Tacrolimus monitoring parameters are not associated with acute cellular rejection following lung transplantation

Immune checkpoint inhibitors use in lung transplant recipients: a case series and systematic review of literature

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are an innovative treatment that has improved long-term survival in several neoplastic diseases over the past decade. Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, particularly lung transplant (LTx) recipients, have been largely excluded from clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficiency of ICIs, because of the perceived high risk of allograft rejection. In this study, we sought to evaluate the use of ICIs for all neoplastic diseases in LTx patients in all French LTx centers and two Belgian centers. We found only a limited number of cases in which ICIs were suggested to two patients due to a lack of alternative treatments. In the first case, acute respiratory failure and death occurred, whereas in the second case, ICI treatment was well tolerated and resulted in a partial response. In addition, we presented the case of a third LTx patient in whom the use of ICIs was considered but not used due to the patient's comorbidities. This last case highlights the difficulty of discussing the risk-benefit balance, which ultimately did not favor ICI treatment of this patient. Further multicenter randomized controlled trials are necessary to investigate the safety and efficacy of ICIs in LTx recipients.

Tacrolimus Variability and Clinical Outcomes in the Early Post-lung Transplantation Period: Oral Versus Continuous Intravenous Administration

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

High variability in tacrolimus pharmacokinetics directly after lung transplantation (LuTx) may increase the risk for acute kidney injury (AKI) and transplant rejection. The primary objective was to compare pharmacokinetic variability in patients receiving tacrolimus orally versus intravenously early after LuTx.

METHODS

Pharmacokinetic and clinical data from 522 LuTx patients transplanted between 2010 and 2020 in two university hospitals were collected to compare orally administered tacrolimus to intravenous tacrolimus early post-transplantation. Tacrolimus blood concentration variability, measured as intrapatient variability (IPV%) and  percentage of time within the therapeutic range (TTR%), was analyzed within the first 14 days after LuTx. Secondary outcomes were AKI, acute rejection, length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU), and mortality in the ICU and during hospital admission.

RESULTS

We included 224 patients in the oral and 298 in the intravenous group. The mean adjusted IPV% was 10.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.9-14.6; p < 0.001) higher in the oral group (27.2%) than the intravenous group (16.4%). The mean TTR% was 7.3% (95% CI - 11.3 to - 3.4; p < 0.001) lower in the oral group (39.6%) than in the intravenous group (46.9%). The incidence of AKI was 46.0% for oral and 42.6% for intravenous administration (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.2; 95% CI 0.8-1.8; p = 0.451). The frequencies of clinically diagnosed acute rejection in the oral and intravenous groups were nonsignificant (24.6% vs 17.8%; OR 1.5 [95% CI 1.0-2.3; p = 0.059]). ICU and hospital mortality rate and ICU length of stay were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Administering tacrolimus orally directly after LuTx leads to a higher variability in blood concentrations compared to intravenous administration. There was no difference in the occurrence of AKI or transplant rejection.

Exploratory associations of tacrolimus exposure and clinical outcomes after lung transplantation: A retrospective, single center experience

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the potential impact of tacrolimus (TAC) exposure on clinical outcomes after lung transplantation.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study enrolled a total of 228 lung transplant recipients. TAC trough levels (C0) were collected for 3 intervals: 0-3 months, 3-12 months, and 12-24 months. The intra-patient variability (IPV) was calculated using coefficient of variation. Genotyping of CYP3A5*3 (rs776746) was performed. Patients were further divided into groups based on the C0 cut-off value of 8 ng/mL and IPV cut-off value of 30%. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to explore the potential impact of C0 and IPV on outcomes of interests, including de-novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA), chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) and mortality.

RESULTS

The influence of CYP3A5*3 polymorphism was only significant for C0 and IPV during the first 3 months. Low C0 (< 8 ng/mL) at 3-12 months increased the risk of dnDSA (hazard ratio [HR] 2.696, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.046-6.953) and mortality (HR 2.531, 95% CI 1.368-4.685), while High IPV (≥ 30%) during this period was associated with an increased risk of mortality (HR 2.543, 95% CI 1.336-4.839). Patients with Low C0/High IPV combination had significantly higher risks for dnDSA (HR 4.381, 95% CI 1.279-15.008) and survival (HR 6.179, 95% CI 2.598-14.698), surpassing the predictive power provided by C0 or IPV alone.

CONCLUSION

A combination of Low C0/High IPV might be considered in categorizing patients towards risk of adverse clinical outcomes following lung transplantation.

Impact of tacrolimus intra-patient variability in adverse outcomes after organ transplantation

Tacrolimus (Tac) is currently the most common calcineurin-inhibitor employed in solid organ transplantation. High intra-patient variability (IPV) of Tac (Tac IPV) has been associated with an increased risk of immune-mediated rejection and poor outcomes after kidney transplantation. Few data are available concerning the impact of high Tac IPV in non-kidney transplants. However, even in kidney transplantation, there is still a controversy whether high Tac IPV is indeed detrimental in respect to graft and/or patient survival. This may be due to different methods employed to evaluate IPV and distinct time frames adopted to assess graft and patient survival in those reports published up to now in the literature. Little is also known about the influence of high Tac IPV in the development of other untoward adverse events, update of the current knowledge regarding the impact of Tac IPV in different outcomes following kidney, liver, heart, lung, and pancreas tran splantation to better evaluate its use in clinical practice.

