No effects of Hypericum-containing complex on dolutegravir plasma trough concentrations: a case report

Polypharmacy and Aging in People Living with HIV: 6 Years of Experience in a Multidisciplinary Outpatient Clinic

BACKGROUND

Despite the availability of potent antiretroviral drugs, the management of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection still presents some important challenges, especially in older patients who often experience age-related comorbidities and complex polypharmacy.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the results of our 6 year experience with the outpatient clinic [Gestione Ambulatoriale Politerapie (GAP)] for the management of polypharmacy in people living with HIV (PLWH).

METHODS

Demographic characteristics, antiretroviral regimens, and number and type of comedications were collected in all PLWH included in the database of GAP from September 2016 to September 2022. Therapies were stratified based on the number of anti-HIV drugs (dual versus triple regimens) and on the presence of pharmacokinetic boosters (ritonavir or cobicistat).

RESULTS

A total of 556 PLWH were included in the GAP database. Overall, the enrolled patients were administered 4.2 ± 2.7 drugs (range 1-17) in addition to antiretroviral therapies. The number of comedications greatly increased with age (3.0 ± 2.2 versus 4.1 ± 2.5 versus 6.3 ± 3.2 in PLWH aged < 50 versus 50-64 versus > 65 years; p < 0.001 for all comparisons). PLWH on dual antiretroviral therapies were significantly older (58 ± 9 versus 54 ± 11 years; p < 0.001) and were concomitantly treated with more drugs (5.1 ± 3.2 versus 3.8 ± 2.5; p < 0.001) compared with those on triple therapies. A significant reduction of boosted antiretroviral regimens (53% versus 23%; p < 0.001) and in the number of comedications (4.0 ± 2.9 versus 3.1 ± 2.2 drugs; p < 0.001) was observed in the subgroup of patients (n = 198) with two GAP visits.

CONCLUSIONS

The high prevalence of polypharmacy in PLWH, especially among older adults, place these patients at high risk for clinically relevant drug-drug interactions (DDIs). A multidisciplinary approach involving physicians and clinical pharmacologists could help to optimize medication regimens associated with reduced risk.

HDI Highlighter, The First Intelligent Tool to Screen the Literature on Herb-Drug Interactions

Herbal food supplements are commonly used and can be an important part of patient self-care. Like all other bio-active and therapeutic products, they have a benefit/risk balance. These products are not without adverse effects and potentially interact with other therapies. Educating patients and providing information for health professionals about the risk of herb-drug interactions is key. One of the purposes of the biomedical literature is to inform prescribers. Scientific literature accessible on databases such as PubMed is dense and careful reading is time consuming. We propose a reading aid tool named "HDI highlighter" to help readers to find key information in clinical studies and case reports describing herb-drug interactions. It uses natural language processing algorithms (artificial intelligence) with a pharmaceutical focus. Semantic relation extraction for herb-drug interactions from the biomedical literature are overexpressed using keywords. We have tested it to review 120 published articles over the last 10 years. In these articles, we have shown that case reports often involved long-term or semi-long-term treatments such as cancer or human immunodeficiency virus therapies, antiepileptic drugs, or central nervous system drugs. Similarly, these classes of drugs are more extensively targeted by clinical studies. Herb-drug interactions described in case reports are identified in medicinal, recreational, and alimentary uses. They also usually lack a rigorous description of the herb(s) involved. Typically, clinical studies provide a complete description of protocols and dosages, with a few exceptions explained by patients' needs. Clinical studies on herbs are nevertheless conducted on a limited number of patients. All these limitations make the interpretation of herb-drug interactions complicated, but the HDI highlighter provides a quick overview of the herb-drug interaction literature.

Herb-Drug Interactions: Worlds Intersect with the Patient at the Center

This review examines three bodies of literature related to herb-drug interactions: case reports, clinical studies, evaluations found in six drug interaction checking resources. The aim of the study is to examine the congruity of resources and to assess the degree to which case reports signal for further study. A qualitative review of case reports seeks to determine needs and perspectives of case report authors. Methods: Systematic search of Medline identified clinical studies and case reports of interacting herb-drug combinations. Interacting herb-drug pairs were searched in six drug interaction resources. Case reports were analyzed qualitatively for completeness and to identify underlying themes. Results: Ninety-nine case-report documents detailed 107 cases. Sixty-five clinical studies evaluated 93 mechanisms of interaction relevant to herbs reported in case studies, involving 30 different herbal products; 52.7% of these investigations offered evidence supporting reported reactions. Cohen's kappa found no agreement between any interaction checker and case report corpus. Case reports often lacked full information. Need for further information, attitudes about herbs and herb use, and strategies to reduce risk from interaction were three primary themes in the case report corpus. Conclusions: Reliable herb-drug information is needed, including open and respectful discussion with patients.