Education in clinical pharmacology at the Rijeka School of Medicine, Croatia

Rational pharmacotherapy training for fourth-year medical students

Objectives:

In this study we aimed to evaluate the impact of Rational Pharmacotherapy (RPT) course program, reinforced by video footages, on the rational pharmacotherapy skills of the students.

Materials and Methods:

RPT course program has been conducted in Dokuz Eylul University School of Medicine since 2008/9. The course has been organised in accordance with World Health Organisation (WHO) Good Prescribing Guide. The aim of the course was to improve the problem solving skills (methodology for selection of the (p)ersonel-drug, prescription writing and informing patient about his illness and drugs) and communication skills of students. The impact of the course has been measured by pre/post-test design by an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). In academic year 2010/11, to further improve OSCE score of the students we added doctor-patient communication video footages to the RPT course programme. During training, the students were asked to evaluate the doctor-patient communication and prescription on two video footages using a checklist followed by group discussions.

Results:

Total post-test OSCE score was significantly higher for 2010/11 academic year students (n = 147) than it was for 2009/10 year students (n = 131). The 2010/11 academic year students performed significantly better than the 2009/10 academic year students on four steps of OSCE. These steps were “defining the patient's problem”, “specifying the therapeutic objective”, “specifying the non-pharmacological treatment” and “choosing a (drug) treatment, taking all relevant patient characteristics into account”.

Conclusions:

The present study demonstrated that the implementation of video footages and group discussions to WHO/Good Prescribing Method improved the fourth-year medical students’ performance in rational pharmacotherapy skills.

Do educational interventions improve prescribing by medical students and junior doctors? A systematic review

Our aim was to review systematically the literature on educational interventions to improve prescribing by medical students and junior doctors. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Educational Resource Information Center, British Education Index, PsycINFO, CINAHL, TIMELIT, Cochrane Trials Database and grey literature were searched. Inclusion criteria were: educational interventions to improve medical student and/or junior doctors' prescribing, in primary or secondary care settings, and published after 1990. After screening 3189 records, we retrieved 11 controlled and four 'before-and-after' trials. Ten controlled trials showed improvements in the scores of the intervention group on written scenarios or clinical examination stations, but one study in junior doctors showed no effect on real-life prescription errors. Only one intervention [the World Health Organization (WHO) Good Prescribing Guide, in six randomized trials] had been tested in a variety of international settings and across a range of students at different levels. All four 'before-and-after' trials reported significant improvements in written tests or clinical stations. However, most studies tested only small numbers of participants and were affected by a range of methodological flaws. There is only moderate evidence in the literature to inform medical schools about how to prepare medical students for the challenges of prescribing. The WHO Good Prescribing Guide is the only model that has been widely used and shown to improve prescribing. Although it is based on sound principles, there is a need for further development. Robust methods of assessment are required to show clearly whether particular teaching interventions are successful.

Favorable effect on postgraduate clinical practice of a drug-interaction exercise for undergraduate students

AIM

Undergraduate students in Jichi Medical School participated in a laboratory exercise investigating the furosemide-probenecid interaction at the end of their clinical pharmacology (CP) course. The aim of this study was to determine whether they learned to recognize drug interactions better than students who did not take such a course.

METHODS

We conducted a postal survey of physicians who had graduated from Jichi Medical School or from other medical schools without a CP course including the exercise. Questions were asked concerning: (1) the recognition of furosemide-probenecid and nine other drug interactions, and (2) the need to anticipate drug interactions and their adverse effects before writing prescriptions.

RESULTS

The degree of the recognition of all drug interactions, and the percentage of physicians who responded that knowledge of drug interactions and adverse effects were essential before writing prescriptions, were significantly greater in physicians who had taken an undergraduate CP course than in those who had not.

CONCLUSIONS

CP courses with specific laboratory exercises on drug interactions lead future physicians to recognize drug interactions and their adverse effects.

Comparison of rational pharmacotherapy decision-making competence of general practitioners with intern doctors

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare rational pharmacotherapy decision-making competency of interns (final-year medical students) who had received rational pharmacotherapy education (RPE), with their classmates at another medical school and general practitioners (GPs) who had not been exposed to RPE.

DESIGN

A written, objective, structured clinical examination (OSCE), consisting of open and structured questions, was given to all participants. The participants were expected to make a treatment plan and prescribe for simple, uncomplicated beta-hemolytic streptococcal tonsillitis and mild-to-moderate essential hypertension patients, explain their proposed treatment plans and reasons affecting their drug choice. After the OSCE, a questionnaire to assess knowledge of the rational use of drugs was given to the participants.

RESULTS

Fifty RPE(+) interns, 54 RPE(-) interns and 53 GPs participated in the study. Mean scores of RPE(+) interns were higher than those of GPs, which were in turn found to be higher than those of RPE(-) interns for all cases. The RPE(+) interns scored the highest regarding all components of rational pharmacotherapy process for all cases of both indications. However, participants in all groups had higher scores for the structured questions compared with the corresponding open ones for both diseases. Prescription analysis also revealed better results for RPE(+) interns regarding the number of drugs/prescription and treatment costs.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrated that the final-year medical students (interns) markedly benefited from undergraduate RPE at the medical school in developing rational prescribing skills compared with their classmates from a medical school with traditional pharmacology education. Interestingly, they got higher scores than not only RPE(-) interns, but also than the GPs participating in this study, indicating the urgent need for continuous medical education programs in this field throughout the country for practicing GPs.