1
|
Eickhoff C, Müller U, Thomas S, Schmidt C, Hartling LS, Michael S, Schulz M, Bertsche T. Patients' Use of a Standardized Medication List - A Mixed Methods Study. Patient Prefer Adherence 2023; 17:2655-2666. [PMID: 37927342 PMCID: PMC10624198 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s427192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose A medication list (ML) is a document listing the patient's entire medication, instructions for use, and indications. In Germany, a national standard was established in 2016 by law. However, data on patients' use of this standardized ML are scarce. We investigated (i) patients' practical use of the ML, (ii) patients' understanding of the ML, (iii) completeness and correctness of the current ML version, and (iv) reasons why patients did not adhere to their ML. Patients and Methods Community pharmacists recruited patients possessing a standardized ML with ≥5 medications. Information sources to evaluate the ML were: (a) brown bag analysis, (b) practical demonstration, (c) patient interview, and (d) patient file. Data were analyzed using qualitative and quantitative methods. Results Two hundred and eighty-eight patients (median age: 76 years, range: 27-95) were enrolled. (i) 38.5% of the patients used their ML regularly to prepare their medication and 73.3% to inform their physician. (ii) Overall, patients' understanding of the ML was good, with >80% of the patients being able to identify all relevant information. (iii) While n = 2779 medications were actually taken, n = 2539 were documented on the ML. No ML was fully correct and complete. Regarding particularly relevant items, ie, active ingredient, strength, dosage, medication missing or listed but not taken, 79.2% of ML were incorrect or incomplete. Handwritten modifications on the ML were frequent. (iv) Almost 60% of all patients did not follow their ML with "fear of adverse drug reactions" being the most frequently (n = 50) mentioned reason. Conclusion Completeness and correctness of the current ML version was poor with handwritten modifications being frequent. Additionally, most of the patients did not adhere to their ML. This indicates that measures that lead to correct and up-to-date ML and improvements in patient counseling about their medication should be developed and implemented into routine practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christiane Eickhoff
- Department of Medicine, ABDA – Federal Union of German Associations of Pharmacists, Berlin, Germany
| | - Uta Müller
- Department of Medicine, ABDA – Federal Union of German Associations of Pharmacists, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sophie Thomas
- Clinical Pharmacy Department, Institute of Pharmacy, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Christian Schmidt
- Clinical Pharmacy Department, Institute of Pharmacy, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | - Sebastian Michael
- Löwen-Apotheke Waldheim e.K, Waldheim, Germany
- Saxon Pharmacists Association, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Martin Schulz
- Department of Medicine, ABDA – Federal Union of German Associations of Pharmacists, Berlin, Germany
- Institute of Pharmacy, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Thilo Bertsche
- Clinical Pharmacy Department, Institute of Pharmacy, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
- Drug Safety Center, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University and Leipzig University Hospital, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Straßner C, Mahler C, Strauß B, Wehrmann U, Krug K, Szecsenyi J, Haefeli WE, Seidling HM. Medication beliefs and use of medication lists - is there a connection? Results from a before-and-after study in Germany. BMC Geriatr 2020; 20:116. [PMID: 32228486 PMCID: PMC7106800 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-020-01513-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2019] [Accepted: 03/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Despite increasing digitalisation the paper-based medication list remains one of the most important instruments for the documentation and exchange of medication-related information. However, even elderly patients with polypharmacy who are at high risk for medication errors and adverse drug events, frequently do not receive or use a complete and comprehensible medication list. Increasing the use of medication lists would be a great contribution to medication safety and facilitate the work of health care providers. Methods This study is related to the project MeinPlan (MyPlan) which comprised an information campaign on safe drug administration in the Rhine-Neckar region in South Germany. The campaign was evaluated in a before-and-after study based on a survey among two independent, representative samples of citizens over 65 years. In total, 5034 questionnaires were analysed. While the effects of the primary outcome (the percentage of citizens using a medication list) have been reported elsewhere, this analysis focusses on the effects of the campaign on citizens’ medication beliefs and assesses whether medication beliefs are associated with the use of medication lists, the use of over-the-counter drugs and the use of the tools offered by the campaign. Medication beliefs were assessed with the German version of the General Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) which results in subscales for “General Overuse”, “General Usefulness” and “General Harm”. The use of medication lists and over-the-counter drugs was assessed with self-developed questionnaire items. Results No statistically significant change in citizens’ medication beliefs before and after the campaign could be detected. Likewise, no association between medication beliefs and the use of medication lists, the use of over-the-counter drugs or the use of the tools offered by the campaign could be shown. Conclusions A campaign focussing on the risks of drug administration did not change the medication beliefs of the targeted population. Moreover, citizens’ general medication beliefs do not seem to be crucial for their decision to use a medication list or over-the-counter drugs. Strategies to improve the use of medication lists by patients should focus on other influential factors, such as individual benefits and barriers and socio-psychological factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cornelia Straßner
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Cornelia Mahler
- Department of Nursing Science, University Hospital Tuebingen, Institute of Health Sciences, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 9, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Beate Strauß
- Berchelmann'sche Apotheke, Eberstädter Str. 63, 64319, Pfungstadt, Germany
| | | | - Katja Krug
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Joachim Szecsenyi
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Walter Emil Haefeli
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hanna Marita Seidling
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Siu HYH, Delleman B, Langevin J, Mangin D, Howard M, Fang Q, Price D, Chan D. Demonstrating a Technology-Mediated Intervention to Support Medication Adherence in Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Primary Care: A Feasibility Study. Gerontol Geriatr Med 2019; 5:2333721419845179. [PMID: 31106241 PMCID: PMC6503597 DOI: 10.1177/2333721419845179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2019] [Revised: 03/27/2019] [Accepted: 03/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Medication non-adherence can lead to significant
morbidity and mortality. This 4-week feasibility study aims to demonstrate that
the eDosette intervention can be implemented with older adults in primary care.
