative Cefazolin at Cesarean Section

OBJECTIVES

American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends a single dose of antibiotic prophylaxis before all cesarean sections (C/S). This recommendation is based on pharmacokinetic studies that include only non-obese patients. We sought to evaluate 1) cefazolin plasma concentrations among obese and non-obese patients after administration of a 2-g cefazolin dose for prevention of surgical wound infections, and 2) whether cefazolin concentration in fetal circulation may be protective against pathogens that cause early onset neonatal sepsis.

METHODS

Maternal and fetal cefazolin plasma concentrations were compared between obese (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 30 kg/m²) and non-obese (BMI < 25 kg/m²) healthy, term pregnant women undergoing scheduled C/S. Liquid chromatographic-tandem mass spectrometric (LC-MS/MS) methods were used for quantification of total and free cefazolin concentrations in maternal blood (MB) and umbilical cord blood (UCB).

RESULTS

Eight women were screened and consented. There was no difference between groups in MB total and free cefazolin concentrations. All MB samples had total and free cefazolin concentrations greater than the minimum inhibitory concentration 90 (MIC90) for Group B Streptococcus (GBS), Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli. All UCB samples had total and free cefazolin concentrations greater than MIC90 for GBS and S aureus, even when administered as briefly as 18 minutes before delivery. A lower concentration of total cefazolin was detected in UCB of neonates of obese women compared to non-obese women (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of 2 g of cefazolin to women undergoing scheduled C/S might be an adequate prophylactic dose for surgical wound infection in both non-obese and obese patients; and cefazolin concentration in fetal circulation may be protective against GBS and S aureus.

Association between Pre-Operative Cefazolin Dose and Surgical Site Infection in Obese Patients

BACKGROUND

A fixed dose of cefazolin results in serum concentrations that decrease as body mass increases. Current national guidelines suggest a pre-operative cefazolin dose of two grams may be insufficient for patients ≥120 kg; thus a three gram dose is recommended. These recommendations, however, are based on pharmacokinetic rather than outcome data. We evaluate the efficacy of pre-operative cefazolin two gram and three gram doses as measured by the rate of surgical site infection (SSI).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of adult patients ≥100 kg who were prescribed cefazolin as surgical prophylaxis between September 1, 2012 and May 31, 2013 at an academic medical center. Patients were excluded if cefazolin was prescribed but not administered, had a known infection at the site of surgery, or inappropriately received cefazolin prophylaxis based on surgical indication. The SSIs were identified by documentation of SSI in the medical record or findings consistent with the standard Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definition. Inpatient and outpatient records up to 90 days post-operative were reviewed for delayed SSI.

RESULTS

Four hundred eighty-three surgical cases were identified in which pre-operative cefazolin was prescribed. Forty-seven patients were excluded leaving a total of 436 patients for final analysis: 152 in the cefazolin two gram group and 284 in the three gram group. Baseline demographics were similar between groups with a mean follow-up duration of 77 days for both groups. Unadjusted SSI rates were 7.2% and 7.4% (odds ratio [OR] 0.98, p = 0.95), for the two gram and three gram groups, respectively. When differences in follow-up between groups were considered and logistic regression was adjusted with propensity score, there remained no difference in SSI rates (OR 0.87, 95% confidence interval 0.36-2.06, p = 0.77).

CONCLUSION

In otherwise similar obese surgical patients weighing ≥100 kg, the administration of a pre-operative cefazolin two gram dose is associated with a similar rate of SSI compared with patients who received a three gram dose.

Evaluation of total body weight and body mass index cut-offs for increased cefazolin dose for surgical prophylaxis

French and American guidelines recommend increased dosage regimens of cefazolin (CFZ) for surgical prophylaxis in patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 35 kg/m² or with a total body weight (TBW) ≥ 120 kg. The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of these cut-offs in identifying patients who require CFZ dose adjustment. A pharmacokinetic study was conducted in patients of varying TBW and BMI who received 2 g of CFZ intravenously for prophylaxis prior to digestive surgery. Adequacy of therapy, defined as a serum concentration of unbound CFZ (fCFZ) ≥ 4 mg/L, was evaluated 180 min (T₁₈₀) and 240 min (T₂₄₀) after the start of CFZ infusion. Possible factors associated with insufficient fCFZ levels were also assessed. A P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. A total of 63 patients were included in the study, categorised according to BMI (<35 kg/m², 20 patients; and ≥35 kg/m², 43 patients) and TBW (<120 kg, 41 patients; and ≥120 kg, 22 patients). All patients had adequate drug levels at T₁₈₀ but only 40/63 patients (63%) had adequate levels at T₂₄₀. At T₂₄₀, therapy was adequate in 15/20 patients (75%) and 25/43 patients (58%) with BMI <35 kg/m² and ≥35 kg/m², respectively (P = 0.20), and in 28/41 patients (68%) and 12/22 patients (55%) with TBW <120 kg and ≥120 kg, respectively (P = 0.28). No factor associated with insufficient fCFZ was identified. In conclusion, current BMI and TBW cut-offs are poor indicators of which patients could benefit from increased CFZ dosage regimens.

