A study of drug utilisation and cost of treatment in patients hospitalised with unstable angina

Evaluation of drug utilization in cardiovascular disease at a teaching and referral hospital in Northern Telangana

OBJECTIVES

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the primary cause of death globally despite the advanced health-care facilities. Extensive disparity exists in pharmacotherapy pattern among CVD patients where rational drug use plays a pivotal role in promoting safety and efficacy. The study focused to evaluate drug utilization using the World Health Organization (WHO) prescribing indicators and defined daily dose (DDD) in patients admitted to a teaching/referral hospital in Northern Telangana.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 1120 medical records were analyzed for drug utilization for a period of 7 months. Prescription pattern was assessed using the WHO prescribing indicators and DDD to measure individual drug utilization categorized under anatomical-therapeutic-chemical classification.

RESULTS

Of the total admissions, 58.57% (55.19 ± 15.19 years) were male and 41.43% (56.64 ± 15.28 years) were female where coronary artery disease was the most common cause of admission followed by cardiomyopathy. Among prescribing indicators, percentage of drugs with generic names was least accounted with 26.86% and 18.95% during hospitalization and discharge, respectively. A mean of 11.55 (hospitalization) and 6.55 (discharge) drugs were prescribed per prescription. Antiplatelet (72.86%) and statin (80.62%) use was predominate during complete therapy. The DDD of furosemide (109.33) was found to be high, followed by atorvastatin (64.6), enalapril (58.44), aspirin (58.14) and clopidogrel (53.2).

CONCLUSION

Polypharmacy and least use of generic name were observed in the study which may affect the rationality. The use of antiplatelets, statins, and angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitors was appropriate, but furosemide overuse is of major concern. Therefore, appropriate prescription writing improvises treatment compliance in the patients, which results in rationality.

Patterns and determinants of cardiovascular drug utilization in coronary care unit patients of a tertiary care hospital

BACKGROUND

A wide variation exists in the patterns of pharmacotherapy among patients admitted with cardiovascular diseases. Very few studies have evaluated the potential determinants of drug utilization. Our objective was to evaluate the clinical characteristics and patterns of cardiovascular drug utilization among patients in coronary care unit (CCU) and assess the determinants of cardiovascular drug use among patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, the medical records of CCU patients were reviewed independently by two trained physicians over one year. Patients were analyzed as two groups - those with CAD and without CAD. Multivariate logistic regression was done to identify the determinants of cardiovascular drug utilization in the CAD group.

RESULTS

Of 574 patients, 65% were males, 57% were <60 years. The five commonly prescribed drug classes were platelet inhibitors (88.7%), statins (76.3%), ACE-inhibitors/Angiotensin receptor blockers (72%), beta-blockers (58%) and heparin (57%). Poly-pharmacy (>5 drugs) was noticed in 71% of patients. A majority of patients had diagnosis of CAD (72.6%). CAD patients received significantly higher median number of drugs and had longer duration of CCU stay (p < 0.0001). Renal dysfunction for ACE-inhibitors [0.18 (0.09-0.36)], ST-elevation myocardial infarction for calcium channel blockers [0.29 (0.09-0.93)] and brady-arrhythmias for beta-blockers [0.3 (0.2-0.7)] were identified as determinants of decreased drug use in CAD group.

CONCLUSION

Predominance of male gender, age <60 and poly-pharmacy was observed in CCU. Antithrombotics, statins, ACE-inhibitors/Angiotensin receptor blockers and beta-blockers were the most frequently prescribed drugs. Clinical co-morbidities (renal dysfunction, arrhythmias) decreased the utilization of ACE-inhibitors, beta-blockers among CAD patients.

Prescribing patterns and predictors of high-level polypharmacy in the elderly population: A prospective surveillance study from two teaching hospitals in India

BACKGROUND

Polypharmacy has been reported to increase the risks for inappropriate prescribing, adverse drug reactions, geriatric syndromes, and morbidity and mortality in elderly populations in the United States and Europe. Data on prescribing patterns and polypharmacy in the elderly population in India are limited.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to assess prescribing patterns and to determine the predictors of high-level polypharmacy in the elderly population in 2 tertiary care hospitals in India.

METHODS

This prospective surveillance study used medical records from patients aged 60 to 95 years admitted to the medicine wards of the 2 tertiary care hospitals between January 2008 and June 2009. Data on medication prescribing from admission through discharge were reviewed. Diseases were coded using the World Health Organization (WHO) International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, and medications were coded using the WHO Anatomical, Therapeutic, and Chemical classification. Concordance of prescribing with the indications in the product labeling as listed in the American Hospital Formulary Services Drug Information 2007 was determined. The prevalences of polypharmacy (5-9 medications) and high-level polypharmacy (>or=10 medications) were determined. Bivariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to determine the influential predictors of high-level polypharmacy during hospital stays.