Method: Fifty-six older adults from four primary care sites in
Southwestern Ontario, Canada participated. The intervention involved generating,
for pharmacist review, weekly medication administration records based on
transmitted data captured by the eDosette. The primary outcome is implementation
feasibility defined by recruitment, adherence rates, frequency of captured
missed and late doses, descriptions of clinical work resulting from the
intervention, and participant feedback. Results: The recruitment
rate was 24% (57/240); one withdrew due to personal reasons. The mean observed
adherence rate was 82% (range 49%-100%). Overall, participants missed 505 and
took 2,105 doses late; 118 clinical decisions occurred with 72 unique medication
changes in 31 participants. Participants found the eDosette easy to use and did
not feel that they were viewed negatively because of their potential
non-adherence. Conclusion: The eDosette intervention could be
feasibly implemented in primary care with older adults. Providing information
about when an older adult takes their medications could play a role in
medication adherence by prompting more informed discussions between the older
adult and primary care clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry Yu-Hin Siu
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Bethany Delleman
- School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jessica Langevin
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dee Mangin
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michelle Howard
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Qiyin Fang
- Department of Engineering Physics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Price
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Chan
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Non-opioid analgesics are frequently used to control chronic pain in elderly patients; however some of these drugs show high rates of adverse drug reactions. Among these are significant clinical problems which impede an effective and safe pain control. This review provides recent data concerning non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID), acetaminophen, metamizol and flupirtin. Due to their risk profile NSAIDs are less appropriate due to high incidence rates and drug-related risk patterns. Acetaminophen, metamizol and flupirtin may be recommended instead; however a shortcoming of acetaminophen in comparison to NSAIDs is its weaker action to control pain. Metamizol is still banned in some countries due to rare but potentially severe hematological side effects and flupirtin frequently causes unfavorable sedation.
Collapse
|
5
|
Siu HYH, Mangin D, Howard M, Price D, Chan D. Developing and testing an electronic medication administration monitoring device for community dwelling seniors: a feasibility study. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2017; 3:5. [PMID: 28168041 PMCID: PMC5286836 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-016-0118-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2016] [Accepted: 12/14/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Medication non-adherence, polypharmacy, and adverse drug events are major healthcare issues leading to significant morbidity, mortality, and healthcare expenditures. Currently, there are no methods to systematically track medication usage in community-dwelling seniors. The eDosette prototype was created to make medication use patterns visible via the Internet. This study aims to demonstrate feasibility, usability, and acceptability of the eDosette in community-dwelling seniors in primary care. Methods A 2-week feasibility study involving a convenience sample of 10 patients from an academic family medicine teaching unit in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, was conducted over a 6-month period between April and October 2015. The eDosette transmitted hourly electronic data via the Internet on each participant’s pattern of medication use; this data was converted into an individualized medication administration record (MAR). Based on the MARs from the 10 participants, the frequency of missed medication doses, the time of dose administration, and each participant’s adherence rate for their prescribed medications could be determined. A medication adherence survey and a patient usability and acceptability survey were administered to all the participants of the study. Results The eDosette was able to record a participant’s medication use and transmit this data electronically via the Internet with sufficient quality to create participant-specific MARs. A total of 418 doses were captured by the eDosette throughout the study; only 5% (n = 22 doses) were missing information or had poor image quality. Analysis of the MARs revealed that 19% (n = 79 doses) were taken outside a 2-h window of the average dose administration time, and two doses were completely missed by all participants during this feasibility study. Participant feedback found the eDosette easy and acceptable to use. Participant feedback also identified hardware and software issues that require attention prior to a larger study. Conclusions The eDosette is a feasible and novel technology that can be successfully installed into the homes of community-dwelling seniors to help in monitoring actual medication use patterns. This study provided details for further device development and evidence to support the need for a larger pilot study on the eDosette’s impact on medication adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry Yu-Hin Siu
