Development of a quality instrument for assessing the spontaneous reports of ADR/ADE using Delphi method in China

Development of the Practice of Pharmaceutical Care for Cancer Pain Management in Outpatient Clinics Using the Delphi Method

Background: There exists no broad agreement of experts on the practice of pharmaceutical care for cancer pain management in outpatient clinics. Objectives: This study aimed to use the Delphi consensus process to provide expert recommendations on the practice of cancer pain management in outpatient clinics from the point of view of pharmaceutical care in clinical practice and future clinical trials. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted to draft the initial practice. In this process, 30-40 senior experts from various provinces in China were invited to rank the items of practice during the two Delphi consultations. The definitions of consensus included a combination with an average score of ≥4, the percentage of experts rating the scores at >4 points, and the coefficient of variation of the scores. Results: The expert panel comprised 18 pharmacists, 3 anesthesiologists, 6 oncologists, and 9 nurses. As a result of a comprehensive review, 33 items were initially formed. Among them, the consensus was reached for 27 items after the first Delphi round. The other six items and a total of five items for supplementation entered the second round, among which consensus was reached for eight items and three items were excluded. Expert consensus was achieved on 35 items after two rounds of consultation, which involved the collection of patient basic information, comprehensive pain assessment, breakthrough or neuropathic pain assessment, analgesic treatment evaluation, out-of-hospital follow-up, medical records, and evidence-based documents for reference. Conclusion: The final list of 35 items could be used to develop the practice of pharmaceutical care for cancer pain management in outpatient clinics in China. The practice may aid in the standardization of pharmaceutical care for pain, relieve pain to the greatest extent possible, and enhance the level of pain management in China.

Development of a list of high-risk perioperative medications for the elderly: a Delphi method

Objectives: There is a lack of direct evidence for the management of perioperative medications in elderly patients. Therefore, the authors aimed to develop a list of high-risk medications for the elderly population in China to provide indicators for clinicians to identify medication-related factors contributing to potential adverse events during the perioperative period. Methods: The initial list of high-risk perioperative medications was developed by studying all the publications that described specific high-risk medications and their risk profiles in the elderly. Delphi consultations were performed to form a consensus among the group of experts and the list was finalized. Results: The expert panel consisted of 36 experts from 29 tertiary hospitals and 18 provinces or municipalities. The consensus was reached after two Delphi rounds. Finally, a total of 86 medications of 13 medication classes and 120 screening items were included in the final list, along with perioperative risk profiles and risk aversion recommendations for each drug. Conclusion: This is the first study to establish a high-risk perioperative medication list in China, which can be used as a reference for intervention and evaluation of perioperative medications for the elderly population.