RESULTS

Data from 814 patients were included (493 [60.6%] men, 321 [39.4%] women; median age, 66 years [range, 60-95 years]). Systemic antibacterials were the most commonly prescribed therapeutic class of medications (574 [70.5%]), and pantoprazole was the most commonly prescribed medication (498 [61.2%]). The majority (7/10 [70.0%]) of the most commonly prescribed medications were prescribed as indicated. Medications prescribed "off-label" included pantoprazole (432/498 [86.7%]), ceftriaxone (212/259 [81.9%]), and atorvastatin (109/237 [46.0%]). Polypharmacy and high-level polypharmacy were prescribed in 366 (45.0%) and 370 (45.5%) patients, respectively. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, multiple (>or=3) diagnoses (odds ratio [OR] = 1.55; 95% CI, 1.16-2.08; P = 0.003), angina pectoris (OR = 2.58; 95% CI, 1.50-4.37; P < 0.001), and a length of stay >or=10 days (10-<15 days, OR = 3.14; 95% CI, 2.09-4.71; P < 0.001; and >or=15 days, OR = 5.74; 95% CI, 2.43-13.51; P < 0.001) were found to be predictors of high-level polypharmacy during hospital stays.

CONCLUSIONS

The campaign for rational drug use in hospitalized elderly patients in India should promote pantoprazole, ceftriaxone, and atorvastatin prescribing in concordance with their indications. Interventions to reduce the high-level polypharmacy in the elderly during their stays in tertiary care hospitals in India should focus on patients with >/=3 diagnoses, angina pectoris, and/or >or=10 days of hospital stay.

A comparison of the biological activity of 2 formulations of enoxaparin in 12 healthy volunteers

INTRODUCTION

India is one of the few countries where biosimilar enoxaparin is available for clinical use. Despite availability since past 4 to 5 years, there is a paucity of published literature regarding their biological activity. The aim of the current study is to compare the biological activity of an endogenously developed formulation of enoxaparin with the branded formulation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twelve healthy male volunteers received 1 subcutaneous injection of 2 different formulations of enoxaparin in a randomized, open-label, balanced, 2-treatment, 2-period, 2-sequence, cross-over study. The test formulation was Injection Troynoxa (enoxaparin sodium 40 mg/0.4 mL, Troikaa Pharmaceuticals Ltd., India) and reference formulation was Injection Clexane (enoxaparin sodium 40 mg/ 0.4 mL, Sanofi-Aventis, UK). The plasma anti-Xa activity and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) were estimated on fully automated coagulometer predose and at 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 hours following dosing with 40 mg/0.4 mL of enoxaparin.

RESULTS

The results of mixed model analysis of repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) for estimating difference between least square means of test and reference formulations, at all time points, showed no significant differences in anti-Xa activity and plasma aPTT levels. Both formulations were well tolerated and there were no bleeding episodes.

CONCLUSION

After a single-dose injection in healthy participants, anti-Xa activities of 2 formulations of LMWH enoxaparin were comparable. No significant difference was observed in the mean plasma aPTT. It remains to be seen whether the 2 formulations would show comparable clinical efficacy.

A systematic review of economic analyses of low-molecular-weight heparin for the treatment of venous thromboembolism

INTRODUCTION

Public concerns about the increase in health care expenditure have prompted investigators to analyze the costs and benefits of health care interventions. We conducted a systematic review of economic analyses of venous thromboembolism treatment focusing on studies evaluating low-molecular-weight heparin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified studies by a MEDLINE search and a review of bibliographies of retrieved articles. From each eligible study, we extracted data on the study characteristics, the effectiveness, and the cost of managing the venous thromboembolism with respect to treatment. We critically appraised the studies according to the framework from the Users' Guides to the Medical Literature XIII: How to Use an Article on Economic Analysis of Clinical Practice.

RESULTS

Six of these eight economic analyses of venous thromboembolism treatment that met the inclusion criteria for this review showed that low-molecular-weight heparin is associated with less recurrent venous thromboembolism and is less costly than treatment with unfractionated heparin. Although discrete recurrent venous thromboembolism event rates were not included in the seventh study, these investigators concluded that the cost of low-molecular-weight heparin for the treatment of venous thromboembolism treatment was offset by the savings associated with fewer hospital admissions when low-molecular-weight heparin was used. In the eighth study, although the cost of treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin was higher than treatment with unfractionated heparin, the investigators concluded that low-molecular-weight heparin is cost-effective for inpatient management.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-molecular-weight heparin treatment may confer economic advantages over unfractionated heparin therapy because it does not require anticoagulant monitoring and it facilitates outpatient therapy.