Cerebral computed tomographic angiography using third-generation reconstruction algorithm provides improved image quality with lower contrast and radiation dose

CT Perfusion Maps Improve Detection of M2-MCA Occlusions in Acute Ischemic Stroke

OBJECTIVES

Middle cerebral artery occlusions, particularly M2 branch occlusions are challenging to identify on CTA. We hypothesized that additional review of the CTP maps will increase large vessel occlusion (LVO) detection accuracy on CTA and reduce interpretation time.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two readers (R1 and R2) retrospectively reviewed the CT studies in 99 patients (27 normal, 26 M1-MCA, 46 M2-MCA occlusions) who presented with suspected acute ischemic stroke (AIS). The time of interpretation and final diagnosis were recorded for the CTA images (derived from CTP data), both without and with the CTP maps. The time for analysis for all vascular occlusions was compared using McNemar tests. ROC curve analysis and McNemar tests were performed to assess changes in diagnostic performance with the addition of CTP maps.

RESULTS

With the addition of the CTP maps, both readers showed increased sensitivity (p = 0.01 for R1 and p = 0.04 for R2), and accuracy (p = 0.02 for R1 and p = 0.004 for R2) for M2-MCA occlusions. There was a significant improvement in diagnostic performance for both readers for detection of M2-MCA occlusions (AUC R1 = 0.86 to 0.95, R2 = 0.84 to 0.95; p < 0.05). Both readers showed reduced interpretation time for all cases combined, as well as for normal studies (p < 0.001) when CTP images were reviewed along with CTA. Both readers also showed reduced interpretation time for M2-MCA occlusions, which was significant for one of the readers (p < 0.02).

CONCLUSION

The addition of CTP maps improves accuracy and reduces interpretation time for detecting LVO and M2-MCA occlusions in AIS. Incorporation of CTP in acute stroke imaging protocols may improve detection of more distal occlusions.

ASPECTS estimation using dual-energy CTA-derived virtual non-contrast in large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke: a dose reduction opportunity for patients undergoing repeat CT?

PURPOSE

Recent studies have shown the feasibility of dual-energy CT (DECT) virtual non-contrast (VNC) for determining infarct extent. In this study, patients presenting with large-vessel occlusion (LVO) acute ischemic stroke (AIS), we assess whether ASPECTS on DECTA-VNC differs from non-contrast CT (NCCT).

METHODS

After IRB approval, LVO-AIS patients undergoing NCCT and DECTA between October 2016 and September 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. DECTA-VNC images were derived using Syngo.via (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). ASPECTS was scored by two blinded neuroradiologists. Square-weighted kappa statistic, diagnostic performance, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests between groups, and CT doses were calculated.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients met inclusion criteria, with median age of 76 (IQR 67-82); 26/51 (51%) were female. Median time between last-known-well and CT was 120 min (IQR 60-252). DECTA-VNC ASPECTS score differed by ≤ 1 from consensus NCCT in 49/51 (96%) patients for reader 1 and in 46/51 (90%) for reader 2. ASPECTS on DECTA-SI and consensus NCCT differed by ≤ 1 in 45/51 (88%) for both readers. On a per ASPECTS-region basis, DECTA-VNC had 87% sensitivity, 95% specificity, 0.82% PPV, and 0.96% NPV. ASPECTS inter-rater agreement was highest for DECTA-VNC (κ = 0.71), DECTA-SI (κ = 0.48), and NCCT (κ = 0.40). NCCT median CTDIvol was 63.7 mGy (IQR 60.7-67.2); DLP was 1060.0 mGy·cm (IQR 981.0-1151.5). DECTA-VNC dose was lower: median CTDIvol was 20.9 mGy (IQR 19.8-22.2); DLP was 804.1 (IQR 691.6-869.4), p < 0.0001.

CONCLUSION

DECTA-derived VNC yielded similar ASPECTS scores as NCCT and is therefore non-inferior in early ischemia-related low attenuation edema/infarct detection in acute LVO-AIS patients. Further evaluation of the role of DECTA-VNC in AIS imaging is warranted.

Head and neck single- and dual-energy CT: differences in radiation dose and image quality of 2nd and 3rd generation dual-source CT

OBJECTIVES

To compare radiation dose and image quality of single-energy (SECT) and dual-energy (DECT) head and neck CT examinations performed with second- and third-generation dual-source CT (DSCT) in matched patient cohorts.

METHODS

200 patients (mean age 55.1 ± 16.9 years) who underwent venous phase head and neck CT with a vendor-preset protocol were retrospectively divided into four equal groups (n = 50) matched by gender and BMI: second (Group A, SECT, 100-kV; Group B, DECT, 80/Sn140-kV), and third-generation DSCT (Group C, SECT, 100-kV; Group D, DECT, 90/Sn150-kV). Assessment of radiation dose was performed for an average scan length of 27 cm. Contrast-to-noise ratio measurements and dose-independent figure-of-merit calculations of the submandibular gland, thyroid, internal jugular vein, and common carotid artery were analyzed quantitatively. Qualitative image parameters were evaluated regarding overall image quality, artifacts and reader confidence using 5-point Likert scales.

RESULTS

Effective radiation dose (ED) was not significantly different between SECT and DECT acquisition for each scanner generation (p = 0.10). Significantly lower effective radiation dose (p < 0.01) values were observed for third-generation DSCT groups C (1.1 ± 0.2 mSv) and D (1.0 ± 0.3 mSv) compared to second-generation DSCT groups A (1.8 ± 0.1 mSv) and B (1.6 ± 0.2 mSv). Figure-of-merit/contrast-to-noise ratio analysis revealed superior results for third-generation DECT Group D compared to all other groups. Qualitative image parameters showed non-significant differences between all groups (p > 0.06).

CONCLUSION

Contrast-enhanced head and neck DECT can be performed with second- and third-generation DSCT systems without radiation penalty or impaired image quality compared with SECT, while third-generation DSCT is the most dose efficient acquisition method.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Differences in radiation dose between SECT and DECT of the dose-vulnerable head and neck region using DSCT systems have not been evaluated so far. Therefore, this study directly compares radiation dose and image quality of standard SECT and DECT protocols of second- and third-generation DSCT platforms.