Higher than standard meropenem and linezolid dosages needed for appropriate treatment of an intracerebral hemorrhage patient with augmented renal clearance

Individualized antibiotic dosage regimens for patients with augmented renal clearance

Objectives: Augmented renal clearance (ARC) is a state of enhanced renal function commonly observed in 30%-65% of critically ill patients despite normal serum creatinine levels. Using unadjusted standard dosing regimens of renally eliminated drugs in ARC patients often leads to subtherapeutic concentrations, poor clinical outcomes, and the emergence of multidrug-resistant bacteria. We summarized pharmaceutical, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic research on the definition, underlying mechanisms, and risk factors of ARC to guide individualized dosing of antibiotics and various strategies for optimizing outcomes. Methods: We searched for articles between 2010 and 2022 in the MEDLINE database about ARC patients and antibiotics and further provided individualized antibiotic dosage regimens for patients with ARC. Results: 25 antibiotic dosage regimens for patients with ARC and various strategies for optimization of outcomes, such as extended infusion time, continuous infusion, increased dosage, and combination regimens, were summarized according to previous research. Conclusion: ARC patients, especially critically ill patients, need to make individualized adjustments to antibiotics, including dose, frequency, and method of administration. Further comprehensive research is required to determine ARC staging, expand the range of recommended antibiotics, and establish individualized dosing guidelines for ARC patients.

A Systematic Review of the Effect of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring on Patient Health Outcomes during Treatment with Carbapenems

Adjusting dosing regimens based on measurements of carbapenem levels may improve carbapenem exposure in patients. This systematic review aims to describe the effect carbapenem therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has on health outcomes, including the emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Four databases were searched for studies that reported health outcomes following adjustment to dosing regimens, according to measurements of carbapenem concentration. Bias in the studies was assessed with risk of bias analysis tools. Study characteristics and outcomes were tabulated and a narrative synthesis was performed. In total, 2 randomised controlled trials (RCTs), 17 non-randomised studies, and 19 clinical case studies were included. Significant variation in TDM practice was seen; consequently, a meta-analysis was unsuitable. Few studies assessed impacts on AMR. No significant improvement on health outcomes and no detrimental effects of carbapenem TDM were observed. Five cohort studies showed significant associations between achieving target concentrations and clinical success, including suppression of resistance. Studies in this review showed no obvious improvement in clinical outcomes when TDM is implemented. Optimisation and standardisation of carbapenem TDM practice are needed to improve intervention success and enable study synthesis. Further suitably powered studies of standardised TDM are required to assess the impact of TMD on clinical outcomes and AMR.

Evaluation of the Accuracy of Standard Renal Function Equations in Critically Ill Patients with Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

Obtaining an accurate estimation of renal function is germane to optimizing care in critically ill patients. However, there is no consensus on the most accurate renal function assessment to utilize in this patient population, particularly in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) patients. Thus, the objective of this observational study was to determine the comparability of renal function equations to body surface area (BSA)-adjusted 8-h creatinine clearance (CrCl) in aSAH patients.

METHODS

A PubMed search investigated the applicability of various renal function equations in critically ill patient populations. A subset of these equations was compared to BSA-adjusted 8-h CrCl from a previous study with aSAH patients with no evidence of renal dysfunction (admission serum creatinine < 1.5 mg/dL) and no history of chronic kidney disease. Area-under-the-curve (AUC) calculations were completed using serial laboratory measurements to validate preliminary findings.