Impact of Tacrolimus Trough Variability on Acute Rejection Following Lung Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Acute rejection is a risk factor for the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction, the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in lung transplant recipients. Calcineurin inhibitors are the cornerstone of immunosuppression regimens after lung transplantation.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the association of tacrolimus level variability with total acute rejection score at 12 months post-transplant. Secondary outcomes included the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction and antibody-mediated rejection at 24months post-transplant. There were 229 lung transplant recipients included.

RESULTS

The mean (standard deviation) total rejection score of the cohort was 1.6 (1.7). Patients with high tacrolimus variability at 0 to 3, 3 to 6, and 6 to 12 months on average scored 0.18 (mean 1.6 vs 1.5; 95% CI): -0.3 to 0.66, P =.46), 0.14 (mean 1.7 vs 1.5; 95% CI: -0.32 to 0.6, P = .55), and 0.12 (mean 1.6 vs 1.5; 95% CI: -0.34 to 0.58, P = .62) point higher in 12-month total acute rejection scores, respectively; however, these differences were not statistically significant. The incidences of chronic lung allograft dysfunction and antibody-mediated rejection were numerically greater in the high variability group throughout certain periods; however, this was not consistent throughout all study timeframes and statistical significance was not evaluated.

CONCLUSIONS

High tacrolimus variability was not associated with increased 12-month total acute rejection score. Further studies are needed to assess long-term outcomes with tacrolimus level variability.

The Role of Intra-Patient Variability of Tacrolimus Drug Concentrations in Solid Organ Transplantation: A Focus on Liver, Heart, Lung and Pancreas

Tacrolimus, the keystone immunosuppressive drug administered after solid organ transplantation, presents a narrow therapeutic index and wide inter- and intra-patient pharmacokinetic variability (IPV). The latter has been fairly studied in kidney transplantation, where it could impact outcomes. However, literature about other transplanted organ recipients remains inconclusive. This review aimed at summarizing the evidence about the IPV of tacrolimus concentrations outside of the scope of kidney transplantation. First, factors influencing IPV will be presented. Then, the potential of IPV as a biomarker predictive of graft outcomes will be discussed in liver, heart, lung and pancreas transplantation. Lastly, strategies to reduce IPV will be reviewed, with the ultimate objective being ready-to-implement solutions in clinical practice by transplantation professionals.

Effect of MMF Immunosuppression Based on CNI Reduction on CNI-Related Renal Damage after Lung Transplantation

In this paper, numerous effects of immunosuppressive regimen of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) on CNI-related renal damage after lung transplantation are evaluated thoroughly. For this purpose, 110 lung transplant recipients who were treated in our hospital from March 2016 to January 2018 were randomly selected. All patients took prednisone acetate tablets or rapamycin at the same time or not at the same time. MMF is 1 g every time, twice a day, and adjusted according to the re-examination. According to the different drugs taken by 110 patients, they were divided into cyclosporine A group and tacrolimus group. Among them, 92 patients in cyclosporine A group took cyclosporine A; 18 patients in tacrolimus group took tacrolimus. The clinical data of age and gender of the two groups were collected, To observe and compare the occurrence of CNI-related renal damage in lung transplant recipients and different immunosuppressants. The CNI dosage of tacrolimus group and cyclosporine A group was compared before and after MMF. The changes of serum creatinine level and serum creatinine clearance rate were measured before MMF administration and 30, 60, and 90 days after MMF administration, to observe the complications of CNI-related renal damage after lung transplantation. Experimental results showed that there were 16 cases (14.55%) of CNI-related renal damage in lung transplant recipients and different immunosuppressants, including 10 cases (11.36%) in males, 6 cases (27.27%) in females, 11 cases (12.09%) in tacrolimus group, and 5 cases (26.32%) in cyclosporine A group. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). Compared with MMF before and after administration, CNI dosage of cyclosporine A group and tacrolimus group decreased significantly (P < 0.01). Compared with MMF before administration, serum creatinine level decreased and serum creatinine clearance rate increased significantly (P < 0.05). In the follow-up, 16 patients with CNI-related renal damage were found to be immune rejection before the adjustment of immunosuppression program, no complications such as immune rejection, myelosuppression, and infection occurred within 15 months after the adjustment of immunosuppression program, blood glucose increased in 3 patients within 2 years after operation, blood lipid increased in 1 patient, urea increased in 1 patient, and uric acid increased in 1 patient. MMF immunosuppressive therapy based on CNI reduction is a safe and effective immunosuppressive therapy, which can significantly reduce immune rejection, improve renal function, and play an important role in improving CNI-related renal damage after lung transplantation.