Impact of isolated basal ganglia infarction at pretreatment DWI on outcomes after endovascular thrombectomy in acute anterior circulation stroke

Dysphagia assessment in ischemic stroke after mechanical thrombectomy: When and how?

Background

Dysphagia is a frequent symptom in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Endovascular treatment (EVT) has become the standard of care for acute stroke secondary to large vessel occlusion. Although standardized guidelines for poststroke dysphagia (PSD) management exist, they do not account for this setting in which patients receive EVT under general anesthesia. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate PSD prevalence and severity, as well as an appropriate time point for the PSD evaluation, in patients undergoing EVT under general anesthesia (GA).

Methods

We prospectively included 54 AIS patients undergoing EVT under GA. Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) was performed within 24 h post-extubation in all patients. Patients presenting significant PSD received a second FEES-assessment to determine the course of dysphagia deficits over time. Dysphagia severity was rated according the Fiberoptic Dysphagia Severity Scale (FEDSS).

Results

At first FEES (FEES 1) assessment, performed in the median 13 h (IQR 5-17) post-extubation, 49/54 patients (90.7%) with dysphagia were observed with a median FEDSS of 4 (IQR 3-6). Severe dysphagia requiring tube feeding was identified in 28/54 (51.9%) subjects, whereas in 21 (38.9%) patients early oral diet with certain food restrictions could be initiated. In the follow up FEES examination conducted in the median 72 h (IQR 70-97 h) after initial FEES 34/49 (69.4%) patients still presented PSD. Age (p = 0.030) and ventilation time (p = 0.035) were significantly associated with the presence of PSD at the second FEES evaluation. Significant improvement of dysphagia frequency (p = 0.006) and dysphagia severity (p = 0.001) could be detected between the first and second dysphagia assessment.

Conclusions

PSD is a frequent finding both immediately within 24 h after extubation, as well as in the short-term course. In contrast to common clinical practice, to delay evaluation of swallowing for at least 24 h post-extubation, we recommend a timely assessment of swallowing function after extubation, as 50% of patients were safe to begin oral intake. Given the high amount of severe dysphagic symptoms, we strongly recommend application of instrumental swallowing diagnostics due to its higher sensitivity, when compared to clinical swallowing examination. Furthermore, advanced age, as well as prolonged intubation, were identified as significant predictors for delayed recovery of swallowing function.

Delayed CTP-Derived Deep Venous Outflow: A Novel Predictor of Striatocapsular Infarction after M1 Thrombectomy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Isolated striatocapsular infarction occurs commonly in patients with ischemic stroke following M1 thrombectomy. We aimed to explore the correlation between CTP-derived parameters of deep venous outflow at presentation and subsequent striatocapsular infarction in a retrospective cohort of such patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

TTP and peak enhancement were measured on CTP-derived time-attenuation curves of the internal cerebral and thalamostriate veins bilaterally. The difference in TTP (ΔTTP) and the relative decrease in venous enhancement between the ischemic and normal sides were calculated. NCCT performed 24 (SD, 12) hours postthrombectomy was used to determine tissue fate in the caudate head, caudate body, lentiform nucleus, and internal capsule. Striatocapsular ischemia (striatocapsular infarction-positive) was defined as infarction and striatocapsular injury as either infarction, contrast enhancement, or hemorrhagic transformation in ≥1 of these regions. A striatocapsular ischemia score was calculated (0 = no ischemic region, 1 = 1 ischemic region, 2 = ≥2 ischemic regions).

RESULTS

One hundred sixteen patients were included in the analysis. Sixty-one patients had striatocapsular infarction (striatocapsular infarction-positive). The mean thalamostriate ΔTTP was 1.95 (SD, 1.9) seconds for patients positive for striatocapsular infarction and 0.79 (SD, 2.1) for patients negative for it (P = .010). Results were similar for striatocapsular injury. The mean thalamostriate ΔTTP was 0.79 (SD, 2.1), 1.68 (SD, 1.4), and 2.05 (SD, 2) for striatocapsular infarction scores of 0, 1, and 2, respectively (P = .030).