RESULTS

A total of 14 renal function equations were identified with seven carried forward for further analysis based upon a priori criteria. Seven equations were excluded for various reasons, including lack of available clinical data, redundancy with other equations, and dissimilar patient populations to this study. When directly compared to the BSA-adjusted 8-h CrCl, only the Cockcroft-Gault and BSA-adjusted Cockcroft-Gault equations were not statistically significantly different (P = 0.0886 and P = 0.4805, respectively); all other equations were statistically significantly different (P < 0.0001). Additionally, only 52% and 44% of patients had average values within 20% of the BSA-adjusted 8-h CrCl using the Cockcroft-Gault and BSA-adjusted Cockcroft-Gault equations, respectively. Finally, the AUC calculations corroborated the preliminary findings with similar results in statistical testing for the Cockcroft-Gault and BSA-adjusted Cockcroft-Gault (P = 0.6300 and P = 0.1513, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The Cockcroft-Gault equation may be the best renal function equation to assess in critically ill patients diagnosed with aSAH. However, accuracy and consistency in assessing renal function when compared to the BSA-adjusted 8-h CrCl were lacking. Thus, this study suggests the BSA-adjusted 8-h CrCl may be the most appropriate assessment of renal function in patients with aSAH.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Continuous-Infusion Meropenem in Febrile Neutropenic Patients with Hematologic Malignancies: Dosing Strategies for Optimizing Empirical Treatment against Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa

A population pharmacokinetic analysis of continuous infusion (CI) meropenem was conducted in a prospective cohort of febrile neutropenic (FN) patients with hematologic malignancies. A non-parametric approach with Pmetrics was used for pharmacokinetic analysis and covariate evaluation. Monte Carlo simulations were performed for identifying the most appropriate dosages for empirical treatment against common Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa. The probability of target attainment (PTA) of steady-state meropenem concentration (Css)-to-minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ratio (Css/MIC) ≥1 and ≥4 at the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) clinical breakpoint of 2 mg/L were calculated. Cumulative fraction of response (CFR) against Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa were assessed as well. PTAs and CFRs ≥ 90% were considered optimal. A total of 61 patients with 178 meropenem Css were included. Creatinine clearance (CL_CR) was the only covariate associated with meropenem clearance. Monte Carlo simulations showed that dosages of meropenem ranging between 1 g q8h and 1.25 g q6h by CI may grant optimal PTAs of Css/MIC ≥4 at the EUCAST clinical breakpoint. Optimal CFRs may be granted with these dosages against the Enterobacterales at Css/MIC ≥ 4 and against P. aeruginosa at Css/MIC ≥ 1. When dealing against P. aeruginosa at Css/MIC ≥ 4, only a dosage of 1.5 g q6h by CI may grant quasi-optimal CFR (around 80–87%). In conclusion, our findings suggest that dosages of meropenem ranging between 1 g q8h and 1.25 g q6h by CI may maximize empirical treatment against Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa among FN patients with hematologic malignancies having different degree of renal function.

Impact of augmented renal clearance on the pharmacokinetics of linezolid: Advantages of continuous infusion from a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic perspective

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the influence of renal function, in particular the presence of augmented renal clearance (ARC), on the pharmacokinetics of linezolid in critically ill patients. The effect of continuous infusion on the probability of therapeutic success from a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) perspective was also evaluated.

METHODS

Seventeen patients received linezolid (600 mg every 12 h) as a 30-min infusion and 26 as a continuous infusion (50 mg/h). The PK parameters were calculated and the probability of PK/PD target attainment (PTA) was estimated by Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) for different doses administered by intermittent (600 mg every 12 h or 600 mg every 8 h) or continuous infusion (50 mg/h or 75 mg/h).

RESULTS

In patients without ARC, the standard dose was adequate to attain the PK/PD target. However, linezolid clearance was significantly higher in ARC patients, leading to sub-therapeutic concentrations. Continuous infusion (50 mg/h) provided concentrations ≥2 mg/l in 70% of the ARC patients. MCS revealed that concentrations ≥2 mg/l would be reached in >90% of patients receiving 75 mg/h.

CONCLUSIONS

ARC increases linezolid clearance and leads to a high risk of underexposure with the standard dose. Continuous infusion increases the PTA, but an infusion rate of 75 mg/h should be considered to ensure concentrations ≥2 mg/ml.