Pain Experience and Perception in the Obese Subject Systematic Review (Revised Version)

Pain is an integral part of life and has an important protective function. Pain perception has been shown to differ between subjects and changes with gender, race, and culture. In addition, it has been suggested that obesity influences pain perception and that obesity can be a risk factor for increased pain thresholds. The aim of this systematic review was to examine pain thresholds in obese subjects compared to non-obese subjects. The electronic databases of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, and EMBASE were searched using combinations of terms for obese, pain measurement, visual analog scale, quantitative sensory testing, and pain perception. Studies without comparison as well as cross-sectional studies, case series, and case reports were excluded. The search was conducted without restrictions on language or date of publication. From a total of 1818 identified studies, seven studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria, whereby only one study tested the pain threshold difference between obese and non-obese and also before and after body weight loss surgery. Two studies showed a lower pain threshold and four studies a higher pain threshold in obese subjects compared to non-obese subjects. Two studies showed no difference in pain threshold before and after substantial body weight loss due to surgery. Weight loss after surgery was not identified as a factor for higher pain thresholds in obese subjects. In view of the heterogeneity of the studies, the variability of the subjects and differences in methodological quality, a meta-analysis could not be performed. From the available literature, there is a tendency towards higher pain thresholds in obese subjects. Neither substantial weight loss, nor gender, were factors explaining difference in threshold. Future randomized, controlled trials should explore demographic variables that could influence pain perception or pain thresholds in obese individuals, and multimodal pain testing is necessary for better understanding of the apparent differences in pain thresholds in obese individuals.

Development of a pharmacist-driven protocol for automatic medication dosage adjustments in obese patients

PURPOSE

A hospital protocol utilizing automatic dosage adjustments and pharmacist consultations to optimize the use of certain medications in obese patients is described.

SUMMARY

After conducting a literature search focused on medication dosing in obese patients, pharmacists at a large community hospital developed a list of commonly ordered medications appropriate for inclusion in a pharmacy-driven institutional protocol for automatic medication dosage adjustment in adult patients with obesity. Evidence-based recommendations on initial dosing of eight antimicrobials and two anticoagulant agents according to weight and renal function were formulated. Under the protocol, pharmacists receive electronic alerts regarding protocol-eligible patients during initial order verification and automatically adjust medication dosages as appropriate. For patients prescribed anticoagulants at specified dosage levels, clinical pharmacists consult with prescribers to help ensure safe and effective initial and ongoing therapy. Multidisciplinary educational initiatives were conducted prior to protocol implementation. During two designated three-week postimplementation data collection periods, pharmacists received a total of 372 protocol-eligible medication orders. Pharmacists adjusted a total of 149 dosages and verified an additional 183 dosages consistent with the protocol as originally ordered. Clinical pharmacy consults were completed for 10-15% of patients, with laboratory monitoring ordered in 25-30% of those cases (all patients were found to have appropriate test values). There have been no documented adverse drug reactions in patients whose medication dosages were adjusted per protocol.

CONCLUSION

Pharmacists implemented weight- and renal function-based dosage adjustments for obese patients in 40% of evaluated protocol-eligible cases to achieve 89% compliance with the protocol. Heparin and cefazolin were the medications most likely to require obesity-related dosage adjustments.

Cefazolin Irreversibly Inhibits Proliferation and Migration of Human Mesenchymal Stromal Cells

Drugs may have a significant effect on postoperative bone healing by reducing the function of human mesenchymal stromal cells (hMSC) or mature osteoblasts. Although cefazolin is one of the most commonly used antibiotic drugs in arthroplasty to prevent infection worldwide, there is a lack of information regarding how cefazolin affects hMSC and therefore may have an effect on early bone healing. We studied the proliferation and migration capacity of primary hMSC during cefazolin treatment at various doses for up to 3 days, as well as the reversibility of the effects during the subsequent 3 days of culture without the drug. We found a time- and dose-dependent reduction of the proliferation rate and the migratory potential. Tests of whether these effects were reversible revealed that doses ≥250 μg/mL or treatments longer than 24 h irreversibly affected the cells. We are the first to show that application of cefazolin irreversibly inhibits the potential of hMSC for migration to the trauma site and local proliferation. Cefazolin should be administered only at the required dosage and time to prevent periprosthetic infection. If long-term administration is required and delayed bone healing is present, cefazolin application must be considered as a cause of delayed bone healing.