CONCLUSIONS

CTP-derived thalamostriate ΔTTP is an excellent surrogate marker for striatocapsular infarction in patients post-M1 thrombectomy. The novel approach of extracting venous outflow parameters from CTP has numerous potential applications and should be further explored.

Outcome after Thrombectomy of Acute M1 and Carotid-T Occlusions with Involvement of the Corticospinal Tract in Postinterventional Imaging

OBJECTIVES

Until now, thrombectomy studies have provided little reliable information about the correlation between the infarct topography and clinical outcome of acute stroke patients with embolic large-vessel occlusions. Therefore, we aimed to analyze whether infarcts of the corticospinal tracts in the central white matter (CWM) or the internal capsule on postinterventional imaging controls are associated with poor clinical outcome after thrombectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed imaging data from 70 patients who underwent endovascular thrombectomy for emergent middle cerebral artery or carotid-T occlusions. Inclusion criteria were postinterventional infarct demarcation in the regions of the internal capsule, caudate, lentiform nucleus, and CWM. Primary outcome was the mRS after 90 days and secondary endpoints were subgroup analyses regarding additional cortical infarction.

CONCLUSIONS

In this exploratory study, we found no indication that infarcts in the course of the corticospinal tracts predict poor clinical outcome after successful thrombectomy in patients with embolic carotid-T or M1 occlusions. In our analysis, a significant number of patients showed a favorable 90 day outcome. Additional cortical infarcts may have a greater impact on the risk of an unfavorable outcome.

RESULTS

Good clinical outcome after 90 days (mRS 0-2) was shown in 36 out of 70 patients (51.4%), with excellent clinical outcome (mRS 0-1) in 23 patients (32.9%). Here, 58.6% patients lived at home without nursing service after 90 days. Patients with minimal additional cortical infarction in postinterventional imaging had a 75.6% better chance of excellent outcome.

Added Value of Rescue Devices in Intra-Arterial Thrombectomy: When Should We Apply Them?

Introduction: Recent trials have demonstrated the superior efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy over other medical treatments for acute ischemic stroke; however, not every large vessel occlusion (LVO) can be recanalized using a single thrombectomy device. Rescue devices were proved to increase the reperfusion rate, but the efficacy is unclear.

Objective: In this retrospective study, we evaluated the efficacy of rescue therapy in different locations of LVO.

Methods: We analyzed the outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy from a prospective registry of consecutive 82 patients in Taipei Medical University Hospital. The reperfusion rate and the functional outcome were compared in patients who received first-line therapy only and patients who need rescue therapy.

Results: An 84.1% reperfusion rate was achieved in our cohort. We applied first-line stent retriever (SR) treatment in 6 patients, among which 4 (66.6%) achieved successful reperfusion. We applied a direct-aspiration first-pass technique (ADAPT) as the first-line treatment in 76 patients, among which 46 (60.5%) achieved successful reperfusion. Successful reperfusion could not be achieved in 30 cases (39.5%); therefore, we applied a second-line rescue SR for 28 patients, and reperfusion was established in 18 (64.3%) of them. These results revealed that the LVO in anterior circulation has a higher chance to respond to SR rescue therapy than posterior circulation lesions (68 vs. 33.3%, P < 0.001). Patients who received only first-line therapy exhibited significantly better functional outcomes than those who were also treated with rescue SR therapy (41.2 vs. 16.7%, P = 0.001). In addition, patients with LVO in the anterior circulation were found to have a higher probability of achieving functional independence than patients with posterior circulation lesions (10.7 vs. 0.0%, P < 0.001). The adjusted multivariate analysis revealed that successful reperfusion and treatment type (first-line or rescue therapy) were significantly related to a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days.

Conclusion: This study reveals that rescue SR therapy improves the reperfusion rate. Patients who require rescue SR therapy have a lower likelihood of functional independence. LVO in the anterior circulation responds better to rescue SR therapy and results in better functional outcomes than posterior circulation lesions.