- Stonechurch Family Health Centre, 1475 Upper Ottawa St, Hamilton, ON L8W 3J6 Canada.,Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Dee Mangin
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.,David Braley Health Science Centre, 100 Main Street West, 5th Floor, Hamilton, ON L8P 1H6 Canada
| | - Michelle Howard
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.,David Braley Health Science Centre, 100 Main Street West, 5th Floor, Hamilton, ON L8P 1H6 Canada
| | - David Price
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.,David Braley Health Science Centre, 100 Main Street West, 5th Floor, Hamilton, ON L8P 1H6 Canada
| | - David Chan
- Stonechurch Family Health Centre, 1475 Upper Ottawa St, Hamilton, ON L8W 3J6 Canada.,Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Waltering I, Schwalbe O, Hempel G. Informationsgehalt von Medikationsplänen vor dem Hintergrund der Einführung des einheitlichen patientenbezogenen Medikationsplans. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN 2016; 115-116:24-32. [DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2016.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2016] [Revised: 06/07/2016] [Accepted: 06/21/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
7
|
Botermann L, Krueger K, Eickhoff C, Kloft C, Schulz M. Patients' handling of a standardized medication plan: a pilot study and method development. Patient Prefer Adherence 2016; 10:621-30. [PMID: 27175062 PMCID: PMC4854253 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s96431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The Action Plan for Medication Safety by the German Federal Ministry of Health introduced a standardized medication plan (MP), a printable document for the patient. The practical handling needs to be tested before the nationwide implementation in Germany. Therefore, the aims of our study were 1) to develop an instrument to evaluate the usage of the standardized MP, 2) to assess if patients can locate, and 3) understand important information. Moreover, we explored patients' opinion and suggestions regarding the standardized MP template. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional study to evaluate the practical handling of the standardized MP. We interviewed 40 adult patients in seven community pharmacies in Germany, who took at least five medicines regularly and gave their written informed consent. The interview consisted of questions regarding finding and understanding information provided on a mock-up MP, patients' opinion and the execution of the information on the MP by filling pill boxes. We eventually developed a new evaluation method to quantify the practical handling of the MP by rating the pill boxes filled by the patients. RESULTS Overall, the participants rated the MP positively. Thirty-nine (98%) participants found important information on a mock-up standardized MP. Patients were questioned to identify if they understood information on medical intake as it relates to meals. In particular, they were questioned about medicine intake "1 hour before a meal", which 98% (n=39) interpreted correctly, and "during a meal", which 100% (n=40) interpreted correctly. The less precise advice of "before a meal" was interpreted correctly by 73% (n=29), and only 15% (n=6) correctly interpreted the term "after the meal". The evaluation of the filled pill boxes resulted in the "Evaluation Tool to test the handling of the Medication Plan" (ET-MP) - a weighted scoring system. CONCLUSION The standardized MP is clearly arranged, and patients are able to find important information. The findings of this study resulted in minor but important revisions of the standardized MP template. The developed evaluation tool ET-MP may serve as an objective instrument to assess patients' ability to transfer written information on the MP into practical handling of medicines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lea Botermann
- Department of Medicine, ABDA – Federal Union of German Associations of Pharmacists, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Institute of Pharmacy, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Katrin Krueger
- Department of Medicine, ABDA – Federal Union of German Associations of Pharmacists, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christiane Eickhoff
- Department of Medicine, ABDA – Federal Union of German Associations of Pharmacists, Berlin, Germany
| | - Charlotte Kloft
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Institute of Pharmacy, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Martin Schulz
- Department of Medicine, ABDA – Federal Union of German Associations of Pharmacists, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Institute of Pharmacy, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Pharmacology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Correspondence: Martin Schulz, Department of Medicine, ABDA – Federal Union of German Associations of Pharmacists, Unter den Linden 19-23, 10117 Berlin, Germany, Tel +49 30 4000 4511, Fax +49 30 4000 4513, Email
| |
Collapse
|