Determination of Cefalothin and Cefazolin in Human Plasma, Urine and Peritoneal Dialysate by UHPLC-MS/MS: application to a pilot pharmacokinetic study in humans

An ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) method for the analysis of cefazolin and cefalothin in human plasma (total and unbound), urine and peritoneal dialysate has been developed and validated. Total plasma concentrations are measured following protein precipitation and are suitable for the concentration range of 1-500 µg/mL. Unbound concentrations are measured from ultra-filtered plasma acquired using Centrifree(®) devices and are suitable for the concentration range of 0.1-500 µg/mL for cefazolin and 1-500 µg/mL for cefalothin. The urine method is suitable for a concentration range of 0.1-20 mg/mL for cefazolin and 0.2-20 mg/mL for cefalothin. Peritoneal dialysate concentrations are measured using direct injection, and are suitable for the concentration range of 0.2-100 µg/mL for both cefazolin and cefalothin. The cefazolin and cefalothin plasma (total and unbound), urine and peritoneal dialysate results are reported for recovery, inter-assay precision and accuracy, and the lower limit of quantification, linearity, stability and matrix effects, with all results meeting acceptance criteria. The method was used successfully in a pilot pharmacokinetic study with patients with peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis, receiving either intraperitoneal cefazolin or cefalothin. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Pharmacokinetics of cefazolin prophylaxis in obese gravidae at time of cesarean delivery

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to compare the pharmacokinetics of 2 g and 3 g doses of cefazolin when used for perioperative prophylaxis in obese gravidae undergoing cesarean delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial from August 2013 to April 2014. Twenty-six obese women were randomized to receive either 2 or 3 g intravenous cefazolin within 30 minutes of a skin incision. Serial maternal plasma samples were obtained at specific time points up to 8 hours after drug administration. Umbilical cord blood was obtained after placental delivery. Maternal adipose samples were obtained prior to fascial entry, after closure of the hysterotomy, and subsequent to fascial closure. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined via noncompartmental analysis.

RESULTS

The median area under the plasma concentration vs time curve was significantly greater in the 3 g group than in the 2 g group (27204 μg/mL per minute vs 14058 μg/mL per minute; P = .001). Maternal plasma concentrations had an impact by body mass index. For every 1 kg/m(2) increase in body mass index at the time of the cesarean delivery, there was an associated 13.77 μg/mL lower plasma concentration of cefazolin across all time points (P = .01). By the completion of cesarean delivery, cefazolin concentrations in maternal adipose were consistently above the minimal inhibitory concentration for both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria with both the 2 g and 3 g doses. The median umbilical cord blood concentrations were significantly higher in the 3 g vs the 2 g group (34.5 μg/mL and 21.4 μg/mL; P = .003).

CONCLUSION

Cefazolin concentrations in maternal adipose both at time of hysterotomy closure and fascial closure were above the minimal inhibitory concentration for both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria when either 2 g or 3 g cefazolin was administered as perioperative surgical prophylaxis. Maternal cefazolin concentrations in plasma and maternal adipose tissue are related to both dose and body mass index.

Drug disposition in obesity: toward evidence-based dosing

Obesity and morbid obesity are associated with many physiological changes affecting pharmacokinetics, such as increased blood volume, cardiac output, splanchnic blood flow, and hepatic blood flow. In obesity, drug absorption appears unaltered, although recent evidence suggests that this conclusion may be premature. Volume of distribution may vary largely, but the magnitude and direction of changes seem difficult to predict, with extrapolation on the basis of total body weight being the best approach to date. Changes in clearance may be smaller than in distribution, whereas there is growing evidence that the influence of obesity on clearance can be predicted on the basis of reported changes in the metabolic or elimination pathways involved. For obese children, we propose two methods to distinguish between developmental and obesity-related changes. Future research should focus on the characterization of physiological concepts to predict the optimal dose for each drug in the obese population.

ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS IN BARIATRIC SURGERY: a continuous infusion of cefazolin versus ampicillin/sulbactam and ertapenem

Background The incidence of surgical site infection in bariatric patients is significant and the current recommendations for antibiotic prophylaxis are sometimes inadequate. Objective The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of three prophylactic antibiotic regimens on the incidence of surgical site infection. Methods A prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted between January 2009 and January 2013 in which 896 Roux-en-Y gastric bypasses were performed to treat obesity. The study compared three groups of patients according to the perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis administered intravenously and beginning at anesthesia induction: Group I consisting of 194 patients treated with two 3-g doses of ampicillin/sulbactam; Group II with 303 patients treated with a single 1-g dose of ertapenem; and Group III with 399 patients treated with a 2-g dose of cefazolin at anesthesia induction followed by a continuous infusion of cefazolin 1g throughout the surgical procedure. The rate of surgical site infection was analyzed, as well as its association with age, sex, preoperative weight, body mass index and comorbidities. Results The rates of surgical site infection were 4.16% in the group treated prophylactically with ampicillin/sulbactam, 1.98% in the ertapenem group and 1.55% in the continuous cefazolin group. Conclusion The prophylactic use of continuous cefazolin in surgeries for morbid obesity shows very promising results. These findings suggest that some prophylactic regimens need to be reconsidered and even substituted by more effective therapies for the prevention of surgical site infections in bariatric patients.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Cefazolin in Serum and Tissue for Patients with Complicated Skin and Soft Tissue Infections (cSSTI)

Introduction

Cefazolin is commonly used to treat complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTI) caused by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and Enterobacteriaceae. We aimed to determine the variability of cefazolin exposure in interstitial fluid (ISF) of tissue and evaluate its dosing recommendations.

Methods

Population pharmacokinetics were performed to co-model serum and ISF concentration data from six patients enrolled in a previous in vivo microdialysis study. A 5,000 patient Monte Carlo simulation was then conducted for 1 and 2 g every 8 h (q8h) regimens to calculate the penetration ratio and probability of target attainment (PTA) at 30% and 50% of the dosing interval that free drug concentrations remain above the minimum inhibitory concentration (fT > MIC) in ISF of tissue.

Results

A three-compartment model, with one of the compartments representing ISF concentrations, fits the data best. The final model resulted in the mean ± SD parameter values: Clearance = 3.8 ± 2.1 L/h, volume of distribution in central compartment = 8.6 ± 6.4 L and volume of distribution in ISF = 36.6 ± 17.9 L. The mean ± SD and median penetration ratios were 1.36 ± 4.57 and 0.80, respectively. At the MIC₉₀ for MSSA of 1 mg/L, PTAs for the 1 g q8h dose in ISF were 96% and 91% for 30% and 50% fT > MIC targets, respectively, which decreased to 87% and 71% at 2 mg/L. For the same respective targets, a 2 g q8h dosing regimen increased PTA to 96% and 91% at 2 mg/L.

Conclusion

Cefazolin penetration into the ISF of a lower limb infection varied across this simulated patient population. Based on these data, a 1 g q8h regimen should be sufficient to obtain 30% fT > MIC exposure against most MSSA causing cSSTI. However, a 2 g q8h dose is required to obtain 50% fT > MIC pharmacodynamic targets at the current breakpoint for Enterobacteriaceae (2 mg/L).

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40121-014-0049-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Antibiotic prophylaxis in obese patients submitted to bariatric surgery. A systematic review

PURPOSE

To review the use of cefazolin in prophylaxis of surgical wound infection (SSI) in bariatric surgery (BS).

METHODS

A systematic review was performed from October to November, 2013 using the following databases: The Cochrane Library, Medline, LILACS, and EMBASE. The inclusion criteria were randomized clinical trials and observational studies that were evaluated by two independent reviewers.

RESULTS

Nine hundred and sixty one titles were recovered after preliminary analysis (title and abstract), seven studies remained for final analysis. There were three clinical trials (one with SSI, and two with antibiotic levels as the outcome), and four were observational studies (three cohorts and one case-control, all had SSI as the outcome). After administration of 1g or 2 g, levels of cefazolin in serum and tissue were suboptimal according to two studies. Results from observational studies indicated that different antibiotics were used for prophylaxis of SSI in BS and that use of other drugs may be associated with higher rates of SSI.

CONCLUSION

The use of cefazolin for surgical wound infection prophylaxis in bariatric surgery is recommended, however further studies are needed in order to refine parameters as initial dose, redose, moment of administration and lasting of prophylaxis.